Kurokotei - Rouen Shitstorm [Taiko]

posted
Total Posts
24
show more
Gezoda

Kurosanyan wrote:

About the BGs, blame _Gezo_.
*Samifer
Hanjamon
Hi~ really sorry for late mod ;w;

  • d=Don
    D=Big Don
    k=Katsu
    K=Big Katsu


[General]

  • Disable ''widescreen support'' in agu's diff, is not necessary

    Best BG (?


[Kantan]

  • I think is better keeping the sv at sv 1.20, i know is 200 bpm but sv 1.20 is okay imo and less confusing when someone plays Kantan ---> Futsuu (my english sucks xD)

    00:36:219 (10) - delete note for a little break and consistency with 00:41:019 - ?
    00:52:119 (3) - delete this note? due to maybe k d d d is a bit hard for a Kantan? also with d d d only fits well too :3
    00:56:919 (11) - delete this note? ^ same reason
    01:00:819 - i'm not sure about this patterns, i know are simple but are also confused imo, maybe delete 01:02:319 (21) - and 01:07:119 (32) - ?
    01:13:419 (7,8) - change these notes to d? fits better with the song imo
    01:15:219 (11) - if you changed ^ maybe change this note to k? (k d k) if is hard, d d k is fine too
    01:18:219 (17,18) - if you changed 01:13:419 - thing, change these notes to d too?


[Futsuu]

  • Personally, i think this diff need more breaks due to the song is 200 bpm

    00:05:319 (17) - delete this note? in the previous patterns like 00:02:919 - you haven't put a note, also you will get a little break
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    00:32:019 - Here i recommend deleting these notes, you will get little breaks and sounds better imo

    00:32:619 (4) - delete?
    00:33:819 (8) - ^
    00:35:019 (12) - ^
    00:36:219 (16) - ^
    00:37:419 (4) - ^
    00:38:619 (8) - ^
    00:39:819 (12) - ^
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[Muzukashii]

  • Long patterns like 00:09:219 (35,36,37,38,39,40,41) - , 00:11:619 (46,47,48,49,50,51,52) - or usage of ddk 00:13:419 (3,4,5) - is a bad idea at this bpm i think >.<

    00:12:069 (49) - delete this note for avoid this long pattern?
    00:13:494 (4) - delete? sounds good without triplet too and is more easier
    00:15:819 (16,17) - maybe sounds a bit weird.. but for a mini-break.. delete these notes?
    00:18:369 (6) - change to d? (ddd) ddk at this bpm is hard for a muzu
    00:20:769 (20) - change to d? (ddd) ^ same reason
    00:23:094 (4) - delete? same reason as before
    00:25:419 (16,17) - delete these notes? same reason as before
    00:27:969 (6) - change to d? (ddd) same reason as before
    00:30:369 (20) - change to d? (ddd) ^ same reason
    00:42:819 (8) - change to d (ddd) or delete 00:42:744 (7) - ? ddk is hard for a muzu..
    00:45:219 (21) - change to d (ddd) or delete 00:45:144 (20) - ? ^ same reason
    01:11:319 (6,9) - delete these notes? i know is similar to Futsuu but is better than the actual pattern imo, i don't say is bad, but this part needs at least 1/1 breaks
    01:12:219 - If you deleted ^ you can add a note here and delete 01:13:119 (16) - , sounds better imo
    01:13:719 (18,21) - delete these notes? same as before
    01:15:519 (27) - ^ if you deleted.. move this note to 01:15:069 - and change to k?
    01:16:119 (30,33) - delete these notes? same as before
    01:17:919 (39) - move this note to 01:17:019 - ? sounds better if you deleted ^
    01:22:119 (11) - change to d? same as before, avoid ddk patterns >.<


[Oni]

  • 00:48:969 (2,4,2) - delete these notes? this part is very similar to the Inner's part, also, i think fits good

    I think is better if you delete the sv changes from 00:52:269 - to 01:00:669 - this part is exactly the same as the Inner

    01:25:869 (9) - Delete this note? maybe a bit of break will be good
    01:27:069 (9) - if you deleted ^ same here, delete this note


[Inner Oni]

  • 01:37:644 (28,29) - control+g these notes and change 01:37:869 (30) - to k? (kddkkdkdk) i think sounds good :3


[agu's NIGHTMARE ONI]

  • 00:23:919 (211) - change this note to d? (dkdkkkddkkd) sounds better imo
    00:40:644 (388,400) - change these notes to d? (ddkdkkddkkddkdk) sounds better imo
    01:07:569 (623,624) - control+g these notes? i think sounds better

    This diff is overmapped a lot and some patterns doesn't fit good, but well.. maybe is fine for now xD


This is all, good luck!! ^^
JUDYDANNY
Hello, M4M(?) via Kurosanyan s’ Request.

