Are you aware that you are trying to turn my statement against me?
Bauxe wrote:Do you really think this would be implemented in a way that causes this?
If this were to be implemented, the speed the circle closes would be faster in order to cover an increased distance in the same period of time.
Im pretty sure we were talking about decreasing the distance and increasing the speed while at it. Please dont use my statements to defend against them.
He said that time stays the same so its not about the time but speed. He also said that he wanted smaller approach circles that go faster not larger.
baraatje123 wrote:It's about the time, not the speed. Also, larger approachcircles will make it go faster, but the time you need to look at it is much shorter
I like this idea
I used edit. You happy now?