forum

Caramelos de Cianuro - La Casa

posted
Total Posts
42
show more
XinCrin
Deja de hacer mapas tan perfectos ;_;. Hola! :)

Facil

  1. 00:40:398 (5) No sè si soy solo yo pero me incomoda un poco este slider y los otros del resto del mapa. Me gustarìa que terminase en 00:40:954 pero tendrìas que arreglar las siguientes notas y eso. Solo es una opiniòn personal, no contarìa como sugerencia o algo que debas cambiar
  2. 00:50:954 (4) No pusiste ningun hitsound a la cabeza de este slider, por lo tanto se escucha un poquito vacio este lugar. Asi que te sugeriria que agregues algun hitsounds, un Whistle serìa genial
  3. 01:02:620 Siento que ignoras mucho aqui entre el tick rojo y blanco. Ya que usaste un ritmo mapeado en 1/2 para los tres sliders previos , como hiciste aqui lo mismo en 00:41:232 , me pregunto porque no hacer lo mismo aqui?.
  4. 01:25:398 (1) Un Whistle al comienzo de este slider va a resaltar ese sonido muy agudo que se logra escuchar en la musica o tambièn podrìas usar un Drum Finish como lo hiciste en 01:43:176 (1).
  5. 02:43:176 (3) No sientes como que muy necesario un hitsound aqui ?
  6. 03:44:287 (x) Sè que no es muy necesaria una nota aqui, pero realmente me gustaria que pusieras una. Porque està comprobado que cuando un principiante està llevando un ritmo constante y hay como un "corte" de ritmo, el jugador falla. Comprobado por mi :P
  7. 04:02:065 (^)
Intermedio

  1. Deberìas considerar hacer uso del kiai time como en las otras dificultades
  2. 00:49:565 (1,2,3,4) Me quede un laaargo rato jugando esta parte, siento que los circles posicionados en los ticks rojos no dan una buena sensaciòn de juego para mi. Serìa mejor si corres estas notas a los ticks blancos pero antes cambiando (1) a un 1/2 slider, ademas haciendo esto da un mejor ritmo en 00:51:509 (6,1,2) . Algo asi:
  3. 01:09:843 (x) Siento necesario una nota aqui para cubrir ese downbeat, ademas no dejamos tanto espacio libro. Serìa mejor en mi opinion
  4. 02:18:454 Misma sugerencia que 00:49:565 (1,2,3,4)
Dificil

  1. 00:21:509 (2) La cola del slider anterior tiene una curvatura hacia arriba y se siente algo raro que esta nota vaya hacia abajo. Asi que me gustarìa que muevas esta nota a x:220 y:36 para un mejor flow
  2. y Mismas sugerencias en cuanto a algunos whistles que en la Easy
Eso serìa todo para mi. Buena suerte mancu!! :)
Little
From my queue.

[Facil]
  1. 00:47:620 (2) - I feel like this will flow smoother between (1) and (3) if you turn the curves in the opposite way: http://puu.sh/d1eXv/f44bee43a0.jpg
  2. 01:13:176 (2) - Minor spacing error can easily be fixed: Code
  3. 01:34:287 (1,2) - Should be 1.0x distance?
  4. 01:38:732 (1) - Use some slider shape to add emphasis to the beat on the repeat? Maybe like http://puu.sh/d1fnQ/118e6915a7.jpg or any other shape that puts emphasis on the syncopated beat.
  5. 01:43:732 (2) - How about a vertical reflection? I think that will flow nicer: http://puu.sh/d1fzA/81407e5e53.jpg
  6. 02:16:509 (2) - You can make the shape a bit cleaner. The curved part is uneven, making the corner have a bit of a weird bump. You can clean it up by moving the second point so it's equidistant from the first and third: http://puu.sh/d1fUB/24c1997714.jpg
  7. 03:09:843 (2) - Same suggestion as 00:47:620 (2)
[Intermedio]
  1. Why no kiai time? Add it to match the other diffs?
  2. 00:26:232 (2) - Try a more interesting shape for this slider? The electric guitar has a cool "growling" effect on this note, so it'd be cool to have a different slider shape to go with it.
  3. 00:34:009 (1) - This is difficult for the player to anticipate, as they will likely expect to play on the downbeat, whereas this is before the downbeat. I recommend either removing this circle or changing the rhythm like so: http://puu.sh/d1knW/180ba933d0.jpg as the slider will help show them where the downbeat really is.
  4. 01:04:843 (2,3,1,2) - Some minor spacing error here. 0.66x should be closer to 0.6x.
  5. 02:33:732 (2,3,1,2) - ^
  6. 02:30:398 (3) - New combo.
  7. 03:37:898 (1) - Did you intentionally change DS to 0.7x at this part? I can't tell :P
  8. 03:38:454 (3,4,5) - I think you should increase distance on these to 1.0x, since they are not overlapping.
[Dificil]
  1. 00:21:509 (2,3) - Fix stack :P
  2. 00:38:732 (1,2) - ^
  3. 00:21:787 (3) - Add sliderslide whistle here too?
  4. 01:13:176 (4) - I think it will flow a bit better if you rotate it like this: http://puu.sh/d1o0Z/a603bfc7f0.jpg
  5. 01:10:954 (5) - I think you should add a new combo here. It will give the drum fill stronger definition, and it's the start of a new vocal phrase... right?
  6. 01:28:732 (8) - ^
  7. 02:39:843 (7) - ^
  8. 02:57:620 (7) - ^
That's all. Nice song and map!
Topic Starter
mancuso_JM_
Xin

XinCrin wrote:

Deja de hacer mapas tan perfectos ;_;. Hola! :)

Facil

  1. 00:40:398 (5) No sè si soy solo yo pero me incomoda un poco este slider y los otros del resto del mapa. Me gustarìa que terminase en 00:40:954 pero tendrìas que arreglar las siguientes notas y eso. Solo es una opiniòn personal, no contarìa como sugerencia o algo que debas cambiar Te entiendo, pero hice esto para empezar ahi con la parte del instrumental, asi los jugadores pueden agarrar el ritmo de lo siguiente mas facil.
  2. 00:50:954 (4) No pusiste ningun hitsound a la cabeza de este slider, por lo tanto se escucha un poquito vacio este lugar. Asi que te sugeriria que agregues algun hitsounds, un Whistle serìa genial Mejor drum finish por consistencia con la hard.
  3. 01:02:620 Siento que ignoras mucho aqui entre el tick rojo y blanco. Ya que usaste un ritmo mapeado en 1/2 para los tres sliders previos , como hiciste aqui lo mismo en 00:41:232 , me pregunto porque no hacer lo mismo aqui?. Hmm.. Agregue una nota, viendo el BPM bajo creo que va a hacer sencillo, ademas me gusto como va este patron y no lo quiero cambiar mucho.
  4. 01:25:398 (1) Un Whistle al comienzo de este slider va a resaltar ese sonido muy agudo que se logra escuchar en la musica o tambièn podrìas usar un Drum Finish como lo hiciste en 01:43:176 (1). Completamente. Elegi el Whistle.
  5. 02:43:176 (3) No sientes como que muy necesario un hitsound aqui ? kkkk
  6. 03:44:287 (x) Sè que no es muy necesaria una nota aqui, pero realmente me gustaria que pusieras una. Porque està comprobado que cuando un principiante està llevando un ritmo constante y hay como un "corte" de ritmo, el jugador falla. Comprobado por mi :P Prefiero dejarlo asi por la cancion, ademas el spacing es muy grande para los nuevos, no creo que le erren xD
  7. 04:02:065 (^) Mismo aca.
Dificil

  1. 00:21:509 (2) La cola del slider anterior tiene una curvatura hacia arriba y se siente algo raro que esta nota vaya hacia abajo. Asi que me gustarìa que muevas esta nota a x:220 y:36 para un mejor flow Hecho
  2. y Mismas sugerencias en cuanto a algunos whistles que en la Easy Ya esta pronto.
Eso serìa todo para mi. Buena suerte mancu!! :)
Gracias Xin!

Cloud

CloudSplash16 wrote:

From my queue.

[Facil]
  1. 00:47:620 (2) - I feel like this will flow smoother between (1) and (3) if you turn the curves in the opposite way: http://puu.sh/d1eXv/f44bee43a0.jpg I didn't like that much this :/.. I'll wait for some more opinions.
  2. 01:13:176 (2) - Minor spacing error can easily be fixed: Code yeah.. fixed.
  3. 01:34:287 (1,2) - Should be 1.0x distance? That's true xD.. Fixed.
  4. 01:38:732 (1) - Use some slider shape to add emphasis to the beat on the repeat? Maybe like http://puu.sh/d1fnQ/118e6915a7.jpg or any other shape that puts emphasis on the syncopated beat. Ok.. Made something here.
  5. 01:43:732 (2) - How about a vertical reflection? I think that will flow nicer: http://puu.sh/d1fzA/81407e5e53.jpg Nah.. I like how it looks and flow actually.
  6. 02:16:509 (2) - You can make the shape a bit cleaner. The curved part is uneven, making the corner have a bit of a weird bump. You can clean it up by moving the second point so it's equidistant from the first and third: http://puu.sh/d1fUB/24c1997714.jpg Yeah.. Fixed a bit :P
  7. 03:09:843 (2) - Same suggestion as 00:47:620 (2) Same here.
[Dificil]
  1. 00:21:509 (2,3) - Fix stack :P lol.. Fixed this pattern in the previous mod post, is not stacked anymore xD
  2. 00:38:732 (1,2) - ^ Fixed this one.
  3. 00:21:787 (3) - Add sliderslide whistle here too? It looks like I have missed it.
  4. 01:13:176 (4) - I think it will flow a bit better if you rotate it like this: http://puu.sh/d1o0Z/a603bfc7f0.jpg Fixed that but not exactly as you told me, I've fixed it on my own.
  5. 01:10:954 (5) - I think you should add a new combo here. It will give the drum fill stronger definition, and it's the start of a new vocal phrase... right?
  6. 01:28:732 (8) - ^
  7. 02:39:843 (7) - ^
  8. 02:57:620 (7) - ^ Makes sense. Fixed all of them!
That's all. Nice song and map!
Thanks Cloud!

Thanks again for the useful mods! :D
Updated!
Luvdic

XinCrin wrote:

Deja de hacer mapas tan perfectos ;_;. Hola! :)


Intermedio

  1. Deberìas considerar hacer uso del kiai time como en las otras dificultades
    Oops, ni me di cuenta que no habia xD
  2. 00:49:565 (1,2,3,4) Me quede un laaargo rato jugando esta parte, siento que los circles posicionados en los ticks rojos no dan una buena sensaciòn de juego para mi. Serìa mejor si corres estas notas a los ticks blancos pero antes cambiando (1) a un 1/2 slider, ademas haciendo esto da un mejor ritmo en 00:51:509 (6,1,2) . Algo asi:
    Yo tambien probe un laaaaaargo rato, y demasiado diria, estos ritmos, y al final decidi que asi quedaba mejor.
  3. 01:09:843 (x) Siento necesario una nota aqui para cubrir ese downbeat, ademas no dejamos tanto espacio libro. Serìa mejor en mi opinion
    Lo prefiero como esta ahora
  4. 02:18:454 Misma sugerencia que 00:49:565 (1,2,3,4)

Eso serìa todo para mi. Buena suerte mancu!! :)

CloudSplash16 wrote:

From my queue.


[Intermedio]
  1. Why no kiai time? Add it to match the other diffs?
    Forgot to add.
  2. 00:26:232 (2) - Try a more interesting shape for this slider? The electric guitar has a cool "growling" effect on this note, so it'd be cool to have a different slider shape to go with it.
    Im not an slider artist, and Ill never be, and this will not change, so sorry ;)
  3. 00:34:009 (1) - This is difficult for the player to anticipate, as they will likely expect to play on the downbeat, whereas this is before the downbeat. I recommend either removing this circle or changing the rhythm like so: http://puu.sh/d1knW/180ba933d0.jpg as the slider will help show them where the downbeat really is.
    Will wait for more opinions on this one
  4. 01:04:843 (2,3,1,2) - Some minor spacing error here. 0.66x should be closer to 0.6x.
  5. 02:33:732 (2,3,1,2) - ^
    Youre totally right!
  6. 02:30:398 (3) - New combo.
    Okay
  7. 03:37:898 (1) - Did you intentionally change DS to 0.7x at this part? I can't tell :P
    Youre totally right! Hahaha
  8. 03:38:454 (3,4,5) - I think you should increase distance on these to 1.0x, since they are not overlapping.
    And this is also another mistake xD

That's all. Nice song and map!
http://puu.sh/d2CUm/1c41324929.osu

Thanks you both!
Sieg
Hello

[General]
  1. Maximum video quality I can get for 17mb 4.30min long http://puu.sh/d5k8P/9e2e958e4f.avi
  2. Timing… I've got 18720 offset and 107,990 bpm, test and decide which is better. This won't take much time anyway.
  3. I remember that ErufenRito wasn't in Xanandra's maps tags and he didn't like to include this.
[Facil]
  1. 00:40:398 (5) - Best transfer to lyrics\guitar part here will be (if you want it exactly here) http://puu.sh/d6aPF/c6a52b740b.jpg because you cover strong lyrics part from 00:40:676 () to 00:40:954 () atm it feels a bit wrong cus 00:40:398 (5) - covers weak part of lyrics and next strong part is just a gap.
  2. 00:58:176 (4) - ^ Same thing
  3. 01:06:509 (4,1) // 01:14:843 (3,1) // 02:27:065 (5) - To feel difference you can compare above spots with this, so smooth transfer to red tick.
  4. 01:47:620 () - Why diff not mapped until here, this is better place to start break than 01:45:398 (3)
  5. 03:16:509 () - ^ Here too.
  6. 02:09:287 (4) - Same thing, like on 00:40:398 (5)
  7. 03:34:287 (1) - Should start from 03:34:287 () - If player is not familiar with the song it's hard to hit accurately from lyrics beat while surrounding strong beats (we suppose this will be newbie player) are missed.
[Intermedio]
  1. 00:29:287 (1) - Will overlap with accuracy meter, move a bit up if you care.
  2. 00:34:009 (1,2,3,4,5) - Five 1\2 hits in a row can be tiring for newbie players.
  3. 01:27:898 (4) - Convert this to 1\2 slider? Seems like more suitable to diff rhythm.
  4. 02:56:787 (4) - ^ Same thing
  5. 01:47:620 () - Same as for easy diff. I guess it more suitable to map until this point.
  6. 03:16:509 () - ^ Here too.
  7. 03:34:009 (1) - Same as for Easy.
  8. 04:08:176 (6) - Try to make this slider repeat. Will cover last beats greatly.
[Dificil]
  1. 00:37:065 (4) - uhm, seems like a bit random extend to lyrics, cus you have many similar spots where slider ends on red tick, nothing really bad tho but maybe end this one on 00:37:343 ()
  2. ^ Also applies to:
    02:23:732 (4) // 02:24:843 (6) // 02:26:509 (3) -
  3. 00:38:732 (1,2) - Also this is like unnecessary\inconsistent diff spike, better to place just triplet here if you want to stress lyrics http://puu.sh/d6cxt/6441dfd080.jpg , this is way more enjoyable to play and hell consistent with the general rhythm of this difficulty.
  4. 02:05:398 (1,2,3,4,5) - ^ Same thing
Great as always. Good Luck!
Topic Starter
mancuso_JM_
Thanks Sieg.. I'll check your mod later, I'm quite tired right now :P
Luvdic

Sieg wrote:

Hello

[General]
  1. I remember that ErufenRito wasn't in Xanandra's maps tags and he didn't like to include this.
Yes please mancuso ;(

[Intermedio]
  1. 00:29:287 (1) - Will overlap with accuracy meter, move a bit up if you care.
    Okay
  2. 00:34:009 (1,2,3,4,5) - Five 1\2 hits in a row can be tiring for newbie players.
    Fineeeee
  3. 01:27:898 (4) - Convert this to 1\2 slider? Seems like more suitable to diff rhythm.
  4. 02:56:787 (4) - ^ Same thing
    Done
  5. 01:47:620 () - Same as for easy diff. I guess it more suitable to map until this point.
  6. 03:16:509 () - ^ Here too.
    I prefer it more this way tbh
  7. 03:34:009 (1) - Same as for Easy.
    Im not sure how easy is mapped, but they are sliders, they should be fine
  8. 04:08:176 (6) - Try to make this slider repeat. Will cover last beats greatly.
    I didnt rerally like it much D:!
Great as always. Good Luck!

http://puu.sh/d6VpF/5e3d1fe0ef.osu

Thanks Sieg! ;)!
Topic Starter
mancuso_JM_

Sieg wrote:

Hello Hey!

[General]
  1. Maximum video quality I can get for 17mb 4.30min long http://puu.sh/d5k8P/9e2e958e4f.avi Looks great! Used!
  2. Timing… I've got 18720 offset and 107,990 bpm, test and decide which is better. This won't take much time anyway. Hmm.. I don't think the BPM is wrong here, in addition with your offset sounds off in some parts.. I'll keep the timing for now but I'll wait for some more opinions.
  3. I remember that ErufenRito wasn't in Xanandra's maps tags and he didn't like to include this. pl0x Xanandra D:
[Facil]
  1. 00:40:398 (5) - Best transfer to lyrics\guitar part here will be (if you want it exactly here) http://puu.sh/d6aPF/c6a52b740b.jpg because you cover strong lyrics part from 00:40:676 () to 00:40:954 () atm it feels a bit wrong cus 00:40:398 (5) - covers weak part of lyrics and next strong part is just a gap. I prefer to leave that as it is, the stronger part in guitar starts in 00:40:676 - , plus, this will make the pattern easier for new players because with the 1/2 slider I'm changing the beat providing them a better transition.
  2. 00:58:176 (4) - ^ Same thing Same here.
  3. 01:06:509 (4,1) // 01:14:843 (3,1) // 02:27:065 (5) - To feel difference you can compare above spots with this, so smooth transfer to red tick. But they are difference, because here I'm following vocals, in the previous spots I was following the highest pitches in the guitar.
  4. 01:47:620 () - Why diff not mapped until here, this is better place to start break than 01:45:398 (3)
  5. 03:16:509 () - ^ Here too. This is a Easy difficulty, that's why I've decided to map it in this way (And please, the next time don't use those ''()'' because the link doesn't work properly :P).
  6. 02:09:287 (4) - Same thing, like on 00:40:398 (5) Same.
  7. 03:34:287 (1) - Should start from 03:34:287 () - If player is not familiar with the song it's hard to hit accurately from lyrics beat while surrounding strong beats (we suppose this will be newbie player) are missed. I don't think this will be hard, I mean I started over a red tick and I tried to change the beat as fast as I could for the sake of the difficulty.
[Dificil]
  1. 00:37:065 (4) - uhm, seems like a bit random extend to lyrics, cus you have many similar spots where slider ends on red tick, nothing really bad tho but maybe end this one on 00:37:343 ()
  2. ^ Also applies to:
    02:23:732 (4) // 02:24:843 (6) // 02:26:509 (3) - As you know, I love the variety in my maps and in both ways this fit, so I'll keep that.
  3. 00:38:732 (1,2) - Also this is like unnecessary\inconsistent diff spike, better to place just triplet here if you want to stress lyrics http://puu.sh/d6cxt/6441dfd080.jpg , this is way more enjoyable to play and hell consistent with the general rhythm of this difficulty. But sounds completely different :/, in addition he sang in this way only here, so this is not my problem here. I think the inconsistent is Azier :P
  4. 02:05:398 (1,2,3,4,5) - ^ Same thing Same as before.
Great as always. Good Luck!
Thanks for modding! I've not changed that much things here, even so I appreciate your effort here :P
Updated!
Artavia
From My Modding Queue Sorry for my late.

General

  1. I think your style is fairly unremarkable. so my modding might not be of avail, maybe.
  2. Yeah, I think your map-set name is a good idea. but, if you want for ranked, you should check the difficulty name. maybe, you already know that.
  3. hmm... 03:51:787 - If you decide long kiai-time to this timing, you should be almost made equally, imo. for example, 01:10:954 - , 02:40:676 and so on..

Facil

  1. 00:18:732 (1,2,3,4) - Add Whistle at head part?
  2. 00:27:620 (1,2) - Try *this shape? This is more like it looks neat.
  3. 00:39:843 (4) - Add Whistle~
  4. 00:42:898 (2,3) - Try *this?
  5. 00:59:009 (1,2,3) - hmm... This copy seems to be not particularly good, imo. 01:01:232 (3) - try just use the curve slider?
  6. 02:35:398 (3) - Add Whistle at tail part.

Intermedio

  1. I can't find big problem.
  2. 00:34:009 (1) - I think removal one reverse and add circle is better.

Dificil

  1. 01:01:648 (2) - I suggest removal it. this timing is not a suitable one.
  2. 01:05:954 (5) - Move to x362 y84?
  3. 01:32:620 (6) - Move to x411 y63
  4. 02:59:565 (2,3,4) - stack is more than better, imo~
  5. 03:51:232 (8,9,10) - ^

Shoot Star. Good Luck.
Topic Starter
mancuso_JM_

Artavia wrote:

From My Modding Queue Sorry for my late.

General

  1. I think your style is fairly unremarkable. so my modding might not be of avail, maybe.
  2. Yeah, I think your map-set name is a good idea. but, if you want for ranked, you should check the difficulty name. maybe, you already know that. I think this is rankable, I have ranked other version with similar names proof and some other mappers are doing the same when they map songs in spanish. So yeah, I'll keep them.
  3. hmm... 03:51:787 - If you decide long kiai-time to this timing, you should be almost made equally, imo. for example, 01:10:954 - , 02:40:676 and so on.. That sections are important but not that important as the last part (in my point of view ofc), so having a simple flash kiai is enough I suppose.

Facil

  1. 00:18:732 (1,2,3,4) - Add Whistle at head part? Hmm.. I'll consider it but for now is a no. I'm emphasizing the red ticks only in the first section because they are the higher in this part.
  2. 00:27:620 (1,2) - Try *this shape? This is more like it looks neat. Fixed a bit :P
  3. 00:39:843 (4) - Add Whistle~ I think is not that necessary
  4. 00:42:898 (2,3) - Try *this? Fixed a bit this as well.
  5. 00:59:009 (1,2,3) - hmm... This copy seems to be not particularly good, imo. 01:01:232 (3) - try just use the curve slider? Naa.. I don't think so. I prefer to keep this one :P
  6. 02:35:398 (3) - Add Whistle at tail part. oops.. That's true. Fixed.

Dificil

  1. 01:01:648 (2) - I suggest removal it. this timing is not a suitable one. Hmm.. but it's following vocals. Keeping it for now, I'll wait for some more opinions.
  2. 01:05:954 (5) - Move to x362 y84? I find the flow weird if I do that :/
  3. 01:32:620 (6) - Move to x411 y63 Makes sense! Done (But I have decided to move it to x:408 y:59 instead).
  4. 02:59:565 (2,3,4) - stack is more than better, imo~ yeah.. looks better xD
  5. 03:51:232 (8,9,10) - ^ But not this one :P

Shoot Star. Good Luck.
Thanks for your help! It was a useful mod! :)
Updated my diffs!
riffy
Yo o/

[General]
  1. Consider making your colours a little less bright. Yur colours are cute, but they may hurt eyes in a really bad way as they are too bright.
  2. I'm quite sure that Xanandra won't be happy to have ErufenRito in the tags. Anyways, you'd bettter ask him directly.
[Facil]
  1. 00:41:232 (1,2,3) - 00:58:176 (4,1) - and so on - I doubt that this rhythm is a way to go for the easiest diff. The problem is that you switch your rhythm and it feels confusing for beginners. Moreover, sometimes the polarity changes like 00:44:565 (3) - leave stong beats (00:44:843) unstressed. The main point is that beginners are incapable of reading/handling rhythm changes/polarity switches.
  2. 01:43:732 (2) - minor - I'd suggest to make this curve more obvious. The ngle is too small and significant parts of the sliderbody get overlapped in a tricky way. rough example

    Actually, I don't quite agree with your rhythm as it feels sorta too complicated for the easiest diff.
[Intermedio]
  1. There are quite a lot of unused green lines. Please, consider removing them as they might glitch the game. 01:47:343 - example.
  2. I'd try to map those empty 3/2 gaps like 00:28:732 - first of all, that'd give your more consistent rhythm. SEcondly, it will make the star rating go higher and improve the balance of the set significantly.
  3. 02:56:232 (3,1) - pretty sure you'd like to keep x1.0 DS here instead of weird x1.2 which was sorta inconsistent.

    So, yeah, I'd recommend to use more 1/2s as that'd fix the balance and improve your rhythm. I won't go into details but I think you've got the idea.
[Dificil]
  1. 00:38:732 (1,2,3) - you could use some rhythm like you did it with 00:36:787 (2,3,4) - I just feel like 00:39:009 - the beat here should be mapped. It has some beats and vocals and ignoring it feels unnatural.
    Note: 01:33:176 - and I'd suggest to map this beat as well
  2. 00:43:454 (5) - haven't you missed a new combo here? It would fit with the vocals/pattern, if I am not mistaken.
  3. 02:05:537 (2,3) - minor - the DS feels a little random. Mind keeping it more consistent?

    This diff is amazing!
I don't really agree with your rhythm choice on Easier diffs, but I really do love the Hard. Well, try to get more opinions or give a try to the suggested changes now, I am 100% sure that it'd make the diffs mmuch better! Keep up the good work, man! Just as I said, patterns are great, it's just that I don't agree with your rhythm on Easy. Also, that'd be great if you could make Normal harder and fix the unbalanced diff gap @.@

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Best of luck!
Topic Starter
mancuso_JM_

-Bakari- wrote:

Yo o/ Hey!

[General]
  1. Consider making your colours a little less bright. Yur colours are cute, but they may hurt eyes in a really bad way as they are too bright. Meh.. I like them, fits with the BG and video in a good way in my opinion. That's why I'll keep it.
  2. I'm quite sure that Xanandra won't be happy to have ErufenRito in the tags. Anyways, you'd bettter ask him directly. I'd really like to keep it :/ but oh well.. Removed :P
[Facil]
  1. 00:41:232 (1,2,3) - 00:58:176 (4,1) - and so on - I doubt that this rhythm is a way to go for the easiest diff. The problem is that you switch your rhythm and it feels confusing for beginners. Moreover, sometimes the polarity changes like 00:44:565 (3) - leave stong beats (00:44:843) unstressed. The main point is that beginners are incapable of reading/handling rhythm changes/polarity switches I did that because I wanted to emphasize the higher points in the music, generally when I map I focus on that, what is the higher thing that I listen in the music. In those cases I think the guitar sounds higher than the vocals or any other instrumental (and some others vocals sound higer than drums for examples) and I've decided to map it over the red ticks but not doing it randomly. I always use a 1/2 slider before the patterns over red ticks (fitting with the song) to give a proper transition so new players could learn the patterns better; always using Sliders and NOT single notes over red ticks that I think will be much harder for new players. Nowadays I've seen Easy difficulties much harder than this one and I'm pretty sure this fits with the difficulty (we have to include the BPM and all the settings are really low), so this is my point of view. I think this is more like a subjective thing, but I respect your opinion
  2. 01:43:732 (2) - minor - I'd suggest to make this curve more obvious. The ngle is too small and significant parts of the sliderbody get overlapped in a tricky way. rough example I like how this looks, looks sexy for me xD

    Actually, I don't quite agree with your rhythm as it feels sorta too complicated for the easiest diff.
[Dificil]
  1. 00:38:732 (1,2,3) - you could use some rhythm like you did it with 00:36:787 (2,3,4) - I just feel like 00:39:009 - the beat here should be mapped. It has some beats and vocals and ignoring it feels unnatural. ''veo la noche'' starts over the blue tick with the note over the downbeat I'm just following the instrumental. Plus, and the slider follows pretty much correct the rhythm, I mean ''veo'' is a pretty long vocal and that's why I tried to represent. Sometimes is good to play with the rhythms to make the gameplay more interesting I think.
    Note: 01:33:176 - and I'd suggest to map this beat as well Hmm.. I prefer to keep this one as well. I mean, the stop appears in the vocals, having a stop in the map is consistent with the song.
  2. 00:43:454 (5) - haven't you missed a new combo here? It would fit with the vocals/pattern, if I am not mistaken. It'll be really short and a bit inconsistent if I compare with the rest of my comboing. And I think the combo in 00:45:398 - fits the music on a better way.
  3. 02:05:537 (2,3) - minor - the DS feels a little random. Mind keeping it more consistent? That's true xD. Fixed!

    This diff is amazing!
I don't really agree with your rhythm choice on Easier diffs, but I really do love the Hard. Well, try to get more opinions or give a try to the suggested changes now, I am 100% sure that it'd make the diffs mmuch better! Keep up the good work, man! Just as I said, patterns are great, it's just that I don't agree with your rhythm on Easy. Also, that'd be great if you could make Normal harder and fix the unbalanced diff gap @.@

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Best of luck!
Thanks Baka! :P.. I've explained everything about my easy, about the Normal I don't think other is really necessary because this Hard is pretty simple, I mean consistent spacing, compressed 1/4 patterns and simple rhythm.
Thanks for modding! Waiting for Xanandra!
Yauxo


Hi there, coming from your request in our/my Modding Queue. Be so kind to take some minutes (or seconds, lets be honest) to answer to my mods. Dont be a dick and just "lol didnt changed stuffs hurr durr" without an explanation. If I told you something that was against your map, tell me why. This way mapper and modder both gain something.

Unrankable
Suggestion

Other than that, colours yellow to red indicate how important changes would be in my opinion
(copy paste end)

[General]
■ I'll assume that the difficulty names are Easy Normal and Hard in ... Spanish? PT? D:
■ How about adding the translated title into the tags?

[Easy]
I guess I'll go somewhat nazi on things (like small coord changes), as I think that the map's probably really good already

■ 00:36:509 (1,2,3) - Personally not a big fan of only slightly curved things, so maybe have these in a straight line?


■ 00:37:620 (3) - I think a blasic rhythm like (image) would be better in an Easy diff.


■ 00:40:398 (5) - y 132 to be on the same coord as 00:37:620 (3) -
00:41:232 (1) - 00:59:009 (1) - (etc) It kinda buggs me that this one a) doesnt start on the big white/downbeat, but on an empty redtick. The actual vocal starts at the blue tick behind that (which obviously also wouldnt be a good idea to place it on in an Easy diff)
Imo, it'd be better if you kept a simple rhythm here as well. Moving the objects to the white tick before sounds much better and prevents unmapped strong beats and awkward vocal mapping

Similar
02:10:120 (1,2) -
02:27:898 (1) -

■ 01:06:509 (4,1) - These two bug me for a similar reason as above. They feel awkward as they skip strong beats that shouldve been mapped.
01:12:065 (1,2) - Less edgy maybe? 1 is new, 2 is old


■ 02:19:843 (2) - curve a tiny bit more for a better blanket?
■ 04:04:287 (1) - Maybe change this one to how 04:02:620 (2,3) - works? (with the little break inbetween)

[Normal]
■ 00:29:287 (1,2,1,2) - Maybe try this rhythm? Having the downbeat on 00:29:287 (1) - 's and 00:31:509 (1) - 's end + a break on a audible long note at ~00:31:093 - and 00:33:454 - makes this feel weird to me.


■ 01:16:232 (2) - I#d actually move the NC here. 01:15:676 (1) - kinda sounds like it belongs to 01:14:843 (4) -, where 01:16:232 (2) - sounds completely different
■ 02:19:565 (3,4) - unstack? You also didnt stack it here 00:51:232 (4,1) - + you didnt use any stacks at all in this diff, so why would you use one here? Kepp the cursors moving /o/
■ 04:09:287 (3) - Circle here?

[Hard]
■ Are all the Sliderslide hitsounds intended? 00:19:565 (4) - for example. Sometimes you use them, sometimes you dont (another example: you use them here 01:05:120 (4) - but you dont use them the slider after 01:07:343 (1) - )
■ 00:46:509 (4) - I dont think that you'll need a drum hitsound here. There's nothing drumm-y to support
■ 03:06:787 (8) - ctrl+g maybe? Would support the circular movement/flow into the next Slider.

Looks good :3
Luvdic
Wtf, why I didn't get any notification of new posts?

Artavia wrote:

Intermedio

  1. I can't find big problem.
    I think its better the way it currently is
  2. 00:34:009 (1) - I think removal one reverse and add circle is better.

-Bakari- wrote:

  1. I'm quite sure that Xanandra won't be happy to have ErufenRito in the tags. Anyways, you'd bettter ask him directly.
    Oh you mancuso :<

[Intermedio]
  1. There are quite a lot of unused green lines. Please, consider removing them as they might glitch the game. 01:47:343 - example.
    So far, I don't know any glitch that might occur, the reason that I decided not to so it's because there's just too many of them, and deleting them one by one gives more room to errors, and thus to actually really glitch it, so in the end I decided it was not worth it.
  2. I'd try to map those empty 3/2 gaps like 00:28:732 - first of all, that'd give your more consistent rhythm. SEcondly, it will make the star rating go higher and improve the balance of the set significantly.

    I disagree, this diff fits perfectly as a middle diff between hard and easy imo. The fact that it has so low star rating just proves that star rating calculations (specially for easier difficulties as I have seen so far) it's still not very precise. Just check how frequent you have to click the notes, in easy it's usually every 2 white ticks, with the occasional 1 or 3 or 4 ticks and with a low amount of circles as well (17%), it's basically follow sliders, while the normal is mainly every 1 tick with the occasional 1/2 tick with much more amount of circles (35%)

    Anyways, this map was very hard for me to map, as since the rhythms are kinda hard to follow (as in the guitar, vocals, drums, etc pretty much have different polarity, and since they take prominence in different parts throughout the song, making the transitions for them in a smooth way was pretty hard, even more since I had to keep it simple, or else it would be too complicated to understand), So yeah, I guess what I try to say is that adding more notes just for the sake of making it more difficult won't do it for me.

  3. 02:56:232 (3,1) - pretty sure you'd like to keep x1.0 DS here instead of weird x1.2 which was sorta inconsistent.
    Nice catch

Yauxo wrote:

[Normal]
■ 00:29:287 (1,2,1,2) - Maybe try this rhythm? Having the downbeat on 00:29:287 (1) - 's and 00:31:509 (1) - 's end + a break on a audible long note at ~00:31:093 - and 00:33:454 - makes this feel weird to me.


Intentional ;)

■ 01:16:232 (2) - I#d actually move the NC here. 01:15:676 (1) - kinda sounds like it belongs to 01:14:843 (4) -, where 01:16:232 (2) - sounds completely different
Actually, youre half right, combo should start at 01:14:843 -

■ 02:19:565 (3,4) - unstack? You also didnt stack it here 00:51:232 (4,1) - + you didnt use any stacks at all in this diff, so why would you use one here? Kepp the cursors moving /o/
Hmm... fine...

■ 04:09:287 (3) - Circle here?
There's no real need for that imo, so no need to complicate things for nothing
http://puu.sh/dg2Yv/c5ce7942a1.osu
Topic Starter
mancuso_JM_

Yauxo wrote:



Hi there, coming from your request in our/my Modding Queue. Be so kind to take some minutes (or seconds, lets be honest) to answer to my mods. Dont be a dick and just "lol didnt changed stuffs hurr durr" without an explanation. If I told you something that was against your map, tell me why. This way mapper and modder both gain something. As you can see, I always give a proper answer to all the modders, so don't worry :P

Unrankable
Suggestion

Other than that, colours yellow to red indicate how important changes would be in my opinion
(copy paste end)

[General]
■ I'll assume that the difficulty names are Easy Normal and Hard in ... Spanish? PT? D: Spanish.. It's a spanish song, that's why xD
■ How about adding the translated title into the tags? Hmm.. not really necessary in my opinion :/, let's see what others think

[Easy]
I guess I'll go somewhat nazi on things (like small coord changes), as I think that the map's probably really good already

■ 00:36:509 (1,2,3) - Personally not a big fan of only slightly curved things, so maybe have these in a straight line? I like how this flow, during the gameplay the difference is really low, that's why I'll keep it.


■ 00:37:620 (3) - I think a blasic rhythm like (image) would be better in an Easy diff. But this works for me, I mean he changed exactly the syllable in this point, so using a repetition in there is the best way to cover it I think.


■ 00:40:398 (5) - y 132 to be on the same coord as 00:37:620 (3) -
00:41:232 (1) - 00:59:009 (1) - (etc) It kinda buggs me that this one a) doesnt start on the big white/downbeat, but on an empty redtick. The actual vocal starts at the blue tick behind that (which obviously also wouldnt be a good idea to place it on in an Easy diff)
Imo, it'd be better if you kept a simple rhythm here as well. Moving the objects to the white tick before sounds much better and prevents unmapped strong beats and awkward vocal mapping Ok guys, you win.. I've seen much harder things in easy difficulties but you're complaining a lot about it so maybe I'm wrong.. Re-mapped all of the up-beat..

Similar
02:10:120 (1,2) -
02:27:898 (1) -

■ 01:06:509 (4,1) - These two bug me for a similar reason as above. They feel awkward as they skip strong beats that shouldve been mapped. But he's singing in this way, pls! I've to follow the music, in this case there is not other thing to follow like the other points, sadly this is not my fault, is Azier (the singer) fault..
01:12:065 (1,2) - Less edgy maybe? 1 is new, 2 is old Hmm.. nah, this is more a personal like I suppose, I'll keep that because I like how this one looks.


■ 02:19:843 (2) - curve a tiny bit more for a better blanket? oops... Done..
■ 04:04:287 (1) - Maybe change this one to how 04:02:620 (2,3) - works? (with the little break inbetween) Completely different sections, I'm not changing that..

[Hard]
■ Are all the Sliderslide hitsounds intended? 00:19:565 (4) - for example. Sometimes you use them, sometimes you dont (another example: you use them here 01:05:120 (4) - but you dont use them the slider after 01:07:343 (1) - ) Yep, they are intentional, some of them are following the instrumental (in the first section till 00:36:509 -), the rest are following in general long prhases.
■ 00:46:509 (4) - I dont think that you'll need a drum hitsound here. There's nothing drumm-y to support lol.. this should be a soft whistle instead, little mistake xD
■ 03:06:787 (8) - ctrl+g maybe? Would support the circular movement/flow into the next Slider. Nice one, I liked it. Fixed.

Looks good :3
I took my time, but I finally check this mod :P.. Thanks a lot!
Updated!
neonat
Facil

00:25:398 (4) - Before:
After:
Yeah I know it's pretty simple adjustments but I think touch-ups to make things perfect is nice
01:34:287 (1,2) - blanket them nicely?
01:34:287 (1,3) - once ^ is done stack these exactly on each others heads
03:46:509 (1) - I found this slider a little bit too out of place here honestly, it felt like a filler. But then also as a filler, I thought if it used the same pattern as what was being used before this, it would blend right in better:

Intermedio

00:34:009 (1) - set aside the fact that this repeat slider has multiple repeats, the music at the point at 00:34:287 is pretty strong, it's the peak pitch (highest tone) in the tune of this section, splitting this to a circle at 00:34:009 and a repeat slider starting from 00:34:287 would be a way to fully express the feeling of the music, by allowing players to click at that point
01:47:343 - Unnecessary inheriting line
01:47:620 - ^
02:04:287 - unnecessary inheriting line
02:04:565 - ^ as it's the same as 01:45:537
02:21:232 (2,3) - adjusting them to allow their ends to line up nicely would be great
02:43:732 (4) - NC here instead of 02:44:565 (1) - that's what you did before the break, refer to 01:14:843 (1) and 01:32:620 (1)

Dificil

00:27:343 (4) - soft whistle, or drum whistle, whichever you think fits more, but something to go with that hi-hat sound in the song, it's the same as 00:36:232 (5)
00:50:676 (3) - why drum whistle in the middle though? It sounds kinda awkward
02:52:065 (4) - NC here instead of 02:52:898 (1) - you usually add it this way, like at 01:23:176 (1)
03:48:176 (2,3) - the end of 03:48:176 (2) is not really centralized to the middle of the curve of the next slider, making further away from the slider head of 03:49:009 (3) - hence blanket is not really exact


Good Luck
Topic Starter
mancuso_JM_

neonat wrote:

Facil

00:25:398 (4) - Before:
After:
Yeah I know it's pretty simple adjustments but I think touch-ups to make things perfect is nice That's true, should be better now.
01:34:287 (1,2) - blanket them nicely?
01:34:287 (1,3) - once ^ is done stack these exactly on each others heads I did something here, with those sliders :P
03:46:509 (1) - I found this slider a little bit too out of place here honestly, it felt like a filler. But then also as a filler, I thought if it used the same pattern as what was being used before this, it would blend right in better: Hmm.. I didn't found it any issue with that rhythm, plus a lot of modders were telling me to simplify the rhythm as much as I can, and adding a single note over a red tick is not that easy for the difficulty. Plus, this slider provides a good mix between vocals/guitar, after the repetition starts a part of vocals, that's why I've decided to do it in this way.

Dificil

00:27:343 (4) - soft whistle, or drum whistle, whichever you think fits more, but something to go with that hi-hat sound in the song, it's the same as 00:36:232 (5) Used a soft one.
00:50:676 (3) - why drum whistle in the middle though? It sounds kinda awkward it was following vocals, but sounds a bit weird listening to again, that's why I've removed it :P
02:52:065 (4) - NC here instead of 02:52:898 (1) - you usually add it this way, like at 01:23:176 (1) Makes sense.
03:48:176 (2,3) - the end of 03:48:176 (2) is not really centralized to the middle of the curve of the next slider, making further away from the slider head of 03:49:009 (3) - hence blanket is not really exact I've tweaked this pattern a bit


Good Luck
Thanks!
Updated my diffs.. Waiting for Xanandra!
Luvdic
Oops, casi se me olvida esto :x

(mancu debe odiarme)

neonat wrote:

Intermedio

00:34:009 (1) - set aside the fact that this repeat slider has multiple repeats, the music at the point at 00:34:287 is pretty strong, it's the peak pitch (highest tone) in the tune of this section, splitting this to a circle at 00:34:009 and a repeat slider starting from 00:34:287 would be a way to fully express the feeling of the music, by allowing players to click at that point
I feel that this way is much more simple to play, since your suggestion implies the player to hit a circle, then a slider 1/1 long, and then another slider even longer, too many objects with different rhythm to process at the same time.

01:47:343 - Unnecessary inheriting line
01:47:620 - ^
02:04:287 - unnecessary inheriting line
02:04:565 - ^ as it's the same as 01:45:537
Read previous mod response about what I think of this lines.

02:21:232 (2,3) - adjusting them to allow their ends to line up nicely would be great
Dont think its necessary

02:43:732 (4) - NC here instead of 02:44:565 (1) - that's what you did before the break, refer to 01:14:843 (1) and 01:32:620 (1)
Oops, thanks ;)
@mancu: puedes hacer lo del combo por mi pls? :$?
Topic Starter
mancuso_JM_
I'm back! Fixed the NC in ''Intermedio'' and increased the AR to 7.5 in Dificil.

Updated and ready for mods again!
Yuii-
Change description of the map.

It says: "Intermedio (Intermidate/Normal)".

It should be "Intermediate".

I will mod this map tomorrow because now I'm so tired ;w;

Good luck ~
Kazuya
Hello, from my Modding Queue. Sorry, my english is horrible. It's only ideas!

[Hard]

This song slow, AR7 better, because the objects is not dense.
  1. 00:40:815 - Put circle here. Strange, and deficient if there is no circle here. Please, emphasize the voice.
  2. 00:41:694 - 00:41:880 - Hmm. Make a 1/3 parts here. Let little variety. Put circles here: 00:41:694 - 00:41:880 - remove reverse from 00:41:787 (3) - slider, and move this slider here: 00:42:065 -
    Timeline example: http://puu.sh/exfip/0e48d4995a.jpg
  3. 00:42:620 (6) - Same as. Make a 1/3 parts here. Change this slider end here: 00:42:991 - , and put circle here: 00:43:176 - A little of vocal. Timeline: http://puu.sh/exfvp/edc0242dd1.jpg
  4. 00:45:954 (3,4) - Vocal killer. The vocal more pronounced: Put circle here: 00:45:954 - , and put 1/1 slider here: 00:46:232 - Timeline: http://puu.sh/exfN5/9e3ef237e3.jpg I think use my suggestion.
  5. 00:54:843 (3,4,5,6,7) - I think this part little boring. There is opportunity! Follow the vocal: http://puu.sh/exgl3/559863f6ba.jpg This is 1/3 and 1/2 part! Take advantage of!
  6. 01:05:954 (5) - I think, two circle better fits the drums/guitar.
  7. 01:07:343 (1) - This reverse is not fit here. The vocal ends here: 01:07:898 - , the reverse slider is weird here. Please, remove reverse, and put circles here: 01:08:176 - 01:08:454 -
  8. 01:15:954 (8,1) - I think, follow the vocals. Put circle here: 01:15:954 - and put 1/1 slider here: 01:16:232 -
  9. 01:18:454 (5) - Same as 01:07:343 (1) - Remove reverse, and put circles here: 01:19:287 - 01:19:565 -
  10. 01:20:398 (7) - I think, two circle better fits the drums, ang guitars. If you don't like it: 01:19:843 (6) - =add once repeat (because vocal ends here 01:20:398 - ), and put circle here: 01:20:676 -
  11. 01:22:620 (3) - Hey, bit monotonous. Please, follow the vocal! Remove this slider, put circles here: 01:22:620 - 01:22:898 - 01:23:037 -
  12. 01:34:009 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - This part little vocal killer. Please, use this similar: http://puu.sh/exiLJ/961d8ab537.jpg (Timeline)
  13. 01:40:815 - Missing circle. Put it here.
  14. 02:07:065 - to 02:09:843 - : Idea : http://puu.sh/exjAj/17083d350a.jpg I tried to follow the vocals.
  15. 02:18:176 (9) - Delete slider, put circle here: 02:18:176 - move this 02:18:732 (1) - slider here: 02:18:454 - and change this 1/1 slider ends here: 02:18:870 - . Put circle here: 02:19:287 - It's better fits the vocals.
  16. 02:19:287 - to 02:20:398 - Make 1/3 part, follow the vocal. Timeline: http://puu.sh/exkej/1071349b8e.jpg This is good here. Really!
  17. 02:21:509 (8) - One circle better here: 02:21:509 - anmd create 1/1 slider here: 02:21:787 -
  18. 02:28:037 - Missing circle
  19. 02:34:843 (7) - Two circle better fits the drums/gitar.
  20. 02:37:065 (2,3,4) - Current concepts is not fit here. Replace it! Circle -> Circle -> Slider. Better fits the vocals, and drums. Timeline: http://puu.sh/exkJD/076af9c0c2.jpg
  21. 02:49:009 (9) - Change slider end here: 02:49:287 - because this vocal ends here, and put circle here: 02:49:565 -
  22. 02:51:509 (3) - Circle is better here: 02:51:509 - and put circles here: 02:51:787 - 02:51:926 -
  23. 03:02:898 (1,2) - Vocal killer. Remove reverse from 03:02:898 (1) - slider, put circle here: 03:03:732 - and 1/1 slider here: 03:04:009 - or 1/2 sliders here: 03:04:009 - 03:04:565 -
  24. 03:06:787 (8) - Vocal fix: This 1/1 slider not fit here. Change slider end here: 03:07:065 - and put circles here: 03:07:343 - 03:07:482 -
  25. 03:09:287 (3) - Vocal: Circle better here: 03:09:287 - , and put circles here: 03:09:565 - 03:09:704 -
  26. 03:38:454 (8,1,2) - I think, use 1/2 sliders here: 03:38:454 - 03:39:009 - . Better fits the vocal!
  27. 03:42:898 (8,1,2,3,4,5,6) - Please, follow the vocal. Current conception is not good. Use similar: http://puu.sh/exm1l/85222b2229.jpg
  28. 03:56:232 (1,2,3) - Same as: 03:02:898 (1,2) - Vocal killer. Please, follow the vocal.
  29. 03:59:843 (5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - Vocal... Timeline example: 03:56:232 - to 04:00:676 - : http://puu.sh/exmvV/ba2b45f066.jpg 04:01:232 - to 04:04:843 - : http://puu.sh/exmAl/de4f0256f3.jpg
Ok. Why ignore the vocals? I think enjoyable, if you not only focuses on the drums. This is hard difficulty, not "hard normal", and BPM is slow.

[Normal]

AIMod: Variable distance is unrankable. Fix it!

Examples:

00:19:565 (2,1) - = 1.0x
00:20:954 (1,2) - 0.60x
00:25:398 (1,2) - 0.60
....

Please use 1.0x distance snap.

00:27:620 (1,2,1,2,1,2) -

Rhythm is very tricky...

[*]00:27:620 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Why don't follow the guitar? My idea: http://puu.sh/exouB/bf189ccb86.jpg Use this similar.
[*]02:10:954 (2,3,4,1) - Timeline: http://puu.sh/exoQ9/bcc456164e.jpg A little of vocal?

Ok, main problem the variable distance.

[Easy]

OK sufficiently easy. Good, no idea.

Good luck.
Xinchii
Hello ~ from queue :)

[Facil]
  1. Not thing I can found here.
[Intermedio]
  1. this diff have use same time point line with Dificil diff , many of them are unnecessary
    EX:
  2. 00:28:448 - useless green line in this diff.
  3. 00:29:009 - ^
  4. 00:36:232 - ^
  5. 00:36:509 - ^
    Check if they are all use.
    Sorry I point this out again , but really I think remove them or reset some new time point to fit with this diff will be more reasonable.
    Consider with this , it's only my recommendation.
  1. Hmm... 1/2 beat use 0.6x , and other use 1.0x ?
    I don't know if it will make normal player confused... or if it fit with rule?
    but at least , I think the veiw is clean.
[Dificil]
  1. 00:38:176(6) - suggest to set this slider straight , will better look with (5) in my veiw.
  2. 01:30:676(2,3,4,5) - try to set this a pentagon with (1)'s slider end ? like:
    I think it's more beautiful in veiw , also it's easy to keep your (5) on center line and (6)'s place symmetry with (4)
  3. 01:32:620(6) - 01:32:620(6) - you let 01:33:176 -'s beat to be empty , so may be set this slider to 2 note will have better play effect , like same you do at 02:43:732(7,8) - I think.
  4. 02:34:843(7) - Bend this slider down will be good look with (8) in my view.
  5. 02:40:676(5,1) - spacing uncentralized here ? check if is mistake.
  6. 03:01:509(7) - ^
  7. 03:14:287 - 03:16:509 - why leave this part empty ? don't consider to map it like previously similar part ? ---> 01:45:398 -
  8. 03:40:676(5) - little nazi , try to move this right to x:252|y:340 to be better blanket
  9. 03:51:509(10,1) - little nazi , try to set (1)'s slider's end at x:236|y:76 , more parallel with (10)

what language this song use? I just feel some interest about this :3
I'm few to listen song genre like this , but it's great relaxed song

Good luck ~!

Edit

Lust wrote:

For people who are concerned about the 1.0x and 0.6x spacing changes in the Intermedio difficulty, it should be fine. Xanandra used the changes throughout the map consistently so there should be no confusion here. The BPM is low enough and the patterns are definitely clear enough for players to be able to discern between them. It offers a logical step up in the difficulty from the Facil.
Okay , I learned a new
Lust
For people who are concerned about the 1.0x and 0.6x spacing changes in the Intermedio difficulty, it should be fine. Xanandra used the changes throughout the map consistently so there should be no confusion here. The BPM is low enough and the patterns are definitely clear enough for players to be able to discern between them. It offers a logical step up in the difficulty from the Facil.
Luvdic

Kazuya wrote:

[Normal]

AIMod: Variable distance is unrankable. Fix it!

Examples:

00:19:565 (2,1) - = 1.0x
00:20:954 (1,2) - 0.60x
00:25:398 (1,2) - 0.60
....

Please use 1.0x distance snap.

00:27:620 (1,2,1,2,1,2) -

Please, read Lust's post for this

Rhythm is very tricky...

[*]00:27:620 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Why don't follow the guitar? My idea: http://puu.sh/exouB/bf189ccb86.jpg Use this similar.
Hard to understand your screenshot since I dont have a base to compare your screen with current, as in, the screenshot doesnt provide the time. Anyways, I really like the way it is currently, so most probably there will be no changes.

[*]02:10:954 (2,3,4,1) - Timeline: http://puu.sh/exoQ9/bcc456164e.jpg A little of vocal?
Complaining about tricky rhythms and yet your suggesting me to make it even more complicated by suddenly following vocals...

Ok, main problem the variable distance.


Good luck.

Xinchii wrote:

Hello ~ from queue :)

[Intermedio]
[list][*]this diff have use same time point line with Dificil diff , many of them are unnecessary
EX:
[*]00:28:448 - useless green line in this diff.
[*]00:29:009 - ^
[*]00:36:232 - ^
[*]00:36:509 - ^
Check if they are all use.
I have already said it before, I'm very sloppy, and honestly, the extra green lines is not gonna cause ANY problem at all to the map, problem my occur while I'm trying to delete them, and while doing so make a mistake, and if I do a mistake, then a problem MIGHT actually happen, so I guess it's better not to do this, unless of course, someone that is very careful does for me ;)

Good luck ~!
Thanks for the mods!

