o/
No real big changes suggestion, looks good as always.
[Kantan]
- 00:52:370 (48,49,50,51) - k ddk instead if kkd k ? it works aswell and is not too similar to the following patterns.
- 01:07:938 (70,71,72,73) - ^.
- 01:17:992 (86) - a finisher here but not at - 01:02:424 (63) - ? it looks intended but maybe think more about it (worth or not). well same for the next kiai so i guess is was intended.
- 01:45:559 (119) - no finisher here but one at - 00:35:505 - again x_x.
- 01:50:424 (124,125) - Kd might be kind of hard to handle.
- 02:02:424 (137,138,139,140) - refer to - 00:52:370 -.
- 02:17:992 (159,160,161,162) -.
- 03:03:397 (214) - no finisher here but one at - 00:14:748 (13) - ? <= maybe remove the first one.
- 03:34:208 (241) - d ? fits my other suggestions and for no two dkk in a row.
[Futsuu]
- 00:26:424 - what about dk (on white lines) instead of k here ? same at - 00:29:019 -.
- 00:53:019 (105,106,107,108) - maybe i would've done d kdk instead of ddk k here 'cause of drums but idk if it really is worth it.
- 00:55:613 - k could be added here (at the same other parts too).
nothing else (except the similar part ^).
[Muzukashii]
two things that could be improved imo here (5 suggestions for two similar changes).
- 00:22:208 - try k d kdd instead of dk dkdd here ? then you miss one vocal beat but the structure looks better imo, because you got something like xxx xx xxxx being repeated and it plays better (i don't really know how to explain x_x...).
- 00:31:289 - here try something like kd dkdd k d instead of kdk kd dkdd ? it fits more what you did at the other part i mentionned and also what i suggested above.
- 01:05:830 (241) - remove ? i think a little break here is alright, prepare for the triplet pattern and the following part which is kinda harder.
- 01:30:965 - try kd dk(ddd 1/4)dk d instead of kdk k(ddd 1/4)dkdk here ? still fitting more the similar part i mentionned earlier and my suggestions about them.
- 02:15:884 (532) - refer to - 01:05:830 -.
- 03:06:965 - the following pattern sounds kinda sad without a d here (that awesome piano part there btw!).
[Oni]
- 00:14:424 (65,66,67) - i prefer kdK rather then getting a dD but personnal pref here. if you do, you can change the next kdk pattern to kkd to not get two kdk in a row btw.
- 03:01:938 - strong complexe pattern potential here (1/3 into 1/4), if you don't mind getting it a bit more difficult, it could look like this :
(from - 03:01:451 (1099) - to - 03:03:397 (1119) -). kdd 1/3 at - 03:03:100 - and ddd 1/3 at - 03:02:748 -. If fits the melody pretty well imo, try it x_x'. (the last kkd could also be changed but i think it is enough lol).
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Good luck'