Guest
home
beatmaps
rankings
community
store
help
forum
  1. Forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked Beatmaps (Archived)

senya - Omoi ga Rekishi ni Kawaru Toki

posted
Total Posts
73
show more
Satellite
3,683 posts
Joined June 2012
Topic Starter
Satellite

scanter wrote:

<3
scanter <333
kakifly
940 posts
Joined April 2014
kakifly
satellite so pro ww
please make this song
//me runs
Satellite
3,683 posts
Joined June 2012
Topic Starter
Satellite

kakifly wrote:

satellite so pro ww
please make this song
//me runs
lol

I'll do my best ... lol
Poruteri
Former osu! Champion: 2014
132 posts
Joined February 2012
Poruteri
[PlainAsia]

00:10:180 (7,8,9,10,1) - x軸に対して2～3マス程右に動かした方が当てやすいと思います
00:17:380 (1) - 直前の単発から2.5xは流れ的には遠いと感じました、コンセプト的に2.5x付近で飛ばしているのは承知してるんですが思い切ってここは2.3～4x程にしてみませんか？
00:23:780 (1) - このスライダーも同じ理由で2.4程にする事をおすすめします
00:39:380 (15) - ここからNCを入れた方が見やすく、この5連打を強調する事が出来ると思います
01:14:180 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1) - この連打の始点は直前の連打の始点と被せた方が良いです、厳密に言えばこの連打の始点の位置をもう少し左に移動させた方がAIMがしやすかったというのが理由です
01:19:380 (3,4,5,6,1) - この連打の位置はもう1～2マス程左に移動させた方が流れが綺麗に見えました
01:22:180 (10) - ここはNCを入れて、01:22:980 (1) - ここからのカラーと統合した方が綺麗に見え、AIMもしやすかったです。画像で言うとこんな感じです
画像
01:24:980 (8,9,10,11,12,13) - この四角形のDSは2.3から2.2に変更した方がやりやすかったです、ちょっと飛ばし過ぎかな
01:29:380 (1) - このスライダーも2.8～9程に縮めた方がやりやすく感じます
Last edited by Poruteri , edited 1 time in total.
Satellite
3,683 posts
Joined June 2012
Topic Starter
Satellite
Thank you ! poruteri :3

後日チェックします！
CSLM
1,058 posts
Joined May 2013
CSLM
senya o/
i can make a diff? /me runs
Satellite
3,683 posts
Joined June 2012
Topic Starter
Satellite

CSLMVenezuela wrote:

senya o/
i can make a diff? /me runs
Thank you :3
But sorry >_>
N H and I only 3diff mapset lol
Momovely
Momovely
god mapppp　 :D
-Mo-
Nomination Assessment Team
953 posts
Joined December 2012
-Mo-
☆
Definitely no fanboying here... nope <.<
Satellite
3,683 posts
Joined June 2012
Topic Starter
Satellite
@Momovely -> Thanks !

@-Mo- -> Thank you star support !!
kakifly
940 posts
Joined April 2014
kakifly
~

PlainAsia

  1. 00:08:572 (2) - i think tail doesn't need whistle?
  2. 00:33:172 (1) - remove NC & add nc to 00:33:372 (3) - to follow your pattern?
  3. 01:08:372 (6) - i think drum finish is better?
  4. 01:43:772 (9) -02:36:572 (9) - NC so you don't have such a long combo lol
  5. 01:48:372 (8) - same as 01:08:372 (6) -
  6. 01:57:972 (1) - remove NC and add to 01:58:172 (3) - ?
  7. 02:02:572 (10,11) - i think maybe ctrl + g flows better?
  8. 02:02:972 (12) - was suppose to be NC ;w; ?
  9. 03:23:872 (10) - i think if you remove this then it follows the rhythm better http://puu.sh/eCCCd/203a8c0086.jpg
Forseen's Hard

  1. 00:26:172 (1) - 01:31:772 (1) - 02:24:572 (1) - 03:23:772 (1) - i don't think this needs NC
  2. 00:38:172 (1) - 01:43:772 (1) - 02:36:572 (1) - 03:35:772 (1) - try to divide this up into 2 sliders then add note at 00:38:972 - so it will feel more natural to play http://puu.sh/eCDf1/9824433ecb.jpg
  3. 01:04:972 (5,6) - i feel the jump here is way too much for hard, try to make a circle http://puu.sh/eCDrx/aad90e7fcf.jpg
  4. 01:10:972 (3) - should have whistle not clap?
  5. 01:16:572 (1,2,3,4) - can you try to keep these under x2.0 spacing? :3
  6. 03:06:972 (3) - why not semi-stack with 03:05:372 (1,2) - ?
  7. 03:34:172 (1) - might be unrankable because the repeat is covered by 03:33:172 (4) -
  8. some random jumps like 03:26:372 (2,3) - 01:34:172 (1,2) - 01:40:772 (2,3) - etc i dont understand, but it's probably just your style:p
Delis's Normal

  1. 01:26:172 (1) - 01:24:572 (3) - can you can avoid overlap here ;w;
  2. 01:48:372 (1) - maybe drum finish fits better imo
  3. 01:53:372 (3) - normal whistle on tail?
  4. 02:12:572 (3) - move down a bit to avoid overlap
  5. 03:17:372 (5,1,2) - little spacing inconsistency
  6. 03:35:772 (5) - i dont think tail needs whistle
nice mapset, good luck :D
Satellite
3,683 posts
Joined June 2012
Topic Starter
Satellite

kakifly wrote:

~

PlainAsia

  1. 00:08:572 (2) - i think tail doesn't need whistle?
  2. 00:33:172 (1) - remove NC & add nc to 00:33:372 (3) - to follow your pattern?
  3. 01:08:372 (6) - i think drum finish is better? oh i mistake here =3= thank you
  4. 01:43:772 (9) -02:36:572 (9) - NC so you don't have such a long combo lol
  5. 01:48:372 (8) - same as 01:08:372 (6) -
  6. 01:57:972 (1) - remove NC and add to 01:58:172 (3) - ?
  7. 02:02:572 (10,11) - i think maybe ctrl + g flows better? OK ww changed
  8. 02:02:972 (12) - was suppose to be NC ;w; ? Okay~
  9. 03:23:872 (10) - i think if you remove this then it follows the rhythm better http://puu.sh/eCCCd/203a8c0086.jpg
No comennt = no change sorry ;w;
I was helpful. thank you for mod !

nice mapset, good luck :D
Sellenite
1,092 posts
Joined September 2013
Sellenite
hitsound just suggestion..
[PlainAsia]
  1. 00:03:772 (7) - add whistle
  2. 00:07:372 (9) - slider head add whistle
  3. 00:13:872 (7,8,9) - i found many stream like this had set drum additions lol
  4. 00:24:572 here use normal additions is more fit imo(finish progressive
  5. 00:58:872 (2) - add clap?
  6. 01:05:272 (6) - ^
  7. 01:14:772 (11) - add drum finish
  8. 01:17:172 (4) - add drum finish
  9. 02:09:972 (4) - ^
  10. 03:37:372 (1) - although have not cymbal here,but is better to add normal finish here i think
[Forseen's Hard]
  1. 00:07:372 (5) - slider end add whistle
  2. 00:08:572 (3) - slider head add whistle
  3. 00:39:172 (2,3,4,5,1) - hmm..here triplets start on 00:39:372 is a bit weird for me ;w;
    SPOILER
  4. 02:37:572 (2,3,4,5,1) - ^
[Delis' Normal]
  1. 03:36:572 (6) - slider head add whistle
always awesome 8-)
Satellite
3,683 posts
Joined June 2012
Topic Starter
Satellite

Sellenite wrote:

hitsound just suggestion..
[PlainAsia]
  1. 00:03:772 (7) - add whistle
  2. 00:07:372 (9) - slider head add whistle
  3. 00:13:872 (7,8,9) - i found many stream like this had set drum additions lol done!
  4. 00:24:572 here use normal additions is more fit imo(finish progressive done!
  5. 00:58:872 (2) - add clap? done!
  6. 01:05:272 (6) - ^ done!
  7. 01:14:772 (11) - add drum finish done!
  8. 01:17:172 (4) - add drum finish done!
  9. 02:09:972 (4) - ^ done!
  10. 03:37:372 (1) - although have not cymbal here,but is better to add normal finish here i think done!


always awesome 8-)
Thanks for mod! Sellenite :3
Forseen
363 posts
Joined November 2010
Forseen

kakifly wrote:

Forseen's Hard

  1. 00:26:172 (1) - 01:31:772 (1) - 02:24:572 (1) - 03:23:772 (1) - i don't think this needs NC - Removed all of them
  2. 00:38:172 (1) - 01:43:772 (1) - 02:36:572 (1) - 03:35:772 (1) - try to divide this up into 2 sliders then add note at 00:38:972 - so it will feel more natural to play http://puu.sh/eCDf1/9824433ecb.jpg - Did that
  3. 01:04:972 (5,6) - i feel the jump here is way too much for hard, try to make a circle http://puu.sh/eCDrx/aad90e7fcf.jpg - I suspected as much, replaced it with the one you suggested
  4. 01:10:972 (3) - should have whistle not clap? - Yup
  5. 01:16:572 (1,2,3,4) - can you try to keep these under x2.0 spacing? :3 - Changed the jump to x2.0 here and for the part that comes a bit later as well
  6. 03:06:972 (3) - why not semi-stack with 03:05:372 (1,2) - ? - Sure
  7. 03:34:172 (1) - might be unrankable because the repeat is covered by 03:33:172 (4) - - Fixed
  8. some random jumps like 03:26:372 (2,3) - 01:34:172 (1,2) - 01:40:772 (2,3) - etc i dont understand, but it's probably just your style:p - I kept on using x2.0 for these parts throughout the song, thought it might look a bit awkward when there's just circles instead of sliders

Sellenite wrote:

[Forseen's Hard]

  1. 00:07:372 (5) - slider end add whistle - Added
  2. 00:08:572 (3) - slider head add whistle - Yup
  3. 00:39:172 (2,3,4,5,1) - hmm..here triplets start on 00:39:372 is a bit weird for me ;w; - Did this for all the similar parts
    SPOILER
  4. 02:37:572 (2,3,4,5,1) - ^ - ^
Thanks!
Satellite
3,683 posts
Joined June 2012
Topic Starter
Satellite
update hard
Delis
1,433 posts
Joined May 2012
Delis
SPOILER

kakifly wrote:

~

Delis's Normal no

  1. 01:26:172 (1) - 01:24:572 (3) - can you can avoid overlap here ;w; eh it doesn't even appear in game, so i don't have to break the placements
  2. 01:48:372 (1) - maybe drum finish fits better imo that is only for 03:03:572 (1) - so this is currently better ><
  3. 01:53:372 (3) - normal whistle on tail? no
  4. 02:12:572 (3) - move down a bit to avoid overlap again, this is not really overlapping and it doesn't affect in game
  5. 03:17:372 (5,1,2) - little spacing inconsistency lol this difference isn't allowable anymore? fixed anyways
  6. 03:35:772 (5) - i dont think tail needs whistle this sounds better though
nice mapset, good luck :D

Sellenite wrote:

hitsound just suggestion..
[Delis' Normal]
  1. 03:36:572 (6) - slider head add whistle it sounds not that good also forgot to put finish here, so added finish instead
always awesome 8-)

thanks :^3
http://puu.sh/eIsh5/1e57b9930c.zip
Satellite
3,683 posts
Joined June 2012
Topic Starter
Satellite
Update ! Thank you Delis and Forseen :3
sionKotori
648 posts
Joined September 2011
sionKotori
:>

Satellite
3,683 posts
Joined June 2012
Topic Starter
Satellite

sionKotori wrote:

:>

irc mod log
12:41 sionKotori: 00:13:372 (5,6,7,8,9,1) -
12:42 sionKotori: 自分ならこうする http://puu.sh/f5dxz/45becdbdd3.jpg
12:42 sionKotori: 即席だしきったないけど
12:42 Satellite: そういう指摘になったか
12:42 Satellite: 形はそこは見づらくなっちゃうから変えない！
12:42 sionKotori: ここから右に1/8で同じdistanceでいくの怖い気がする
12:42 Satellite: あくまで視認性重視！
12:42 sionKotori: りょ～～
12:42 Satellite: 多分だけど
12:43 Satellite: プレイしてみたら叩けると思う！
12:43 Satellite: そこまでこれは難しく感じないはず・・・？
12:43 sionKotori: ・・・
12:43 Satellite: てっきりここの指摘は
12:43 Satellite: 00:12:572 (1,2,3) - これと
12:43 Satellite: 00:13:172 (4,5,6) - これを
12:43 Satellite: 対称にしよう！とかかなって
12:43 Satellite: 思ってしまった
12:43 sionKotori: いや～そこはとてもいいとおもうます
12:43 sionKotori: ってかほんと
12:43 Satellite: ２０１２年ぽくおいたつもり
12:43 sionKotori: modってプレイできないとな～～って
12:43 sionKotori: つよく
12:43 sionKotori: おもいます
12:44 Satellite: sionAppleだからなあ
12:44 Satellite: ctber
12:44 Satellite: あと最初のところかえちゃうと
12:44 sionKotori: CTB譜面ってある程度プレイできる人の譜面じゃないと
12:44 sionKotori: うん
12:44 Satellite: 後半全部変えないといけない一貫性の問題もあるから
12:44 Satellite: 申し訳ないけどキープって形で！
12:44 sionKotori: りょうかい～～～
12:45 Satellite: ここだけなら考えたかも・・・！
12:45 Satellite: 多分vocal ありなしのマッピングで
12:45 Satellite: ９０度変わると思うし大変だよねmodとかも・・・
12:46 sionKotori: そうだね・・・ボーカル曲なのにボーカルでとってない譜面とか
12:46 Satellite: 今回のこの譜面のコンセプトは
12:46 Satellite: 台形
12:46 sionKotori: なんで？？って思っちゃうし、その譜面の持ち味って考えたら指摘できなくなっちゃうし
12:46 sionKotori: yes
12:46 sionKotori: 00:28:372 (6,7,8,9,10) -
12:47 Satellite: いいところに目をつけましたね
12:47 sionKotori: 678-9と9-10のスペーシングが違うのは意図的めうか
12:47 sionKotori: ってかこれ綺麗すぎてみるところない・・・
12:47 Satellite: これは持論になるけどいいかな？
12:48 sionKotori: いいよ全然いいよ
12:48 Satellite: スライダーってこのゲーム判定あまあまあまちょろりんだからDS考慮したことない(　)
12:48 sionKotori: なるほど！
12:48 Satellite: どんな無茶な配置してもスライダーって押せるじゃん！っていう主観があるんだよね
12:48 Satellite: 言ってることは最も！you are rightって感じです！
12:48 sionKotori: そうなんだ・・・
12:49 sionKotori: 00:30:972 (3,4,5) - こことか一定だし
12:49 sionKotori: そこらへん一貫性とかあるのかなって思ってたけど
12:49 sionKotori: そうでもないのかな？
12:49 sionKotori: ないな
12:49 sionKotori: ここだけ一定なだけだ
12:50 sionKotori: 00:34:972 (6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) -
12:50 sionKotori: これすごいすき
12:50 Satellite: いいよねｗｗｗ
12:50 Satellite: 神Flowって感じ
12:50 Satellite: しおんことりちゃんが好きなパターンは
12:50 Satellite: ほかにも出て競う
12:51 Satellite: きそう*
12:51 sionKotori: 01:14:072 -
12:51 sionKotori: ここにも音あるよ～＝
12:51 sionKotori: ただ追加すると
12:51 sionKotori: 配置ががらっと変わっちゃう
12:51 Satellite: これは裏じゃなくて
12:52 Satellite: メロディフォローだからとってないね
12:52 Satellite: それなら
12:52 Satellite: 01:12:472 -
12:52 Satellite: ここもいれないとだめでしょ？ってなっちゃう
12:52 sionKotori: 裏のシンセの音かと思ってしまった・・・
12:53 Satellite: motiron
12:53 Satellite: もちろん裏の音もフォローしてるけど
12:53 Satellite: メインはメインメロディフォローだからここは一貫して全てのパートで
12:53 Satellite: 拾ってないはず・・・"はず"
12:53 sionKotori: そうなんだよね～
12:53 sionKotori: 最初ボーカルの音フォローしてるのに
12:54 sionKotori: そこからいきなり裏の音でストリーム取り始めてるな～？って思ってたんだけど
12:54 sionKotori: そういうｋとおね
12:54 Satellite: ボーカルがあるときに裏の音拾うとリズムがわかりづらいから
12:54 Satellite: ボーカルがないところでも
12:54 Satellite: あるところと同じようにリズムをとって
12:54 Satellite: わかりやすくしてるってのもあります :>
12:55 Satellite: めっちゃ主観でno changeしてて
12:55 Satellite: 胸がいたい
12:56 sionKotori: いやいや
12:56 sionKotori: ぜんぜん
12:56 sionKotori: すｇｇｇｇｇｇｇｇｇっごく個人的だけど
12:56 sionKotori: 01:28:172 (9,11) -
12:56 sionKotori: これhiddenキラーたとおもう
12:56 sionKotori: だと
12:56 Satellite: end stackは今は透過スキンあるから
12:56 Satellite: 全く考慮してないです！
12:56 Satellite: 頭スタックだと透過では見えないけど
12:56 Satellite: エンドなら見えるので問題ないと思ってます！
12:57 sionKotori: 透過スキンってのは公式？
12:57 Satellite: 公式じゃないけど
12:57 sionKotori: ちなみにこれは頭スタックね 01:34:572 (7,10) -
12:57 Satellite: mod考慮するのはデフォルトスキンではnoneしか考慮してないね
12:57 sionKotori: なるほど～
12:57 Satellite: そこは３番目だからいいかなーって理由です！
12:57 sionKotori: りょうかい～～
12:57 Satellite: 01:35:172 (9) - これが頭だったら変えたって感じだ・・・
12:57 Satellite: めっちゃ屁理屈いってるきがする・・・
12:58 Satellite: 一応考えて作ってるから理由はあるんだけど
12:58 Satellite: 言い訳にしか見えないこれｗ
12:58 sionKotori: いやいや、プレイヤー視点の考えとかめっちゃためになるんで
12:58 sionKotori: 全然大丈夫よ～～～
12:58 Satellite: あとはmod考慮？っていうのは
12:58 Satellite: insaneではあまり考えてないってのもあるかもｗ
12:58 Satellite: それでも考えてるけど！！
12:59 sionKotori: なるほどね
12:59 sionKotori: 01:43:772 (9) -
12:59 sionKotori: nc?
12:59 Satellite: それ一回指摘されたんだけど
12:59 Satellite: いれたほうがいい？
12:59 sionKotori: いいと思う
12:59 Satellite: それなら 00:38:172 (6) - ここもいれないとおかしいよねって
12:59 sionKotori: 00:38:172 (6) -
12:59 Satellite: なっちゃうんだよね
12:59 sionKotori: これもになるけど
12:59 Satellite: いれちゃうとnc spamかなあって
12:59 Satellite: ドレインを考慮するとここはStreamだから
12:59 Satellite: ここで落ちることはないかなーって思っていれてないってのもあるんだけど
13:00 Satellite: ここのNcの指摘は２回目なのよねー
13:00 Satellite: 迷い中だ
13:00 sionKotori: まあコンボ数が多いから指摘したくはなる・・・
13:01 Satellite: ここはもう少し考えさせてくださいorz
13:01 Satellite: 未だ決め兼ねます・・・
13:02 sionKotori: 02:03:772 (3,4,5,6) -
13:02 Satellite: 普通の場所が２桁いってないNc刻みなら
13:02 Satellite: Ncいれてたんですが
13:02 sionKotori: ここはあのジャンプ使わないんだ
13:02 Satellite: 今回のコンセプトとしてNcあんまりいれてないってのもあります
13:02 Satellite: ここのところは
13:02 Satellite: 02:03:972 (4,5) - ここをCtrl+Gしてないのは
13:03 Satellite: 意図的で
13:03 Satellite: 半時計周りの流れを意図的に作って
13:03 Satellite: このような配置にしてます！
13:03 sionKotori: りょりょりょ
13:03 Satellite: いつもなら
13:04 Satellite: この半分のペースで
13:04 Satellite: Ncうってたんですが
13:04 Satellite: Drain意味ねえなあ？って思って２倍にしてます :>
13:04 sionKotori: 4連単発で4つとも裏でキック鳴ってるところは時計回り/反時計回りにしてるのかな？
13:04 sionKotori: なるほど！
13:04 Satellite: そこまでは考慮してないんだけど
13:04 Satellite: そのときの感覚だそれは・・・
13:05 sionKotori: u_i
13:05 sionKotori: U_u
13:05 sionKotori: マジで見るところないぞ・・・
13:05 Satellite: 大丈夫ですもうkds付与できるくらいのアドバイスは頂いているので
13:06 sionKotori: しかし全部nochange
13:06 Satellite: Ncについては賛成案として２人目という
13:06 Satellite: 貴重な意見です！
13:06 sionKotori: 02:27:772 (8,9,10,11) -
13:06 sionKotori: ここジャンプにしたい～～～
13:07 sionKotori: 流れ殺してる感がある・・・
13:07 Satellite: 11.1で
13:07 Satellite: ジャンプしたいよねっていうのはあるよね・・・
13:07 sionKotori: うーんでも難しいなぁ
13:08 Satellite: http://puu.sh/f5h7N/e786d81e60.jpg
13:08 sionKotori: http://puu.sh/f5h87/1f3f684022.jpg
13:08 Satellite: 最初こんな形だったんですが
13:08 sionKotori: 思い切って
13:09 Satellite: 流れくっそわるかったんでぼつになりました
13:09 Satellite: んーーーーーーー
13:09 Satellite: この流れはどうなんだ・・・
13:09 sionKotori: ってか
13:09 sionKotori: ジャンプするなら
13:10 sionKotori: この配置まるまる変えたい感じあるな・・・
13:10 Satellite: かえてもいいんだけどねえ
13:10 Satellite: 02:27:372 - ~ 02:28:372 -
13:10 Satellite: ここの間はいじれるんだけどねえ
13:10 Satellite: 思い浮かばない
13:12 sionKotori: http://puu.sh/f5hA3/dfa014b0e7.jpg
13:12 sionKotori: んー・・・
13:13 Satellite: いい感じ
13:14 sionKotori: .v.
13:14 sionKotori: ・v・
13:14 sionKotori: 02:32:572 (3,4,5) -
13:14 Satellite: 一度codeもらっていい？
13:14 Satellite: xy値でもいいけど！
13:17 sionKotori: おっけー
13:19 sionKotori: 307,334,147772,5,2,0:0:0:0:
13:19 sionKotori: 377,173,147972,1,4,0:3:0:0:
13:20 sionKotori: 222,255,148172,1,4,0:3:0:0:
13:20 sionKotori: 399,285,148372,1,8,0:0:0:0:
13:20 sionKotori: 02:32:572 (3,4,5) -
13:22 sionKotori: 広げよう！
13:29 Satellite: all fixed
rui
1,388 posts
Joined February 2009
rui
[General]
  1. この曲の終わり03:51:772のほうがよくないですか？03:50:172にまだ大きな音があるしボーカルもあるのに終わるのは個人的にはすごく違和感を感じます。最後をに このような長いスライダー　http://puu.sh/f5OK7.jpg を入れるとかスピンを入れるとかしたほうがいいと思う。
  2. no kiai timeなの？サビ使ったほうが映えると思うけど。
[Delis' Normal]
  1. 01:45:172 (X) - note 足しませんか？
  2. 01:50:972 (5) - 今までのに合わせるならここは手前の白線終わりのほうがいい
  3. 02:10:772 (X) - add note?
  4. 02:54:172 (1) - (nazi) 1grid下げるといいかも
  5. 03:35:772 (5) - 終点の笛いらないと思う
[Forseen's Hard]
  1. 00:15:772 (1,2) - ctrl + G ? not need to big jump imo
  2. 00:22:172 (1,2) - same
  3. 00:35:572 (4,5) - ctrl + G I was at a loss whether that next of (2) is (3) is (4)
  4. 02:09:372 (1,2,3,4,5) - This is my preference. I like 01:16:572 (1,2,3,4,5) - this placement. so I want to use again this part lol　http://puu.sh/f5ZV5.jpg
  5. 03:48:372 (X) - add note?

    Good Hard. Fun :3
[PlainAsia]
NCが極端に少ないのは故意的かもしれませんがHP回復ポイントも減りますしあまり利点もないのでもう少し細かく分けることをお薦めします。
もし分ける場合を書いておくので、このままがいいなら何も書いていないところは無視してください。何も書いていないのはadd NCです。
NC関連
  1. 00:02:972 (5) -
  2. 00:06:172 (4) -
  3. 00:09:172 (3) -
  4. 00:15:572 (6) -
  5. 00:18:972 (7) -
  6. 00:21:972 (6) -
  7. 00:28:372 (6) -
  8. 00:31:772 (6) -
  9. 00:34:972 (4) -
  10. 00:38:172 (6) -
  11. 00:38:172 (6) - NC (リズムが変わるから)
  12. 00:38:972 (14) - これもNCしていいと思う、好みかなこれは
  13. 00:57:372 (6) -
  14. 01:18:972 (2) -
  15. 01:21:172 (6) -
  16. 01:24:572 (6) -
  17. 01:27:572 (6) -
  18. 01:30:972 (7) -
  19. 01:33:972 (4) -
  20. 01:37:372 (7) -
  21. 01:40:372 (4) -
  22. 01:43:772 (9) - NC
  23. 01:44:572 (9) - NC
  24. 01:50:172 (7) -
  25. 01:56:572 (7) -
  26. 02:01:372 (7) -
  27. 02:11:772 (2) -
  28. 02:13:972 (6) -
  29. 02:17:372 (7) -
  30. 02:20:372 (4) -
  31. 02:23:772 (5) -
  32. 02:26:772 (4) -
  33. 02:30:172 (7) -
  34. 02:33:172 (6) -
  35. 02:36:572 (9) - NC
  36. 02:37:372 (9) - NC
  37. 02:39:572 (4) -
  38. 02:42:172 (9) -
  39. 02:47:772 (3) -
  40. 03:02:172 (6) -
  41. 03:05:372 (4) -
  42. 03:13:172 (6) -
  43. 03:16:572 (6) -
  44. 03:19:572 (6) -
  45. 03:23:772 (9) -
  46. 03:26:172 (9) -
  47. 03:29:372 (7) -
  48. 03:35:772 (9) - NC
  49. 03:36:572 (17) - NC
  50. 03:38:972 (3) -
  51. 03:42:172 (7) -
  52. 03:45:372 (3) -
  1. バランスを見るならHP+1してもいいかな
  2. 00:36:572 (1) - 後ろの音に合わせて手前の赤線で終わりのほうがいい
  3. 00:37:772 (4,5) - 00:36:572 (1,2,3,4,5) - ここの後ろの音に合わせてここは1/2のスライダー４つで統一したほうがいいと思う段々音が大きくなってるので距離もだんだん離すというこんな配置はどう？ http://puu.sh/f5SpN.jpg
  4. 00:54:872 (X) - ここの音取りだけど00:53:572 (4,5,6,7,8,9,1) - の音をとるなら00:54:872 (X)にadd noteしたほうがいいと思う。後ろが少し音足りなくて寂しく感じる。00:55:272 (X)にも音あるけどこれは無理して取らなくていいかなって気がする好みで(以降これを*1とします)
  5. 01:01:272 (x) - *1
  6. 01:07:672 (x) - add note
  7. 01:14:272 (6) - こっちの方があってると思う http://puu.sh/f5U1Z.jpg
  8. 01:46:372 (4,5,6,7,8,9,1) - ここだけdistance0.7だけどわざと？
  9. 01:47:672 (X) - *1
  10. 01:54:072 (5) - *1
  11. 02:00:472 (3) - add note
  12. 02:07:072 (6) - 01:14:272 (6)と同じ
  13. 02:52:072 (X) - 02:52:072 (X) - と　02:52:372 (X) - に音が欲しいこんな感じにどう？ http://puu.sh/f5Vbt.jpg
  14. 03:23:772 (9,10,11,12,13) - ここの連打あってないと思う今まで通りでこれでいいのでは？ http://puu.sh/f5VlL.jpg
  15. 03:34:572 (3,7) - これ近くない？盛り上がるところだから距離が狭くなるのはあまりすきじゃないせめて一定を保ちたい03:34:572 (3) - (156,368)あたりはどうだろうか？(7)は反転で
以上です
Satellite
3,683 posts
Joined June 2012
Topic Starter
Satellite

rui wrote:

[General]
  1. この曲の終わり03:51:772のほうがよくないですか？03:50:172にまだ大きな音があるしボーカルもあるのに終わるのは個人的にはすごく違和感を感じます。最後をに このような長いスライダー　http://puu.sh/f5OK7.jpg を入れるとかスピンを入れるとかしたほうがいいと思う。
  2. no kiai timeなの？サビ使ったほうが映えると思うけど。
:arrow: 全難易度修正

[PlainAsia]
NCが極端に少ないのは故意的かもしれませんがHP回復ポイントも減りますしあまり利点もないのでもう少し細かく分けることをお薦めします。
もし分ける場合を書いておくので、このままがいいなら何も書いていないところは無視してください。何も書いていないのはadd NCです。
NC関連
  1. 00:02:972 (5) -
  2. 00:06:172 (4) -
  3. 00:09:172 (3) -
  4. 00:15:572 (6) -
  5. 00:18:972 (7) -
  6. 00:21:972 (6) -
  7. 00:28:372 (6) -
  8. 00:31:772 (6) -
  9. 00:34:972 (4) -
  10. 00:38:172 (6) -
  11. 00:38:172 (6) - NC (リズムが変わるから)
  12. 00:38:972 (14) - これもNCしていいと思う、好みかなこれは
  13. 00:57:372 (6) -
  14. 01:18:972 (2) -
  15. 01:21:172 (6) -
  16. 01:24:572 (6) -
  17. 01:27:572 (6) -
  18. 01:30:972 (7) -
  19. 01:33:972 (4) -
  20. 01:37:372 (7) -
  21. 01:40:372 (4) -
  22. 01:43:772 (9) - NC
  23. 01:44:572 (9) - NC
  24. 01:50:172 (7) -
  25. 01:56:572 (7) -
  26. 02:01:372 (7) -
  27. 02:11:772 (2) -
  28. 02:13:972 (6) -
  29. 02:17:372 (7) -
  30. 02:20:372 (4) -
  31. 02:23:772 (5) -
  32. 02:26:772 (4) -
  33. 02:30:172 (7) -
  34. 02:33:172 (6) -
  35. 02:36:572 (9) - NC
  36. 02:37:372 (9) - NC
  37. 02:39:572 (4) -
  38. 02:42:172 (9) -
  39. 02:47:772 (3) -
  40. 03:02:172 (6) -
  41. 03:05:372 (4) -
  42. 03:13:172 (6) -
  43. 03:16:572 (6) -
  44. 03:19:572 (6) -
  45. 03:23:772 (9) -
  46. 03:26:172 (9) -
  47. 03:29:372 (7) -
  48. 03:35:772 (9) - NC
  49. 03:36:572 (17) - NC
  50. 03:38:972 (3) -
  51. 03:42:172 (7) -
  52. 03:45:372 (3) -
  1. バランスを見るならHP+1してもいいかな
    :arrow: Ncの指摘とバランスのために+1は矛盾してませんか？このマップは意図的にNcの入れ具合を長くしてのHP6で構成されているので変更はなしです
  2. 00:36:572 (1) - 後ろの音に合わせて手前の赤線で終わりのほうがいい
    :arrow: 裏の音ではなくてメインの音を拾っているため nochangeです
  3. 00:37:772 (4,5) - 00:36:572 (1,2,3,4,5) - ここの後ろの音に合わせてここは1/2のスライダー４つで統一したほうがいいと思う段々音が大きくなってるので距離もだんだん離すというこんな配置はどう？ http://puu.sh/f5SpN.jpg
    :arrow: 同様の理由でno changeです
  4. 00:54:872 (X) - ここの音取りだけど00:53:572 (4,5,6,7,8,9,1) - の音をとるなら00:54:872 (X)にadd noteしたほうがいいと思う。後ろが少し音足りなくて寂しく感じる。00:55:272 (X)にも音あるけどこれは無理して取らなくていいかなって気がする好みで(以降これを*1とします)
    :arrow: 余裕を持たせたい意味合いと、追加するとごちゃごちゃするしリズムがわからなくなるため全てのパートを指摘してもらってますが、こちらも一貫性で全て追加していないので追加はなしです
  5. 01:01:272 (x) - *1
  6. 01:07:672 (x) - add note
  7. 01:14:272 (6) - こっちの方があってると思う http://puu.sh/f5U1Z.jpg
    :arrow: リズムを一定化させることによって叩きやすくしているのでこちらの形もアリですが今のままのほうが叩きやすいと思ったのでそのままで
  8. 01:46:372 (4,5,6,7,8,9,1) - ここだけdistance0.7だけどわざと？
    :arrow: ミスでした0.8で置きなおしFixedです！
  9. 01:47:672 (X) - *1
  10. 01:54:072 (5) - *1
  11. 02:00:472 (3) - add note
  12. 02:07:072 (6) - 01:14:272 (6)と同じ
  13. 02:52:072 (X) - 02:52:072 (X) - と　02:52:372 (X) - に音が欲しいこんな感じにどう？ http://puu.sh/f5Vbt.jpg
    :arrow: 意図的に空けています。ここは変更する気はないです
  14. 03:23:772 (9,10,11,12,13) - ここの連打あってないと思う今まで通りでこれでいいのでは？ http://puu.sh/f5VlL.jpg
    :arrow: 音が今までの場所よりはっきりしているのと最後のサビなのでこのような形をとっています。５連打なのでややこしいリズムでもないのでこのままでいくつもりです
  15. 03:34:572 (3,7) - これ近くない？盛り上がるところだから距離が狭くなるのはあまりすきじゃないせめて一定を保ちたい03:34:572 (3) - (156,368)あたりはどうだろうか？(7)は反転で
    :arrow: 音にあわせてDSを変えています。Finishが入るところは広く両方とも同じように左右対称で合わせています
以上です
ミスが確認できてとても助かりました！ Thank you for mod ! :3
Delis
1,433 posts
Joined May 2012
Delis

rui wrote:

[Delis' Normal]
  1. 01:45:172 (X) - note 足しませんか？ 足してみました！前の音取りと合わせると少し難しそうなのでとりあえず様子を見てまた戻すかも知れませんが、、
  2. 01:50:972 (5) - 今までのに合わせるならここは手前の白線終わりのほうがいい どこかと合わせてこの音取りにしてたはずなんですが忘れちゃったんで変えました！
  3. 02:10:772 (X) - add note? ここは多分このままのほうが合ってる気がします。。。
  4. 02:54:172 (1) - (nazi) 1grid下げるといいかも done!
  5. 03:35:772 (5) - 終点の笛いらないと思う 無くてもいいんですけど、あったほうが好きなのでこのままでいきたいです！
以上です
http://puu.sh/f73PF/4fa7f4b7d2.zip

modありです！
Forseen
363 posts
Joined November 2010
Forseen

rui wrote:

[Forseen's Hard]
  1. 00:15:772 (1,2) - ctrl + G ? not need to big jump imo - Done
  2. 00:22:172 (1,2) - same - Ok
  3. 00:35:572 (4,5) - ctrl + G I was at a loss whether that next of (2) is (3) is (4) - Fixed as well
  4. 02:09:372 (1,2,3,4,5) - This is my preference. I like 01:16:572 (1,2,3,4,5) - this placement. so I want to use again this part lol　http://puu.sh/f5ZV5.jpg - True, works better than stacks
  5. 03:48:372 (X) - add note? - Added it both here and a beat before due to vocals, yup
Thanks!

http://puu.sh/f7V2f/700bc38792.osu
Satellite
3,683 posts
Joined June 2012
Topic Starter
Satellite
All diff update
litoluna
1,073 posts
Joined April 2011
litoluna
[Normal]
  1. 02:54:172 (1,2) - 自分ならブランケットする。
  2. 03:46:972 (6) - 後ろに1noteしか無いけどパターン的にNCだとおもう。
    sliderで誰が作ったかワカルmap
[Hard]
  1. 01:30:172 (3) - ctrl+G? little jump(01:30:172 (3,4) - )
  2. 01:30:972 (1) - add finish at head
  3. 01:37:372 (1) - add finish at head!!
    watashi ha Forseeeeeeeeeen no Hard ga suki!!!!!!!!!
    mousukoshi Finish hoshii desu!
    Satellite nowo maneshite mite!!!
[Insane]
  1. 03:34:172 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19) - 綺麗だけど流石にどこかでNC入れない？？
    03:35:772 (9) - こことか。

    パターンとコピー綺麗
    直線slider譜面
    おしまい！！！！！！！！！！！

Satellite
3,683 posts
Joined June 2012
Topic Starter
Satellite
@litoluna -> Ncは変えません!!Checkありがとうございます :3
Forseen
363 posts
Joined November 2010
Forseen
Fixed the jump and added some more finishes throughout the chorus as you suggested, thanks!

http://puu.sh/fg20J/a140f62bc1.osu
Delis
1,433 posts
Joined May 2012
Delis

litoluna wrote:

[Normal]
  1. 02:54:172 (1,2) - 自分ならブランケットする。時と場合によっては自分もするけどココは違う
  2. 03:46:972 (6) - 後ろに1noteしか無いけどパターン的にNCだとおもう。わすれてました
    sliderで誰が作ったかワカルmap わかんないよ！
modありがとうございました=D
http://puu.sh/fgg5Z/883024bec1.zip
Satellite
3,683 posts
Joined June 2012
Topic Starter
Satellite
Update all.
Loneight
osu! Alumni
1,332 posts
Joined January 2011
Loneight
Hi, mina o/
Request from PM.


  • Black is just suggestion, if you don't like , you can skip it
    Blue is recommended to fix
    red is unrankable issue

[Delis' Normal]

  1. 01:14:572 (5) - how about try to remove whistle and add clap?
  2. 01:33:372 (3) - did you forget adding whistle at slider-head ;w;? 02:27:772 (5) - , 02:34:172 (4) - Same as here
  3. 01:34:972 (6) - add whistle to replace the sound of song or use the wav. file?
solid diff! good job

[Forseen's Hard]

  1. 00:07:372 (5) - how about remove the whistle at slider-head?
  2. 01:50:972 (3,4) - try ctrl+G? flow would be more suitable IMO
  3. 02:04:172 (5) - how about move to 264|264? could express more feeling what the song singing?
solid diff too!

