Numbers 596108 wrote:

Mod request by AxelHino (Modding Queue)

[Kantan]

Notes :

- Try not to use 1/2 beat snap in this difficulty. well, they all fit in the music and the bpm's quite slow so...why not?

[Futsuu]

Notes :

00:07:806 (9,10) - oo ok
00:31:377 (45,46) - oo don't see the point of changing the notes, so no
01:16:913 (142) - o ok
01:26:020 (5) - o don't see the point of changing the notes, so no

[Muzukashii]

Fine.

[Oni]

00:31:645 (94) - o don't see the point of changing the notes, so no
00:35:931 (117) - o ^

That's all, good luck :3
Sorry too late because of the traffic accident.

Surono wrote:

<(``) hai

[General]
ga diksh Shakers di akhir? xD *Forget thiz~

[Kantan]
nice~

[Futsuu]
00:04:591 (5,6) - ganti K? i think a D emphasizes the beat better
00:06:734 (7,8) - thiz too?~ ^
01:07:672 (121) - K? ok

[Muzukashii]
00:04:591 (5,6) - K like futsuu
00:06:734 (7,8) - K ^
00:08:341 (10) - k i prefer emphasizing the beat, so no pitch change on the notes

[Oni]
00:40:931 (136) - k ok
00:53:252 (175) - k ok
00:57:894 (200) - k ok
01:38:341 (373,374,375,376) - kdkk? kkkd flows better so i'll keep it.

well sry if not helpful ^^" *lagunya enak kwkwkw~

1. 00:12:627 (1) - This note could be moved to 00:13:163 - as a don, to be consistent with the next patterns.
2. 00:25:752 (10) - I'm a bit unsure about this part, as we have 1/2 colour switch and going from a big note to a normal one, and such movement could be a bit hard to handle in Kantan level, I think it'd be better to remove this note.
3. 00:41:020 - This may be my personal opinion, but this part feels a bit weird the the instrument change, a slider/spinner would fit better so you keep following the trumpet. In case you keep the notes, you should consider 00:42:895 (31) - the same as 00:25:752 (10) - .
4. 01:03:519 (58) - Remove this note to not make the hand/finger movement to harsh for beginners?
5. 01:45:841 (11,12) - Maybe make it monocolour?
6. 01:51:467 (20) - As 00:25:752 (10) -
7. 01:54:413 (25,26) - As 01:45:841 (11,12) -
8. 02:00:038 (35) - As 00:25:752 (10) -
9. 02:08:609 (47) - ^
10. 02:17:181 (60) - Maybe move it 1/2 beat forward as a don? It'd fit better, imo.

1. 00:12:627 (1) - This note feels a bit odd, maybe remove it so you begin to map on the music pattern which begins in 00:13:163 - ?
2. 00:41:020 - As Kantan.
3. 01:14:770 (136,137) - Maybe remove these notes? There's no relevant notes for the trumpet, and It'd create a nice break (since you have a relatively long pattern looking how this part changes in K->F->M).
4. 01:23:341 (1,2) - ^
5. 01:33:252 (19) - Move this note 1/2 beat backward to make it fit better the trumpet?
6. 01:34:056 (2) - Probably remove this note?
7. 01:38:341 (5,3,6) - Maybe remove this note to follow only the strongest beats?

1. 00:39:413 (99) - Maybe remove this note to follow cleaner the trumpet?
2. 00:55:484 (142) - Remove this note? It feels a bit more like a filler here.
3. 01:11:288 (192) - ^
4. 01:16:109 (206) - Maybe remove this note to follow cleaner the trumpet?
5. 01:19:859 (218) - ^
6. 01:23:073 (227) - ^
7. 01:28:431 (242) - ^
8. 01:36:466 (264) - ^
9. 02:01:109 (61) - You should remove this note, it'd help to follow better both trumpet and the main beat in the background.
10. 02:04:323 (72) - Remove this note too.
11. 02:10:752 (92) - ^

1. 00:01:377 - 00:01:823 - Add notes here? They'd fit really cool, Same for the next two patterns.
2. 00:27:091 - A note is missing here, the triple feels really off while playing, imo. Same for 00:31:377 - and 00:35:663 - .
3. 01:16:288 (288) - Shouldn't this note be on the white tick?
4. 01:34:234 (358) - This may be my personal feeling, but I think this note would play better as a kat.

DakeDekaane wrote:

Experience tells you must be annoying in order to have a map ranked. Mod coming soon.

[General]
Use this comma for the Unicode title 、done!

[ Kantan]

1. 00:12:627 (1) - This note could be moved to 00:13:163 - as a don, to be consistent with the next patterns. ok
2. 00:25:752 (10) - I'm a bit unsure about this part, as we have 1/2 colour switch and going from a big note to a normal one, and such movement could be a bit hard to handle in Kantan level, I think it'd be better to remove this note. keeping it because i want to emphasize the loud parts and i don't think it's too much of a problem for a K d since the BPM's quite slow
3. 00:41:020 - This may be my personal opinion, but this part feels a bit weird the the instrument change, a slider/spinner would fit better so you keep following the trumpet. In case you keep the notes, you should consider 00:42:895 (31) - the same as 00:25:752 (10) - .changed to spinner
4. 01:03:519 (58) - Remove this note to not make the hand/finger movement to harsh for beginners? i want to emphasize the Ks similar to the ones on
5. 00:25:752 (10) , but since it goes d K K (3 hits), i'll remove it.
6. 01:45:841 (11,12) - Maybe make it monocolour? changed to k
7. 01:51:467 (20) - As 00:25:752 (10) - for reasons above
8. 01:54:413 (25,26) - As 01:45:841 (11,12) - changed to k
9. 02:00:038 (35) - As 00:25:752 (10) - for reasons above
10. 02:08:609 (47) - ^ removed because the d doesn't put much emphasis in that particular part
11. 02:17:181 (60) - Maybe move it 1/2 beat forward as a don? It'd fit better, imo.

okay
[ Futsuu]

1. 00:12:627 (1) - This note feels a bit odd, maybe remove it so you begin to map on the music pattern which begins in 00:13:163 - ? alright
2. 00:41:020 - As Kantan. changed to spinner
3. 01:14:770 (136,137) - Maybe remove these notes? There's no relevant notes for the trumpet, and It'd create a nice break (since you have a relatively long pattern looking how this part changes in K->F->M). alright
4. 01:23:341 (1,2) - ^ removed the k
5. 01:33:252 (19) - Move this note 1/2 beat backward to make it fit better the trumpet? removed the note
6. 01:34:056 (2) - Probably remove this note? i want those particular notes to match the strings, so i'm not removing it
7. 01:38:341 (5,3,6) - Maybe remove this note to follow only the strongest beats? the trumpets are pretty noticeable so i'm not removing it

[ Muzukashii]

1. 00:39:413 (99) - Maybe remove this note to follow cleaner the trumpet? okay
2. 00:55:484 (142) - Remove this note? It feels a bit more like a filler here. okay
3. 01:11:288 (192) - ^ okay
4. 01:16:109 (206) - Maybe remove this note to follow cleaner the trumpet? okay
5. 01:19:859 (218) - ^ okay
6. 01:23:073 (227) - ^ okay
7. 01:28:431 (242) - ^ okay
8. 01:36:466 (264) - ^ okay
9. 02:01:109 (61) - You should remove this note, it'd help to follow better both trumpet and the main beat in the background. okay
10. 02:04:323 (72) - Remove this note too. okay
11. 02:10:752 (92) - ^okay
    
    wow the muzu feels way better after that

[ Oni]

1. 00:01:377 - 00:01:823 - Add notes here? They'd fit really cool, Same for the next two patterns. inserted a k and moved the following note 1/6 backwards
2. 00:27:091 - A note is missing here, the triple feels really off while playing, imo. Same for 00:31:377 - and 00:35:663 - . inserted a k
3. 01:16:288 (288) - Shouldn't this note be on the white tick? ...i went too carried away with the rhythm lol
4. 01:34:234 (358) - This may be my personal feeling, but I think this note would play better as a kat. ah, it does feel better...

The only thing that worries me a bit is that the Futsuu is closer to Muzukashii than Kantan in 00:14:234 - 00:26:020 - deleted a few notes and 01:43:163 - 02:00:306 - deleted a few notes , I don't know if it'd be possible for you to do something about that.

A good map overall, feel free to get a few more mods and poke me whenever you're feel ready.

1. Eastern artists must be written in the proper 'surname firstname' format. (written in RC)
   岡部啓一 → Okabe Keiichi / 帆足圭吾 → Hoashi Keigo
   Romanised Artist: Okabe Keiichi, Hoashi Keigo

1. SV1.4 is better. You might feel slow, but I think this speed is optimum for beginner player.
2. 00:23:877 (6) This Finish is not needed just like with 00:21:734 (3).
3. 01:05:663 (30) maybe d is better? I think it's more fit with kick.

1. 01:22:806 (80) k ? I hear the same scale with 01:22:270 (79).
2. 01:11:556 put not d to follow melody and kick. Break is enough because there's (63).
3. 01:28:698 ^

1. 00:51:734 -, (130~138) d is too continuous. change to k of few. I think ddk pattern is better.
2. 00:56:020 (140,141,142) ~ ^ ddk pattern is better, too.

tasuke912 wrote:

Hi. from my queue.
[ General]

1. Eastern artists must be written in the proper 'surname firstname' format. (written in RC)
   岡部啓一 → Okabe Keiichi / 帆足圭吾 → Hoashi Keigo
   Romanised Artist: Okabe Keiichi, Hoashi Keigo

... "For artists which have a preferred romanisation, use this one". So i'm not changing it

[ Kantan]

1. SV1.4 is better. You might feel slow, but I think this speed is optimum for beginner player. going to keep it in 1.6 too avoid clutter.
2. 00:23:877 (6) This Finish is not needed just like with 00:21:734 (3). there's a cymbal sound there, so i think there should be a finish note there
3. 01:05:663 (30) maybe d is better? I think it's more fit with kick. ok

[ Futsuu]

1. 01:22:806 (80) k ? I hear the same scale with 01:22:270 (79). ok
2. 01:11:556 put not d to follow melody and kick. Break is enough because there's (63). i want to leave a 2 beat rest, so i think it's better to not put a note here
3. 01:28:698 ^ ^same

[ Muzukashii]

1. 00:51:734 -, (130~138) d is too continuous. change to k of few. I think ddk pattern is better. the intention here is to map with mainly dons during 00:51:734 - until 00:59:234 - , then map with mainly kats during 00:59:502 - until 01:06:466 - , so i'm not changing it
2. 00:56:020 (140,141,142) ~ ^ ddk pattern is better, too. ^same

Good luck.

00:08:341 - k
00:38:609 - k
00:40:931 - K
01:47:181 - k
01:55:752 - k

fine ~

Masih amatir ngemod bm 1/6

[R] wrote:

Suggestion

[Muzukashi]

00:08:341 - k not changing it since i want it to match the beat (as in, the bass drum's sound
00:38:609 - k okay
00:40:931 - K changes to normal k
01:47:181 - k matching the horns, so no
01:55:752 - k ^

[Oni]

fine ~

Masih amatir ngemod bm 1/6 aww don't be sad xD, you'll get better at it if you practice~

DakeDekaane wrote:

Hi there.

In Oni, either add a note in 00:01:913 - or go back to your previous pattern (only a kat there), since ignoring the strongest beat there feels a bit awkward to play. Same for the next patterns.

xtrem3x wrote:

Request via .... well is better than before .-.

_____________________________________________________

General:

don = d
kat = k
Big Don = D
Big Kat = K

_____________________________________________________

Oni:

HP=6
OD=5 (with 1/3 Style is a bit harder get these notes)

00:27:002 - kkkdd -> kkddk (follow "trumpet" sound combined with BG Sound is more coordinated) i'm sorry, but i don't like the third note being a don.
00:31:288 - Same ^
00:35:573 - Same ^
_____________________________________________________

Muzukashii:

HP/OD = 5

00:54:413 - Change to k (monotone sequence with d) i like putting dons during that part to emphasize the pitch compared to the next part

01:03:431 - Move to 01:03:341- (is better imo) i don't think a 1/3 there fits...

