neonat wrote:

General

Your difficulty setttings are quite weird, I will elaborate further for each difficulty later forgot to fix them after some checks

Normal

AR0 -> AR3 ok
00:19:379 (2,3) - you can blanket them they are already
00:36:045 (1) - that custom finish doesn't really suit here really, use Soft sampleset finish at the start of the slider ok
00:44:379 (3,1) - you can avoid all unnecessary slight overlaps by being more precise: done

01:17:712 (4,1) - this is just one example, many of the 'blankets' aren't really exactly curving around each other perfectly done this and same other
01:19:101 (2,3) - ^
01:29:379 (1) - same as 00:36:045 (1)
01:33:268 (4,1) - avoid overlapping
01:47:156 (1) - same as 00:36:045 (1)
02:04:934 (1) - that 1 beat rest after the spinner is not ample enough time in Normal, make the gap much longer made gap twice longer

The sliders need to be made nicer, they don't curve around each other nicely, and the blankets are bad. Rework the sliders and ensure their smooth curves around each other. It would look much neater I will recheck this in free time

Hard

AR0 -> AR 5 or 6 made 6
HP6 -> HP5 ok

00:18:268 (1) - soft sampleset finish added
00:21:323 (3,1) - avoid overlapping them done
00:29:795 (2,4) - this doesn't look nice being overlapped fixed, idk why I have that
00:32:156 (3) - having this object placed behind the previous slider, the flow isn't very good, and the movement is not smooth and it doesn't really look very nice fixed
00:33:268 (6,4) - avoid overlap done
00:35:906 (7) - this sounds off really I've checked this in 25% before mapping, sounds nice.
00:39:240 (3,4) - like Normal, your blankets using the body of sliders are off and ugly, needs to be more perfectly curved around the objects fixed all noted as overlaps and bad blankets
00:42:156 (10,1) - ^
00:50:490 (4) - use a simpler more perfect curve (3 point slider) done
00:51:601 (1,2) - blanket better
01:11:601 (1) - same as 00:18:268 (1) for the slider head
01:11:601 (1,5) - don't overlap
01:23:268 (2,4) - blanket better
01:29:379 (1) - same as 01:11:601 (1)
01:33:823 (1,2,4) - don't overlap
01:37:156 (5,1) - the blankets really need relooking, every single one of them
01:38:268 (1,3) - don't overlap them
01:47:156 (1) - same as 01:11:601 (1)
01:50:490 (3,4) - weird overlapping, doesn't look good
02:01:045 (2,3) - don't overlap this way
02:02:712 (1,4) - don't overlap
02:04:934 (1) - same as 01:11:601 (1)

I honestly feel the presentation for the difficulties isn't really good, it's quite bad and the map just looks messy.

The curves need to be rounder and smoother, like for 01:38:268 (1) it should be smoother like:

They need to look like they actually go around nicely around the other object

Insane

AR9 -> AR 8 done
HP6 -> HP7 don't know about this, cause I feeling this too much

Same suggestions about the soft sampleset finish for those sections done

You still need to make the blankets better and smoother, and avoid overlaps such as 00:27:156 (1,3) and 01:20:490 (3,5) as noted before I'll check

You don't need to use many NCs for parts like 00:35:906 (5,1,1) - it's not needed and it's quite spammy once in map I may use it

00:42:573 (2,3) - take note of your spacings, make this more even with 00:42:434 (1,2)

00:43:823 (7,8,1) - this isn't really good flow, and hiding the head of 00:44:379 (1) doesn't really look nice

Shapes like 01:17:573 (7) are not really good, the edges are raw and look hastily done

Improve the simple blankets as well, like 01:29:379 (1,2)




Overall, the slider shapes need to be much better, the blanketing isn't working right now. Correct the Difficulty Settings and ensure a gradual increase in difficulty, the AR wasn't even changed for Normal and Hard. Work on the placements and have less unnecessary overlaps, they undermine the presentation and structure of the map.



Good Luck

-Mo- wrote:

Hey, Mod4Mod coming from #modreqs.

Normal
- 00:28:545 (3) - This blanket could be improved; you can see that it is off. Perhaps consider moving it around too so that the flow from 00:27:990 (2) is improved? fixed
- 00:32:434 (2) - This blanket isn't perfect. If you reverse 00:31:601 (1) and view it from [00:31:531], you can see how it compares to an appropriate approach circle. removed blanket
- 00:33:823 (1) - This curve doesn't look too good since you've made it too sharp. I would shallow the curve of this slider so it's smoother. slider have blanket with 00:31:601 (1)
- 00:36:045 (1,3) - Try and avoid having these touching. fixed
- 00:41:323 (2,3) - The spacing is inconsistent between these. fixed
- 00:41:601 (3,1) - Try and have the gap between these be consistent. It's kinda barely noticable, but you can see that's it's not quite perfect. Sorry for being a bit pedantic here. tried to fix

Image

- 00:44:934 (1,2) - As above. tried to fix
- 00:47:156 (1) - This blanket could be improved [00:46:809]. If you look at it from that timestamp, you can see how it compares to the approach circle. fixed
- 01:12:434 (2) - This blanket could be improved. It's currently touching 01:11:601 (1) which should be avoided. fixed
- 01:13:823 (1) - This curve seems to have the same problem as 00:33:823 (1) where the curve doesn't look smooth. The blanket isn't perfect either, if you view it from [01:13:511]. fixed
- 01:22:712 (1) - This blanket isn't quite perfect [01:22:712]. fixed
- 01:24:934 (1) - As above [01:24:656]. You can reverse this slider so that the tail is locked so that it doesn't mess with the blanket from 01:24:379 (4). tried to fix
- 01:29:379 (1) - As above [01:30:073]. tried to fix
- 01:33:823 (1) - As before about the curve being too sharp on the slider. tried to fix
- 01:35:490 (4,1) - Same problem as 00:41:601 (3,1) where the gap between these isn't consistent. fixed
- 01:44:656 (1,2,3) - The spacing between these isn't consistent. fixed
- 01:53:268 (4,1) - Try and avoid these touching. fixed

Sorry about the mod of this difficulty being pretty pedantic on the blankets. Other than that it looks pretty good. I understand, that's well what you pay attention to this.

Hard
- AIMod: 02:20:212 (6) - Object end isn't snapped. fixed
- 00:18:545 (2,3) - The spacing seems to be inconsistent here and it's causing these to touch. fixed
- 00:29:240 (1,2) - This is poor polarity and is difficult to read the timing. about polarity - during testplays none of testers said what that was bad, I'll keep it as is for now unless some BAT will say what that's need to fix
- 00:31:462 (1) - As above.
- 00:36:462 (1) - As above.
- 00:38:129 (1) - As above.
- 00:38:268 (2) - This blanket isn't quite perfect [00:38:268]. Try and use just one slider point if possible. fixed a bit
- 00:39:240 (3) - As before about polarity.
- 00:40:906 (2) - As above.
- 00:42:156 (6,1) - As before about the gap between them being inconsistent. tried to fix
- 00:45:906 (3) - As before about polarity.
- 00:47:573 (2) - As above.
- 00:51:462 (5) - As above.
- 00:51:601 (1) - As blanket could be improved. fixed
- 00:53:823 (8) - Perhaps a new combo to add effect, and since you're using a new hitsound? fixed
- 01:15:490 (5) - Perhaps balance this slider so that it's symmetrical about the centre? fixed
- 01:21:462 (2) - As before about polarity.
- 01:24:934 (1) - I'm guessing this blanket gave you quite a bit of trouble, but it's still not perfect, as seen from [01:24:726]. fixed
- 01:28:962 (5,6,7) - This section has barely audible hitsounds. Since you're switching to the soft soundset anyway, I don't think it's necessary to lower the volume. I'll enlarge sound volume here
- 01:38:268 (1) - I don't like how this slider looks. Perhaps balance it out by having it be symmetrical? fixed a bit
- 01:39:934 (4,5,1) - This isn't a perticularly nice overlap. I would suggest doing something else other than this. I like this as is
- 01:49:379 (1) - This blanket isn't quite perfect [01:49:031]. fixed
- 01:53:823 (1) - As above [01:52:816]. fixed
- 02:06:601 (5) - This slider looks kind of lop-sided. Try using just one slider point to keep it as smooth as possible. I like this as is

The main issue here is the polarity. Although it fits the music, the rhythm is pretty hard to play for someone who's not familiar with the song, and will result in a lot of 50s by players hitting the note too early or too late, and then having that confuse them for the rhythm for the rest of the combo. The section after the break is much easier to play since there are less hanging blue-tick notes. as noted before

Insane
- 00:21:601 (4) - This blanket isn't quite perfect [00:21:184]. fixed
- 00:25:768 (4) - Perhaps balanced this so that it is symmetrical? fixed
- 00:27:156 (1,3) - Avoid having these touch. fixed
- 00:35:906 (5,1,1) - Not too sure about this. Since it's on 1/8 timing, it might be a bit difficult to read. I think a slider would be better. made slider
- 00:36:879 (3,5) - These aren't perfectly stacked. fixed
- 00:49:379 (3,5) - As above. fixed

This difficulty seems to have the opposite problem to Hard. The first section was very well done in terms of rhythm. However,

- 01:11:601 (1) - 01:46:879 (4) - This section is just very hard to read since all of your combos start and end on blue ticks, whilst missing all of the upbeats. The upbeats are pretty important to cover since this is a percussion heavy song. Although it makes sense to the song, it's pretty difficult to follow this sort of rhythm, and results in prematurely hitting almost every single combo in this section. I would highly recommend remapping this section to cover all of the white notes and pay good attention to the video I linked earlier about polarity. Since this may result in changing a lot of this section, I won't be giving a more in-depth mod of this section lest it becomes obsolete after you fix the rhythm. as noted before, I've asked for lot of testplays (about 10, not sure) and none said what they feeling confused or so, keeping as is

- 01:48:406 (2,3,4) - Try and make a perfect equilateral triangle from this. tried to fix
- 01:51:601 (1,2,3) - Keep the spacing consistent, or if you want a jump, consider stacking 2 on 3. fixed
- 01:55:629 (3,4,5) - Try and make a perfect equilateral triangle from this. fixed
- 01:59:101 (4) - This blanket isn't perfect [01:58:649]. fixed
- 02:02:295 (4,5) - This spacing is inconsistent. fixed
- 02:11:184 (3,4,5) - Keep the spacing consistent between these. lowered jumps
- 02:14:518 (3,4,5) - As above. there will be overlap in any way if I'll do that
- 02:17:156 (1) - Perhaps something like this? I like it as is
[/box]
- 02:20:490 (1,2,3) - I think this is kinda difficult to read. Perhaps something like this (3 is stacked below the tail of 2)? I like it as is
[/box]

The first part of this difficulty is really well done and pretty fun to play. Unfortunately it's let down by the rest of the difficulty. I know that you can improve this to the expected standard though, given that you mapped the first section pretty well.

Best of luck

Sonnyc wrote:

Normal modding.

Normal:

00:29:379 (1,2) - This small overlap can be removed. fixed
00:36:045 (1,3) - ^ fixed
00:41:323 (2,3) - Keep the spacing please. fixed
01:29:101 (4) - This object is really hard to hear. Suggesting to set the volume as 40%, and adding a whistle. reworked this part in another way
Hard:

01:24:795 (6,1) - This jump is way too much. ctrl+G (1) will work better. fixed in another way
01:28:962 - Volume 40% please. reworked this part in another way
02:04:379 (5) - Spacing. fixed

Insane:

00:27:156 (1,3) - Better fixing this overlap. fixed
00:29:379 (1,2) - Are you sure about this jump?? fixed
00:30:212 (4) - Keep spacingp please. fixed
00:35:976 (1,1) - Imo there isn't much need for a combo spam to let players notice this is an 1/8... fixed
00:48:545 (8) - Shouldn't the whistle be in the head instead of the slide? I hear song part on slide
01:12:851 (6) - Add a new combo to increase readability. fixed
Personally other than this, there were more objects that lack readability such as 01:17:295 (6)- 01:24:518 (8)- 01:26:740 (3)- 01:30:629 (4) etc because such anti jumps felt quite sudden comparing with the song. Would be better if you can add new combo for those too. added a lot of nc
02:14:656 (4,5) - Imo this jump didn't seem to work well. fixed

Imo adding a new difficulty to fill the gap between Normal and Hard would be better for your spread.