forum

Rank Join.

posted
Total Posts
40
This is a feature request. Feature requests can be voted up by supporters.
Current Priority: +107
Topic Starter
lehmakari
Example : Only rank # 199,999 below is allowed
Custom rank
this can be turn on and off

You guys dont get it.? uhh.. Example i created a GAME IN MULTIPLAYER If i enabled rank join This can be editable....
deadbeat
is this for multiplayer?
Sea_Food

deadbeat wrote:

is this for multiplayer?
No i think he means that peppy should have a feature that for example only people who are rank 100k or better are allowed to play single or multi. The game would be locked for others. What do you think is it for MP or not?


But yeah this actually sounds like a good idea. Filtering people from up and down so that games are more fair. But honestly since rank is subjective to others and pp2 is objective, i think it should be based on pp instead of rank. Or maybe have option for both if the host cant visualize other.
Deimos

Sea_Food wrote:

deadbeat wrote:

is this for multiplayer?
No i think he means that peppy should have a feature that for example only people who are rank 100k or better are allowed to play single or multi. The game would be locked for others. What do you think is it for MP or not?
How does it even make sense?

How do you want to get better if you are not allowed to play single or multi.


As deadbeat menitioned:

Create a multiplayer lobby and add a requirement like: only #5.000 or better are allowed to join the lobby
Topic Starter
lehmakari
Yes it is for multiplayer
Bladesu
I actually thought about the same thing for a while...
Charize
Really don't like this idea. Actual skill is often not accurate to rank or PP.
I get PP because i really push for full combo on songs. But if i played many different songs without really beating down for full combo I would not have nearly the same PP. Aswell as those who "PP farm" with double time hard maps can get alot more than other players of the same skill.

Are you then saying the farming player has to play on servers with more skilled players or make his own server. Unecessary :/
Put the difficulity of maps you play in the lobby name and let players decide their skill by them selves.
You can always kick or just make him play with mods as a handicap.

It could some more detailed stats as to the recommended rank based on the players in it. Like average or median value. Now you basically only see lowest and highest. Which could be inacurate.
Yukiteru Amano
I would love this option! :)
Golterboose
Would be a good option, but what if i want to play with the pro players in ctb XD
Bara-

Zenmetsu wrote:

Would be a good option, but what if i want to play with the pro players in ctb XD
Ask Yukiteru Amano


I like this.
I hate it when I'm playing taiko, and a low rank comes in (5 k is low for me), and can't keep up with it, and then starts complaining about the map
Flanster
I guess it can be useful to filter higher ranked players not to overpower the rest. Sure.
FrzR
Would be great. +1 :D
Lach
Oh man, I can see it now.

Game name: SNOW WHITE BATTLE ME
Minimum rank: #1

Forever empty room. I suppose if this were added a measure could be taken to prevent people setting the minimum rank above their own, but I still don't think this is a very good idea. If someone is having trouble they should perhaps try finding another room with players around their skill level instead.
haha5957
looks ok for me

some obviously use multi to kinda compete random others and those kind of people will not want to compete #100 when you're #10000 because they most likely are gonna lose.

if this can't be room specific making this as a channel (some other games, say like ~#300000, ~#100000, ~#50000, ~#20000, ~#5000, #4999+ and etc) should also work too imo

a person with #8000 making room "#7999 or below only" looks little stupid but can be prevented anyways.


and if you think you have undeserving rank in either lower/higher way you are somehow wrong. you being #7800 doesnt mean you are better than #7801 or #7802 but you probably are better than #12000.
Pawsu
like loliflan said, as long as it doesn't overpower it...
some dude wants to play harder maps, but all the rooms are ranks lower than him, and he isn't able to join! that'd be really...uh, upsetting, i guess
Karuta-_old_1

haha5957 wrote:

looks ok for me

and if you think you have undeserving rank in either lower/higher way you are somehow wrong. you being #7800 doesnt mean you are better than #7801 or #7802 but you probably are better than #12000.
no, I am rank 5k and I can't beat some of the 20k out there
Ethelon
Sure rank doesn't precisely pinpoint how skilled you are at any given time, but having default rank categories gets closer.

You don't have to give the player the option of setting the rank requirement.
In application you'd be setting a category based on the following default minimum requirements (arbitrary numbers):
#250,000+
#250,000
#100,000
#50,000
#25,000

(I'm not going any lower because I assume that there are much less players at these ranks randomly looking for multiplayer games outside of friend groups)
You could also allow players to set boundaries between requirements to exclude higher ranked players.

There could be the argument that this would fragment areas of the community in multiplayer, but I think it allows for a better overall gameplay experience.
And to be honest, there have been plenty of times when a #250K+ player joins a game with a bunch of under #10K players (or being generous, #50K) and makes the group wait (because we're not mean) only to quit immediately. This will help new players find games they can actually play in.

The point isn't to display superiority, but rather to facilitate a better gameplay experience.
Green Platinum
Could I make a lobby that only allows 40ks and above. I hate it when people beat me in mp.
shioty
Nice app my friend :D
Topic Starter
lehmakari
Thanks
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply