EDIT:
OK what jerrysr said, this is the end.
Let the map die with mercy.
OK what jerrysr said, this is the end.
Let the map die with mercy.
But the ranking criteria are AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAOrkel wrote:
Star'd
I don't understand what the fuck is going on in the past few pages but this map is fun as hell and it deserves a rank.
Card N'FoRcE wrote:
These new "rules" are getting us nowhere.
Those "rules" were meant to be guidelines to help newbie mappers making "standard" maps and increase their mapping experience.
After aquiring experience, new original maps should come from that mapper.
Instead this happens: maps go against a "rule" and both mappers and BATs don't know what to do.
Please guys, think about one/two years ago.
Everyone made maps quite reasonably without the need of this and you can see what happened after that: playing was fun, many users registered and the community grew a lot in a short period of time.
Instead of stimulating mappers it's almost like the "rules" are forcing them to make maps in a fixed way: "this is not allowed", "this is bad", "this is boring", "this is too hard", "this is useless", "remove this and that"...
So yeah, every map will be the same. Then what's the point of mapping? Let's just have the editor making the maps for us.
Again, please think about one/two years ago, guys.
My two cents.
I'm sorry i went off-topic, Jerrysr.
The sad thing is, a 2007 star system seems more convictive then all of evans mappers, players and modders.minyeob wrote:
SPOILERuhhh Have heard much about Evans issue. But I didn't read the thread Orz
OK now I read this. Here's my comment. Sorry if this confuses you orz
First, about deepsea relaxing and hard.......
We need lower star rating for short maps.
Like Alace mentioned, when there's only 1 note on a map, star rating is............ lol
So,
Hard can't be considered as "Insane"
Why? Because break time sucks so many star ratings. That's why most of TV size insanes are 5.00 stars although they're like hard.
deepsea relaxing and Hard are good/enough difficulties.
But there are 3 Insanes already lol
How about making Ign's another as "CTB difficulty?"
I'm strongly against about this new rule. But as long as I'm the part of whole team, maybe I should accept new rules now.
But At Least
As many people mentioned before,
Luigi updated about "no more 2 insane / Setting minium diffculty as 3 star" rules on April 5 on Pending beatmaps forum.
That means any kind of diffculty issue can't be applied until that day.
But unranked on April 3rd?
Even judge can't punish criminals if there's no appropriate rule.
This is contradiction.
I would have accepted this camly if this map had unranked due to hidden notes.
But the truth is,this map got unranked due to diff problem, not hidden notes.
It is no use speaking about hidden notes after this map got unranked. Unranked reason is just diff problem.
And Next,
We tend not to unranking maps for minor issue(I define major issues as "unsnapped notes/wrong BPM)
This map got unranked, although 2 days had already passed. This is horribly bad. Do you think 2 day is such a short period so it can be unranked?
Actually, this map gained lots of play counts so it can't be unranked.
Well I ranked taka's H/I map on the end of March.
But BAT you guys warned me because there's difficulty disscussion thread on MOD LOUNGE but not on beatmap ranking criteria.
The map had been bubbled for almost 4 weeks. But how could I said mapper like "Make an easier diffulcty sorry"?
And recently, Diffculty-based AI-modding..... just orz
@@For Chinese users sorry for making this thread dirty. Apologizes about that ><
And sorry Jerry, I should have re-ranked this when you had requested before Orz
I found no reason why this map can't get reranked. Why did you give up? lol
If you can use Chinese and everyone understands that, will you give up about this map?
Please think about it one more time, If you can use Chinese and everyone understands that, will you give up about this map?
I think you guys wouldn't give up if you could have spoken your opinions to BATs freely.
Don't surrender due to language barrier.
I will rank this...... if the map is bubbled. Although there's a possibilty that I can be cut from BAT team ahahaha
Just get one more BAT who agrees with me
If this map's difficulty was E/H/I/I/I/Taiko I(Before unranked)
Would Eph unranked this?
This map is acutally E/H/I/I/I/Taiko I because the map is short
Ahh very long post btw, I have to study English more lol.....
Thanks Pas. Thanks a lot.Pasonia wrote:
(Yes, please regard this mod post only while disregarding Remmy's modding due to it not fulfilling the criteria of "map improvements" as he had claimed it to be)
I disagree.Pasonia wrote:
(Yes, please regard this mod post only while disregarding Remmy's modding due to it not fulfilling the criteria of "map improvements" as he had claimed it to be)
I only see one correction you need to do, but which you'll need to spend a while doing. Don't alter the map, because they're fine as is to me. No hidden note bullshit. It's just fine, if tough.
