forum

Sexual Orientation Poll

posted
Total Posts
213

Your sexual orientation:

Heterosexual
101
56.74%
Gay/Lesbian
16
8.99%
Bisexual
33
18.54%
Pansexual
17
9.55%
Asexual
11
6.18%
Total votes: 178
show more
Yuudachi-kun
I'm butch
silmarilen

EneT wrote:

Damn, I rolled a 27.
damn me too
Apex_old
untitled
Vialle

Apex wrote:

Why are there so many bisexuals?
Traps
Apex_old
untitled
Yuudachi-kun
Doesn't have to be.
Szymek
I am Bi sometimes and Straight mostly Bi.
Pituophis
29
the heck is a femme :?

Edit: Oh, apparently I'm a feminine lesbian.
Vuelo Eluko

Apex wrote:

Why are there so many bisexuals?
confused children, we've been over this.
Yuudachi-kun

Riince wrote:

Apex wrote:

Why are there so many bisexuals?
confused children, we've been over this.
FUTA IS MY FAVOURITE
Arzenvald
i wonder whether younger player see this 'adult-ish' topic.. should i worried?
'-' just saying
Friendan
well at least here everyone knew about sex in what, 3rd/4th grade?
I mean, I was late but whatever. My point is that really young kids know about sex, but they'll probably just think "lol look at these gays" guess thats what happens when no mods come here
Yuudachi-kun
lol look at these gays
Vuelo Eluko

Kheldragar wrote:

lol look at these gays
EneT

Riince wrote:

Kheldragar wrote:

lol look at these gays
Friendan
wait what's a gay?
Cancel

Friendan wrote:

wait what's a gay?
B1rd
Gays ruined America.
Apex_old
untitled
Yuudachi-kun
THE ACE OF SPADES
Apex_old
untitled
bigfeh
Just wondering what the fuck would a pansexual be
Friendan
basically bi except it was created by tumblr. Instead of preferring both sexes, you prefer none or something stupid like that. So yeah, same thing
chaee
I lick fry pans and get off.
ZenithPhantasm
2D>3D
My future looks dim
shuttlespock

ZenithPhantasm wrote:

2D>3D
My future looks dim
You just have low battery.
Friendan

shuttlespock wrote:

ZenithPhantasm wrote:

2D>3D
My future looks dim
You just have low battery.
why would you play with 3d on???
HazeL
I dont understand the options :(
Bara-
55% heterosexual
Wut?
I thought that was around 80-85
deadbill
Homosexual individuals are a failure in natural selection sense as they do have a potential to threat the genetic process of a species.
In any sense, homosexuals, pedophiles, or any individuals with sexual orientation disorder are basically the same.
In which I cant understand, the law are currently trying to defend them homos.

If homos have their right, so pedophiles and any other sickos might have it as well.
Bara-

deadbill wrote:

Homosexual individuals are a failure in natural selection sense as they do have a potential to threat the genetic process of a species.
In any sense, homosexuals, pedophiles, or any individuals with sexual orientation disorder are basically the same.
In which I cant understand, the law are currently trying to defend them homos.

If homos have their right, so pedophiles and any other sickos might have it as well.
Biggest bull shit ever
deadbill

Baraatje123 wrote:

deadbill wrote:

Homosexual individuals are a failure in natural selection sense as they do have a potential to threat the genetic process of a species.
In any sense, homosexuals, pedophiles, or any individuals with sexual orientation disorder are basically the same.
In which I cant understand, the law are currently trying to defend them homos.

If homos have their right, so pedophiles and any other sickos might have it as well.
Biggest bull shit ever
No, It's not
Bara-
Yeah
Forgot I should never believe you
Your sig says enough
deadbill

Baraatje123 wrote:

Yeah
Forgot I should never believe you
Your sig says enough
Why? Is there something wrong with my argument? can you point it out?
Bara-
Do homosexuals bother you? Are they trying to rape your children? Are they murderers?
No

Also, homosexuality is completely normal, and is common (10%) under multiple if not all animals
Hoewever, homophobia is only found in one.

Also, how is it a disorder? It's not bad, only people are bitching about it

Also, why am I saying also after every new point. Anyone knows a better word to use? Also seems quite stupid xD
Syphist

deadbill wrote:

Homosexual individuals are a failure in natural selection sense as they do have a potential to threat the genetic process of a species.
In any sense, homosexuals, pedophiles, or any individuals with sexual orientation disorder are basically the same.
In which I cant understand, the law are currently trying to defend them homos.

If homos have their right, so pedophiles and any other sickos might have it as well.
They may be a failure in natural selection, but ever since modern medicine, humans have defeated natural selection. They are not a threat to our genetics, because they are an extreme minority, and societies no longer make them feel forced to hide, therefore making them less likely to reproduce. They are not necessarily a disorder, since when is being homosexual, bisexual, etc posing a threat to anyone? You compare them to pedophiles, many of which go out of their way to exploit children. I don't see homosexuals exploiting members of the same gender. Not to mention that pedophiles are primarily attracted to humans that are not of sexual maturity while homosexuals are attracted to those of sexual maturity. You are essentially equating a neutral to a negative.

That is my 2 cents for this.

OT: I am just your average heterosexual.
HaruryuuSan
Pansexual~
Bara-

Harumi wrote:

Pansexual~
Cooking pans?
Or do you prefer baking

Sorry
Couldn't stand it
The name of it is just so weird
There is probably a better word for it
Idon'tcareabouttheotherssexsexual
What do you think?
EneT
I feel like a lot of people in forums like to throw the 'pansexual' card all willy nilly. Complete bullshit.
HaruryuuSan
Haha, but you get the meaning :P
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply