1. osu! forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked/Approved Beatmaps
show more
posted
After checked.I think it's good enough.In game,the Normal Stars are 1.98
So Bubbled.Congratulations
posted
01.wav delay more than 5ms


J1.wav not over 100ms
J2.wav
J3.wav
J4.wav
J5.wav
J6.wav
J7.wav^
posted

[ S a k u r a ] wrote:

01.wav delay more than 5ms


J1.wav not over 100ms
J2.wav
J3.wav
J4.wav
J5.wav
J6.wav
J7.wav^
Fixed, great thanks!
posted
BG resolution should be 16:9 or 4:3
posted

[ S a k u r a ] wrote:

BG resolution should be 16:9 or 4:3
……………………1023*767 _(:3」∠)_
OK reuploaded to 1024*768, thanks again~
posted

Ichigaki wrote:

Mod Requested from QQ :P



Column setup


| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |


Pew's Insane

  1. 00:25:618 - How about add note on 3 because its sound is same with 00:25:337 - nope, they LN are present to strings on previously
  2. 00:26:837 - 00:27:025 - Should be added by note like the previous - can be added but looks no rest before new chorus. i think empty is a good way
  3. 00:31:900 - Should be 2-notes like the previous (00:28:900 - and 00:30:400 - ) removed, nice catch
  4. 01:15:775 - 01:17:275 - 01:18:775 - 01:27:775 - 01:29:275 - Should be 3-notes like previous - added
  5. 01:19:056 - Add a note to 2 - all fixed/added
  6. 01:19:150 - Add a note ^
  7. 01:26:650 - Add a note to 5 ^
  8. 01:29:650 - Add a note to 3 ^
  9. 01:35:837 - Add a note for soft drum - prefer solo stream on there
  10. 01:57:118 - 01:57:212 - Should be added by a note - no good/fit enough to add for ending note instrument
thanks, woc so late reply until i didnt realize this map get bubbled


fixed ver.

http://puu.sh/gr9aa/fce05b139b.osu
posted
Updated~
posted
Qualified
posted
Grats ExPew and ljqandylee <3

IN GAME normal 1,98*, maybe its not an issue for the DQ
posted
Aren't SR gaps wider than 1.5 stars unrankable? The gap between Insane's star rating and Ex-ray's is 1.87.
posted
Lately, there's been some unwritten rule about 1.5+ star gap being unrankable, and maps have been halted citing this hidden clause. p/3772733 I'm not sure why this map was pushed through despite this hidden rule being acknowledged by most of the mapping/modding community.

I personally can't make any judgment on the actual difficulty gap between the two difficulties as I have very little experience with 7K, but the NPS graphs have some large differences. Ex-ray also has some very dense and complex LN patterns, while Insane is much more simplistic.

Insane


Ex-ray
posted
woah wocao lol
new 7K mapset for et's :U
/i know this song from cytus lol

grats pew and ljqandylee owo/
posted
RIP Rating

If just talking about the star difficult, 2.02 star won't the reason for DQ
And I never heard that 1.5 stars gap will be considered unrankable, it is not an unwritten rule, too. If must say, it is not recommend to have 1.5 stars gap because if often means it really has gap issue, but if diff spread is reasonable, even 2.5 stars gap can be rankable

If you need examples:
Soleily - Renatus (Hyper -> Another: 3.16 -> 4.80)
Sharlo & yealina - Kakushigoto (7K HD -> 7K MX: 2.37 -> 4.96)
posted
It is an unwritten rule though, because bubbled maps have been popped for the sr gaps, and other maps can't get ranked because of that.
And using Renatus, which was only ranked through the contest, and Kakushigoto (we all know the drama behind that) as examples...those are not good examples.
posted
Yuyoyuppe - AiAe
A.SAKA - Nanatsu Issenzakura
Please find me a map dq'd by sr gaps thank you.
posted

Kuo Kyoka wrote:

Grats ExPew and ljqandylee <3

IN GAME normal 1,98*, maybe its not an issue for the DQ
posted
As I've mentioned before to a few others already concerning this map, the gap allowable in such a case like this.
I've asked around and gotten confirmation from QATs already before the qualification of this mapset that this is allowable.

There was a reason why 1.5* gap was an unwritten rule as it was never really definite - but instead a decent enough reference / guideline point to use in order to judge spread.
Recently many people have been complaining about the inefficiency of the star rating system from what I can tell - it particularly being not a good enough judge to accurately determine spread, therefore things like density, BPM and pattern complexity will be the main judge in determining whether a map is acceptable beyond the 1.5*+ spread range. It'll be somewhat similar to standard and how their spread is determined. (Also this only really applies to higher difficulties. To be completely honest, having easier diffs outside of 1.5* anyways is just not really that logical to begin with.)

This does take things to a more subjective approach which some people may or may not agree with, but again if keeping to the 1.5* max gap guideline anyways you won't have any issues.

Again as previously mentioned we already have previously ranked maps exceeding the 1.5* gap, although we have a few maps popped / told to change due to the gap (although I believe in Negative Legacy's case I believe it was the spread gap between hard? Which doesn't make as much sense if it was between Max And the hardest diff). It's really just dependent on the dynamic of this current growing system. (Explained below)

Anyways, a last thing (and one of the most important things) to just keep in mind is that the reason why a lot of these rules and such aren't completely set in stone is because osu!mania in terms of the mapping/modding part is still a fast-growing system. Two months ago we had around 3 BATs only. Now there's 23 BNs that specialise in osu!mania alone. Of course things will be a bit unstable or change, nothing can help that.

This isn't coming from me, but what I have come across and seen recently to be the new judgement of this gap spread concern. I'm not arguing with anyone or defending anything, I'm simply enlightening and notifying.

(If this map gets DQed for whatever reason, the above still applies.)

Preferably I'd like further discussion of this spread gap to be elsewhere as at this point after qualification it doesn't become constructive at all. This is up to the QAT's discretion now. Thanks.
posted
I believe this is acceptable since it is higher than 5.25 which is stated in RC (but never told about the gaps though..)
We really need some clarification about the gap thing :v QATs got this~

Anyway, congrats~
posted
不管图最终啥命运 我都永远永远永远支持
posted
http://puu.sh/gsnFC/815877c55f.png
Jacks on weak finger make me sad
show more
Please sign in to reply.