The map should be disqualified.Thanks! I've noted QATs about this, so I'll be waiting for their final decision whether this gets disqualified or not.
01:34:485 (9,1) - and 01:39:285 (9,1) - clearly indicate a 1/4 jump, especially the second one. I had a big WTF moment when trying to play this part without checking it in the editor first. If you want a confirmation, watch jantan's replay (#2 place), he shoots 100s on those streams same way as I did. I'm pretty sure top50 is filled with players doing just that if you want more examples.
Edit: checked, DudsonZ also does it in his replay. I'm fairly sure the high-acc FCs don't do it only because they've already choked at that point and remembered this part in the editor.
The map should be unqualified solely for that part, but you can fix some more.
02:14:085 (4,1) - Seriously no one noticed a 1/4 screenjump out of nowhere?
01:04:635 (1,2,3,4) - No big deal but, why the different spacing on (1) and (2)?
Also I don't quite understand the random distance spacing changes in streams. 02:25:035 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 0,6x and then suddenly 02:26:235 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) - 0,8x. There's obviously more. No big deal, still playable, just weird.
03:56:085 (1,2,3) - Why is this stacked exactly?
04:01:860 (6,1,1) - HORRIBLE flow. You basically killed half of the FCs up to this point with this dickmove.
While I'm at it I may as well point out some stuff from other diffs.
00:16:634 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - This played plain weird, every single time.
02:41:984 (3,4,5) - Another dickmove. Not only this doesn't play well, but you didn't enforce the player to do such movements in the previous patterns of the chorus (patterns that sound exactly like this one). You only required a simple, one-dimensional drag over the streams, not a complex movement such as this. The players are not ready for this and will miss in most cases (-> saw Rafis playing quite a bit and he did that). Spacing it like this makes no sense and is unintentionally hard.
02:46:334 (13,14) - Same here. Please be consistent with the streams.
03:55:334 (5,6) - This seems kinda fine because you put the next part of the pattern on a white tick correctly, but still similar to the above.
I hope you have a great day.