if anybody was the consistent one it was snowwhite, he broke combo only like once before the finalsRiince wrote:
if big k and hvick didnt make their roster scary enough, Rucker and his stupid high consistency is probably going to be the biggest factor especially on getting to the finals. unless dungeon comes out of left field with the combos i dont even think korea will make it to the finals...
im really excited to see Rucker play again, he was my favorite player last owc with how hard he almost carried his team to 1st, and now that his team doesnt even really NEED to be carried he's just going to be extra horsepower on an engine that was already fixed on victory.
forum
osu! World Cup 2014 - Discussion Thread
posted
Total Posts
1,140
yeah but you cant deny rucker kept them in it during the finals
at least, if memory serves.
at least, if memory serves.
Go commies :^)-Soba- wrote:
Go 'murika!!!!!
wow... and to think I once called you a friendMy Accuracy Sucks wrote:
Go commies :^)-Soba- wrote:
Go 'murika!!!!!
I'll do it, for obvious reasons.AmaiHachimitsu wrote:
There isn't a single decent player doing the commentary, it will probably suck unless they do some research.
Can't you at least find one "expert" like it happens everywhere? D:
I don't know of any people who can commentate and play well. I hope there's somebody out there.
Wait what Mr.Color won't be commentating?
/didn'treadthethread
/didn'treadthethread
wasn't there some talk about lewa and jesse commentating? why don't we make that happen?AmaiHachimitsu wrote:
There isn't a single decent player doing the commentary, it will probably suck unless they do some research.
Can't you at least find one "expert" like it happens everywhere? D:
in the matches I saw, Rucker was the one who was more consistent.silmarilen wrote:
if anybody was the consistent one it was snowwhite, he broke combo only like once before the finals
But if the matches won and subsequently wins, losses difference is the same, only then is that third rule used. In that case the team with the lower win percentage will be higher ranked.buny wrote:
win % is a higher priority though, since the team that has more wins than losses difference is going to be prioritised
Also, coming from you, that hurts. Considering that you were the first to respond last year, and you approved of it since you actually read it that time. p/2660641
I exist.Omgforz wrote:
I don't know of any people who can commentate and play well. I hope there's somebody out there.
requesting kriers
Cookiezi made a new country just to play in the owc. He'll be playing all 4 player spots alone. It was his plan all along
Why not play and occasionally commentate some of the matches? There's plenty of good players with high English skills that would be suitable for this (you're one of them).Omgforz wrote:
I don't know of any people who can commentate and play well. I hope there's somebody out there.
Or you can always invite some native British or American speakers that are skilled, but not participating in the tournament.
+1silmarilen wrote:
requesting kriers
think of it this way,Angusman wrote:
But if the matches won and subsequently wins, losses difference is the same, only then is that third rule used. In that case the team with the lower win percentage will be higher ranked.buny wrote:
win % is a higher priority though, since the team that has more wins than losses difference is going to be prioritised
Also, coming from you, that hurts. Considering that you were the first to respond last year, and you approved of it since you actually read it that time. p/2660641
there is a possibility to win from 0 to 12 maps, which is the main focus of the prioritisation
sure they could have the same (maps won - maps loss), but the team with the most maps won should win. Why? Because they had scores closer to winning than the other team.
If the teams were playing BO1 instead of BO7, it would be a different story because that's directly correlated to win%.
you could probably pm loctav for a direct answer, since i'm only speculating
and how did you derive to the conclusion that I approved it? I didn't mention anything about my thought on it and it should have been clearly obvious that was a trash post
What about Australian speakers? :O Don't count us out!fartownik wrote:
Or you can always invite some native British or American speakers that are skilled, but not participating in the tournament.
We need commentators as energetic as this http://youtu.be/6q83gj8kFco?t=20sAmaiHachimitsu wrote:
There isn't a single decent player doing the commentary, it will probably suck unless they do some research.
Can't you at least find one "expert" like it happens everywhere? D:
Although, the only thing we would hear would be "COMBO DROP" occasionally.
Loctav, can we get a running status on the teams who have already signed up? We're in the dark here on how much time we have left since 32 spots is really limited for the world.