[Kantan]
  1. 00:40:419 (9) – don? same as 00:35:619 (9) -?
  2. 01:57:219 (1) – D? looking at long span ( 01:48:819 (1) -~ 01:57:219 (1) -) , This note pitch is (maybe?)the lowest pitch , and the end of music. It’s more important for me to follow dat pitch than cymbal.
  3. 01:41:019 (3) – don? just my opinion, fits better for me lol.


[Futsuu]
  1. 00:33:519 (7) – don?
    I guess you can make the rule completed.
    00:32:019 (1) - ~~~d, dkd, ddk.
    00:41:619 (1) - ~~~ k, kdk, kd, kk.
  2. 00:35:919 (17) - ^?
  3. 01:09:819 (63) – don?
  4. 01:42:369 (11) – don?
  5. 01:57:219 (1) – D?
  6. well, little hard. but not bad.
[Muzukashii]
  1. 00:04:869 (17) - k? I guess flow is better comparing with Futsuu.
  2. 00:40:869 (21) – add k? same as 00:36:069 (18) -.
  3. 01:57:219 (1) – D?
[Oni]
  1. 00:44:169 (19) – add don here? Melody line is not stopped, and dat no finisher before.
  2. 01:49:119 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1) – d-ddk-kkd-d-K >>>ddd-kkk-d---K or ddd-kkk-ddd-K ? fit as better these triplets to begin to melody slar imo ( same as 01:48:219 (14,15,16) – kkk.)
[Inner Oni]
  1. 00:36:219 (34) - k? emphasized to 00:36:519 (37,38) - –dk sound, that pitch is up.
  2. 01:01:944 (11,12,13,14,15,16) - 1/4>>>> 1/3???
  3. 01:04:344 (28,29,30,31,32,33) - ^
  4. 01:37:756 (29) - k?
  5. 01:37:419 (26,27,28,29,30,31,32) – kkdddk? (For melody line) or kddkddk? (For mapset flow ,comparing with Oni, Muzu).
  6. 01:49:269 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11) – ddk-kkd-d >>>d-kkk-ddd?
  7. 01:50:469 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11) -^
  8. 01:56:119 (38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46) – I recommend to change to Spinner or ,1/6 , or 1/4 stream. how about make the 1/4 kdkdkdkdkdkdk ?
    catch the acc. is very hard on the music imo.
    There’re no 1/3 clear sound , and I felt to listen on this place that makes the sounds , higher density.
  9. 01:57:219 (1) – Don?
[agu's Oni]
  1. 00:04:194 – delete? or 00:04:644 (1,2) - change to dk ?
  2. 00:16:494 – delete, unnecessary.
  3. 00:34:419 (324,325,326,327,328,329,330,331,332,333,334,335,336,337,338,339,340,341,342,343,344,345,346,347,348,349) –
    Uuumm,,,, what following? Arrangement ?
  4. 00:36:369 (1,2,3) - kdk? linked by before the sream kddd~~.
  5. 00:45:144 – delete, unnecessary.
  6. Either?
    00:48:744 (1,2) - >>(delete,add finisher)
    00:49:494 - add don ,and 00:49:419 – delete finisher?
  7. ^
    01:24:369 (781,782,783,784,785) – d-k-ddk>>>ddk-d-K
    01:26:094 (795) – add don, and 01:26:019 (794) – delete finisher?
  8. similar as above part, 01:27:144 (805) - delete, 01:27:219 (806) – add finisher?
  9. 00:51:519 – delete or change to don?
  10. and, 00:51:669 (1,2) - change to kd?
  11. 00:53:319 (510,511) – swap
  12. 00:55:719 (528,529) - ^
  13. 01:04:944 (599) – delete no need to make a hard part for music.
  14. 01:10:419 - ~~ 01:12:819 (675) - need to make more break cuz you made next parts( 01:12:819 (675) -~ , 01:15:219 (696) -~, 01:17:619 (716) - ~), difficulty level is very far.
  15. 01:39:969 (914,923) – k?
That’s all! I thank you for reading it through ;)
Good Luck! :D
roufou
too lazy to make a nice little post quoting all the things I did and didn't...because I implemented everything on hanja's and DANNY's mod anyhow
Sayaka-
revive pls
Topic Starter
Kurosanyan
(´;ω;`)

I will come back eventually, when I'm done with my current issues.
Aldwych
pour le fwance, revive this!
Gezoda
rouen bowling
360 nostrike
#GEZOFAISHUIT
Sayaka-
https://instaud.io/Uhp le 2017 edition
Topic Starter
Kurosanyan

Sayaka- wrote:

https://instaud.io/Uhp le 2017 edition
BanchoBot
This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply