Gray Veyron wrote:

It's done, completely done.

Download me :3/

1. spinner at the start is not appropriate for beginners
2. easy maps should not have syncopation
3. incomplete

1. start is too sudden
2. abuses spinners
3. inconsistent spacing
4. incomplete

1. The spacing confused me in the second verse

1. inconsistent spacing (It starts as 1 space = 1/2 beat and later morphs into 2 spaces = 1/2 beat}
2. too many jumps when not needed
3. drop is unplayable

Fort wrote:

Veyron's Hard:
same SV with Insane diff? looks bad idea But GDs are fine. Don't look like a 'bad' idea.
some kind of overmap triplets is like beating insane pattern with only has 1/1 and 1/2 pattern with jumps the density in this map > density in insane diff

01:50:848 (1,2) - lmao blanket lmao, this is on purpose. Not trying to make a blanket here.
01:52:233 (3,4) - use 1/2 pattern pls (i still can hear sound in 01:52:464 - ) I was trying to follow the ride, so i did a little extended slider length for it. Maybe i'll keep this.
02:31:002 (4,5) - make this distance didnt too far idk, i was trying to make a jump here since the vocal sounds like it. But i'll change if another modder says this...
03:19:002 (4) - you kidding in here right? use simple 1/2 pattern pls But the guitar sounds like 1/4.
03:43:002 (3,1) - overlap with 03:41:502 (6,1) - a bit Okay
03:49:002 - unnecessary blank timeline at downbeat, you must map this, even you follow vocal this one needs to be mapped (kinda confusing about jump in here) Okay, also added little jump here :3
03:55:464 (2) - map this circle in 03:55:233 - Okay
03:57:541 (5) - end slider in 03:58:233 - But it sounds ending on 03:58:118 -

nice map i guess but this map similar like insane, just idk increase AR can help

ok good mapset, later
Good luck!

Kay- wrote:

this map is too good that ill not even get surprised by this be ranked right now

LGV894 wrote:

It's not yet ranked because I'm not that famous. :/

• [Insane]
  
  00:10:223 (2) - Try to keep on same line -red tick and slider's repeat (I hope you can understand my horrible English ._.)
  00:28:223 (2) - This isn't looks shapely (This isn't important thing just an idea)
  00:28:223 (2,3) - I understand that what you wanted to do but a blanket can be good for here
  00:46:685 (2,3) - 00:56:146 (2,3) - 00:56:377 (3,1) - 01:01:223 (2,3) - Let's blanket
  01:23:146 (1,4) - This blanket isn't looks shapely
  01:23:146 (1) - Move this to 296 204
  01:27:069 (1) - Move this to 272 140
  01:44:146 (2,3) - Blanket ._.
  01:45:300 (1,2) - ^
  01:45:992 (3) - 01:46:684 (4) - CTRL + G
  01:50:838 (1,2) - Blanket again
  02:02:838 (3) - One tick left
  02:03:761 (1) - 02:04:223 (2) - CTRL + G
  02:13:454 (2,3) - Looks bad, 02:14:146 (3) - Move this to 384 152
  02:14:377 (4,1) - Fix blanket
  02:35:838 (2) - One tick right
  02:46:915 (2) - Move to 192 264
  03:18:992 (4) - I want to say CTRL + G but this ruins the flows so never mind
  03:19:454 (1) - This isn't looks shapely (This isn't important thing just an idea)
  03:21:761 (2) - Move to 208 204
  03:31:223 (2) - A few ticks up
  03:33:761 (5) - Move to 232 224
  03:42:300 (2) - Two tick right, after it 03:42:992 (3,4) - These can look bad, I think you can fix it easily

salinqi wrote:

[Veyron's Hard]
`OD can be added to 5~6 Okay, made it OD5
01:06:069 (4,5,6,7,8,9) - looks a little crowded,you may separate them a bit Okay, moved only (7)
02:30:531 (3,4) - blanket? If i made a blanket here, the spacing would be bigger on the next notes. To avoid that, it's better i keep it a little closer.
03:02:723 - too much sliders may make players feel boring so I suggest adding a note here If only you'd follow the song track ;p i don't think if too much sliders bores players, probably CIRCLES are the ones making players bored on 'clicking' too much.
03:38:146 (2,5) - stack? Already stacked o_o
03:39:992 (2,3,4) - ds inconsistency Ehhh... what?
03:57:531 (5) - maybe end here 03:58:223 - and NC? Okay, done on my own way.

Snaggletooth wrote:

M4M~

[Insane]

1. Rhythmical Issues
   1. 00:09:070 (4) - This is not really wrong as it is mapped correctly and I can totally understand why. It's
      just that it seemed weirdly off the first time playing it. And playing it again the gap between (4) and the next hit-
      object (being (1)) seems way too long. I tried to turn (4) into a 1/1 slider which helped the gap
      improve and not stop the flow awkwardly but at the same time it is not as beneficial to the vocals as
      the rhythm you have now. So basically, do whatever feels nice to you. fixed
      
   2. 00:10:223 (2) - ^ // This gap is very long, just like the previous one. But now it's a diffrent Situation
      as the vocals still do go on after (2) has ended which makes this break seem even more awkward. fixed
      
      
      Timeline

      
      
      This Rhythm would fill the Gap. I also added (4) to match the synth in the background and to keep the
      1/1 gap consistency. with the previous pattern.
      
   3. 00:40:685 (1,2) - This anti-jump is uncalled for. I hear the synth you wanted to empathize with the break,
      but since it is a sustaining sound, a 1/2 or 1/1 slider would for one fit the sound more, and secondly it would play a
      lot better and be a lot more readable. Another reason for it's 'unfittingness' could be that there still is a sound on 00:40:916
      which is left out. + You didn't Anti-Jump on 00:48:300 (2) which makes either of them seem inconsistent. fixed
      
   4. 03:57:300 (1) - That spinner is kind of short imo. You even had to extend it towards a starting point
      that is totally off beat/has no 'spinner-value'. The Vocals that you wanted to empathize start on 03:57:531 which
      makes the spinner seem off-beat. you can either shorten the spinner (which is obviously a bad idea) or
      remove it. fixed
      
      
      Timeline

      
2. Cosmetical Issues
   1. 00:28:454 - 00:27:300 (6,1,3) - These 3 are overlapping pretty heavily which to me looks odd while playing.
      But I'll keep in mind that this is more or less an opinion-based thing as it dosnt influence the actual play. doesn't it flow good? on hold
      
   2. 01:01:454 (3,4,5,6,1) - ^ remapped
      
   3. 00:57:992 (5,6) - This is overlapping pretty bad and this would be something I'd personally try to avoid at all cost.
      Try x:388 y:280. Would get rid of the overlap.

remapped

[Hard]

• 
  
  You have quite a lot of spacing inconsistensies. Most of them aren't needed/only for pattern purpos which is
  not an ideal thing. I am not expecting a remap, just a fix for the crucial ones which means that I will mostly focus
  the mod for this difficulty on spacing.

1. Rhythmical Issues
   1. 00:11:146 - Same issue as on insane. You can apply what I said there. Same on 00:14:146 fixed
2. Spacing Issues
   1. 00:09:993 (1,2) - That jump is unneceassary. The Vocal change isn't enough (for me at least) to justify a jump on hard.
      Concidering this is a Hard, jumps should be extra 'obvious' and reasonable. Reduce this jump accordingly with DS. This wont even hurt
      you pattern. fixed
      
   2. 00:17:377 (1,2) - ^
      
   3. 00:24:993 (2,3) - Fix the spacing here as there is no strong beat to support the jump. I don't think
      the synth here is enough. fixed
      
   4. 00:54:992 (4,1) - Jump without justification - The vocal could have been one but since this isn't mapped
      on vocals but on the very quite synth in the background, this jump should be reduced. emphasis on new combo
      
   5. 00:58:684 (3,1) - ^ ^
      
      
      
   6. 01:12:761 (2,1) - quite a heavy jump for a rather soft change in music. fixed + NC should be on 01:13:915 (2) - not on 01:13:454 (1) fixed
      
   7. 02:11:146 (1,2) - ^ ephasis on chord progression
      
   8. 02:49:454 (4,1,2) - Major spacing issue. Your jump from (4) to (1) is quite signifficant and should be removed, esspecially since
      you then have 1/1 beat pause with the exact same spacing. This is quite deceptive and brought me to miss/100 multiple times.
      I highly suggest to you, that you fix this. Same goes for 02:56:838 (4,1,2)
   the jump was to give emphasis on NC/chord change but fixed anyways
   
3. Cosmetical Issue
   1. 01:00:992 (1,2,3,4,1) - This is overlapping quite badly. This could be quite confusing and/or lead to
      a miss since it is simply not expected/overlap makes it hard to read. I highly suggest you'd clean this /remap this pattern. fixed
      
   2. 02:03:761 (1,2,3,4) - ^ ^

You might find more Jumps that should be changed. Those were the once that stood particularly out to me.

I also want to clarify that cosmetical issues are my personal preference. This is obviously up to you, tho
I do hope that you at least consider my suggestions.

I hope it helped.

GL

jinhang_ang wrote:

Okay hi M4M request (talked about it before right?)
omg i love this song rank this please

[Hard]
Not very sure but I noticed a lot of distance inconsistencies. I assume that they are intentional but what I want to say is they feel strange sometimes.

