Basically....unless if the bikini (or pantsu) is too skimpy that it barely covers any parts.marcostudios wrote:
Well... Costumes like bikini should be fine, naked shouldn't
About nudity, this map should probably be the gap.
That was beautifulCDFA wrote:
I'm not gonna fight for anime titties, but I'm gonna fight for the right to know if my anime titties are rankable or not.
Well the thing is you can't deny that drawing anime girls in bikinis was intended to be anything but sexual...Lust wrote:
There has to be a distinguished boundary between images that are overtly sexualized and those that celebrate the beauty of the body. There are images that are obviously looking to raise masts but there are ones out there that let the masts appreciate the ocean view (did that even make sense I'm high).
IMO a huge chunk of the playerbase has seen what an anime titty or two looks like, I think its fair enough to allow certain things to some degree. Lach states it pretty well - as long as theres clothing that covers what needs to be covered and the image isn't too sexual in any manner it should be fine.
+1_verto_ wrote:
Also I feel like this only occurs when the breasts are somewhat big. If you censor those, censor smaller breasts too. Treat all breasts equally.
this.Stella wrote:
+1_verto_ wrote:
Also I feel like this only occurs when the breasts are somewhat big. If you censor those, censor smaller breasts too. Treat all breasts equally.
That's because that map isn't even ranked (and it's graved) so nobody even notices maps like thoseTidek wrote:
I dont know why BGs in some maps are not deleted yet, people complain about anime gurl in bikini, but no1 is complaining about that kind of maps https://osu.ppy.sh/s/185753 (and there is more stuff with that kind of BGs).
Anyone is checking it to keep it save from things like in above example?
yeah. it doesn't matter for play. man who dislike the bg, players can just dim and do thatKibbleru wrote:
this.
well osu! is a game that was intended for like 13+ i think? and u know... the government and parents and sht doesn't want sexually suggestive things. even if peppy doesn't really care about this himself, it's gotta be done.
on the other hand i really don't think there's anything wrong with the current.
it's just like pantsu = no and bikini = acceptable right?
well who the fuck puts gore in a bg likeWOOB22 wrote:
Why is all talking about boobs and things .-. Remeber to that gore is NSFW too
Well that's an entirely different discussion altogether because that's considered artistic nudity. It's not really portrayed in a sexual sense, it's just a portrayal of the human body. It also does not show any genitalia (As artistic nudity showing genitalia would probably be shot down regardless of its meaning).Kuro wrote:
lol gore
*ehem*
Anyway....
If watercolour got ranked with 2 nude people in the bg, then I don't see why anything else can't.... J/S bro >:
/me runs
CptBlackBird wrote:
we need anime boobs,boobs are love,boobs are life
+∞OzzyOzrock wrote:
we can't ban boobs that's why people download the map!
That's a really stupid way to think about it, as what would be questionable to one person may not be questionable to another as it depends largely on where you're raised and who by. What could be considered tasteful in one country may be widely considered "sick filth" in another more conservative country.Lust wrote:
After speaking to some others and gathering a few opinions, the general consensus seemed to be if you had to ask if it was NSFW, then it probably already is. So if you have any doubts over its "rankability" then its best to suggest a different background. Although my opinion remains the same (the one I posted earlier)
Pantsu is yes????piruchan wrote:
I suggest we use fapability as a guidance. If you can fap to it, then it's not rankable. (But some of you might fap to girls in bikini)
Why don't we have a list of what is acceptable or not? Use this as an exampleV = acceptable, X = not acceptable
Bikinis and male swimsuit V
Skimpy bikinis (ones that barely/only covers private parts) and skimpy male underwear X
See through underwear beneath V
See through no underwear beneath X
Pantsu V
Boxers V
Lingerie X
Hand bra X
Cleavage V
Cameltoe and male equivalent X
Things that seem to be nipples, but the character is still clothed X
Side boob V
Under boob V
Too much boob X
Too much ass X
Ahegao X
Girls/guys blushing and panting X
Nipples and genitalia X
etc
Now someone tell if best BG in 2014 is NSFW or notKinda stupid and off topic, but I think it would workMaybe we need someone who is capable of deciding if BGs are NSFW or not. He/she must have a reasonable approach to this matter. This person doesn't check backgrounds on his/her own will, mappers and BATs come to him/her if they have a questionable BG on their hands. He/she must be able to give clear reasons to each judgment and maybe set a criteria of what is acceptable and not.
I'm more impressed that you managed to come up with such a big list of things...piruchan wrote:
V = acceptable, X = not acceptable
Bikinis and male swimsuit V
Skimpy bikinis (ones that barely/only covers private parts) and skimpy male underwear X
See through underwear beneath V
See through no underwear beneath X
Pantsu V
Boxers V
Lingerie X
Hand bra X
Cleavage V
Cameltoe and male equivalent X
Things that seem to be nipples, but the character is still clothed X
Side boob V
Under boob V
Too much boob X
Too much ass X
Ahegao X
Girls/guys blushing and panting X
Nipples and genitalia X
etc
Wut bro... gtfo, i thought you were cool.. :<piruchan wrote:
Things that seem to be nipples, but the character is still clothed X
mfw when I watch the video up close and see a penis.Wafu wrote:
To be honest, nothing's gonna ever change from what I have seen so far.
Let's talk about this map https://osu.ppy.sh/s/15430
If you open the video (recommended in video player, not osu!, because that will mess up a timing a bit) on 1:42, you can clearly see the girl is holding a penis in her hand and holds it near the mouth (also to mention, she's most probably a loli, what's considered as a child porn in some states, so basically, who downloaded this could have downloaded stuff he can be arrested for without a warning, yay!). That map was never unranked. Because it is "too old" or because it cannot be told what she holds (obviously it's not when you zoom it to your monitor's resolution while the resolution is many times smaller)? If we consider age of the map, we should not remove other NSFW things so it can be fair to all people, both to this map and people who would get their maps removed (for example my map because of having pu**y in song tile) I do not think any justice was used here. If you make a murder, you are not forgiven after few years, you still did a murder. So we shall probably start removing maps and judge what's NSFW after we apply justice to maps which are really NSFW, not questionable. Obviously, not even the fact the QAT system didn't exist back in that time, it shouldn't be an apologize for this map being still available.
About the rules, common sense could be applied I think. Anything what does not emphasize the genitals or breasts is just safe. Showing panties is okay unless a cameltoe is visible, showing breasts partially is okay unless nipples or their shape is visible. What is NSFW about panties, bras, swimsuit and other underwear? You haven't ever seen someone in swimsuit on beach or so? I guess most of us did and I don't think there was anyone who told them to take clothes, obviously. Unless it is sexually suggestive (or eventually showing brutal stuff like interrupted parts of body), it is not NSFW.
sounds legitpiruchan wrote:
Too much ass
Well.. she does have big boobs, but still, that's not sexually suggestive, or if it is, it is same sexually suggestive as flat chest.[ kenon ] wrote:
question
this is NSFW or not ?
this BG for my maps
NSFW shouldn't be depending on boobs, this is kind of unfair to people who has small boobs. It could be NSFW even the person has small boobsWafu wrote:
Well.. she does have big boobs, but still, that's not sexually suggestive, or if it is, it is same sexually suggestive as flat chest.[ kenon ] wrote:
question
this is NSFW or not ?
this BG for my maps