_____________________________________________________

Futsuu:

HP/OD = 4

_____________________________________________________

Kantan:

GOOD
_____________________________________________________


Note: if next BN acccept some change of this modding it is he / she who grants the kudosu (is bubble and any update is Pop Bubble)

1. Is the preview point correctly placed?
2. Why 100% soft instead of low with normal? Soft has a really underwhelming volume

1. 00:54:413 (184) - k, to accentuate this being a higher pitch?
2. 00:57:537 (202) - Following 00:53:252 (178) - shouldn't this be k?
3. 00:59:904 (215) - Is actually way more sync'd on 1/4. Which is lame because it's likely the song's fault.
4. 01:14:770 (284) - Despite the snare hit, maybe make this d for flow?
5. 01:16:823 (293,294,295,296,297) - Sounds more like kd kk k, no?
6. 01:32:181 (352) - Pretty good as a d I think, pitch starts to lower.
7. 01:38:341 (375,376,377,378) - Isn't this more of a rising pitch? dddk?
8. 02:02:270 (67) - Sounds much more sync'd at 02:02:181
9. 02:03:966 (75) - Just move this to 02:04:056 since it's pretty off as it is. Not worth mapping it.
   
   tbh, a lot of parts have questionable timing, but it's the song's fault. Not sure how that'll play out.

1. 00:52:002 (131,137) - These to k? It's kinda weird seeing the song have different sounds mapped the same.
2. 00:56:287 (142) - ^
3. 01:37:806 (260) - ^ In this case, because d k k d seems nicer.

1. 01:36:734 (4) - Since in taiko slider ends don't get emphasized through hitsounds, extend it to 01:38:341 ?
2. Though, here and Kantan, I'd recommend mapping the slider.
   
3. 01:41:020 (7,8,9,10,11) - Definitely nerf this. K K K K should be fine.
   
   Big note usage sort of creeps this into being close to Muzu at some parts, but it should be fine.

1. OD 4 here too.
2. 00:24:413 (7) - Delete? Eases it up while fitting nicely.
3. 00:49:591 - d here? Then 00:50:127 (10) - delete this like before.
4. 00:58:699 (21) - at 00:59:234 similar to 00:54:948 (17) - ?
5. 01:21:198 (15) - Delete, similar to how there was no note here earlier in the verse?
6. 01:36:734 (4) - Mentioned both the sliders in kantan. Notes fit better than the drum spam of sliders.
7. 01:39:413 (2,4) - Delete, same reason as 00:24:413 (7) -

OzzyOzrock wrote:

2 months is L O N G E N O U GH

[General]

1. Is the preview point correctly placed? yuuup
2. Why 100% soft instead of low with normal? Soft has a really underwhelming volume ahhh okay, changed to normal 75%

[Oni]

1. 00:54:413 (184) - k, to accentuate this being a higher pitch? i want the majority of the notes there to be d, and i think it adds extra rhythm to put d there
2. 00:57:537 (202) - Following 00:53:252 (178) - shouldn't this be k? nice call
3. 00:59:904 (215) - Is actually way more sync'd on 1/4. Which is lame because it's likely the song's fault. ahh yeah
4. 01:14:770 (284) - Despite the snare hit, maybe make this d for flow? sounds nice
5. 01:16:823 (293,294,295,296,297) - Sounds more like kd kk k, no? sounds better
6. 01:32:181 (352) - Pretty good as a d I think, pitch starts to lower. i would rather[save the d for the upcoming note, just to emphasize the rhythm/color]
7. 01:38:341 (375,376,377,378) - Isn't this more of a rising pitch? dddk?
8. 02:02:270 (67) - Sounds much more sync'd at 02:02:181 there's another note there but alright..?
9. 02:03:966 (75) - Just move this to 02:04:056 since it's pretty off as it is. Not worth mapping it. okay
   
   tbh, a lot of parts have questionable timing, but it's the song's fault. Not sure how that'll play out.

[Muzukashii]

1. 00:52:002 (131,137) - These to k? It's kinda weird seeing the song have different sounds mapped the same. okay
2. 00:56:287 (142) - ^ ok
3. 01:37:806 (260) - ^ In this case, because d k k d seems nicer. alright

[Futsuu]

1. 01:36:734 (4) - Since in taiko slider ends don't get emphasized through hitsounds, extend it to 01:38:341 ? sounds nice
2. Though, here and Kantan, I'd recommend mapping the slider. wanted to add a bit more variety than just normal notes
   
3. 01:41:020 (7,8,9,10,11) - Definitely nerf this. K K K K should be fine. alrighty
   
   Big note usage sort of creeps this into being close to Muzu at some parts, but it should be fine.

[Kantan]

1. OD 4 here too.
2. 00:24:413 (7) - Delete? Eases it up while fitting nicely. okay
3. 00:49:591 - d here? Then 00:50:127 (10) - delete this like before. okay
4. 00:58:699 (21) - at 00:59:234 similar to 00:54:948 (17) - ? ok
5. 01:21:198 (15) - Delete, similar to how there was no note here earlier in the verse? ah yeah sorry for that w
6. 01:36:734 (4) - Mentioned both the sliders in kantan. Notes fit better than the drum spam of sliders. variety like futsuu
7. 01:39:413 (2,4) - Delete, same reason as 00:24:413 (7) - alright

I'll be asking people about this set. It's a spooky thing since quite a few parts are mapped to sounds the song has a little off-sync. But for now, this!

1. 00:00:573 (2) - delete. I consider spread with Futsuu.
2. 00:02:716 (4) - same as above.
3. 00:04:859 (6) - ^
4. 00:07:002 (8) - ^
5. 00:20:127 (10,1) - change to dd? Reverse 00:15:841 (4,5) - and do a pattern wealthily.
6. 00:31:913 (17) - move to 00:32:448 - . I think is better.
7. 00:36:198 (22) - move to 00:36:734 - same as above.
8. 00:51:466 (13) - delete and 00:51:734 ~ It looks good when I make a feeling similar to 00:43:163 (1,2,3) -

1. 00:51:734 ~ 01:00:306 - You should copy this rhythm →00:43:163 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) -　((Of course delete 00:51:466 (13) - ))
2. 01:00:306 ~ 01:06:734 - For a similar feeling.
3. 01:43:163 (6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26) - It is good here. Please make it in this way. ((01:55:752 (26) - move to 01:56:020 - Don't forget!))

SKSalt wrote:

Hi, Taiko mod request from my queue.

[Kantan]

1. 00:00:573 (2) - delete. I consider spread with Futsuu. ok
2. 00:02:716 (4) - same as above. ok
3. 00:04:859 (6) - ^ ok
4. 00:07:002 (8) - ^ ok
5. 00:20:127 (10,1) - change to dd? Reverse 00:15:841 (4,5) - and do a pattern wealthily. i don't think it's necessary as there isn't any change to the music itself
6. 00:31:913 (17) - move to 00:32:448 - . I think is better. ok
7. 00:36:198 (22) - move to 00:36:734 - same as above. ok
8. 00:51:466 (13) - delete and 00:51:734 ~ It looks good when I make a feeling similar to 00:43:163 (1,2,3) - alright

Ah, sorry. I can no longer mod! Because it is missing to be beyond the consistency of the sound in all difficulty. At first I will let you unify rhythm!

Edit : Oni is still better. I'll mod Oni :3

[In Kantan, For example]

1. 00:51:734 ~ 01:00:306 - You should copy this rhythm →00:43:163 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) -　((Of course delete 00:51:466 (13) - )) i want to focus on the sax for this one, so no
2. 01:00:306 ~ 01:06:734 - For a similar feeling. same, but with kats too denote the higher pitch
3. 01:43:163 (6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26) - It is good here. Please make it in this way. ((01:55:752 (26) - move to 01:56:020 - Don't forget!)) i think it's okay...? the bpm's pretty slow

Let's unify rhythm in similar place! When I let you unify rhythm, it will look much better. (Some high things of the degree of difficulty may have an adventure.) Please do your best.

Good luck