1. Hard (2.33 stars, 151 notes)
2. Normal (1.74 stars, 117 notes)
3. Sincerity (3.25 stars, 187 notes)

LixRei wrote:

Eh... well, as for the reason of that: I'm making a jump while keeping distance of (8), (9) and (1)'s reverse the same. It's practically an "Insane" diff, so I can play with spacing a bit, as long as I don't exceed myself (and believe me, jumps like this are good enough for Insane).

For now, I'm glad you liked the map!

1. Exactly because it's low BPM it's good as it is with a simple Normal (I follow main beats a lot, and barely follow vocals).
2. Gap of difficulty between diffs is great. Usually, the gap Normal-Hard is big, but it isn't the case on this set. On the other side, the Hard-Insane gap isn't really that big since the only thing that changes are... more jumps and streams.

kamikin wrote:

Hi hi! Here's my mod!

General

Disable Widescreen Support Whoops, I forgot to disable it on Normal.
I think the hitsounds volume could be lowered 5-10% as they are a bit louder than the music itself Volume is okay IMO, but I'll think about it with more mods (maybe).

Normal

00:00:697 (2) - The repeat does not hit the vocal as the vocal is on 1/6, I suggest this rhythm http://puu.sh/fqb5z/3fe4bb2e2a.jpg biut this might be too complex for a normal so you may just have to make it a a long slider without a repeat Um... actually, I can hear an "sss"-ish sound on the beat, so I assume vocal changes there (on 1/4 tick).
00:05:581 (1,2) - Switch NC as it fits the vocals NC pattern follows strong downbeats, instead of vocals. No change.
00:02:790 (1) - and 00:08:372 (1) - feel strange to be NCs as they dont it the vocals ^
00:10:465 (4) - it looks and flows better, imo, if its placed like so http://puu.sh/fqbIn/9c58aaa772.jpg This is for variety, and it isn't that bad, really.
00:13:255 (2) - this doesn't map anything so may confuse hidden players It's mapped to the singer's breathing. This was necessary to keep a simple rhythm (and I don't really care about players using mods; they know it's harder that way).
00:19:534 (1) - Imperfect blanket Seems to be okay on my end.
00:20:930 (3) - imo, a copied version of 1 would look better I disagree here. Also, this is useful for a change in flow.
00:25:116 (1) - You could use this to make a diamond pattern (e.g. http://puu.sh/fqcbb/fbb3245eb4.jpg) That goes against the intended effect (of moving to the corner).
00:28:604 (3,4,5) - You could try this (there's still around a 0.2 second gap in-between themhttp://puu.sh/fqckV/7cb6a6e2da.jpg I'm following the main beats of instrument here.
00:31:395 (3) - this could be a blanket It -is- a blanket.
00:37:674 (3,4,5) - The same sound is repeated but you use a slider instead, I would use all sliders or all hitcircles I only use the slider at the end 'cause of the 1/12 notes. I had to simplify rhythm somehow, and a slider is the best choice here.
00:38:372 (5) - Turn off grid snap to improve this blanket Okay, should be fixed.
00:43:604 (3) - Imo, this should be a blanket to improve aesthetics ^
00:59:302 (2) - I think this fits the music better on the previous blue tick Sadly, I disagree here.
01:05:232 (2) - This sounds better as a long slider Following main beats.
01:06:976 (1,4) - These would look better as blankets That's the plan, and I can't see blankets wrong. @_@
01:23:720 (1) - this overlaps with 4, I think its hitsound should be a bit quieter as it stands out at the moment Blame Distance Snap. HS volume is okay, it fits the cymbal (and it isn't as strong as a finish).

Hard

00:02:790 (1,2,3) - these could make a triangle I like the way it flows right now.
00:08:023 (5,1) - Flow could be improved imo ^ (drop-off flow, I guess).
00:14:825 (4) - Slight overlap Fixed (overlap could be visible in play mode, tho, since stack).
00:27:790 (1) - This sound a bit strange as a slider Yeah, but I have to hold the sound somehow, to prepare players for next diff.
00:38:372 (5) - Sounds strange... This is okay IMO. Following the 1/12 notes with a simplified 1/6 slider (same as above).
00:58:604 (1) - imperfect blanket Fixed (lol).
01:09:418 (5) - Curving this would keep it consistent with the other slider Too short to make an apparent curve.
01:13:953 (4) - Looks like it should be a blanket Nice catch.
01:20:930 (1,3) - I think it fits the music better to switch combos here It's fine IMO.

Sincerity

00:02:790 (1,2,3,4) - Weird pattern imo, a square would look better This is a partial pentagon (had to delete a note, since unfitting).
00:16:395 (5) - Curved looks better Too short to make a nice curve.
00:32:790 (7) - I think this should not be in the triangle as players wont expect it as they will be following the vocals and this doesnt This isn't a triangle (lol). I'm gradually increasing DS values, using 00:32:093 (3,5,7) - as a "center" of the pattern and 00:32:267 (4,6,8) - are the main jumps.
00:50:232 (1) - Delete this NC or swap it with 00:49:883 (8) - as it feels weird (and would also play weird in Tag on multi player) Y u no like my NC pattern? ;w;
01:18:139 (1,2) - Weird flow It's part of a pattern. I think it's easy to predict the slider will appear there.

I hope you found my mod helpful!

1. 00:00:697 (2) - Eeeh, creo que es mejor que extiendas el slider a la linea blanca, la vocalista canta en la azul pero el ritmo suena medio raro. Además en casos posteriores (ejemplos: 00:06:279 (2) - , 00:11:162 (1) - ) no haces eso.
2. 00:19:534 (1,2,3) - Sugeriria seguir a la voz, ya que es lo que mas "domina" en esa parte, porque al parecer la estas siguiendo desde antes y porque este slider 00:20:930 (3) - empieza en tecnicamente nada. Algo así:
   
   imagen

   
3. 00:58:604 (1,2,3) - Algo confuso y suena extraño el ritmo. La vocalista canta en las lineas azules y tu tratas de mapear algunas partes de eso, no esta mal, pero solo lo haces en algunas partes lo que lo hace inconsistente. Solo lo deberías de hacer en casos en los que encaje bien y manteniendo la consistencia en el ritmo ya que es un normal, no deberia tener mucha complejidad en el ritmo. Yo diria que en esos casos o mappees el beat o a la vocalista. (No es el único, hay varios casos así en el mapa)
4. 01:04:186 (1) - En mi opinion, daria un mejor efecto si le quitaras el repeat y agregaras un circulo en su lugar.
5. 01:08:372 (3,4) - Quedaria mejor con dos sliders 1/2. Encaja mejor con la voz.
   
   No esta mal, pero necesita que mejores el ritmo en general.

1. 00:02:790 (1) - Yo haria esto un slider 1/4 que empieze acá 00:02:616 - . Para ser mas consistente con los sliders del principio.
2. 00:18:837 (3) - Ctrl + g? Crearia un flujo mas interesante.
3. 00:30:610 (7) - Overmappeado! No veo porqué está ahi, no hay nada y no lo hace mas interesante o divertido. Y si dices "la guitarra", el sonido (que es casi inaudible a menos que estes en halftime) no se halla ahi.
4. 00:33:401 (6) - ^
5. 00:38:372 (5) - Deberia acabar en el tick azul, si es que estás siguiendo al sonido del (piano?, no se que es eso).
6. 00:41:773 (8) - Ya tu sabes
7. 00:49:534 (5) - Deberia ser un slider 1/2, suena mal asi como está (Sin mencionar el overmap)
8. 00:53:372 - Deberias de poder agregar una nota acá, la canción es lenta al punto en el que medio beat es suficiente descanso (en mi opinión).
9. 00:59:302 (3) - Te propongo este ritmo que sigue mejor a la vocalista.
   
   imagen

   
10. 01:04:186 (1) - Misma cosa que en el normal.
11. 01:05:232 (3,4) - En mi opinion el slider deberia ir primero, encaja mejor.
    
    Mejor!

1. 00:02:790 (1) - Misma cosa que en el hard
2. 00:04:883 (4) - Creo que un slider 1/2 en vez del circulo quedaria mejor.
3. 00:24:418 (5,1) - Alejalos un poco, para remarcar un poco mas la distancia en el timeline.
4. 00:27:209 (3) - Deberia ser un solo circulo, queda mucho mejor.
5. 00:30:610 (8) - Si... podrias dejarlo ya que es insane pero yo los quitaria.
6. 00:31:220 - Agrega un circulo para el piano.
7. 00:49:534 (5,6,7) - Lo mismo que en el hard, algo tienen los triples que empiezan en tick blanco que no suenan bien la mayoria del tiempo, a menos que la cancion lo tenga.
8. 01:05:058 (4) - Mmm, si quieres mappear ese tick azul recomendaria que dividas el slider en un circulo y un slider 1/2 (Preferiria que no lo hicieras pero bueeeeno). Algo asi:
   
   imagen

   
   
   Good!

