They are easier.Tshemmp wrote:
Wait, the new HR Maps are supposed to be easier? For some reason I find them way harder than the previous ones, is that just me?
Best comment everAzer wrote:
another one bites de_dust
All hail seedingHumiliation wrote:
my friend's team (20k - 50k) is going against happystick, elysion, nitro, and more. What the fuck?
I'm quitting osuDon't be like that honey.jackisgone wrote:
Take me off the roster
The point is to not have a rank 32 vs rank 1 semi-finals or some shit.Tshemmp wrote:
Mh, I don't like how Challonge puts the #1 team vs the #32 team and so on. Wouldn't it be more exciting if #1 would play #17, #2 vs #18 and so on? This would make sure the best 16 team still advance but prevent shit like #1 vs #32 were the results are totally clear from the very beginning (not saying #1 vs #17 wouldn't be clear either but it would be a bit more interesting to watch). I doubt these matches would be very fun for anybody.
Wont happen. If Seed 32 would win against Seed 18 for example, Seed 32 would still be #rekt in the next match, when they play against Seed 4 or whatever[AirCoN] wrote:
The point is to not have a rank 32 vs rank 1 semi-finals or some shit.Tshemmp wrote:
Mh, I don't like how Challonge puts the #1 team vs the #32 team and so on. Wouldn't it be more exciting if #1 would play #17, #2 vs #18 and so on? This would make sure the best 16 team still advance but prevent shit like #1 vs #32 were the results are totally clear from the very beginning (not saying #1 vs #17 wouldn't be clear either but it would be a bit more interesting to watch). I doubt these matches would be very fun for anybody.
If worse comes to hand I'll commentateAthrun_Yamato wrote:
Just want to say that my timetable does not look good.
I probably may have to drop out of commentator/referee due to family issues as well as scehduling issues
I'll update as I go.
With your system there would be NO interesting games. A seeding system like this is meant to ensure that the teams that deserve to get into the next round do, while creating heated contests among the teams that are in the middle of the pack. Obviously first seed should pretty much always be expected to go through barring a miracle or freak occurrence. But now the games that are most interesting are #16 v. #17, #15 v. #18, etc., and part of the exciting thing is to see how far up the chain the matches will be close, like whether or not a #21 will be able to upset a #12, or a #25 upset a #8. With the system you propose, all teams that are higher seeded should always advance, since there is a considerable skill gap in every single match.Tshemmp wrote:
Mh, I don't like how Challonge puts the #1 team vs the #32 team and so on. Wouldn't it be more exciting if #1 would play #17, #2 vs #18 and so on? This would make sure the best 16 team still advance but prevent shit like #1 vs #32 were the results are totally clear from the very beginning (not saying #1 vs #17 wouldn't be clear either but it would be a bit more interesting to watch). I doubt these matches would be very fun for anybody.
+ That would mean the final would be THEORICALLY #1 vs #16. I guess nobody wants that. Of course the first round wouldn't be the most interesting with my system but ALL the other rounds would be interesting.CptHampton wrote:
With your system there would be NO interesting games. A seeding system like this is meant to ensure that the teams that deserve to get into the next round do, while creating heated contests among the teams that are in the middle of the pack. Obviously first seed should pretty much always be expected to go through barring a miracle or freak occurrence. But now the games that are most interesting are #16 v. #17, #14 v. #18, etc., and part of the exciting thing is to see how far up the chain the matches will be close, like whether or not a #21 will be able to upset a #12, or a #25 upset a #8. With the system you propose, all teams that are higher seeded should always advance, since there is a considerable skill gap in every single match.Tshemmp wrote:
Mh, I don't like how Challonge puts the #1 team vs the #32 team and so on. Wouldn't it be more exciting if #1 would play #17, #2 vs #18 and so on? This would make sure the best 16 team still advance but prevent shit like #1 vs #32 were the results are totally clear from the very beginning (not saying #1 vs #17 wouldn't be clear either but it would be a bit more interesting to watch). I doubt these matches would be very fun for anybody.
This live drawings will happen. "Top-seed1" just mean that a top-seeded hold this place. It will determine who will be put against who on later rounds.mayank0 wrote:
Are the challonge brackets final or the live drawing thing on 6th is happening?
So that is what it means. Thanks for pointing that out.-Ryosuke wrote:
This live drawings will happen. "Top-seed1" just mean that a top-seeded hold this place. It will determine who will be put against who on later rounds.
Thanks. Well, it is not looking as bad but still pretty bad. I need to space out time to pack my luggage as well as some other stuffMiruHong wrote:
If worse comes to hand I'll commentate
So if you revive then your score will be counted? Or do you mean reviving still does not validate the score?-Ryosuke wrote:
If a player fails the map, his score will be nullified and reviving does not nullify his score.
RIP -> 0 ScoreBroccoly wrote:
So if you revive then your score will be counted? Or do you mean reviving still does not validate the score?-Ryosuke wrote:
If a player fails the map, his score will be nullified and reviving does not nullify his score.
^so yeah, if you revive, your score will be counted.Yauxo wrote:
RIP -> 0 ScoreBroccoly wrote:
So if you revive then your score will be counted? Or do you mean reviving still does not validate the score?
Not RIP -> whateveryourscoreis Score
now nowEcZaByTe wrote:
this is lame and boring
hey it's my twinDeath wrote:
now nowEcZaByTe wrote:
this is lame and boring
/Gangsta DT Finals confirmed-Ryosuke wrote:
EDIT: HYPE FOR RURUCCHI PLEASE