Oh god, why did I decide to check this
[it.]
00:18:273 (4,5) - imo, a stack would work much better here, since there is no flow in the song. Having 0 movement in those 2 empty beats complements it really well. You do have a stack at 00:22:113 (4,5) -
00:37:713 (2,3) - Make them perfectly symmetrical (as in, the location of the sliders should be symmetrical too. So move (2) to 366:19
00:38:673 (2,3) - ^^ (but these sliders aren't really symmetrical at all (oh, the location ofc is different
up to you (either change 2 or 3)
00:39:393 (1,2,3,4) - This isn't following the proper rhythm at all. The correct rhythm is as following (but it requires much more density than the other parts, so 1/2 sliders would be fine for the first 2 sliders as well. A 3/4 slider can be used for the (3,4,5)
01:04:713 (8,9) - This jump is way too large. The music is really calm, has no beat, yet you use a 5x DS jump.
01:05:313 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - The DS between (3,4,5,6) is fine. The DS between (1,2,3) is not. The spacing seems way too high for such a calm part. Actually for the whole part of 01:03:633 (1) - 01:10:953 (6) - I'd advise you to use constant spacing, since the music doesn't change power/intensity much
01:18:513 (7) - Should be a 1/8 slider (with normal-whistle on all reverses)
01:22:593 (1) - I'd really prefer if this was a circle, and you'd remove 01:22:833 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - This way you'll give much more emphasis to the song's main track (drums)
01:24:513 (1) - Same, delete 01:24:753 (2,3,4,5) -
01:25:353 (6) - ^^ delete 01:25:593 (7,8,9,11,12,13) - (Keep (10) as a circle)
01:26:433 (1,2) - Would work much better as a 1/1 slider, to give some sort of fade from the strong beat. Try to stack 01:26:913 (3) - with (1) then like this, since it looks pretty
01:28:353 (1) - Same
01:27:273 (5,5,1) - Why are the rhythms so different here (and the Nc'ing)?
01:32:193 (1) - stop it at 01:33:033, since that sound just get ignored
01:33:873 - Then add a note here (preferrably stacked un top of the next note)
01:36:993 (1,2,3) - OMG this is pretty as
fuck fort
01:40:473 (5,6,1) - You don't seem to follow the 1.4 when it's due to the ring-type of sound. However, when the drums are 1/4 you do follow it. Here there are drums with 1/4, so can you please have a 1/4 burst between these notes?
01:44:433 (6,7) - ^^
01:48:153 (5,6,1) - ^^
The same thing applies for the later similar kiais (I'm too lazy to mention them al... /me runs)02:15:393 (1,2,3,4,5) - Everything is all spaced out, while the song isn't that intense. Here is a really powerful drum at 1/2, yet you map it really calmly. Increase the spacing here by making this a zig-zaggy pattern
02:29:313 (8) - It might be me, but imo it'll be sooo much better if it were to start at 02:29:553, or at least make it 2 sliders, the sound at 02:29:553 is too strong to ignore
02:26:913 (1,2,3,4) - Same as 00:39:393 (1,2,3,4)
03:53:553 (2) - I really disagree with this slider. The offbeat-ness makes it feel really weird. Try this (mostly rhythm based, but imo for such rhythm, patterns as these work best)
03:54:513 (2) - 03:55:473 (2) - 03:56:433 (2) - 03:57:393 (2) - 03:58:353 (2) - Same. you do have proper rhythm in the next part
04:10:953 (3) - NC. The sound calls for an NC
04:11:313 (5) - ^^
04:11:553 (1) - Remove NC/ the sounds are much more powerful than the downbeat, no need to NC that one
04:11:673 (2) - NC
04:12:033 (4) - NC
04:12:273 (5,6,7,8) - Either NC (5) or all of them just to give much more emphasis to this strong part before going into the final kiai
04:21:153 (1,2,3,4) - Same as 00:39:393 (1,2,3,4)
I honestly don't know what to say... It's too hard
Good luck Fort!