This. Also I don't get why people think mouse is bad. It's not. Just like a tablet, just train and shit. Post less, play more.cheezstik wrote:
For starters, cod / most FPS = 3D, osu! = 2D
This. Also I don't get why people think mouse is bad. It's not. Just like a tablet, just train and shit. Post less, play more.cheezstik wrote:
For starters, cod / most FPS = 3D, osu! = 2D
Absolute tracking is easier to learn since you take mouse drift out of the equation. But yes it all comes down to preference and whether you want to pay for a tablet or not.DahplA wrote:
This. Also I don't get why people think mouse is bad. It's not. Just like a tablet, just train and shit. Post less, play more.cheezstik wrote:
For starters, cod / most FPS = 3D, osu! = 2D
You've also been playing for four years and are still objectively worse than me. I outrank you by 25,000 and I beat you in all the top plays we have in common. You have no business questioning my advice.bigfeh wrote:
This is me, pure mouse player, playing at 2790 CPI without my forearm on the desk. Sue me.
This is absolutely terrible advice because it is obvious to anyone with a pulse. "Get better by playing more" is right up there in advice quality with "if you click more accurately, you get more points". Way to play it safe.buny wrote:
are you saying this is shit advice? That op should seek a secret technique that allows him to automatically play better without practice?buny wrote:
also you get better by practicing. Even if you were told how to grip your mouse you would still have to practice to get better. Practice is inevitable
how ironicPhilosofikal wrote:
Wow, I really wasn't going to reply back here but now that literally a full page of retardation has been posted in response to me.
Taking the time to promote cancer ey?[ Momiji ] wrote:
DahplA wrote:
Post less
Um. No, there were not? You wanna go back and look at your post?buny wrote:
congratulations on looking at one part of my post and ignoring the rest. You realise there are words past the first fullstop, right?
are you saying everybody that disagrees with you is retarded?
u fkn wot m8 look at my mlg cod skills I'm best mouse player NA swag doritos yolo mtn dewYeah, that's pretty damn retarded. Check.
Are you saying your advice is not a subjective matter?99.9% of advice is subjective. How, exactly, does one give advice that doesn't come from a personal point of view, sensei?
Your "advice" consisted of "maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaybe get aTo reduce static friction, and friction in general, so you have less hand strain? The main limiting factor of mouse only play?biggerslick mousepad?
OH AND YOU HAVE TO USE THIS DPIA DPI I don't even use, which is meant as a median starting base to find one's own personal DPI?
AND U HAV 2 ALTERNATE EVEN THO NOT MANY MOUSE ONLY PLAYERS ALTERNATEHow else are you going to learn how to stream as a new player?
OK LISTEN TO ME I CANT EVEN PLAY 3 STAR MAPS K????????????????"Really? Because it would seem to me my top play is a 98% S rank on a 4.5 star map.
getting better equipment doesn't mean that you're going to perform better; better peripherals allow you to express your skill better. You can't express what's not there, and you shouldn't notice a difference until you reach the high ranksThis is the only actual point you've given, and I already stated that having better equipment doesn't make you better, it only makes it easier to get better. You can get a great monitor for $200, a great mouse for $20, and great headphones for $25.
you think 4 months and 50k rank is impressive? lolI already said that I haven't owned a PC for 3 of the 4 months I've supposedly been playing. Don't you see the huge flatline in my play history?
No one said it wasn't fun or you're bad for playing COD, we're just saying it really is one of the lower skillcap and more forgiving FPS's out there. The fact that most of the people that play it are twelve year olds on xbox that fucked your mum last night is a different matter.Philosofikal wrote:
1. I couldn't care less about your opinions of Call of Duty. You're not cool, witty or edgy by humping the Call of Duty hate train. I'm aware of the flaws of Call of Duty, but I still love it because it's easy fun, extremely fast paced and very fluid compared to any other shooter I've played (and I've played many). If you have a problem with that, you can suck my toes.
