Reposting as suggested
00:17:561 (1,2,3,4) - why is this the only part mapped differently when the music is the same
00:35:288 (1,2,3,4) - same as above; it would make more sense to have this as the first or last of the set rather than ~3/4 in
00:43:470 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - 2-5 stays, 00:44:152 (no beat),00:44:237 (6,7,8,9). so in essence slider 4 notes, space, 4 notes, 10-12.
I feel like that is more consistant with what you did the combo before because as of now you are mapping on differnt parts
01:01:198 (7,1) - i think the spinner comes in where is 7 is
01:20:288 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - i think this is personal but never been a fan of triplets that change spacings. looks off and not too sure about placement either cause of it
01:22:163 (6,7,8) - not sure about sliders ending on the main beats like that nor do i think they are consistnat with 01:21:652 (1,2,3,4,5)
01:25:658 (17) - i almost dont want this note here. cant really explain but its like you have two half triplets, one starting with the 5 slider and another at the 1 repeat slider
01:28:555 (12,13) - doesnt this area also get a kai time?
01:31:879 (6,7,8,9) - either all sliders or slider+note+slider+note
01:33:073 (3,4,5,6) - maybe spaced slightly closer idk
01:34:948 (9) - is right on top of 7 and at the end of 11. cluttered
01:36:652 (3,4,5,6,7) - i think you can be more creative with this part. much potential such lack much wow
01:41:595 (4,5) - was kinda expecting another slider
01:46:965 (4,5) - this is kinda far compared to the rest and in general
01:47:391 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - there is something here that is missing. possibly something before 6. listen slow search for inconsistancy
02:05:118 (9,1,2,3) - personally i think this is a little too spaced
02:06:652 (4) - new combo here? then you can make it 6 and 6
02:31:027 (5,1) - end of 5 intrudes on next combo.
02:51:482 (1,2,3,4) - not a fan, kinda crude looking
03:19:266 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - theres a lot in such little space. not big but just a observation
03:20:629 (3,4,5,6,7) - slighly obscures readablility
03:48:925 (1,2,3,4) - once again not a fan of this syle. slighly deviates from your orignial design if that makes sense at all
03:49:948 (7,8,9,10,1) - is the 8 being out of place intentional or not cause it looks off
03:54:379 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - its a little too stacked, give it just a bit more space so that it doesnt look too stacked
04:12:448 (5) - so lonely repeat slider seems lost. maybe end of the combo should have one too?
04:22:675 (7,8,9,10,1,2,3,4) - aestetics
05:38:868 (6,1) - maybe make 6 a slider and 1 not? not sure about this one
Extra Notes: Use auto+dt and watch your map. Anything that catches your eye, regardless of what it is, may need revision.
-aestetics, readablilty, patterens, flow, anything