[PlainAsia]

  1. 00:39:372 (1,2,3,4,5) - I think there should be a curve same as 00:38:172 (6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) - , because feel uncomfortable when I hit here
  2. 03:34:972 (5) - try to add NC for here would be more easiler to read
good job! I like the flow over the diff
well.. that's all
are you sure the map need mod? (run
call me back anytime when you feel it's ready
star~✩
and good luck
Satellite
3,683 posts
Joined June 2012
Topic Starter
Satellite

Loneight wrote:

Hi, mina o/
Request from PM.

　

[PlainAsia]

  1. 00:39:372 (1,2,3,4,5) - I think there should be a curve same as 00:38:172 (6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) - , because feel uncomfortable when I hit here
  2. 03:34:972 (5) - try to add NC for here would be more easiler to read
good job! I like the flow over the diff
well.. that's all
are you sure the map need mod? (run
call me back anytime when you feel it's ready
star~✩
and good luck
All fixed <3 Thank you for mod Loneight chan ~~ :3
Delis
1,433 posts
Joined May 2012
Delis

Loneight wrote:

Hi, mina o/
Request from PM.

[notice]

  • Black is just suggestion, if you don't like , you can skip it
    Blue is recommended to fix
    red is unrankable issue

[Delis' Normal]

  1. 01:14:572 (5) - how about try to remove whistle and add clap? yes!
  2. 01:33:372 (3) - did you forget adding whistle at slider-head ;w;? 02:27:772 (5) - , 02:34:172 (4) - Same as here there's random piano that kind of hard to catch so didn't add whistle there
  3. 01:34:972 (6) - add whistle to replace the sound of song or use the wav. file? added!
solid diff! good job

well.. that's all
are you sure the map need mod? (run
call me back anytime when you feel it's ready
star~✩
and good luck
thanksy!

http://puu.sh/fGtz3/424bc0fe75.zip
Forseen
363 posts
Joined November 2010
Forseen

Loneight wrote:

[Forseen's Hard]

  1. 00:07:372 (5) - how about remove the whistle at slider-head? - Removed from the tail, left for the head
  2. 01:50:972 (3,4) - try ctrl+G? flow would be more suitable IMO - Sure
  3. 02:04:172 (5) - how about move to 264|264? could express more feeling what the song singing? - Yep
solid diff too!
Thanks!

http://puu.sh/fHfMd/94bdea96fc.osu
Satellite
3,683 posts
Joined June 2012
Topic Starter
Satellite
Update all ~
Loneight
osu! Alumni
1,332 posts
Joined January 2011
Loneight
There we go~
Bubbled!ヽ( ･д･´)
Satellite
3,683 posts
Joined June 2012
Topic Starter
Satellite
omg! loneight chan thank you <3
sionKotori
648 posts
Joined September 2011
sionKotori
~RANKED~
Satellite
3,683 posts
Joined June 2012
Topic Starter
Satellite

sionKotori wrote:

~RANKED~
rank pls
Kyubey
osu! Alumni
3,097 posts
Joined December 2012
Kyubey
Yoo
[General]
BG stuff was resolved in PM
http://puu.sh/fMBmL/7eb3b9e9a7.wav please use this sliderslide instead of your current because it's written in RC to use this blank wav.
[Normal]
02:58:972 (4) - i think better to not move things offgrid because this one will really hardly overlap with scoreboard on 4:3 screens
[Hard]
Please notice that most of next suggestions is pretty necessary for spread good because difficulty gap between Normal and Hard is pretty huge due to things I will mention.
01:16:772 (2,3,4) - maybe make distance ~1.8 instead of 2? keeping controlled cursor with that straight flow can be pretty hard and i think difficulty of this patter can be reduced
01:25:772 (6,7) - i wonder why did you made jump here when strong beat is 01:25:372 (4) - this one
01:40:572 (1,2,3) - you didn't use that flow change in current chorus before, it looks strange here and unfitting compared to other current chorus parts (and to next chorus too)
01:50:972 (3,4,5,6,1) - song in this part isn't that intensive to make these jumps, and they are pretty hard for it, better to keep usual spacing here
01:57:372 (3,4,5,6,1) - x2.2, x2.5, this part is more intensive than previous but it still shouldn't be that hard, even jumps in chorus are easier, make this part easier
02:09:572 (2,3,4) - as i told before, better to make spacing less on patterns like this because controlling is hard with straight flow
02:18:772 (4,1) - this flow is hard and bad, i don't think this place should be pointed with that hard and uncomfortable flow, make jump less and somehow rotate slider to make flow better. like this for example http://puu.sh/fMGA1/dd802633a2.jpg
02:54:172 - this part is pretty slow and calm, i wonder why did you use same amount of notes with same spacing like on intense parts, when you could use more sliders and slowed SV to make this part slow and calm for fitting the song
03:38:972 - maybe use here more sliders like 03:45:372 here since it's a calm part? and 03:40:372 (8,1) - this jumps looks pretty forseenced for this calm part
не подведи, фурсин, из-за этих вещей могут и анранкнуть :с
[PlainAsia]
00:20:372 (1,2,3) - move it up please because it overlaps with score meter that almost everyone uses and it looks pretty bad in game http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2744859
01:06:572 (4,5,6,7,1) - same thing
01:25:572 (11,12,1) - tbh i don't like this flow, it played uncomfortable, maybe move (12) somehow on the left side, like stack with 01:26:572 (4) - or even more left?
01:28:972 (12,13,1) - this flow feels strange too, maybe make something like this? http://puu.sh/fMKiB/e1d84fe82b.jpg
01:54:772 (8) - overlaps with score meter, move up a little
01:58:972 (6,7,8,9,10,11,1) - this can be really hard to notice because player is concentrated on the down side and sudden jump with stack on the up side can be pretty sudden, move 01:59:372 (8,9,10,11,1) - down please
02:01:372 (7) - score meter stuff
03:21:972 (4) - ^
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply

0
11 / 73