How is this not ranked yet?
Thanks for the mod! I owe you something.Moo-Chan wrote:
m4m[Normal]go through and check blankets. other than that i like the diff
- id make the AR5 or something. going from 3.5 to 6 is a big difference from an easy to a normal
- 00:22:403 (1,2) - fix blanket
- 00:26:153 (3,4) - ^
- 00:48:803 - 00:50:078 - i doubt it matters but id remove the green points that are in between these times
- 01:05:753 (1) - id move the last anchor to the left once to even out with the previous slider
- 01:17:603 (1,3) - i dont really like this barely touching overlap, so maybe move the single note to the right just a bit?
- 01:19:553 (6) - id nc this to keep consistency with this nc 01:09:953 (1)
- 01:33:953 (1) - remove nc. i dont see a point for one here
- 02:12:353 (6) - same with above. nc to keep consistency leaving this for consistency with the other drumrolls into kiai flash thing
- 02:18:803 (4) - idk if this is rankable, but this slider goes far off the grid, so id move it to the left
- 02:40:703 (4,1) - this overlap could be fixed
- 03:08:453 (1,1) - is it ok to have two spinners start so close next to each other?
- 03:24:953 (1) - ♥
- 03:35:153 (6) - nc for consistency
- 03:42:803 (7,1) - same as the easy, idk about the no break here
[Infinite]in love ♥♥♥
- https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3037907 ;-;...
- 00:04:403 (2) - maybe you could move this to x:248 y:100? to me the small space it makes between 00:03:953 (1) - and 00:04:403 (2) - feels nice
- 00:08:453 (7) - just a suggestion, but maybe you could do something like this? http://puu.sh/hlvV5/2f117aeac6.jpg it plays nicely imo think it takes a bit of the emphasis off the slider following those, so going to leave
- 00:20:303 (2) - ctrl - g? it feels less awkward to play
- 00:21:203 (2) - ^
- 00:24:803 (1,2) - fix the blanket here? its slightly off
- 00:43:253 (2,3) - fix blanket
- 01:00:503 (2,4) - you should ctrl - g these separately. it plays so much better like that
- 01:03:353 (1,3) - ^
- 01:17:303 (6,7) - to me, this pattern is a bit meh to play. even when i was testplaying it it felt awkward. maybe come up with something else to do? will see
- 02:05:453 (6) - ctrl - g? like the backward motion here
- 02:36:503 (6,7,1) - fix blanket
- 02:43:103 (4) - imo you should ctrl - g this. the flow it creates feels nice
- 03:10:553 (6) - nc?
- 03:25:403 (1,1) - fix blanket
- 03:40:853 (2) - ctrl - g? same backward thing
aaaaa, i love this song. amazing choice
good luck with getting this ranked!
have my two stars~
Thanks so much!CrypticMech wrote:
from #modreqs yesterday I think? idunno
[Infinite]Sorry that I couldn't have been of more help, good luck!
- I'm probably stupid but what is the diffnames relevancy in relation to the song. It has to do with how I feel about the lyrics! If it ultimately proves to be too much of a stretch, then I'll change it.
- 00:05:453 (4,5) - I get why these are here rhythmically, but it doesn't sit right with me that they aren't in the song (from what I can hear?) there's some vocal stuff there
- 00:30:953 (1) - Rotate 5 degrees to better line up with the triplets?
- 00:45:503 (2,3) - CTRL+G for more back-and-forth goodness? (Or would that be too much) Yeah, I think the two groups of circles match the vocals a bit, like each group of two is a unit, if that makes sense
- 01:16:253 (1,2) - It flows well, but I don't get why the DS is so large compared to other notes when the musics intensity is about the same. yeah, that was why the ds was pretty big, since it flows, but I decreased it a bit.
- 03:00:053 (2) - Better blanket?
- 03:43:928 (1) - I kind of dislike how theres no clickable note on the end of the word "starting." It just feels strong enough to be clickable to me. I think this works fine, since the end part he kind of dies a bit before the next word
Once again, fairly polished, great set!