Anyway you heard him bois, all of us are the retards and the 50k mouse only player after 4 months that just claimed COD makes him good at osu is the correct one, move along everyonePhilosofikal wrote:
Wow, I really wasn't going to reply back here but now that literally a full page of retardation has been posted in response to me I guess I have to say something to defend myself.
hes still not banned wtf?cheezstik wrote:
It's true, Gayzmcgee got so good from minecraft.
i disagree, i've tried both and never noticed any difference from 60 hz in standard, but on other modes its fucking unreal how much better the scrolling objects look, it's just unnatural, even if it was an actual strip of material going across the screen, i think my eyes would see it as blurrier..Noobsicle wrote:
no-one is disagreeing with this
i heard ar10.3 is a tiny bit easier to read on 144hz but i can't read it myself, do you notice a difference in reading ar10.3 on 60hz vs 144hz?Riince wrote:
i disagree, i've tried both and never noticed any difference from 60 hz in standard, but on other modes its fucking unreal how much better the scrolling objects look.
well even the people who i know that are high rank [300+] with multiple 10.3 scores say it's about reacting not reading, so i certainly cant read it or i'd be saying im better than them.. i can react to it if im warmed up enough and if the bpm isn't too excessive to me which it usually is because the kinds of maps that become 10.3, i can even hit 300's. i dont think i tried 10.3 with the monitors though no.Noobsicle wrote:
i heard ar10.3 is a tiny bit easier to read on 144hz but i can't read it myself, do you notice a difference in reading ar10.3 on 60hz vs 144hz?Riince wrote:
i disagree, i've tried both and never noticed any difference from 60 hz in standard, but on other modes its fucking unreal how much better the scrolling objects look.
10.3 is perfectly readable .___., but that's aside the point. To improve, play more. The "I don't have a tablet so i have mous das y i suk" or "wow lol every1 has mekkanikal kb but i suk cos i hav rubber doom keyboard" excuses are for people who are not willing to face the fact that they, quite bluntly, are shit.Riince wrote:
well even the people who i know that are high rank [300+] with multiple 10.3 scores say it's about reacting not reading, so i certainly cant read it or i'd be saying im better than them.. i can react to it if im warmed up enough and if the bpm isn't too excessive to me which it usually is because the kinds of maps that become 10.3, i can even hit 300's. i dont think i tried 10.3 with the monitors though no.
what are you even talking about? reddit circlejerking? noone's doing this, if anything my post was the complete opposite to the idea that "better equipment = better player"..Dumii wrote:
10.3 is perfectly readable .___., but that's aside the point. To improve, play more. The "I don't have a tablet so i have mous das y i suk" or "wow lol every1 has mekkanikal kb but i suk cos i hav rubber doom keyboard" excuses are for people who are not willing to face the fact that they, quite bluntly, are shit.Riince wrote:
well even the people who i know that are high rank [300+] with multiple 10.3 scores say it's about reacting not reading, so i certainly cant read it or i'd be saying im better than them.. i can react to it if im warmed up enough and if the bpm isn't too excessive to me which it usually is because the kinds of maps that become 10.3, i can even hit 300's. i dont think i tried 10.3 with the monitors though no.
Keep blaming things, put less effort into the game to get better.
I can guarantee you'll end up an excellent reddit circlejerker.
It's besides the point but also wrong.. don't tell me that no improvement in 5 months using mouse was just because of a lack of effort at getting better. Peripherals matter.Riince wrote:
what are you even talking about? reddit circlejerking? noone's doing this, if anything my post was the complete opposite to the idea that "better equipment = better player"..Dumii wrote:
10.3 is perfectly readable .___., but that's aside the point. To improve, play more. The "I don't have a tablet so i have mous das y i suk" or "wow lol every1 has mekkanikal kb but i suk cos i hav rubber doom keyboard" excuses are for people who are not willing to face the fact that they, quite bluntly, are shit.
Keep blaming things, put less effort into the game to get better.
I can guarantee you'll end up an excellent reddit circlejerker.
I should've stated that I was talking to that CoD guy in the second part. LOLRiince wrote:
what are you even talking about? reddit circlejerking? noone's doing this, if anything my post was the complete opposite to the idea that "better equipment = better player"..