Atsuro wrote:

Hola!

M4M desde tu queue

Me enfoco en el ritmo porque es lo unico que se hacer Okay. Aunque por qué modeas primero? */me cry*

[Normal]

1. 00:00:697 (2) - Eeeh, creo que es mejor que extiendas el slider a la linea blanca, la vocalista canta en la azul pero el ritmo suena medio raro. Además en casos posteriores (ejemplos: 00:06:279 (2) - , 00:11:162 (1) - ) no haces eso. Sólo hago eso en el primero porque no existe nada más qué seguir (sólo voz). En el segundo que mencionaste ya hay un beat que puedo seguir, y es aún más evidente que hay algo en el tercero. Créeme, yo también quiero un ritmo constante, pero la canción no lo da ;w; (?)
2. 00:19:534 (1,2,3) - Sugeriria seguir a la voz, ya que es lo que mas "domina" en esa parte, porque al parecer la estas siguiendo desde antes y porque este slider 00:20:930 (3) - empieza en tecnicamente nada. Algo así: Okay. Hice algo así.
   
   imagen

   
3. 00:58:604 (1,2,3) - Algo confuso y suena extraño el ritmo. La vocalista canta en las lineas azules y tu tratas de mapear algunas partes de eso, no esta mal, pero solo lo haces en algunas partes lo que lo hace inconsistente. Solo lo deberías de hacer en casos en los que encaje bien y manteniendo la consistencia en el ritmo ya que es un normal, no deberia tener mucha complejidad en el ritmo. Yo diria que en esos casos o mappees el beat o a la vocalista. (No es el único, hay varios casos así en el mapa) En los casos que mencionaste, en realidad estoy siguiendo un offbeat (00:58:953 - ) y un "snare" (00:59:476 - ). Que las vocales empezaran/terminaran allí era mera coincidencia. Y por los otros casos, pienso que está bien (realmente no suena mal, y es algo fácil de tocar las notas).
4. 01:04:186 (1) - En mi opinion, daria un mejor efecto si le quitaras el repeat y agregaras un circulo en su lugar. Está bien así. Me gusta seguir así este tipo de ritmo.
5. 01:08:372 (3,4) - Quedaria mejor con dos sliders 1/2. Encaja mejor con la voz. (3) es para poner énfasis en el cymbal, no realmente para seguir la voz. En ese combo puse énfasis en los beats de la canción.
   
   No esta mal, pero necesita que mejores el ritmo en general. ;w;

[Hard]

1. 00:02:790 (1) - Yo haria esto un slider 1/4 que empieze acá 00:02:616 - . Para ser mas consistente con los sliders del principio. Honestamente me gusta mejor así. Además, así apoyo el downbeat con un círculo.
2. 00:18:837 (3) - Ctrl + g? Crearia un flujo mas interesante. No busco un "jump" aquí.
3. 00:30:610 (7) - Overmappeado! No veo porqué está ahi, no hay nada y no lo hace mas interesante o divertido. Y si dices "la guitarra", el sonido (que es casi inaudible a menos que estes en halftime) no se halla ahi. No es la guitarra, pero ciertamente hay algo allí, y esto ayuda a simplificar el sonido en cierto modo. (además, yo si oigo la guitarra fuerte y claro, aunque es cierto que no se ubica en ese beat). Pero lo cambiaré con más opiniones.
4. 00:33:401 (6) - ^ Aunque aquí definitivamente hay un beat.
5. 00:38:372 (5) - Deberia acabar en el tick azul, si es que estás siguiendo al sonido del (piano?, no se que es eso). Estoy completamente seguro que el sonido termina en 1/6.
6. 00:41:773 (8) - Ya tu sabes Ya tu sabes (estoy seguro que este no es overmap; aquí hay algo).
7. 00:49:534 (5) - Deberia ser un slider 1/2, suena mal asi como está (Sin mencionar el overmap) ^
8. 00:53:372 - Deberias de poder agregar una nota acá, la canción es lenta al punto en el que medio beat es suficiente descanso (en mi opinión). Necesito la opinión de un BN (Beatmap Nominator) D:
9. 00:59:302 (3) - Te propongo este ritmo que sigue mejor a la vocalista. Me gusta más el actual. ;w;
   
   imagen

   
10. 01:04:186 (1) - Misma cosa que en el normal. (/inserta lo mismo que dije allí)
11. 01:05:232 (3,4) - En mi opinion el slider deberia ir primero, encaja mejor. Nope. Aquí mantengo el sonido del tambor hasta que se desvanece (el slider-slide es útil algunas veces! )
    
    Mejor!

[Sincerity]

1. 00:02:790 (1) - Misma cosa que en el hard Lo mismo que allí dije.
2. 00:04:883 (4) - Creo que un slider 1/2 en vez del circulo quedaria mejor. Seeh. xD
3. 00:24:418 (5,1) - Alejalos un poco, para remarcar un poco mas la distancia en el timeline. Al ponerlo más cerca de lo que debería, crea un poco de desconcentración en los jugadores, y eso es lo que deseo (? Nah, ya en serio: esto lo hago para resaltar un poco el (1), ya que después del salto de 00:23:372 (3,4) - los jugadores están más alerta, y a algunos les quedará claro que el beat está a una distancia de tiempo diferente (a menos que odien los anti-jumps xD).
4. 00:27:209 (3) - Deberia ser un solo circulo, queda mucho mejor. Eh... quisiera "mantenerlo" hasta el momento del fade-out, y por eso lo hice así. Nota que hay una timing section que reduce el volumen al final del slider (hecha para este fin). Reduje el volumen de eso, para evitar overmap-haters
5. 00:30:610 (8) - Si... podrias dejarlo ya que es insane pero yo los quitaria. Em... no. ;w;
6. 00:31:220 - Agrega un circulo para el piano. Agregado.
7. 00:49:534 (5,6,7) - Lo mismo que en el hard, algo tienen los triples que empiezan en tick blanco que no suenan bien la mayoria del tiempo, a menos que la cancion lo tenga. Necesito más opiniones. En serio pienso que hay algo allí.
8. 01:05:058 (4) - Mmm, si quieres mappear ese tick azul recomendaria que dividas el slider en un circulo y un slider 1/2 (Preferiria que no lo hicieras pero bueeeeno). Algo asi: Lo recomiendas pero no quieres que lo haga. Wat (no cambiaré esto, está bien así).
   
   imagen

   
   
   Good!

Eso es todo, buena suerte!

monstrata wrote:

M4M as promised~ Srry it took a while . I hope this helps . It's okay.

[Sincerity]

00:02:441 - Would be nice if you could map a note here instead of slider-end. Had to make this rhythm somehow the same in every diff, as a way of adaptation. Making it the same yet different will have another effect in players.
00:09:767 (3,4,5) - This spacing is really deceptive. Also the flow from 4 to 5 isn't great imo . If this spacing deceives you, you aren't ready to an Insane (lol). As for the flow thingy, I think a jump here is okay.
00:11:686 (2,3) - This part of the song is rather calm, and you use a lot of sliders or spaced-out single circles here. Seems odd to put two circles here rather than just a slider. It simply feels weird to map 00:11:860 (3) - with a slider end.
00:12:558 - This is a good place to start another slider imo. Shorten the previous slider a bit? Um... no. Priority goes to hold the vocal.
00:15:348 - ^ ^
00:20:406 (2,3) - Swap in time-line. Slider into Circle plays better. Wanted 00:20:581 - clickeable since it's a notorious beat.
00:32:093 (4,5,6,7,8) - Are the overlaps necessary? I feel like there are better ways you could have mapped this without being unnecessarily hard to read since the rest of your map doesn't really employ overlaps. B-but I like this! ;w; (and it's a fun pattern).
00:33:488 (1,2,3) - Shorten 1 by 1/2 a beat so you can start 2 at 00:33:837 - . And make 00:34:011 (3) - 1/2 beat longer. 00:34:186 - should have a clickeable thing, since beat is strong. Also, you shouldn't consider 1/4 as 1/2. The fact I'm mapping as double BPM doesn't change the meaning of the snapped notes.
00:37:674 (5,6,7) - Is such a big jump necessary? Main issue is that this jump goes into a repeat slider at 1/12 snap. Sorry, but I don't really consider this to be a long jump. (also, I needed to emphatize that slider somehow, so I increased distance).
00:40:988 (8) - Doesn't really fit imo.... You could map the vocals better without a repeat slider. I don't really think so, and I think it fits perfectly here (and it's also consistent with the other diffs, so why not?).
00:48:139 - Why not have a slider begin here instead? 'Cause extending slider to hold vocals.
00:53:023 - + 00:53:372 - Are really strong beats... And would work really well if you made a jump here. This is alright as it is, since spinner is "relatively" long.
00:59:999 (5,6,7,8) - For the hardest difficulty, this is kind of undermapped... Maybe add another circle at 01:00:872 - ? it mimics a rhythm you have later here: 01:03:837 (6,7,1) - . If there was really something to be mapped there, I would. Placing a circle there seems like overmapping to me.
01:05:058 (4) - Better to have two sliders, second slider beginning at 01:05:406 - imo... I don't think a reverse slider plays that well. I think a reverse slider actually fits. First and last beat follow vocals and reverse avoids the possibility to skip another beat.
01:09:418 (7) - Not going to put two circles here? Actually, not.
01:21:976 (3,4,5) - Might want to check the blankets here. Fixed those I think are wrong.

