coincidence?
no.
no.
[general][insane]
- 01:21:827 (1,5) - new combos should be switched. right now combostuff gets off by a measure. i dunno how to describe it but you probably know what i mean right
- 01:23:745 (6,7) - sounds a lot better ctrl+g'd. the two drum hits at 01:24:269 - are just louder repeated versions of the drum hits at 01:23:920 - so mapping them with the same poitns of emphasis makes sense. tail of 6 is also the same sound you mapped with clickablethings at 01:21:129 (3) - 01:22:524 (3) - so
- 00:07:176 (3,4,5) - shouldnt spacing from 4->5 be larger than 3->4 since you're emphasizing the same beat as 5 everywhere else does that even maek esnese
- 00:26:885 (3,4,5) - ^yea just comparing to 00:24:094 (3,4,5) -
- 01:11:710 (10,1) - strong vocal and instrumental on 1, yet it's the smallest spacing in the entire section. makes sense larger
rarely see 2 measure comboing on insanes anymore lol
- nice !!
- !
- !
- 00:08:397 (1,3) - shouldn't new combos be switched
- 00:50:780 (6,1,2,3) - mixing 1/1 and 1/2 gaps on normals is something we don't do i thought, especially this close together. considering this is the only 1/1 gap it kind of stands out so would make sense to just space it properly
- 01:19:908 (1,2) - would make sense to swap new combos here since 2 is the start of the next phrase, not 1
cool
- widescreen support tho
- 00:01:245 - 00:04:036 - not getting why there's a break during the second one while the first one is mapped and they're the same thing consistencyeueyeye. normal repeats the same rhythm so it's gud
- 00:23:222 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - 00:34:385 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - music just repeats for these two combos, yet you mapped one to the drums and the other to the vocals. aside from these sections, you emphasized vocals, so changing the two places that ignore the vocals here would fit
alsocool