But those errors were taken care of? Also most of remmys mod post is style suggestions, and they aren't exactly neccessary to change....Ephemeral wrote:
Regardless, all levels of this bullshit does not get this map re-ranked any faster. The conditions for re-rank have been clearly outlined by peppy himself here (viewtopic.php?p=370140#p370140) - what the mapper has to do is exceedingly obvious and any further effort spent on this map by any party is a waste of time. peppy will be the one to re-rank this, not any of us.
Drop this shit and move on. It is up to Jerrysr to fix this and if he is not prepared to implement the fixes required, then let the map rest in peace.
the point isBlue Dragon wrote:
bad apple = E H I I I
oh, yes.
That's my bad, feel free to revert it.Cyclone wrote:
Hard:
What the hell is up with these difficulty settings?
OD 6
The others you can adjust. HP drain needs to be raised. Circle size could go 1 smaller if you want.
Relaxing:
Not much i can say except "lol 0 HP drain" and the lack of volume on some of the hitsounds bugs me tremendously.
Well, if Remmy's mod doesn't fit the map improvement criteria as Pasonia has said, then couldn't it be overruled? If it couldn't it'd be kind of funny, since you yourself overruled your own team when you unranked this map.Ephemeral wrote:
Nobody on this team is in a position to override anybody else - superfluous title or otherwise. You can refute or disagree, but overruling his perfectly valid input and completely disregarding his expertise has made me lose what little iota of respect I had left for you. We are all equal on this team and possessing a largely superfluous title does not change that fact, as has been mentioned many times before.
The fact that you pass personal judgement of your own then ask for 'solid reasoning' to refute it is the most sickening case of hypocrisy I think I've ever seen from a member of this community. Who are you to pass your opinions as the word of god?
he does have a point there20m4t4r wrote:
Well, if Remmy's mod doesn't fit the map improvement criteria as Pasonia has said, then couldn't it be overruled? If it couldn't it'd be kind of funny, since you yourself overruled your own team when you unranked this map.Ephemeral wrote:
Nobody on this team is in a position to override anybody else - superfluous title or otherwise. You can refute or disagree, but overruling his perfectly valid input and completely disregarding his expertise has made me lose what little iota of respect I had left for you. We are all equal on this team and possessing a largely superfluous title does not change that fact, as has been mentioned many times before.
The fact that you pass personal judgement of your own then ask for 'solid reasoning' to refute it is the most sickening case of hypocrisy I think I've ever seen from a member of this community. Who are you to pass your opinions as the word of god?
Starred, and I hope this gets solved soon.
In Pasonia's opinion, Remmy's advice does not fit. Do note the important bit: "opinion".20m4t4r wrote:
Well, if Remmy's mod doesn't fit the map improvement criteria as Pasonia has said, then couldn't it be overruled? If it couldn't it'd be kind of funny, since you yourself overruled your own team when you unranked this map.
Starred, and I hope this gets solved soon.
wait, but isn't what you unranked it for opinionated? Doesn't it take someone's OPINION to say if a map has a bad difficulty spread.Ephemeral wrote:
In Pasonia's opinion, Remmy's advice does not fit. Do note the important bit: "opinion".20m4t4r wrote:
Well, if Remmy's mod doesn't fit the map improvement criteria as Pasonia has said, then couldn't it be overruled? If it couldn't it'd be kind of funny, since you yourself overruled your own team when you unranked this map.
Starred, and I hope this gets solved soon.
This map was unranked over imperative issues, not subjective ones. If I had unranked this over subjective issues then yes, I would not exactly be practicing what I preach.
Isn't should be an opinionated phraseEphemeral wrote:
Unranked due to.. god do I even need to explain why?
Seriously, N I I I I I spread should be gunning for approval, not for ranking. This is just a waste of time.
What do we have here? Oh its another opinionEphemeral wrote:
I meant no disrespect with my statements. We have a set of rules we must follow when ranking maps, and based off my judgement, said rules were not precisely followed when this map was ranked.
I suppose you're right. In hindsight my actions are really no better than what I went out and condemned Pasonia for.ouranhshc wrote:
words
an hour for me XD[Lance] wrote:
Well this thread entertained me for 30 minutes.
Is it the case really?Ephemeral wrote:
if we allow maps to get progressively more difficult without restraint (via the way the system used to work), newer players will have nothing solid to play.
Kodora wrote:
Can be re-ranked now i guess?