Frey wrote:

Deleted the intro and used a spinner instead, also fixed the NC problem, no wonder that was fast.

There is still something to polish, it can take some time but not much.

ZZHBOY wrote:

Frey wrote:

Deleted the intro and used a spinner instead, also fixed the NC problem, no wonder that was fast.

There is still something to polish, it can take some time but not much.

call me back then

Yauxo wrote:

Loctav wrote:

Yauxo wrote:

I feel like things get more subjective each day. If someone wants to make a "guide to a high quality map", please go ahead and do so. I'd love to see one, because all of these "quality issue" dq's are difficult to predict.

[ D_L ] wrote:

for me it is sad to see the first part of the map is gone
do you have a copy of the old map?
i would like to save it and fc in the future

• 
  
  First, there is something really noticeable, and questionable. The difficulty difference between the kiai part and the other parts is really huge.
  Kiai part is difficult to handle if you're not a top play or a good jump player. When the other parts are easy to FC.
  This difficulty difference make this map a little frustrating to play because when playing the beginning, the player will say, awh it's difficult but handleable, and when he starts playing the kiai, he could say "OMG THESE JUMPS ARE UNEXPECTED. I Agree with Loctav, these patterns are a little overdone. At least, try to reduce this large difficulty gap between these parts.

1. 00:14:713 (8,1) - This looks a little confusing because the player expects that there is a 1/2 gap between these objects, and the distance between is them is close. There should be a higher distance between them.
2. 00:30:019 (1,2,3) - There should be a higher distance between them too, the next patterns like this are more distant. It could be better if you keep consistency.
3. 00:59:101 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - It could be better if you use some slider to make this part less difficult concerning note density, and also less heavy and more enjoyable. As you did here 01:18:999 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1) - for example.

Cherry Blossom wrote:

No kd.

General

1. Unused files, remove them :
   - soft-hitclap7.wav
   - drum-hitclap7.wav
   - drum-hitwhistle7.wav

Fixed

6006's Hard

1. 01:04:305 - missing finish ?

Fixed

Insane

• 
  HP7 ? this looks a little too much for this diff, reduce to 6 or 6.5.
  
  Fixed. 6.5 instead

1. 00:22:366 (7) - is this supposed to be 1/3 like the other diffs ? 1/4 works well here though. Same for 01:40:734 (6) - and 01:45:632 (6) -
   
   I know it's werid, but following the piano sound isn't a wrong choose.

Call me back.

Thanks for modding!

Loctav wrote:

All remaining difficulties were really enjoyable and we liked them a lot.

Aka wrote:

;-;..