1. 01:02:800 (1,2) - Maybe you can swap these notes in the timeline like this: .
   This way 01:02:958 (2) starts on a white tick like 01:02:329 (2).
   
2. 02:22:526 (1,3,5) - You can try Strg+G. Maybe on Slider 5 ?
   
3. 01:31:577 (4) - You can use 2 Singles and make a jump to emphasize the climax of the vocal. http://puu.sh/gq75w/e4b371aef7.jpg
   
4. 01:34:408 (4) - Same.

Tipsy wrote:

Hi M4M (^.^)/

[STORMY]

1. 01:02:800 (1,2) - Maybe you can swap these notes in the timeline like this: .
   This way 01:02:958 (2) starts on a white tick like 01:02:329 (2). umm, i like this.... sorry!
   
2. 02:22:526 (1,3,5) - You can try Strg+G. Maybe on Slider 5 ? keep
   
3. 01:31:577 (4) - You can use 2 Singles and make a jump to emphasize the climax of the vocal. http://puu.sh/gq75w/e4b371aef7.jpg fixed!
   
4. 01:34:408 (4) - Same. not strong part imo. i keep this.
   

Very nice map !

1. コンボカラーの1,4の色が似ているので、ちょっとだけ異なって見えるように修正してください。02:01:140 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - こういった部分で変化がわかりづらかったです。

1. 00:14:997 (2) - 特に大きい音があるわけでもないのでここにジャンプがあると不自然に見えました、また00:14:210 (1) - からの流れを考えるとすこしやりにくいかと思います。こういったデザインはどうでしょう？少し互いに間を空けてもいいかもです。
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:57:454 (2) - もう少し間隔をあけたほうがプレイしやすいと思います。+ x0.2 ~ x0.5
3. 01:10:034 (2,3,4,5) - 直線よりも角度をつけたほうが流れがいいと思います。
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 01:15:538 (4) - 始点に強い音があるのでジャンプさせてみてはどうでしょう？また前のスライダーの（３）とは異なる音なので同じ形のスライダーではない物を使用するとより良いと思います。
5. 01:42:270 (1) - 始点のfinishはsoftの方がいいと思います。
6. 01:46:673 (5,6,7) - 見た目1/2の音と変わりないなので01:46:673 (5) - にnew comboを入れてあげるとよりプレイヤーにわかりやすくなると思います。
7. 02:33:061 (4) - 1/1のスライダーだとギターの音を若干無視することになるので違和感を感じました。音取りを統一するためにギターの音を取ってみてはどうでしょう？
8. 03:55:943 (2) - 配置的にここからnew comboを入れたほうがまとまりがあります。
9. 04:18:901 (5,6,7,8) - 全体から見ると静かめなパートなのでここのジャンプは大きすぎると思います。
10. 05:01:676 - Softの音にしませんか？こちらは前のスピナーの終点とは違いギターの音もないので

alacat wrote:

こんにちは～ :3

[General]

1. コンボカラーの1,4の色が似ているので、ちょっとだけ異なって見えるように修正してください。02:01:140 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - こういった部分で変化がわかりづらかったです。

[STORMY]

1. 00:14:997 (2) - 特に大きい音があるわけでもないのでここにジャンプがあると不自然に見えました、また00:14:210 (1) - からの流れを考えるとすこしやりにくいかと思います。こういったデザインはどうでしょう？少し互いに間を空けてもいいかもです。
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:57:454 (2) - もう少し間隔をあけたほうがプレイしやすいと思います。+ x0.2 ~ x0.5
3. 01:10:034 (2,3,4,5) - 直線よりも角度をつけたほうが流れがいいと思います。
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 01:15:538 (4) - 始点に強い音があるのでジャンプさせてみてはどうでしょう？また前のスライダーの（３）とは異なる音なので同じ形のスライダーではない物を使用するとより良いと思います。
5. 01:42:270 (1) - 始点のfinishはsoftの方がいいと思います。
6. 01:46:673 (5,6,7) - 見た目1/2の音と変わりないなので01:46:673 (5) - にnew comboを入れてあげるとよりプレイヤーにわかりやすくなると思います。
7. 02:33:061 (4) - 1/1のスライダーだとギターの音を若干無視することになるので違和感を感じました。音取りを統一するためにギターの音を取ってみてはどうでしょう？
8. 03:55:943 (2) - 配置的にここからnew comboを入れたほうがまとまりがあります。
9. 04:18:901 (5,6,7,8) - 全体から見ると静かめなパートなのでここのジャンプは大きすぎると思います。
10. 05:01:676 - Softの音にしませんか？こちらは前のスピナーの終点とは違いギターの音もないので

がんばです

handsome wrote:

hi

1. 04:52:238 - snap this greenline? lol done!
2. 00:23:016 (4,5,6,7) - 00:25:532 (4,5,6,7) - the guitar riffs are on red tick so maybe you can change? oh, nice catch!
   http://i.imgur.com/4gKvxtC.png
3. 00:36:225 (1) - bad stack, you can check ingame. okay. fixed DS.
4. 00:51:636 - map to this beat? follow vocal and i won't follow drum this part.
5. 02:31:489 - map to this beat okay.
6. 02:33:061 (4) - this feels weird, cuz its 2/1 hold, quite boring don't you think. can map the white ticks~ actually, bit worried. but, play is good work now. done.
7. 02:42:654 - better to put a not ehere, not reverse, so it can emphasize more the loud sound. okay.
8. 02:43:912 (1,2,3,4) - this don't suit rhythm cuz red tick no sounds, maybe: http://i.imgur.com/w1IzTQ4.png okay.
9. 02:52:560 (6,1) - feels odd to switch to drum when follow guitar all along... maybe: http://i.imgur.com/h5DefyH.png okay.
10. 02:59:244 (3,5,8,11) - no sounds~ done.
11. 03:30:615 (2,5,6) - no sounds~ oh, i can hear (5,6) drums sound. please hear 25%speed. so, i remove (2) and fixed.
12. there are few sliders in the kiai section that miss clap sound/white tick, but i think you won't change haha yeah, my mapping style won't tick hitsound.

good luck!

Mazzerin wrote:

00:30:093 (2) - move to x208 y272 for consistent spacing okay.
01:25:602 (4,1) - align them so they go in the same line? i like this flow. so, keep.
03:25:425 (1,2,3,4) - holy fuk maybe reduce spacing a bit here 5.46→5.44
also your intro was offtime so i kinda fixed it http://puu.sh/h2Fr4/a5ee4c17bb.png http://puu.sh/h2FsW/5bc56ca814.png

1647,356.083086053412,4,2,1,100,1,0
2003,314.13612565445,4,2,1,100,1,0
2317,291.26213592233,4,2,1,100,1,0
2608,363.636363636364,4,2,1,100,1,0
2789,289.855072463768,4,2,1,100,1,0
3225,314.13612565445,4,2,1,100,1,0
5738,335.195530726257,4,2,1,100,1,0
6073,317.460317460317,4,2,1,100,1,0
6707,298.26213592233,4,2,1,100,1,0
7005,319.122448979592,4,2,1,100,1,0
7324,326.281437125748,4,2,1,100,1,0
7650,303.789473684211,4,2,1,100,1,0
7801,317.460317460317,4,2,1,100,1,0
8593,312.5,4,2,1,100,1,0
11405,289.314285714285,4,2,0,100,1,0
11694,314.498375091729,4,2,1,50,1,0

My Mod:

HabiHolic wrote:

Hey~ Sorry for late~ i will your map mod tomorrow~

Edit : Mod Time~

[STORMY]

01:02:651 - Note add? i follow guitar sound here. so, not add.
01:12:401 (2) - This ctrl+gflow better imo ok.
01:42:751 (2) - this move (1) slider tail. now is very bad flow~ done!

SPOILER

02:45:025 (7) - Ctrl+G done
04:42:035 (1) - same (^) i tried, but, more spacing is feel good play and keep flow.
04:42:506 (2) - smae (^) so you can made this patten ^

SPOILER

04:46:909 (2) - better this 1/3 rhythm nice.

nice map!

call me back your already

Euny wrote:

just quick check for safe bubble and rank.

• STORMY

1. 01:44:481 (3,1) - touching HP bar
   
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 02:06:497 (4,5) - guys, lets safe. i think these are nearby hp bar too.
   
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 03:10:029 (2) - hope you place it up little bit.
   
   
   SPOILER

   

its hard to modding by dont using gif and blingblingfancy
whatever, lets safe. hope you dont ignore it xD..
i'll tell habi she will rebub for this map.
regards, your lovely tamago

P o M u T a wrote:

Yeah but sorry no changed!

Edit: i checked in game, so, y: axis have -1. so,it's need fix. i changed both about hp bar.
last suggest is no changed. before reason.
thanks for mods Euny!

EDIT: i changed 02:41:251 (4,1) - 5 circles → 2 sliders. so, because bit awkward for me before place. so, more playable changed. 01:43:381 (5,1) - so, I took this sound. because same sound part! I hope you agree this change. thanks you.

1. 00:08:580 (4,1) - Since you used to create a long slider like 00:07:795 (3) - , it should be logic to start your spinner at a white tick! →00:09:209 -
   It'll also adjust the flow cause the spinners is way too early here.
   
2. 00:21:607 (5) - Maybe you should move it a little bit to the right to blanket it w/ 00:21:764 (1) - . I don't think it'll be hard in that diff cause there are some long streams before and some little jump at 00:21:371 (3,4) - for example!
   
3. 00:26:324 (4,1,2,3,4,5) - Flow could be improved here cause the shape of the slider 00:26:324 (4) - isn't following the beginning of the stream's shape.
   
4. 00:27:425 (1,2) - Maybe that you can do something like that , it's another idea of the pattern who can be improved :
   
   idea

   
5. 00:41:107 (2,3) - stack could be better hue
   
6. 00:43:465 (2,3,4,5) - Your parallelogramm shaped pattern could be nicer tho !
   
7. 00:47:711 (3,4,5,1) - Maybe you can do a star shaped pattern with 00:47:240 (2) - 's tail ! It'd be nice for the visual aspect of the map!
   
8. 00:56:518 (4,5,6) - huh? It's really weird here. I don't get how you can aim that triplet if the previous note is really far from the beginning of the triplet. It's kinda hard to say but the cursor movement between 00:56:361 (3) - and 00:56:518 (4,5,6) - is kinda hard to aim.
   
9. 01:15:546 (4) - I'm curious to know why you didn't make a slider like 01:15:231 (3) - to follow the pattern logic
   
10. 01:46:054 (1,2,3,4) - It's the same thing as 00:56:518 (4,5,6) -
    
11. 01:56:590 (2,3,4) - I don't really think that a slider would fit here owo Maybe add some circles instead?
    
12. 02:24:425 (1) - lol xD Maybe you could use another shape but hey it's following the synth at least xD
    
13. 02:37:870 (2) - I'm not really sure but I highly doubt if it's following the song actually lol. It's clearly overmapped for me imo and awkward to play owo
    
14. 02:42:352 (3) - Same here as above, it's really hard to aim and look at that HUGE jump with 02:42:667 (1) -
    
15. 04:42:035 (1) - Felt like that there's a strong beat who could be covered by a circle or a jump. But well , it's up to u c:

Secretpipe wrote:

As P o M u Ta request , I'm modding this /

[STORMY]

1. 00:08:580 (4,1) - Since you used to create a long slider like 00:07:795 (3) - , it should be logic to start your spinner at a white tick! →00:09:209 -
   It'll also adjust the flow cause the spinners is way too early here. done.
   
2. 00:21:607 (5) - Maybe you should move it a little bit to the right to blanket it w/ 00:21:764 (1) - . I don't think it'll be hard in that diff cause there are some long streams before and some little jump at 00:21:371 (3,4) - for example! i made simply blanket.
   
3. 00:26:324 (4,1,2,3,4,5) - Flow could be improved here cause the shape of the slider 00:26:324 (4) - isn't following the beginning of the stream's shape. play is not awkward imo. i think keep ok.
4. 00:27:425 (1,2) - Maybe that you can do something like that , it's another idea of the pattern who can be improved : okay.
   
   idea

   
5. 00:41:107 (2,3) - stack could be better hue (1) slider end and (2) and (3) stacked, Automatically here, it's already fine.
   
6. 00:43:465 (2,3,4,5) - Your parallelogramm shaped pattern could be nicer tho ! done.
   
7. 00:47:711 (3,4,5,1) - Maybe you can do a star shaped pattern with 00:47:240 (2) - 's tail ! It'd be nice for the visual aspect of the map! i was image trapezoid. sorry.
   
8. 00:56:518 (4,5,6) - huh? It's really weird here. I don't get how you can aim that triplet if the previous note is really far from the beginning of the triplet. It's kinda hard to say but the cursor movement between 00:56:361 (3) - and 00:56:518 (4,5,6) - is kinda hard to aim. umm i don't think so. 1.30x spacing and actually rise triplet nice flow imo.
   
9. 01:15:546 (4) - I'm curious to know why you didn't make a slider like 01:15:231 (3) - to follow the pattern logic (3) is vocal, (4) is finish drum and next force, fit music that's all.
   
10. 01:46:054 (1,2,3,4) - It's the same thing as 00:56:518 (4,5,6) - really playable. also, you are the first man who say that to me. (was suggest too)
    
11. 01:56:590 (2,3,4) - I don't really think that a slider would fit here owo Maybe add some circles instead? nice
    
12. 02:24:425 (1) - lol xD Maybe you could use another shape but hey it's following the synth at least xD I am serious. fit guitar slider!
    
13. 02:37:870 (2) - I'm not really sure but I highly doubt if it's following the song actually lol. It's clearly overmapped for me imo and awkward to play owo um, higher sound and flow is fine, not hard play. it's no problem imo.
    
14. 02:42:352 (3) - Same here as above, it's really hard to aim and look at that HUGE jump with 02:42:667 (1) - no problem here imo. but, i agree awkward pettern. i changed more easily play.
    
15. 04:42:035 (1) - Felt like that there's a strong beat who could be covered by a circle or a jump. But well , it's up to u c: nice play and 3.16x spacing. no problem here.

By the way , I don't know if you really want to keep that diff name but at least, consider to remove the caps xDD this title caps. so, diff name caps really fit and fine. why you suggest this D:

That's all otherwise !

Call me back~