3000 isn't good. maybe 4000.
forum
what rank is considered 'good'
posted
Total Posts
90
rank doesnt fully represent your actual skill
Well it get's lower everyday since more and more people rank up.
8k pp
You could even say the actual #1 is casual since he doesn't even play that muchNarrill wrote:
"Casual" isn't a descriptor for rank quality, it's a descriptor for time investment. Any person of any rank can be "casual."
imo under 1k
#171,354 and under.
A player being casual or having a good rank are two separate things. A player with a great rank may barely touch the game, and vice versa where somebody can play constantly but not necessarily consider themselves good. What ranks are considered good depends on each player's view. When you're rank 300k, 100k seems incredible, when rank 150k, 70k seems impossible and so on. At the same time to call people of any rank a bad player isn't very true because that would imply that their ability to improve is already locked... In a game like osu! it becomes very difficult to classify anybody as "good" or "bad" because of the wide range of difficulties and high number of players. Really it just depends on one's own view as to whether they are good or others are good or bad.
i personally think top10k is pretty good already
Top 10k checking in, can confirm not good. Maybe top 2-3k.
yeah and once you get to top3k you will still say you're not good.
if you can fc 4.5+ star maps with like 98% accuracy then you're pretty good already.
if you can fc 4.5+ star maps with like 98% accuracy then you're pretty good already.
now I have a goal so senpai will finally notice mesilmarilen wrote:
i personally think top10k is pretty good already
yeah, if you can fc like 80% of them you're not bad. But if you can do that, that's probably at least 3.5K pp.silmarilen wrote:
yeah and once you get to top3k you will still say you're not good.
if you can fc 4.5+ star maps with like 98% accuracy then you're pretty good already.
Top 2,5k ppv1 :^)
Nah, top 100 ppv1 is where it's at.
My best right now is actually 5.03 star no-mod with 98% acc (huehue brag more) but regardless, I wasn't being completely serious anyway. Ofc everyone has a different definition of 'good'.silmarilen wrote:
yeah and once you get to top3k you will still say you're not good.
if you can fc 4.5+ star maps with like 98% accuracy then you're pretty good already.
I would consider people who have 3,306 pp or higher "good".
pls dont hurt me
pls dont hurt me
Definitely more than 10k as I'm 10k and I still think I'm realy bad :lel:
I'd say something like being able to play AR8+DT and FC with good accuracy or something like that, rank is sometimes not realy a good indicator.
I'd say something like being able to play AR8+DT and FC with good accuracy or something like that, rank is sometimes not realy a good indicator.
Sub Rank 500
Overall ppl who can read AR5-AR10.3 and can play HR and DT.
A good example is WubWoofWolf
"Good" is above "average".
In my eyes:
A average person can pass AR 8,9,10 Maps and maybe FC 1/4 of these.
A good person can FC more than 7/8 AR 8,9,10 Ranked Maps
Just my opinion.
Overall ppl who can read AR5-AR10.3 and can play HR and DT.
A good example is WubWoofWolf
"Good" is above "average".
In my eyes:
A average person can pass AR 8,9,10 Maps and maybe FC 1/4 of these.
A good person can FC more than 7/8 AR 8,9,10 Ranked Maps
Just my opinion.
I'd consider Top 3k are good.
Can't agree more with silm here, you guys either have extremely low self esteem or don't bother watching what's happening around you because if you're ~10k, you're probably far above the REAL "average" players, therefore "good" already.
Rank 0. If you haven't broken down the barrier of natural numbers with your sheer awesomeness then you don't deserve the title "good." You can settle on the title "not as bad as some people" if you would like though.
Saturos shall never be forgotten
Probably 10k 
Or WWW if I'm remembering correctly.GoldenWolf wrote:
Saturos shall never be forgotten
I think I am good but I need to be"better"Varetyr wrote:
Can't agree more with silm here, you guys either have extremely low self esteem or don't bother watching what's happening around you because if you're ~10k, you're probably far above the REAL "average" players, therefore "good" already.
kevpwns
around ~500 and up
But personally I think anyone above 5kpp deserves to call themselves good too
But personally I think anyone above 5kpp deserves to call themselves good too
ahaha that's a funny jokeRiince wrote:
But personally I think anyone above 5kpp deserves to call themselves good too
can you tell it again
just going off my tons of spectating of hundreds of different people good and badwinber1 wrote:
ahaha that's a funny jokeRiince wrote:
But personally I think anyone above 5kpp deserves to call themselves good too
can you tell it again
Anyone better than me. It's a dynamic skill metric!
This thread taught me that no one wants to admit they are good. "Good" is just above "Average". There are over a million ranked players. Based on that, I'd say the top 10 or even top 5% could easily say they are "Good". That's the top 100k and 50k respectively. "Good" does not mean "Great".
At least 7k pp. 8k is when you're certainly good.