[Hard]

00:10:813 - Should be a circle and slider should begin at 00:11:162 - . Take out repeat and move the slider to where the old slider should have ended. Holding vocal. Honestly, I kinda hate doing this, but since I'm extending slider to hold a certain sound, I think it's okay.
00:19:534 (1,2,3) - Spacing's a bit uneven for me... Blame Grid Snap Fixed.
00:25:813 - No circle here? You just mapped the same sound to 00:22:325 (1,2,3,4,5) - , so when the piano plays here, I kind of expect there to be a circle since the part right before with the same piano sound was mapped to circles. I'm using a slider to hold the piano key. Just by seeing slider length you can stop expecting a circle.
00:32:441 (4) - Make this repeat? Placed a circle on 00:32:790 - instead.
00:39:418 (2,3,4,5,6) - I don't see why the circles here need to be stacked. Especially for 5, 6, because the vocals change between the two notes (so clicking the same location plays a bit odd). I'm simply repeating the same pattern. I didn't made that for vocals, but for the beats of song in background.
00:43:081 - No circle here? Holding vocal.
00:45:174 (2,3,4) - Sudden difficulty jump during a "calm" part of the song... How about just a slider instead? Wanted 00:45:348 - clickeable, and a 1/8 slider is very short. Without a reverse, it might be very confusing. So, stream.
00:53:023 - Same as Sincerity. Strong beats here that should be mapped. You can end the spinner a bit earlier imo.. Ending the spinner early is far more unfitting IMO.
01:13:779 (3,4) - Check blanket. I didn't really wanted a blanket here, but oh well.

[Normal]

00:04:883 (4) - Slider here? There are more notes here to map, and imo mapping the rhythm is more important here than following the pentagon pattern. After the first complex combo, I want a simple rhythm here as plain mercy.
00:08:372 (1,2,3,4) - Tidy up this pattern? 1, 2, 3 are an equilateral triangle, but 4 just looks out of place... It was the only way to keep a nice flow. Flow > Aesthetics.
00:13:255 (2,3) - Repeat slider? Not fitting.
00:42:558 (2) - Repeat slider doesn't map well here imo... The note is at 00:43:081 - Which isn't covered by the repeat. Maybe just a full slider instead here? I'm mapping an almost inaudible sound to keep a simple rhythm. I didn't wanted to do this, but no ideas came into my mind for another thing. ;w;
00:55:813 (1,2) - Check blanket. Seems to be okay.

Kazamastar11 wrote:

from my queue

I cancelled the template lol,.. Maybe next time

[Normal]
00:23:372 (3,5) - I suggest you to rearrange this, i prefer without stack Um... I don't think so. Song kinda suggests stacking IMO.
00:50:406 (1) - Use sampleset Normal Soft finish best finish (for this).
01:23:720 (1) - Remove this NC Nope. I'll keep NCs constant, even if there isn't anything else (also, it helps to emphatize the beat and to balance drain).