00:17:608 (2,3,1) - I know that they are intended, but I prefer this. Take note that 00:19:223 (2) is stacked with 00:18:300 (3) in my suggestion, and 00:19:685 (3) 's location is tweaked. No, thanks. I prefer the current pattern.

Image

http://puu.sh/hKsTZ.jpg

00:22:685 - Something missing here. I hit 00:22:916 (2) too early instead ;; maybe extend 00:22:223 (1) as a slider and hit there?Sorry about that, I fixed it.
00:49:454 (4,1) - Blanket needs fixing. fixed
02:06:761 (3,4) - Maybe try blanketing this, and make 02:06:992 (4) 's slider tail make a triangle together with 02:06:069 (2) 's tail and 02:06:761 (3) Meh, doesn't flow good.
02:11:146 (1,3) - Stack tail? You did this on 02:12:531 (4,2) That's it? Meh.
02:36:761 (4,2) - ^ Not stacking can make it easier to read.
02:40:684 (1,2) - Blanket if you want that. Meh, I'm not a fan of 1/2 blankets.
02:48:069 (1,2,3,4) - The fourth slider looks strange. I would suggest reversing 02:48:992 (3) and add a circle to replace 02:49:454 (4) No, I like that push effect at (4)
02:52:684 (3,1) - Maybe you are trying to manual stack..but i feel that auto stack looks better? I didn't even mean to stack them.
03:06:531 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - This seems to be a high difficulty spike. I would make it <slider> <circle ><circle> style. It's a buildup so difficulty should be going up. But I'll take note of that
03:51:300 (2,4) - Something similar like above Sorry, fixed it.

[Insane]
03:42:992 (1) - This slider slowdown is a little too sudden? fixed

Since I found out that Insane is almost perfect (and to be honest, I love it really really much), I will just mod another diff. YUSH! Thanks! I worked really hard for it.

[Veyron's Hard] Gray, it's yours!
00:19:223 (2,3,4) - It doesn't feel right here. I am tapping to the vocals and yes this design makes me feel lost and idk what to tap here.
00:21:070 (6,7) - ^ maybe changing first circle to slider might fix the problem.
02:01:915 (6,7) - Idk, it doesn't blanket each other, nor makes a mirror.
02:24:069 (1) - This is a little awkward. To be honest i would like to see more stuff mapped in sliders and circles here ;;
02:30:531 (3,4) - Blanket, if that's what you want.
03:11:608 (4) - I suggest remove one reverse, replace the reverse with a circle. Makes a little more sense when tapping.
03:48:761 (5,6) - Similar problem. The tapping feels a little lost here.

Okay that's all To be honest Veyron you might have to make your map feel better when tapping test play with autopilot when possible

Good luck for rank!

jinhang_ang wrote:

[Veyron's Hard]
00:19:223 (2,3,4) - It doesn't feel right here. I am tapping to the vocals and yes this design makes me feel lost and idk what to tap here. Well, you would've followed some vocals and beats here. Will keep this one.
00:21:070 (6,7) - ^ maybe changing first circle to slider might fix the problem. ^
02:01:915 (6,7) - Idk, it doesn't blanket each other, nor makes a mirror. Probably doing this on purpose, making some symmetry here might be a little boring somehow.
02:24:069 (1) - This is a little awkward. To be honest i would like to see more stuff mapped in sliders and circles here ;; There's this ride sound in the song track, so a spinner here might emphasize this one. Similar to 00:48:070 (1) -
02:30:531 (3,4) - Blanket, if that's what you want. LOL okay
03:11:608 (4) - I suggest remove one reverse, replace the reverse with a circle. Makes a little more sense when tapping. Nahh, it might be a little harder, and likely unnoticeable. Somewhat should be similar to 01:20:838 (4) -
03:48:761 (5,6) - Similar problem. The tapping feels a little lost here. Same reason.

Okay that's all To be honest Veyron you might have to make your map feel better when tapping test play with autopilot when possible

Anxient wrote:

feed me kudosu

20:48 Anxient: i would go for veyron to move with 8.0AR
20:48 Anxient: so that ar drops with
20:48 LGV894: just realized that the normal diff's hp is higher than Hard...
20:48 LGV894: Well, the insane is just 3.7 stars...
20:49 Anxient: insane = 8.5 v.hard = 8, hard = 7.5
20:49 Anxient: and i feel like veyron didn't know if he should go with 3.5 and 4 CS
20:49 Anxient: so he's like eh f it 3.8

Anxient wrote:

20:52 Anxient: im no bisharp >:[

Battquif wrote:

Hi M4M!!~~

General

• You should add some custom hitsound.
  Your MP3 is 128 KB/s :/ Try to find a 192 KB/s if possible

