1. osu! forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked/Approved Beatmaps
show more
posted

Gray Veyron wrote:

Hello, sorry for a huge delay from some weeks, but ticket is now used here~

: I gave this a star icon because i can see great potential on this set, with good quality too, great job!
[> General <]
  1. - I think there's a gap between Hard and Insane, 2.78 stars > 4 stars. Maybe you should make the Insane a little easier. The stars among the three diffs are 1.11 and 1.22,I think it's no problem
  2. - On what i see, the background is a little low quality. I've modified the pixels and some strokes, so this might fit your map a little better. Fixed,thank you very much :D
  3. - Really fine!


[> Normal <]
  1. 00:10:384 (2) - Since this is the easiest diff in the set, i guess this kind of slider is not allowed. Because it overlaps small part of the body, might be a little complex for beginners.
  2. 00:56:636 (1) - Almost the same reason as above.
  3. 01:18:242 (1,2) - I'm not sure, but this overlap would also count.
  4. - Sorry for being a little picky on few overlaps, but quite a great diff!
    All fixed


[> Hard <]
  1. 00:14:669 (4,1) - Would sound better if you Ctrl + G this rhythm, this might emphasize much more with the song track. I prefer the original
  2. 00:22:351 (4,5) - Ehh, i think this jump looks quite too big for a Hard diff... i guess... I think it's fine,not very hard because the speed is slow
  3. 00:49:494 (3) - I don't think this 1/4 reverse arrow follows anything on the song track, you may remake this slider as 1/2 or either add some notes for a better rhythm. Really?I think it follows well
  4. - Some rhythms, btw this diff looks nice to play imo~


[> Insane <]
  1. 00:23:243 (4) - Kinda the same reason as Hard, a little off-beat imo. Fixed
  2. 00:32:350 (1,2,3) - Idk, but this anti-jump is a little awkward... How about moving one of these sliders? to keep the player's cursor active in Insane diffs. I want to keep these
  3. 00:38:422 (5) - Likely minor, but curve this slider above instead of below? Reduced the radians of 00:37:350 (3,4,5) -,they look better now
  4. 00:40:565 (4) - Ctrl + G? might improve playstyle performance. Tried but no change,don't like this flow :(
  5. 01:07:707 (6,1) - The spacing here looks a little sudden, since you've used bigger spacings previously. Maybe you should balance this one a little more. I want to keep these
  6. - Well, above mods are just suggestions... GJ with this diff!

Nice map~ get me back when you're done~ :D
Thank you very much~
posted
I guess this is ready-to-go! I'm feeling anxious about the gap between Hard and Insane, i hope your reasons are acceptable. Have this bubble ~

Next BN: Try to check as deep as possible before qualifying/popping. The mapping is great, but it's probably a worrisome to me.
posted

Gray Veyron wrote:

I guess this is ready-to-go! I'm feeling anxious about the gap between Hard and Insane, i hope your reasons are acceptable. Have this bubble ~

Next BN: Try to check as deep as possible before qualifying/popping. The mapping is great, but it's probably a worrisome to me.
Thank you very much~ :)
posted
Another bubbled-since-a-long-time masterpiece here. The low SV and the overall approach are extremely emotional and charming.
I hope I can qualify it soon :3
posted
i don't think the metronomes are 100% accurate (yeah i know we can't have /8th) but i think
00:07:350 - should be 5/4
00:09:492 - should be removed
..?
no idea https://musescore.com/user/1285146/scores/632126 is pretty weird and sometimes conflicting what's in this set. Does anyone even care..?
posted

Okoratu wrote:

i don't think the metronomes are 100% accurate (yeah i know we can't have /8th) but i think
00:07:350 - should be 5/4 Fixed
00:09:492 - should be removed Fixed
..?
no idea https://musescore.com/user/1285146/scores/632126 is pretty weird and sometimes conflicting what's in this set. Does anyone even care..?
Thank you~
posted
as i said i am not even sure, I'll leave that up to desp because he showed interest in pushing this xD
posted
The change to 5/4 is correct. I will check the rest of the timing carefully again when I'm at home, however I don't think there are more changes necessary. This song switches between various time signatures, some of them are not supported by osu! (for example 9/4), but the Ranking Criteria says that "If an incorrect time signature would last for more than 2 bars, add another timing section to fix it.". That means if a few measures don't have the correct time signature it won't be too big of an issue.

EDIT: https://musescore.com/user/1285146/scores/632126 I will use this as a reference to check if the timing is accurate when I'm at home. (Although the authors of that sheet seem to be confused as well because some measures under 6/4 time signature randomly have 7/4 of content, but I will just try to time the map so that the barlines are identical to the sheet.)
posted
Alright so I checked with the sheet and the map's current timing is acceptable. There are some time signatures that differ but it's on very confusing spots of the composition (the artist most likely didn't care about time signatures at all) and the sheet is not official so the map's time signatures are equally correct.

Give me a sign and I'll rebubble.
posted
Rebubbled :3
Try to call Veyron for heart icon.. I hope for you that he will be available (but please don't let the mapset die again ;w;)
posted

Desperate-kun wrote:

Rebubbled :3
Try to call Veyron for heart icon.. I hope for you that he will be available (but please don't let the mapset die again ;w;)
Thank you very much~
posted
This is a great map !
Gogo!
posted
Yes, really Great and Interesting indeed!

GO GO GO
posted
Good Luck! here my star!
posted
[General]
  1. Let's refrain from using using pure white combo colors. This is to prevent strobing issues during the kiai section.
  2. "√A" might not be needed in the tags, since it is already in the source.
  3. Any proof for the metadata? What I've found is http://marv.jp/special/tokyoghoul/music.html and the artist should be "österreich". Not sure about the title though, but I think it should be without (TV edit).

[Hard & Insane]
  1. 01:22:884 - Useless greenline above the redline, while have a conflicting volume.

Haven't actually checked the whole set, but popping the bubble for now due to these issues. Contact the original nominator for further moving.
posted

Sonnyc wrote:

[General]
  1. Let's refrain from using using pure white combo colors. This is to prevent strobing issues during the kiai section.
  2. "√A" might not be needed in the tags, since it is already in the source.
  3. Any proof for the metadata? What I've found is http://marv.jp/special/tokyoghoul/music.html and the artist should be "österreich". Not sure about the title though, but I think it should be without (TV edit).

[Hard & Insane]
  1. 01:22:884 - Useless greenline above the redline, while have a conflicting volume.

Haven't actually checked the whole set, but popping the bubble for now due to these issues. Contact the original nominator for further moving.
All fixed except the third point.

Thank you very much~ :D
posted
Oh good that there's an accurate title. Any explanations for "oesterreich"?
posted
Yes.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germanic_umlaut

Historically an o with an e on top morphed into the umlaut ö hence this romanisation
posted
Revived? O.O why it still in graveyard nvm
posted
Nominated.
show more
Please sign in to reply.