Hi, here comes a taiko mod as requested by rew0825 in my queue.
- [Gen's Kantan]
- 00:11:795 (1) - consider starting this spinner at 00:12:995 - ? It would be more reasonable to accompany the start of the long vocal stretch. Also, adding a timing point at 00:12:995 - with about 50% volume would be great as the spinner is currently too loud imo.
- 00:27:032 (9) - k would be better for both the snare sound and the violin.
- 00:28:807 (11) - consider adding finish here ? This could support the strong background cymbal.
- 00:54:369 (32) - This note could be deleted to give a 8/1 break. As you placed notes in 4/1 mainly, a longer break could work well in the calm part.
- 01:12:831 (9) - similar to 00:28:807 (11) - , K would sound better.
- [Gen's Futsuu]
Please use a volume setting similar to Kantan for consistency. The current one is too soft imo.
- 00:03:795 (4,5,6) - These notes could be rearranged to have a smoother flow. First, move 00:03:795 (4) - to 00:03:395 - and move 00:04:195 (5) - to 1/1 later. Then move 00:05:395 (6) - 1/1 earlier in order to make the whole pattern coherent to the previous 00:00:195 (1,2,3) -
- 00:11:795 (1) - same as Kantan
- 00:26:500 (14) - consider moving this note to 00:26:677 - and changing it to d ? The sound at 00:26:500 - is not very obvious.
- 00:48:334 (59,60,61) - k d k could fit both the snares and the changes in vocal pitch well.
- 00:49:754 (63,64) - try k D here to accompany the decrease in vocal pitch ?
- 00:52:594 (69) - d would sound better because of the absence of vocal and snare.
- 00:55:790 (72) - d , move 00:56:500 (73) - to 00:56:322 - and k ? This could follow the vocal in a way better.
- 00:59:162 (77) - k would be nice if you change ^
- 01:10:346 (18,22) - k could fit the higher-pitched vocal there.
- 01:11:056 (20,21) - k d would be better as the vocal pattern is similar to 01:09:636 (16,17) -
- 01:12:831 (25) - consider changing this note to K ? The vocal there is relatively high-pitched.
- 01:16:204 (33) - k would probably sound better because of the high-pitched vocal.
- 01:19:399 (39) - you may move this note to 01:19:577 - and change to k since the beat there is more noticeable.
- [Rew's Muzukashii]
- 00:02:395 (8) - k would be better since it has the same vocal pitch as 00:01:995 (7) -
- 00:02:795 (9,10,11) - k d k would be great as the vocal at 00:02:995 (10) - is lower-pitched than 00:02:795 (9,11) -
- 00:03:995 (13) - d here could fit the drop in vocal pitch well.
- 00:06:795 (22) - move to 00:06:995 - to follow the vocal there as you did at 00:00:595 (2) - ?
- 00:07:595 (24,25,26) - d k d as you did at 00:01:195 (4,5,6) - for consistency ?
- 00:08:395 (27,28) - same as 00:01:995 (7,8) -
- 00:10:195 (33,34) - consider swapping these notes to k d to accompany the pitch drop there ?
- 00:52:417 (132,133,134,135) - try k d d K to follow the snares as you did from 00:30:227 - ?
- 01:01:115 - consider adding k here to map the vocal ?
- 01:01:470 (147) - maybe D for the loud cymbal there ?
- 01:02:003 (148,149,150) - These notes could be deleted as vocal is absent.
- 01:13:186 (185,186) - d k would be better since the vocal pitch is increasing.
- [IMT's Oni]
- 00:01:195 (5,6,7) - d k d would be better if you want to follow the changes in vocal pitch.
- 00:01:995 (8,9) - similar to ^ , k d would work well here.
- 00:06:995 (27,28) - same as ^
- 00:07:595 (29,30,31) - same as 00:01:195 (5,6,7) -
- 00:08:395 (32,33,34) - It would be better to make it consistent to previous 00:01:995 (8,9,10) -
- 00:20:908 - add d and change 00:20:997 (16) - to k to follow the pitch of the music ?
- 00:25:612 (47,48,49,50,51) - kkkkd would sound better as the background music pitch is progressively decreasing.
- 00:28:807 (70,71) - consider swapping these notes to k d to maintain a stricter snare consistency ?
- 00:32:713 (95,96) - As the part is don-intensive, k here could strike a balance.
- 00:35:198 (110,111) - k d would be better if you want to follow the vocal.
- 00:38:393 (132,133,134) - kkd could fit the higher-pitched vocal at 00:38:393 - in a way better.
- 00:49:932 (205) - k would sound better since the vocal at 00:49:754 (204) - still lingers.
- 00:58:275 (233,234) - swap these notes to k d for the decrease in vocal pitch ?
- 01:20:287 (116) - maybe d here to emphasize the high-pitched vocal at 01:20:464 (117) - ?