Okoratu wrote:

asdf I think i have a few things to say about extreme as well
Edit:
---------
heyo

would increase HP on Extra at least by .5 or 1.0 and - if you do that - on Extreme by .5 if you do that for Extra .5

[Extreme]
yay i am target audience of this diff now (wasn't previously because flow was lethal)
i hate yoloncs which just give you a ton of health for reading a pattern correctly also you do these in beginning mostly and then just go with onebar combos ;_; suck it up

1. 00:09:142 (1,2,1,2) - why comboing differently than 00:06:857 (1,2,3,4) - 00:16:000 (1,2,3,4) - for a stack ..? lol pretty much
2. 00:29:428 (5) - 00:30:571 (5) - 00:31:571 (4,5,1) - compared to most other things these 3 are much much harsher and sharper than e.g. 00:26:857 (3,4,1) - or 00:28:000 (3,4,5,1) - 00:33:714 (3,4,5,1) - etc. i think these 3 should be less sharp / toned down a bit in terms of spaceee ok
3. 00:32:857 (7) - i think whole pattern would flow better if you move this one more to the bottom right so that you have more of a zig zag movement in 00:32:571 (5,6,7,1) - instead of a back-forth-up movement so like where it was before asphyxia told me to move it ok
4. 00:41:428 (2,3,4) - stacking this makes 00:41:714 (5,6,7) - a bit weirder to anticipate because you have to hold on for a bit and then suddenly move up and do a downwards motion, which is potentially edgy spacing this triplet out in some direction could end up playing better idea is big drop down onto 2 from 1, so having it spaced means drop not as work i dont know i like stack
5. 00:51:142 - random rhythm which could be annoying for at least me: clap on sliderend should be clicked imo dunno if crtl+ging rhythm in 00:50:714 (3,4,5) - is an option or just going full circles is consistent with others but i still don't like because you don't go with vocals that much in prev parts (more like not at all) B)
6. 01:04:000 (1,2,3) - this was super unexpected on first play (was fine afterwards because i knew what to expect) because you don't do 1/2 stacking in this diff (disregarding the 2 stacks in beginning) besides that one and 02:11:479 (1,2,3) - has also movement so everyone complains about this one and i thought it was cool but cool is not allowed
7. 01:44:050 (7) - 00:45:714 (1) - nc? lol it should but i'm not doing it i have my reasons dont judge
8. spacing / flow in last kiai and after should probably be smoother or smaller in: did stuff for all of these ones
   
   1. 01:46:050 (5) - probably a bit to the left can be less harsh here
   2. 01:48:193 (5,6) - i don't really get why this is so huuuge, like i'm missing reason behind this because 01:47:336 (1,2) - is smaller while also having clap stuff on white, also having huge spacing kind of makes this feel like it's 2 separate patterns while in most other places this stuff looks like one single pattern idk how to explanation
   3. 01:55:336 (1) - normally you would expect this go face the other way because of the way 00:56:571 (3,4,5,1) - worked better than this does, i recommend 01:55:336 (1,2) - crtl+h and moveing 01:56:050 (3) - somewhere to the bottom left quarter of the screen to have a vocal empathis jump thing from 3 to 4
   4. 01:58:336 (4) - slight nerf to distance to prev object would be play better imo
   5. 02:00:479 (4) - moving down and a bit to the left like 380\230ish somewhere in that area might be making this a less harsh jump pattern
   6. 02:04:622 (1,2,3,4,1) - this felt like it was relying on x axis movement way too much, having more upwardsmovement expecially in 02:05:479 (4,1) - may feel much better imo are you mapping ctb
   7. 02:09:336 (2,3) - 02:08:336 (2,3) - are quite HARSh considering this is not kiai and more of "a tiny bit calmer"-section so doing huge spacing makes not that much senso
   damn i hope that makes sense