Topic Starter
If you wish to change your roster, send me a PM and resubmit your roster. Anyways, do this only in case someone in your team hops off or refuses to play (that's why you can still change it).
You don't need to save slots or whatever bullshit. There is no "first come, first serve". The most competitive teams registered will be accepted. The teams will be released after registration phase.
Leaving you in the dark is intended.
You don't need to save slots or whatever bullshit. There is no "first come, first serve". The most competitive teams registered will be accepted. The teams will be released after registration phase.
Leaving you in the dark is intended.
#hypeblocker
B1rd wrote:
+1silmarilen wrote:
requesting kriers
Because then the tournament would be unbalanced.mayank0 wrote:
why not just increase the limit XD
why would it be? u guys can always have more groups with the top 32 getting seeded and the rest placed with the top 32 in groups such that the groups arnt unbalanced as a whole... there could be many countries who would want to participate but might not be able to because of the limit... especially bcoz their country's pp is low, or bcoz there might be not be as many players playing the game..
Unusual-bot
this is the owc, this isnt a tournament where anybody can join and the best go through, this is a tournament where the best can join and the best of the best go through. if your country doesnt have high pp players then you dont belong here.mayank0 wrote:
why would it be? u guys can always have more groups with the top 32 getting seeded and the rest placed with the top 32 in groups such that the groups arnt unbalanced as a whole... there could be many countries who would want to participate but might not be able to because of the limit... especially bcoz their country's pp is low, or bcoz there might be not be as many players playing the game..
it's like letting an amature club play in the world cup football.
atl have some qualifiers to select the unseeded ones, even the fifa wc does that... pp isnt always an accurate representation of your skill level
Supporting Korea and Poland / Germany this year!
Poland or Germany are definitely the only european countries that can make it through! #believe
god won't save the queen.
me as commentator pls
Poland or Germany are definitely the only european countries that can make it through! #believe
god won't save the queen.
me as commentator pls
:<-Ryosuke wrote:
Poland or Germany are definitely the only european countries that can make it through! #believe
No, it's like letting a lowly-ranked country compete to qualify in world cup football.silmarilen wrote:
this is the owc, this isnt a tournament where anybody can join and the best go through, this is a tournament where the best can join and the best of the best go through. if your country doesnt have high pp players then you dont belong here.mayank0 wrote:
why would it be? u guys can always have more groups with the top 32 getting seeded and the rest placed with the top 32 in groups such that the groups arnt unbalanced as a whole... there could be many countries who would want to participate but might not be able to because of the limit... especially bcoz their country's pp is low, or bcoz there might be not be as many players playing the game..
it's like letting an amature club play in the world cup football.
Oh wait.
Yes, only the best 32 countries should be in the World Cup, but if significantly more than 32 countries register interest, qualifiers for 17th-xxth should definitely happen.
It's probably too late for this to happen this year, but it's something I'd love to see next year.
Sure, PP isn't accurate. But I am pretty sure a team of 8, all in the top 500, are going to beat a team of rank 5,000+ with ease.mayank0 wrote:
atl have some qualifiers to select the unseeded ones, even the fifa wc does that... pp isnt always an accurate representation of your skill level
Plus, there are another 3(4) other world cups too, they don't have time to do qualifier tournaments, and other things like that. If you want to be in the OWC, have a team that is good enough to be somewhat competitive in some situations.
Loctav wrote:
If you wish to change your roster, send me a PM and resubmit your roster. Anyways, do this only in case someone in your team hops off or refuses to play (that's why you can still change it).
You don't need to save slots or whatever bullshit. There is no "first come, first serve". The most competitive teams registered will be accepted. The teams will be released after registration phase.
Leaving you in the dark is intended.
So we wont know who's playing in until November 1st?
Unusual-bot
i know, but atl this tourney will be more interesting bcz the losing team in the Round 16 still have a chance to win the tourney, and i like thatSoinou wrote:
Not the best thing done this year. The freemod is now really good, and the possibility to ban maps is just amazing. This year, strategy will be a must to winNaCulus wrote:
thanks Loctav for doing this
dino plsFrostmourne wrote:
+1silmarilen wrote:
requesting kriers