Dumii wrote:
I should've stated that I was talking to that CoD guy in the second part. LOLRiince wrote:
what are you even talking about? reddit circlejerking? noone's doing this, if anything my post was the complete opposite to the idea that "better equipment = better player"..
oh holy fuck i forgot that guy was having a fucking temper tantrum in the thread Popolittz started, and somehow thought it was going on in another thread. Welp. Short term memory loss.Dumii wrote:
I should've stated that I was talking to that CoD guy in the second part. LOLRiince wrote:
what are you even talking about? reddit circlejerking? noone's doing this, if anything my post was the complete opposite to the idea that "better equipment = better player"..
Oh no, every high ranked player ever only got to their rank because of peripherals.B1rd wrote:
It's besides the point but also wrong.. don't tell me that no improvement in 5 months using mouse was just because of a lack of effort at getting better. Peripherals matter.
Better peripherals = Better time invested.Dumii wrote:
Oh no, every high ranked player ever only got to their rank because of peripherals.B1rd wrote:
It's besides the point but also wrong.. don't tell me that no improvement in 5 months using mouse was just because of a lack of effort at getting better. Peripherals matter.
DEFINITELY not their 50000 + plays and 10m + hit count, right?
https://osu.ppy.sh/u/1302328Dumii wrote:
Oh no, every high ranked player ever only got to their rank because of peripherals.B1rd wrote:
It's besides the point but also wrong.. don't tell me that no improvement in 5 months using mouse was just because of a lack of effort at getting better. Peripherals matter.
DEFINITELY not their 50000 + plays and 10m + hit count, right?
alternatively, https://osu.ppy.sh/u/lncognitoB1rd wrote:
https://osu.ppy.sh/u/1302328
im not sure what that person is doing, but he's not really trying hard to be goodB1rd wrote:
https://osu.ppy.sh/u/1302328Dumii wrote:
Oh no, every high ranked player ever only got to their rank because of peripherals.
DEFINITELY not their 50000 + plays and 10m + hit count, right?
lncognito is a known easy/normal 4mod farmer. he doesnt play to set crazy insane scores.Riince wrote:
alternatively, https://osu.ppy.sh/u/lncognitoB1rd wrote:
https://osu.ppy.sh/u/1302328
is there a single mouse only player in the top 50? the best i can think of is Kriers.silmarilen wrote:
neither is linking to 1 low ranked person when there are multiple mouse players in the top50 (or who got there while using a mouse)
Pyonta. But he quit.Riince wrote:
is there a single mouse only player in the top 50? the best i can think of is Kriers.
A few mouse players in the top 50 doesn't prove anything, it's besides the point. The point was that peripherals have an effect. That one person is very good example of how some people can't improve very well with a mouse, and like I said, I couldn't either. Mouse is less intuitive than a tablet; and some people can get good with one, other people have a lot more trouble. I've never seen someone with 5 digits and 50K+ PC who uses a tablet.silmarilen wrote:
when there are multiple mouse players in the top50 (or who got there while using a mouse)
ehembuny wrote:
you think 4 months and 50k rank is impressive? lol
pff woob outranked me at 4 monthsLagel wrote:
ehembuny wrote:
you think 4 months and 50k rank is impressive? lol
it proves more than 1 mouse player not being in top50B1rd wrote:
Pyonta. But he quit.Riince wrote:
is there a single mouse only player in the top 50? the best i can think of is Kriers.A few mouse players in the top 50 doesn't prove anything, it's besides the point.silmarilen wrote:
when there are multiple mouse players in the top50 (or who got there while using a mouse)
http://osu.ppy.sh/u/277771#_leaderB1rd wrote:
I've never seen someone with 5 digits and 50K+ PC who uses a tablet.
My pride is rekt!B1rd wrote:
I've never seen someone with 5 digits and 50K+ PC who uses a tablet.
ehemerLagel wrote:
ehembuny wrote:
you think 4 months and 50k rank is impressive? lol