Good diff >< Nice song ! Thanks! (^w^)/
[Hard]
00:23:372 (3,5) - Rearrange, avoid stack No.
00:38:372 (5) - Huh ? I suggest you to change this to 1 circle Following instrument beats (how's that instrument even called? Idfk).
00:50:406 (1) - Use sampleset Normal No.
01:19:186 (3) - x: 256 y: 148 Want to keep stack. ;w;
01:23:720 (1) - Remove NC No.

I won't check Sincerity because, I think it's for Insane diff..
Sorry for short mod ! Take my star !

Good luck~

WildOne94 wrote:

Awww man give some kudos to people D:
They worked hard to mod your beatmap >.<
Even if you didn't like all of it.
i can still see you agreed with some suggestions which improved the beatmap so it's nice to give them kudos to people ;w;.
(Don't KD this)

• Normal

1. consider changing OD to 4.
2. move 00:10:465 (4) to X:400, Y:148 so you can stack 00:09:069 (2,1) .
   i thought it flowed well and blankets looked nice. nice job!

• Hard

1. 00:49:534 (5,1) - move to same X coordiante.
   there isnt much to say. the map looks done to me. sounded nice and flowed well in my opinion.

• Sinceriy
  I liked what you have done. looks like a solid map to me.

[Dominic] wrote:

Hello! mod request from my mod queue!
Please remember that the mods I make are nothing more than suggestions. do not feel the need to change anything/everything I mention.

• Normal

1. consider changing OD to 4. Considered, but it kinda breaks the difficulty balance. No change.
2. move 00:10:465 (4) to X:400, Y:148 so you can stack 00:09:069 (2,1) . Oh, cool idea.
   i thought it flowed well and blankets looked nice. nice job!

• Hard

1. 00:49:534 (5,1) - move to same X coordiante. Done.
   there isnt much to say. the map looks done to me. sounded nice and flowed well in my opinion.

• Sinceriy
  I liked what you have done. looks like a solid map to me. That's great!

That's it for my short mod. I may not have found many problems due to lack of modding experience, but, Overall, I liked the maps very much and didn't see any reason to change much.
Good luck getting this ranked!

1. 00:00:697 (2) - i don't get this rhythm somehow, like you skipped a entire vocal, i know you are following the vocal but dont skip vocals,there is a vocal sound at 00:01:046 , plz add a rhythm to that, whatever you use, sliders will be the best, circles are ok too
2. 00:06:279 (2) - now somehow you starting to ignoring the vocal, i see you followed the vocal in the previous part, but... y you are ignoring vocals now, in normal rhythm still matters
3. 00:28:255 (2,3) - better have a 1/4 rhythm here because the bpm is not fast, and a 1/2 over lap after a 1/2 would let new player get confuse
4. 00:37:674 (3,4,5) - i think this is too hard for new players, you want them to be all stacked or all ds because this is all 1/2
5. 00:42:558 (2,3) - confused rhythm, isnt following the vocal,try this
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 01:23:895 (1) - spinner ends at a 1/6 at 01:26:744 (for all diff)

1. 00:02:616 - missing a vocal rhythm
2. 00:03:837 - missing a piano rhythm
3. 00:27:790 (1) - i think this is a 1/12 rhythm
4. 00:29:302 (4) - 1/4 plz
5. 00:38:372 (5) - same,why people skip 1/6 (1/12 here)this days

1. 7.6 is nice no need to ar 8
2. i feel the kiai is too empty for this diff, maybe you shouls fill in more 1/2 jumps(1/4 jumps) for this diff here,follow the instrument and drums not vocal only, it is the highest difficulty if its nothing different than the Hard diff then y you r doing it
3. this diff has the best quality among all the diffs though lol

pkhg wrote:

m4m o/ \o

[General]
Las vocals en esta parte estan mal 00:01:220 - deberian empezar en el tick amarillo 00:01:308 - Lo mismo aca 00:06:802 - P-pero juro que puedo oir la s de "sana" (chiisana) en 00:01:220 - y la b de "be" (narabeteru) en 00:06:802 - (o al menos, la parte menos audible de la vocal empieza en los ticks azules).
00:55:813 - 01:20:930 - En esta seccion seria mucho mejor si reemplazaras las claps que pusiste en el 2 y 4 tick de cada measure con un Normal sampleset+additions soft whistle :3 Buena idea! (pensé que los drum-clap serían suficientes, pero esto me gusta más). Aunque no me convence el soft-whistle, así que no agregaré ese...
Me encanto la cancion <3 <3

