forum

BoA - MASAYUME CHASING

posted
Total Posts
12
Topic Starter
wmtokok
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on 2015年7月18日 at 下午 01:14:02

Artist: BoA
Title: MASAYUME CHASING
Source: FAIRY TAIL
Tags: opening 15
BPM: 129
Filesize: 5510kb
Play Time: 03:29
Difficulties Available:
  1. Hard (2.66 stars, 444 notes)
  2. Insane (3.7 stars, 689 notes)
  3. Normal (1.58 stars, 237 notes)
Download: BoA - MASAYUME CHASING
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
這是妖精的尾巴的OP 15 full ver.
FAIRY TAIL OP 15 full ver. :)

N/H/I diff By: me
koreapenguin
BoAAAAAAAAAAAA wmtokokkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk


General
  1. first note's start offset is 630ms then you must add AudioLeadIn: 1570ms for safe
  2. do you think tick rate is fit with this song? i think 1 tick rate is better, and hear so some tick sound is noise
  3. about hitsound on kiai isn't 'S' ? why used 'S:C1' ? 00:45:281 - look this part on hard diff... i think so you must check them

Normal
  1. I think AR5 is so fast in this diff also doesn't fit, how about AR4?
  2. 02:56:443 (1) - it's not big problem, just suggestion :3 how about emphasis on here 02:57:374 - ? like this http://puu.sh/ehYTd/4daf17bc51.jpg there is have strong beat also change new bar so i think it better

    nothing to say. and about new combo, i don't understand what did you followed on newcombo D: vocal? pattern?
    we normaly make like this http://puu.sh/ehZov/a135c652f6.jpg right? try to this... i think it's better than mix. ya like hard, insane diff

Hard
  1. 00:04:350 (1,2) - it's not big problem just how about flow the song? like this http://puu.sh/ei5gZ/5344cb11ec.jpg 00:04:583 - 00:04:816 - there are have some low string and piano so did repaet and 00:05:048 - have strong sound so did circle
    03:27:141 (1,2) - same as ^, even this 03:29:002 (1,2) -
  2. 01:32:723 (1,3) - swap newcombo here, coz for following vocal? even here 01:35:048 (1,2) - ,01:42:723 (6,1) - ,02:01:327 (1,2) -
  3. 01:47:839 (2) - del this note, there is haven't anysounds
  4. 01:57:606 (1,2) - swap newcombo here, seem looks better
  5. 02:03:885 (3,4) - i feel so this rhythm is some... weird, first 02:04:583 (4) - this slider vocal is start on 02:04:583 - here (to~) until here 02:04:816 - also 02:04:816 - have strong beat then place circle is better. and 02:03:885 (3) - this can hear clearly vocal and have strong sound so just place circle and 02:04:118 - here (kiit~to) have vocal until 02:04:583 - here so make slider. try to like this http://puu.sh/ei7RF/b9464554eb.jpg it's more better
  6. 02:49:002 (5,6) - this slider i think it should be have one more repeat like this http://puu.sh/ei89b/ecdf870acf.jpg . hear the song 02:49:350 - here and 02:49:816 - here, if ignore them it would be weird

    good hard diff :D

Insane
  1. about AR... do you think AR9 is fit this song? but i don't think so... AR8 is better than AR9
  2. 00:55:513 (6) - oh...seem you followed vocal.. well it's not big problem, how about change just circle? like this http://puu.sh/ei9hZ/7a517888d6.jpg and put jump coz havs some strong beat. even this 02:02:490 (6) -
  3. 01:01:095 (5,6,7,8) - i don't think this pattern is fit this point,and really really weird if there are have beat clearly then i can understand but is not. i meant like this ex) 01:36:443 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - 00:44:350 (6,7,8,9) - , also 01:05:048 - here there is have sound and more strong than 01:01:211 - here. so 01:01:211 (6) - move 01:01:327 - on here and hear. sound is more better than previous? right?, even this 01:04:816 (5,6,7,8) - ,03:09:467 (5,6,7,8) - ,03:13:188 (5,6,7,8) -
  4. 01:51:443 (7) - seem it's difference with 00:44:350 (6,7,8,9) - here, i think it's right http://puu.sh/eiaFn/65f3c0a0d8.jpg try to this
  5. 01:54:583 (2,3) - hum.. flow is bad so.. how about this? http://puu.sh/eib19/e022f75ec1.jpg hum, it better to play good
  6. 01:14:118 (1,5) - about new combo try this http://puu.sh/eiblH/af6d32bb2c.jpg even here 02:21:095 (9,1) - and add new combo here 02:22:257 (2) - , 02:35:978 (11,1) - ,03:07:606 (9,1) -
  7. 02:26:676 (3,4,5) - i don't want recommend this... Does it play well?l ah... have no idea about this
  8. 02:46:211 (1) - add newcombo for consistency
that's all, and sorry about my bad english i hope your understanding :D
Topic Starter
wmtokok

koreapenguin wrote:

BoAAAAAAAAAAAA wmtokokkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk


General
  1. first note's start offset is 630ms then you must add AudioLeadIn: 1570ms for safe change
  2. do you think tick rate is fit with this song? i think 1 tick rate is better, and hear so some tick sound is noise not change
  3. about hitsound on kiai isn't 'S' ? why used 'S:C1' ? 00:45:281 - look this part on hard diff... i think so you must check them It is my mistake. Fix

Normal
  1. I think AR5 is so fast in this diff also doesn't fit, how about AR4? I try AR4.5
  2. 02:56:443 (1) - it's not big problem, just suggestion :3 how about emphasis on here 02:57:374 - ? like this http://puu.sh/ehYTd/4daf17bc51.jpg there is have strong beat also change new bar so i think it better OK

    nothing to say. and about new combo, i don't understand what did you followed on newcombo D: vocal? pattern?
    we normaly make like this http://puu.sh/ehZov/a135c652f6.jpg right? try to this... i think it's better than mix. ya like hard, insane diff Oh...My new combo is very bad >< thanks you this suggestion

Hard
  1. 00:04:350 (1,2) - it's not big problem just how about flow the song? like this http://puu.sh/ei5gZ/5344cb11ec.jpg 00:04:583 - 00:04:816 - there are have some low string and piano so did repaet and 00:05:048 - have strong sound so did circle OK
    03:27:141 (1,2) - same as ^, even this 03:29:002 (1,2) - ^
  2. 01:32:723 (1,3) - swap newcombo here, coz for following vocal? even here 01:35:048 (1,2) - ,01:42:723 (6,1) - ,02:01:327 (1,2) -
  3. 01:47:839 (2) - del this note, there is haven't anysounds NO fix this , because i think it is more affluent the rhythm
  4. 01:57:606 (1,2) - swap newcombo here, seem looks better OK
  5. 02:03:885 (3,4) - i feel so this rhythm is some... weird, first 02:04:583 (4) - this slider vocal is start on 02:04:583 - here (to~) until here 02:04:816 - also 02:04:816 - have strong beat then place circle is better. and 02:03:885 (3) - this can hear clearly vocal and have strong sound so just place circle and 02:04:118 - here (kiit~to) have vocal until 02:04:583 - here so make slider. try to like this http://puu.sh/ei7RF/b9464554eb.jpg it's more better OK :) I know what you mean
  6. 02:49:002 (5,6) - this slider i think it should be have one more repeat like this http://puu.sh/ei89b/ecdf870acf.jpg . hear the song 02:49:350 - here and 02:49:816 - here, if ignore them it would be weird nice

    good hard diff :D

Insane
  1. about AR... do you think AR9 is fit this song? but i don't think so... AR8 is better than AR9 I feel AR8 is too slow._.
  2. 00:55:513 (6) - oh...seem you followed vocal.. well it's not big problem, how about change just circle? like this http://puu.sh/ei9hZ/7a517888d6.jpg and put jump coz havs some strong beat. even this 02:02:490 (6) -
  3. 01:01:095 (5,6,7,8) - i don't think this pattern is fit this point,and really really weird if there are have beat clearly then i can understand but is not. i meant like this ex) 01:36:443 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - 00:44:350 (6,7,8,9) - , also 01:05:048 - here there is have sound and more strong than 01:01:211 - here. so 01:01:211 (6) - move 01:01:327 - on here and hear. sound is more better than previous? right?, even this 01:04:816 (5,6,7,8) - ,03:09:467 (5,6,7,8) - ,03:13:188 (5,6,7,8) - OK...I also think it is weird.
  4. 01:51:443 (7) - seem it's difference with 00:44:350 (6,7,8,9) - here, i think it's right http://puu.sh/eiaFn/65f3c0a0d8.jpg try to this OK
  5. 01:54:583 (2,3) - hum.. flow is bad so.. how about this? http://puu.sh/eib19/e022f75ec1.jpg hum, it better to play good nice
  6. 01:14:118 (1,5) - about new combo try this http://puu.sh/eiblH/af6d32bb2c.jpg even here 02:21:095 (9,1) - and add new combo here 02:22:257 (2) - , 02:35:978 (11,1) - ,03:07:606 (9,1) - OK
  7. 02:26:676 (3,4,5) - i don't want recommend this... Does it play well?l ah... have no idea about this fix
  8. 02:46:211 (1) - add newcombo for consistency OK
that's all, and sorry about my bad english i hope your understanding :D
thanks for mod :)
update~~~
Topic Starter
wmtokok
Some update here:
  1. All offset 630>623
  2. AudioLeadIn: 1570>1563
  3. Insane OD 8>7
BeatofIke
Your timing is good. Good luck with your map :D
Topic Starter
wmtokok

BeatofIke wrote:

Your timing is good. Good luck with your map :D
thinks for check ><
DahplA
Hi, DahplA here posting from Jloughman14's and DahplA's Modding Team. This is a response in regards to this request. Please be sure to vote here on how helpful our mod was.

Insane
  1. 00:02:483 (1,2,3,4) - Any reason as to why these notes are slightly (and I mean very slightly) off centre? Or is it just a mistake.
  2. 00:12:250 (3,4,5) - I think it would give better flow if this had more of a curved arc.
  3. 00:14:576 (6,7,8,9,10,11,1) - Why is the spacing so far here? I think 7,8 should have same space as 9,10
  4. 01:55:274 (3,4) - I think you can give more distance space here, since the claps are significant enough
  5. 02:12:018 (6,7,8) - Why not make the triple straight here. It just looks unpolished like that.
  6. 02:51:088 (2,3,4) - Why not make an equilateral triangle here
Hard
  1. OD: 5.5
  2. 00:32:250 (1) - Improve blanket
  3. 01:32:250 (2) - ^
Normal
  1. 00:04:343 (1) - I think this slider shape could use some improvement
  2. 00:55:506 (4) - Blanket can be improved

Very solid mapset. Good luck.
Topic Starter
wmtokok

DahplA wrote:

Hi, DahplA here posting from Jloughman14's and DahplA's Modding Team. This is a response in regards to this request. Please be sure to vote here on how helpful our mod was.

Insane
  1. 00:02:483 (1,2,3,4) - Any reason as to why these notes are slightly (and I mean very slightly) off centre? Or is it just a mistake. change some thing
  2. 00:12:250 (3,4,5) - I think it would give better flow if this had more of a curved arc. I think it is fine of the flow.
  3. 00:14:576 (6,7,8,9,10,11,1) - Why is the spacing so far here? I think 7,8 should have same space as 9,10 fix
  4. 01:55:274 (3,4) - I think you can give more distance space here, since the claps are significant enough It fine imo
  5. 02:12:018 (6,7,8) - Why not make the triple straight here. It just looks unpolished like that. I make this triple straight because i hope a big jump should has a special triple.
  6. 02:51:088 (2,3,4) - Why not make an equilateral triangle here good idea
Hard
  1. OD: 5.5 I think OD 5.5 not better
  2. 00:32:250 (1) - Improve blanket fix
  3. 01:32:250 (2) - ^ ^
Normal
  1. 00:04:343 (1) - I think this slider shape could use some improvement I can't make it more good._.
  2. 00:55:506 (4) - Blanket can be improved fix

Very solid mapset. Good luck.
thanks for mod :)
k-on daisuki
Insane
00:12:250 (3,4,5) - give better flow,if u don;t want is fine.
01:14:576 (5) - i think you can put spinner here,not slider...if u want to keep the slider,than don't put the spinner
01:55:274 - I think you can give more distance space,it should be okay to play.
02:12:018 (6,7,8) - give more distance space?

Hard
i think AR7 is better than AR6...if u feel AR7 is a bit faster, than keep it
01:48:995 (2) - put hitsound? or delete it?

anyways it is a good map~ :)
sorry about my bad english, hope u can understanding
Good luck
Topic Starter
wmtokok

k-on daisuki wrote:

Insane
00:12:250 (3,4,5) - give better flow,if u don;t want is fine. Not change of the flow
01:14:576 (5) - i think you can put spinner here,not slider...if u want to keep the slider,than don't put the spinner put spinner not better for the rhythm
01:55:274 - I think you can give more distance space,it should be okay to play. The distance space is enough now
02:12:018 (6,7,8) - give more distance space? not need,I like this special triple.

Hard
i think AR7 is better than AR6...if u feel AR7 is a bit faster, than keep it AR7 may too hard for low BPM and hard diff
01:48:995 (2) - put hitsound? or delete it? I think it is better for the rhythm.

anyways it is a good map~ :)
sorry about my bad english, hope u can understanding
Good luck
thanks for mod
Arusamour
I think the source should change capitalization to "Fairy Tail", instead of "FAIRY TAIL".
Topic Starter
wmtokok

Boobs wrote:

I think the source should change capitalization to "Fairy Tail", instead of "FAIRY TAIL".

I think it is fine.


You can see a logo is "FAIRY TAIL"
BanchoBot
This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply