maybe change my diff name to advance?
Rizia wrote:
give it a try
bubbled
good luck!
Thanks Choz!Chaoslitz wrote:
[Starfy's Insane]
- 00:21:412 (3) - The red tick needs more emphasize rather than using a 3/4 here? I think a constant rhythm pattern here is more important here so no change here
- 00:31:246 (6) - Space it more so that 00:31:246 (6,1) won't overlap Fixed
ALL FIXEDChaoslitz wrote:
[General][Easy]
- I recommend you to add a normal-sliderslide2
- Generally you can't use different combo colours in your own diff :v, so better to use the same in the whole mapset
[Hard]
- 00:00:746 - Finish
- 00:08:746 (1) - This drum clap is so weird lol
- 00:19:412 (1,2) - Please blanket it well...
- 00:32:079 (4,5) - Try a 1/1 slider instead to reduce the no of notes in a row :v
- 00:32:746 (1,2) - You can simply move those anchor for a better wave shape..
- 01:02:079 (4,5) - Spacing (0.9x)
- 00:03:412 (3) - 00:38:746 (4) - 00:43:412 (4) - 00:48:746 (3) - 00:56:746 (4) - 01:02:079 (4) - 01:07:412 (5) - NC
- 00:54:079 (4,1) - Switch NC
- I would like to see a denser rhythm in Easy, current one look so empty lol
- I didn't expect Advance has a higher sv, probably it is due to the high spacing you used, 1.2-1.3x would fit....
[Insane]
- 00:02:746 (5) - There is actually no sound at 00:03:190, using a 1/1 slider will be fine
- 00:07:079 (3,1) - 00:08:857 (2,3) - Spacing here is too far comparing to the calm part of music
- 00:08:635 (5,1,2) - This is so confusing to play with lol
- 00:21:079 (1,1) - This looks so weird only when edges are overlapping...
- 00:22:079 (1) - Curve this more for a better flow
- 00:43:412 (3) - NC
- 00:52:412 (5,6) - The jump here is to big imo
- 00:58:746 (1,1) - Better to space them out as there is 1/2 interval in between
- The last stream looks messy lol, if you want to use 1/4 reverse sliders better to start it every new downbeat (eg 01:23:412 (1,2) ), so 01:24:412 (7) - will be notes and 01:25:079 (2,3,4,5) be a slider
Sorry I have to pop the bubble here. The diff spread among Advanced, Hard and Insane is still a no-go for me, Hard needs a denser rhythm when compared to Advanced (Actually naming Hard and Hyper make more sense), there are place that you can map it out like 00:46:540, as well as 1/1 slider is used too much, it should be a good way to balance the spread instead of using high ds
Call me back once you fixing the Hard, then it will be good to go o/
http://puu.sh/pFFMr/79c287210e.rarChaoslitz wrote:
Recheckkkkkkkkk
[NNK's Hard]
00:10:079 (3,1) - switch NC only this no change
ALL FIXEDChaoslitz wrote:
Recheckkkkkkkkk[Easy][Hyper]
- 00:43:412 (4) - NC
- Didn't i say you need a denser rhythm in Easy :<? :
- 01:04:412 - 01:15:079 - note
- 01:06:746 - 1/1 slider instead of 01:06:746 (4)
[Insane]
- 00:01:412 (4) - Try something else except a long straight slider like this? :v
- 00:01:412 (4) - 00:02:746 (2) - you dont really have to follow ds is this two, the interval is really big and it feels weird
- 00:03:412 (1,3) - overlapped :<
- 00:39:746 (4,5) - ^, place 00:40:079 (5) - lower
- 00:43:412 (1) - 00:58:746 (3) - The whistle is slider body is noisy lol, only on slider head will be fine
- 00:46:079 - Map it out like what I've said, the rhythm is less dense then in Hard :v
- 00:51:079 (4,1) - Stack
- 01:18:635 (2,3) - Try a note on 1/6 and then 1/2 slider instead
- 01:25:412 (2,1) - WHY =.=, i mean you can place it next to the reverse
- 00:56:746 (1) - 01:14:079 (1) - You dont need to follow with the vocal exactly tbh, you can have a denser rhythm (spread)
- 00:22:079 (1) - Curve more! overlapping :v
/me lazy af
OKChaoslitz wrote:
[Easy][Hyper]
- 01:03:412 (2,3,1,2) - The flow is really bad here lol (The angle is too sharp)
- 00:56:746 (1) - You didn't fix this :v
call me back
O.Ohandsome wrote:
really feel like nc should be on here instead 01:08:079 (2) - on top diff
imo u can interpret it different waysxxdeathx wrote:
00:54:079 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - 00:55:412 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - For these the emphasis is on every 3rd note 00:54:079 - 00:54:579 - so you shouldn't arrange the combos and jumps in pairs of 2, but rather groups of 3 like Rizia and Skystar did.
Well, if you listen to the drums, you'll hear the accents which suggest 3 + 3 + 2.Kibbleru wrote:
imo u can interpret it different waysxxdeathx wrote:
00:54:079 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - 00:55:412 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - For these the emphasis is on every 3rd note 00:54:079 - 00:54:579 - so you shouldn't arrange the combos and jumps in pairs of 2, but rather groups of 3 like Rizia and Skystar did.
:V- G I D Z - wrote:
:V
Fixedhandsome wrote:
really feel like nc should be on here instead 01:08:079 (2) - on top diff
Hmm, I'm trying to express the floor toms + snare of the drums here. No change here sry :<xxdeathx wrote:
00:54:079 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - 00:55:412 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - For these the emphasis is on every 3rd note 00:54:079 - 00:54:579 - so you shouldn't arrange the combos and jumps in pairs of 2, but rather groups of 3 like Rizia and Skystar did.