1. osu! forums
  2. osu!
  3. Gameplay & Rankings
  4. Tournaments
show more
posted
Similar skill he says... HA! T^T
posted

Rewben2 wrote:

buny wrote:

next time maybe have a double elimination from the start, the second round would have the lower ranked players in the loser bracket playing against each other. Wouldn't actually change anything though since none of them would make it to the finals
The idea isn't for the lower ranked players to make it to finals (Why would this be the intention ever?). It's so they can have a more fair+enjoyable experience by playing against players of a more similar skill level, rather than being matched against high ranked players and having absolutely no hope and getting crushed. And it still has the benefits of seeding; the higher ranked players still play eachother at the end.

It's pretty pointless to discuss now, it's far too late to change anything now but I guess it can be changed for the next tournament.
except a tournaments idea isn't to "have fun"

it's to play in a competitive nature.


please try get that into your thick head




also, stop complaining about the tournaments structure in this thread. It has already started and this is equivalent to bitching in hindsight. Save it for after it's finished
posted
Guys, stop being so oblivious to the fact that Australia and NZ'ers are already true MLG players
posted

buny wrote:

except a tournaments idea isn't to "have fun"

it's to play in a competitive nature.


please try get that into your thick head




also, stop complaining about the tournaments structure in this thread. It has already started and this is equivalent to bitching in hindsight. Save it for after it's finished
All I'm saying is that the different idea for seeding better caters for the players who are playing to have fun (which I can almost safely say is the majority) while still maintaining the competitive aspect and having the top players play each other in the finals. Better for everyone. I didn't say or imply that fun is a priority and that the idea of a tournament isn't for competition anyways..

And can you try not to insult everyone and call them thick-headed for not sharing the same opinions as you? What I'm saying isn't even disagreeing with your ideas, you're just being a cunt.

No point in discussing this further.
posted
the point is that tournaments are in a competitive aspect, which I have stated in nearly every one of my posts. THE definition of a tournament is defined by the word competition, so whatever you want to believe won't change the fact that this IS in competitive nature, and if you lack the skill to compete against the players in that environment, then you shouldn't be here in the first place




if you can't accept that then you should stay the hell away from tournaments or any competitive scenes


Also I don't insult people for disagreeing with me, I insult them because they dodge the facts and keep trying to defend a point that has been disregarded for many generations.
Would it be nice that lower skilled players can play each other? Sure. Go make your own tournament with rank restrictions then, don't try to manifest someone elses event to be ideal for yourself


Rewben2 wrote:

you're just being a cunt.
cry more














on a more related note: map pool seems to be progressing at a reasonable pace. It could have definitely started out a bit harder, though.
posted

buny wrote:

on a more related note: map pool seems to be progressing at a reasonable pace. It could have definitely started out a bit harder, though.
Sorry buny poo poo ;w;
posted
>tfw second map pool is better than the first but you're eliminated q.q
posted

EmeraldStar82 wrote:

>tfw second map pool is better than the first but you're eliminated q.q
1on1 me :>>>>
posted

Melt3dCheeze wrote:

buny wrote:

on a more related note: map pool seems to be progressing at a reasonable pace. It could have definitely started out a bit harder, though.
Sorry buny poo poo ;w;
its ok i dont love u anymore tho
posted
Help I can't fc any of these new maps.
posted
Any way we can bet on matches?
posted

[AirCoN] wrote:

Any way we can bet on matches?
I updated this. :D
But I reckon actual money betting would have to be discrete and it would have to be kept far away from osu because of laws and such.
posted
I'd like to bet $1000 on TimmyTimTims please.
posted

B1rd wrote:

I'd like to bet $1000 on TimmyTimTims please.
But you're gonna rek Tim tho D:
posted

EmeraldStar82 wrote:

B1rd wrote:

I'd like to bet $1000 on TimmyTimTims please.
But you're gonna rek Tim tho D:
my plan is to go easy on him so I can get the money 8-)
posted
My first born child on Bauxe pls.
posted
lol rip tang




Also good luck to the kiwis playing here :)
posted
i'm going to lose

i can't fc any of these
posted

buny wrote:

i'm going to lose

i can't fc any of these
Too easy for you?
posted
Do I win my match by default yet? Still haven't seen any notice of my opponent.
show more
Please sign in to reply.