00:00:004 (1,2,3,4,5,6) – imo, the last two beats in this measure are stronger than the first two beats in this section, so I'd like to see the jumps be into (5) and (6). The same is especially true for 00:01:228 (1,2,3,4,5,6) -
00:28:779 (5) – Similarly, there's places like this where I think you under-emphasize the strong note here. I'd like to see a jump into some of these stronger notes, but I will try not to mention it anymore since I think we disagree on this. Msg me if you want more suggestions like this.
00:03:677 (1,2) – With slider leniency, this DS is very small. Consider not blanketing and instead increasing the DS.
00:10:106 (2) – Consider finding a custom hitwhistle that goes better with the song.
00:22:963 (5,4) – Stack (4) around (5)'s tail so that the DS emphasizes 00:23:881 (5) – more
00:28:473 (3,6) – This overlap doesn't look great because (2) fades too soon to recognize the symmetry of your overlap.
00:33:218 (2) – This felt weird to play. I'm not sure that I would use exactly .60x spacing on (2,3,4), but regardless, I can see the effect you're going for. I think this works a lot better if you introduce it with a jump of 2.50x like:
http://puu.sh/pyvSw/3e1946bf14.jpg. This will clue the player in to approaching this pattern differently which will make the drop in spacing at (2,3,4) more clear and agreeable. Also, 2.50x is consistent with 00:33:677 (5,6) - .
00:35:361 (6,1) – and 00:40:259 (6,1) – consider emphasizing these notes consistently in DS.
01:39:646 (4,5,6,7) – The previous notes have been building tension, and I feel like here is where the payoff comes in the music where it releases that tension with the pitch change on (4), so consider scaling this pattern up (by 1.7 as seen in the following) and give it a jump like maybe:
http://puu.sh/pyveZ/2c6cb2aaed.jpg
){kind=link}