[Sincerity]
Podrias usar hp6, es algo molesto el drain con HR, podrias bajar el od en -1 tambien Okayyyy (aunque nadie dijo nada en Tsuki Akari, logre rankear eso con HP7 ) /me runs~*

00:04:883 (4) - Quita la clap de aca, solo esta el sonido del piano
00:07:674 (4) - ^
00:10:465 (4) - ^ Es mejor si la usas en el segundo tick blanco de cada measure. Usalo para todas las diffs si aceptas Aplicadas esta y las de arriba. o/
00:41:773 (9) - Seria mejor si borraras este, le daria mas enfasis a las vocals que es lo que principalmente sigues. Ademas pienso que no deberias usar triplets antes del kiai, no van muy bien ademas de que -almenos yo- no puedo escuchar nada que justifique su uso. En el kiai se entiende mejor porque la cancion es mas fuerte. Solo es mi opinion, no es necesario que lo hagas :p Aunque yo sí oigo algo...
00:42:558 (2,3,4) - No le veo mucho sentido al jump del (2) al (3). Es mejor del (3) al (4) porque asi enfatizas mejor las vocals imo Habría un overlap si acorto la distancia; por eso el jump...
00:49:622 (6,10) - Podrias borrar esas, asi sigues mejor el piano y mantienes lo "calmado" de la cancion en esta parte Okay.
01:05:232 - Es mejor si haces de esto algo clickable Usando slider para mantener vocal (seeeh, hay una reversa, pero no importa :3).

[Hard]
Lo mismo de los triplets que dije en Sincerity Arreglados como en aquélla diff.

00:32:441 (4,5) - No le veo mucho sentido al jump :d Yo digo que la siguiente nota es algo relevante (en piano), aunque lo pensaré con más opiniones.
00:49:534 (5,1) - ya sabes Yeeeahhh.
01:05:232 (2,3) - podrias darle ctrl+g, sigue mejor la nota sostenida aca 01:05:232 Creo que en realidad 01:05:581 - debería de ser clickeable, ya que paso de seguir la vocal a los tambores otra vez (además de que es un tick blanco).

[Normal]

00:13:255 (2,3,1) - Podrias intentar algo asi. Imagino que un flujo mas lineal se hace mas sencillo para los newbies Okay, hice algo así.
00:25:116 (1,3) - El hitburst del (1) podria cubrir al (3). Solo lo señalo por si acaso, hay una buena diferencia en tiempo entre las notas y no creo que sea un problema A ver que opinan los BN después...
00:36:279 (1,2) - Un pequeño error de spacing Este está bien. La distancia es de 1.23x, lo que significa que aún es constante con 1.20x (sólo es un pequeño margen de error).
00:40:465 (3,4,1) - Estas overlappean mucho, podrian ser algo confusas Pienso que la diferencia de tiempo de las notas y el NC servirán para hacer esto menos confuso, pero a ver que dicen otros jugadores...

Eso seria todo, suerte

ByBy_ChAn wrote:

Hi ~ Can I say something ? o3<

The spinner from all diffs is very louder =/ and also it's unsnapped and it should be snapped on blue tick , not between blue and yellow tick and about the volume of the spinner , add a green line where the spinner ends(after you snapped it)with 5% volume After hearing this several times with slower Playback Rate, I found it actually it's ending on the right place (snapped to 1/6). As for the volume, it's okay, since there's a relatively loud cymbal.

Some suggestions about Sincerety diff

In this diff , there's some weird patterns and flow example : 00:00:697(1,2)- You can make the first slider more curve like this : http://puu.sh/gfzzI/999147f076.jpg (did this since yeah, it's better aesthetically and flow-wise) and in some parts ( on all diffs ) you forgot to put whistle and finish example : in normal diff : 00:19:534(1)- At the slider's head it's whistle but you forgot to put finish . Maybe you should :3 Oh, yeah. I thought of placing a finish here on the first place, but it sounds a bit more weird with it (whistle is practically inaudible with the loud finish). So now, I'm just using the whistle to emphatize the piano instead. :3

Well I hope I helped you and sorry for this poor mod ;w;

Good Luck ~