|0|1|2|3|
[BASIC] - 00:03:639 (3639|1) In order to keep balance with 00:06:234 (6234|2,6234|0).I suggest to add a extra note.
2 - 00:09:963 (9963|2,10126|1) Using Ctrl + H to reverse them. 00:09:963 (9963|2)'s pitch is lowest.
- 00:10:936 (10936|2,11099|1) Same as above.using Ctrl + H to let the note more adapt pitch relevancy.
- 00:29:099 (29099|3) move to column 0 to emphasize this note's pitch is obvious different with other note in this part.
- 00:33:477 (33477|2,33639|1,33801|0) move to column 3,0,1.
- 00:38:828 (38828|2,38990|1) Same to 2.
- 01:04:774 (64774|0) Move to 1 since this note's pitch is lower than 01:05:423 (65423|0).
- 01:07:855 (67855|3,68017|3) You can move to 2 so that it can play more comfortable. ignore this opinion if you want keep it was.
- 01:09:963 (69963|2) Delete this note. Keep balance with 01:10:288.
- 01:22:126 (82126|2,82288|1,82450|0,82612|1,82774|3) rearrangement like
this to more suit for pitch.
[Mashiro's ADVANCED] - 01:01:693 (61693|2) move to column 0 to show that this clap sound is obvious different with 01:01:531 (61531|3,61855|1).
- 01:32:828 ~ 01:33:153 A simple idea(
screenshot)
[EXTREME] - 00:02:099 , 00:02:423 Forget to pick these note?or ignore it on purpose?
- 00:24:558 (24558|1) remove it to keep balance with 00:25:207.
- 01:19:531 ~ 01:20:180 I don't know if
it's acceptable in EXTREME(Another)diff. But i think the old one can't profermance the pitch correctly.
- 01:48:396 ~ 01:48:720
a ideahere.I think just use one note to profermance the same kind of sound is ok.