Hi Leorda~ From your M4M queue. zzzzz I modded your Lunatic but then had to close tabs and lost it so i had to remod zzzz sry for delay.
I noticed your Normal is above 2.00 stars so you might want to lower the star rating because as it currently is, I don't think it will meet the ranking criteria. Also, you could nerf Hard a bit to even out the diff spread imo~
[Lunatic]
00:42:021 (7,8,9,10,1) - Could make this straight with the slider?
00:47:475 - There is definitely a beat here. I think you can avoid this complex rhythm by just making this another 5-stack.
00:51:475 (2) - 342||164
00:52:203 (4,5,6,7,1) - Maybe move 4, 5, 6, 7 down a bit so a bit more of Slider 1 is overlapped.
00:59:112 (3,4) - I'm not sure this works... I think 4 should be on 00:59:475 - . no? Cuz there is clearly a beat there that you've ignored because of the slider-body.
01:17:293 (1,2) - Could blanket this better imo~
01:48:930 (9,1) - Check blanket.
01:53:566 (1) - 164||242
01:58:021 (1) - 360||256
02:02:566 (3,4) - This flow isnt good imo. The angle is really sharp. Try something like [url=http://puu.sh/h4as6.jpg this? [/url].
02:08:203 (1,2) - Shouldn't these be 1/3 not 1/4?
03:04:930 (1) - How about 366||288 So the sliders are on the same line? like you did with the previous two sliders.
03:17:839 (1,2) - Check blankets.
03:36:203 (4,5) - I think if you Ctrl+G these two sliders the flow would be better.
03:55:839 - Pretty significant beat here. I would map this to a circle and have the spinner begin on the next blue tick instead.
04:03:111 (1) - 146||99? If you want to have the sliders straight/
[Hard]
00:46:748 (1) - 200||212? Could also fix the stack on the next repeat slider too.
01:04:203 (1,2,3,4) - Idk... This rhythm seems too simple compared to your other rhythms in this section. Maybe add a slider or some 1/2 usage here?
01:49:293 (1,2) - Check blankets.
01:51:839 (3,1) - ^
01:55:112 (1,2) - This doesn't flow too well. Plus it creates a really large jump because of the extra repeat. Maybe take off 1x repeat on both 01:55:112 (1,2) - ? Or bring the sliders a bit closer together because the spacing is quite large compared to the circles that preceded it.
02:34:384 (1,2) - 1/2 sliders instead? This rhythm is over-simplified.
02:54:203 (5) - 1/2 slider instead?
04:19:839 (4) - How about rotating this slider 180 degrees from selection center.
[Normal]
00:40:203 (3,4,5) - Repeat slider instead?
00:51:839 (3,4,5,1) - I don't think beginners can play this kind of overlap that well. 00:52:203 (5,1) - Don't stack these two, have the sliderhead of 1 elsewhere where its mostly visible.
01:10:748 (2,3,4) - 01:15:112 (2,3,4) - Might be better to stack them, or not put a repeat slider for simplicity.
02:44:203 (4,5,6) - I really feel that patterns like this create difficulty spikes in your Normal. I would try and avoid this for Easy/Normal diffs, but its up to you honestly. If you plan on reducing the star-rating to avoid having to map an Easy though, definitely consider stacking, or making these patterns 1/2 repeat sliders instead.
03:19:475 (1,2) - Maybe blanket them?
03:20:748 (1,2,3) - This flow doesn't work really well imo, since slider 1 is bending rightward but the notes force the player to move leftward right after. Since this is right before the break, I think you can re-order them in a way that makes more sense. By blanketing 03:19:475 (1,2) - You would also create more room for the placement of the next slider.
03:41:657 (2,3) - 1/1 slider fits better here imo.
04:03:656 (3) - This note isn't really audible... I think you should just stick with the rhythm you created here: 04:00:202 (1,2,3) -
Alright, good luck!!
I noticed your Normal is above 2.00 stars so you might want to lower the star rating because as it currently is, I don't think it will meet the ranking criteria. Also, you could nerf Hard a bit to even out the diff spread imo~
[Lunatic]
00:42:021 (7,8,9,10,1) - Could make this straight with the slider?
00:47:475 - There is definitely a beat here. I think you can avoid this complex rhythm by just making this another 5-stack.
00:51:475 (2) - 342||164
00:52:203 (4,5,6,7,1) - Maybe move 4, 5, 6, 7 down a bit so a bit more of Slider 1 is overlapped.
00:59:112 (3,4) - I'm not sure this works... I think 4 should be on 00:59:475 - . no? Cuz there is clearly a beat there that you've ignored because of the slider-body.
01:17:293 (1,2) - Could blanket this better imo~
01:48:930 (9,1) - Check blanket.
01:53:566 (1) - 164||242
01:58:021 (1) - 360||256
02:02:566 (3,4) - This flow isnt good imo. The angle is really sharp. Try something like [url=http://puu.sh/h4as6.jpg this? [/url].
02:08:203 (1,2) - Shouldn't these be 1/3 not 1/4?
03:04:930 (1) - How about 366||288 So the sliders are on the same line? like you did with the previous two sliders.
03:17:839 (1,2) - Check blankets.
03:36:203 (4,5) - I think if you Ctrl+G these two sliders the flow would be better.
03:55:839 - Pretty significant beat here. I would map this to a circle and have the spinner begin on the next blue tick instead.
04:03:111 (1) - 146||99? If you want to have the sliders straight/
[Hard]
00:46:748 (1) - 200||212? Could also fix the stack on the next repeat slider too.
01:04:203 (1,2,3,4) - Idk... This rhythm seems too simple compared to your other rhythms in this section. Maybe add a slider or some 1/2 usage here?
01:49:293 (1,2) - Check blankets.
01:51:839 (3,1) - ^
01:55:112 (1,2) - This doesn't flow too well. Plus it creates a really large jump because of the extra repeat. Maybe take off 1x repeat on both 01:55:112 (1,2) - ? Or bring the sliders a bit closer together because the spacing is quite large compared to the circles that preceded it.
02:34:384 (1,2) - 1/2 sliders instead? This rhythm is over-simplified.
02:54:203 (5) - 1/2 slider instead?
04:19:839 (4) - How about rotating this slider 180 degrees from selection center.
[Normal]
00:40:203 (3,4,5) - Repeat slider instead?
00:51:839 (3,4,5,1) - I don't think beginners can play this kind of overlap that well. 00:52:203 (5,1) - Don't stack these two, have the sliderhead of 1 elsewhere where its mostly visible.
01:10:748 (2,3,4) - 01:15:112 (2,3,4) - Might be better to stack them, or not put a repeat slider for simplicity.
02:44:203 (4,5,6) - I really feel that patterns like this create difficulty spikes in your Normal. I would try and avoid this for Easy/Normal diffs, but its up to you honestly. If you plan on reducing the star-rating to avoid having to map an Easy though, definitely consider stacking, or making these patterns 1/2 repeat sliders instead.
03:19:475 (1,2) - Maybe blanket them?
03:20:748 (1,2,3) - This flow doesn't work really well imo, since slider 1 is bending rightward but the notes force the player to move leftward right after. Since this is right before the break, I think you can re-order them in a way that makes more sense. By blanketing 03:19:475 (1,2) - You would also create more room for the placement of the next slider.
03:41:657 (2,3) - 1/1 slider fits better here imo.
04:03:656 (3) - This note isn't really audible... I think you should just stick with the rhythm you created here: 04:00:202 (1,2,3) -
Alright, good luck!!