Easy

• HP2;AR2 ? sure
  
  00:07:454 (1) - Make it horizontal It is horizontal. What are you talking about?
  00:16:685 (2) - ^ ^
  00:27:762 (3) - I think a simple 1/1 slider is enough here. The end of this slid is following nothing in the song :/ O, rly? U not hear d' chord change, ma' boy?
  00:28:685 - So, add a 1/1 slid here (or a revers on the previous slider) Added a hitcircle.
  00:35:146 - ^ No.
  00:47:608 (3) - You miss a white tick here. Something like that is better imo : https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3218403 Sure.
  01:17:608 (1) - Continue with 1/1 sliders. You break the rhythm here :/ 4 1/1 sliders maybe? No, thanks.
  01:56:377 (1) - I don't think it need a spinner, remove it. No, it does.
  02:17:608 - There is needing a note here, try it : https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3218428 Won't it hurt easy players?
  02:24:531 - ^ ^
  03:55:684 - start the spinncer here maybe? No.

Normal

• AR4-4.5 Sure thing.
  
  00:29:608 (4) - I think it's better like that : https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3218482 Okay...
  01:52:685 (1) - 347:146 Sure.
  01:56:377 (1) - I don't think it need a spinner, remove it. Naaaaah.
  02:07:454 (5) - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3218496 ? Yeah.
  02:15:762 (1) - CTRL+J then place it with a good DS Kay.
  02:18:531 (5) - Curve it for a better flow. Ok.

Hard

• 00:15:993 (2,1) - You should stack it. WTF is wrong with you modders? Can't you see how far those objects are?
  00:28:916 (3,4) - blanket?? Eh, fine.
  00:33:070 (4,5,1) - You didn't do this before, why now? remove 5. No beacause 00:25:685 - and 00:33:070 - are different. Can't u music, brah?
  00:36:300 (3) - 408:290 Too OP.
  01:10:915 (2,1) - stack? -.- Fine
  01:30:415 (4) - I don't think it's useful, remove it "I(1/2) - Want(1/2) - you(1/4) - to(1/4) - |C|(1/2)" so no.
  01:45:184 (4) - ^ I Want You To No.
  01:48:415 (3) - ^ You should not stack under a slider like that in a hard diff. Enable "show stacking in editor" for god's/gods' sake.
  02:36:761 (4,2) - Try to stack the end of the slid with the circle. It breaks distance snap.
  02:52:684 (3,1) - stack? Seriously, guys? It's not even that necessary!
  03:07:684 (2,3,3) - ^ SERIOUSLY, THOUGH.
  03:21:185 (4) - You know what I will say HAHA SO FUNNY.
  03:29:378 (2,3) - blanket? HUH?
  03:35:954 (4) - <- just click. Not if I don't want to..
  03:39:185 (3) - Why am I noticing it? Because you have eyes.

Veyron's Hard

• AR7 K.
  
  00:18:531 (1) - Curve it more
  00:35:146 (6) - NC
  01:28:223 (4) - CTRL+G? Or something like that for stack with 01:28:684 (1) -
  02:05:608 (6) - NC
  02:45:992 (4) - Make a jump here (so destack it)
  03:18:992 (4,1) - Move it for stack the end of 4 with 1

Insane

• AR8 K.
  
  00:37:454 (2,5) - You should stack it. Seriously?
  00:45:531 (5) - 374:346 You want a PP farm right? No, I said "Sorry, PP farmers."
  01:03:761 (3,4,5,6,7) - remove it or space it more, hard to read in DT What do you mean hard to read? It's so easy ffs.
  01:07:684 (4,5,6) - You don't need it, it's free 100... No, because I'm evil. Can't you hear the synth?
  01:13:454 (5,2) - stack? Sure?
  01:19:454 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - Don't forget that your map is not played by only DT players. Stream at 130 BPM is not pleasant... Try some reversed sliders then a little stream of 5-7 notes What? I love 128/130 bpm streams!
  01:26:608 (4) - I think reduce the SV is good just here. Wut? No. That slider is already too small.
  01:33:761 (4) - ^ No.
  01:41:838 (2,5) - make it cleaner Seriously?
  01:47:608 (3) - 278:245 Nasty PP farmerz.
  01:47:146 (1,4) - blanket? K.
  02:15:300 (2,5) - make it cleaner No!!!
  02:18:531 (1,4) - stack? No.
  02:54:531 (3,4,5,6,7) - Why a stream?? :/ Ask Zedd why he put quarter notes there.
  03:10:915 (7) - there are 5 notes. I know, but the testplayers didn't want it.
  03:11:146 (1) - Don't space it like that! If I place it closer, some players might misread it.
  03:38:377 (3) - You can try to make longer jumps on the final kiai K.

Hope it has been useful!! It's mapped very well!! WP TY for mod.