And thanks Lust for your input!
Lally
#queue

[General]
  1. kiai is not consistent in the diffs
[Dificil o3o]
  1. 01:15:954 (8) - what about to change the flow like this?
  2. 02:44:287 - :/ missing circle hre add one >3<
  3. 03:06:787 (8) - ctrl+g
[Medio]
  1. 00:18:454 (1) - why are you starting 1/2 before the others diff?
  2. 00:19:565 (2,1) - personally i don't like this flow why don't you try to give another shape to 00:19:565 (2) - to have a better flow for the next object?
  3. 00:44:842 (4,1,2) - i explain everything with the immage:
    the flow is not good here
perfect map <3 good luck
Topic Starter
mancuso_JM_
Thanks for modding guys!

I'll fix your mods tomorrow, I've just came back from the beach and I'm a bit tired right now.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kazuya

Kazuya wrote:

Hello, from my Modding Queue. Sorry, my english is horrible. It's only ideas! Hey.

[Hard]

This song slow, AR7 better, because the objects is not dense. Used 7.5 for that reason I suppose xD. A lot of players will play this with DT due to the density of the map, and 7.5 fits better with that mode plus it doesn't work bad without modes either, so I'll leave it as it is.
  1. 00:40:815 - Put circle here. Strange, and deficient if there is no circle here. Please, emphasize the voice. There isn't any strong sound in this tick and in this particular pattern drums sounds higher in my opinion, so nope.
  2. 00:41:694 - 00:41:880 - Hmm. Make a 1/3 parts here. Let little variety. Put circles here: 00:41:694 - 00:41:880 - remove reverse from 00:41:787 (3) - slider, and move this slider here: 00:42:065 - Sincerely plays horrible to me :/. I prefer to keep this mix between vocals/guitar that provides a better gameplay.
    Timeline example: http://puu.sh/exfip/0e48d4995a.jpg
  3. 00:42:620 (6) - Same as. Make a 1/3 parts here. Change this slider end here: 00:42:991 - , and put circle here: 00:43:176 - A little of vocal. Timeline: http://puu.sh/exfvp/edc0242dd1.jpg This one sounds better but still weird for me during the gameplay.
  4. 00:45:954 (3,4) - Vocal killer. The vocal more pronounced: Put circle here: 00:45:954 - , and put 1/1 slider here: 00:46:232 - Timeline: http://puu.sh/exfN5/9e3ef237e3.jpg I think use my suggestion. Fixed this one.
  5. 00:54:843 (3,4,5,6,7) - I think this part little boring. There is opportunity! Follow the vocal: http://puu.sh/exgl3/559863f6ba.jpg This is 1/3 and 1/2 part! Take advantage of! I prefer to keep that in this way, it provides a good mix between vocals/guitar, it looks like you only follow vocals in your maps but I'm not that kind of mappers. Those 1/3 plays terrible in my personal point of view, and maybe is just this a personal like but since this is my map I'll do what I like, this map was also testplayed by others and the didn't argue about those 1/3, so yeah, prefer to don't touch them.
  6. 01:05:954 (5) - I think, two circle better fits the drums/guitar. Sure thing.
  7. 01:07:343 (1) - This reverse is not fit here. The vocal ends here: 01:07:898 - , the reverse slider is weird here. Please, remove reverse, and put circles here: 01:08:176 - 01:08:454 - Works for me, specially if you listen both guitar and vocals.
  8. 01:15:954 (8,1) - I think, follow the vocals. Put circle here: 01:15:954 - and put 1/1 slider here: 01:16:232 - Hmm.. I prefer to follow the instrumental here.
  9. 01:18:454 (5) - Same as 01:07:343 (1) - Remove reverse, and put circles here: 01:19:287 - 01:19:565 - I don't know what you're listening here, but this clearly said ''tris'' (in the first part of the slider) and ''te'' in the second part after the slider and this was what I tried to follow.
  10. 01:20:398 (7) - I think, two circle better fits the drums, ang guitars. If you don't like it: 01:19:843 (6) - =add once repeat (because vocal ends here 01:20:398 - ), and put circle here: 01:20:676 - Hmm.. I don't think so.
  11. 01:22:620 (3) - Hey, bit monotonous. Please, follow the vocal! Remove this slider, put circles here: 01:22:620 - 01:22:898 - 01:23:037 - Definetly I prefer to follow the instrumental here :/
  12. 01:34:009 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - This part little vocal killer. Please, use this similar: http://puu.sh/exiLJ/961d8ab537.jpg (Timeline) Not exactly but I did something similar here.
  13. 01:40:815 - Missing circle. Put it here. Seriously you have to see what I'm trying to follow. In all these points where you suggested me to add a note I'm not trying to follow anything of this, plus they sound weird to me. What I tried to follow is that sound in the instrumental, and I emphasized it with those double finisher.
  14. 02:07:065 - to 02:09:843 - : Idea : http://puu.sh/exjAj/17083d350a.jpg I tried to follow the vocals. This is following the instrumental in a proper way if you ask me, notice I'm not that kind of mappers that focus on following just vocals. Specially in this song where vocals are not ''constant'', if I would do that the map would play really weird.
  15. 02:18:176 (9) - Delete slider, put circle here: 02:18:176 - move this 02:18:732 (1) - slider here: 02:18:454 - and change this 1/1 slider ends here: 02:18:870 - . Put circle here: 02:19:287 - It's better fits the vocals. Keeping this as well.
  16. 02:19:287 - to 02:20:398 - Make 1/3 part, follow the vocal. Timeline: http://puu.sh/exkej/1071349b8e.jpg This is good here. Really! Sorry for this words, but these 1/3 sucks for me. That kind of mixes between 1/3 and 1/2 plays really bad in my personal point of view, I've done something you are telling me in this map but it's not exactly the same because I used 1/3 in chorus and 1/2 in the rest not mixing it in the same pattern. I repeat this again, I'm not that kind of mappers that follow only vocals, and the vocals in this song doesn't go in a constant way, that's why I decided to use other things in the music, to make the map better in terms of gameplay.
  17. 02:21:509 (8) - One circle better here: 02:21:509 - anmd create 1/1 slider here: 02:21:787 - As you can notice, I'm following drums here, so nope.
  18. 02:28:037 - Missing circle I'm following the guitar here.
  19. 02:34:843 (7) - Two circle better fits the drums/gitar. Hmm.. I don't think so.
  20. 02:37:065 (2,3,4) - Current concepts is not fit here. Replace it! Circle -> Circle -> Slider. Better fits the vocals, and drums. Timeline: http://puu.sh/exkJD/076af9c0c2.jpg I don't agree with you in this point, personally this is following the guitar in a good way.
  21. 02:49:009 (9) - Change slider end here: 02:49:287 - because this vocal ends here, and put circle here: 02:49:565 - Definetly not, this slider is providing a great mix (in my opinion ofc) between instrumental and vocal. You can notice vocal ends exactly in 02:49:565 - where ''that sound'' in the instrumental appear.
  22. 02:51:509 (3) - Circle is better here: 02:51:509 - and put circles here: 02:51:787 - 02:51:926 - no thanks.
  23. 03:02:898 (1,2) - Vocal killer. Remove reverse from 03:02:898 (1) - slider, put circle here: 03:03:732 - and 1/1 slider here: 03:04:009 - or 1/2 sliders here: 03:04:009 - 03:04:565 - Fixed in a similar way, but following my criteria.
  24. 03:06:787 (8) - Vocal fix: This 1/1 slider not fit here. Change slider end here: 03:07:065 - and put circles here: 03:07:343 - 03:07:482 - Fit for me, as I explained before.
  25. 03:09:287 (3) - Vocal: Circle better here: 03:09:287 - , and put circles here: 03:09:565 - 03:09:704 - nope, explained before.
  26. 03:38:454 (8,1,2) - I think, use 1/2 sliders here: 03:38:454 - 03:39:009 - . Better fits the vocal!
  27. 03:42:898 (8,1,2,3,4,5,6) - Please, follow the vocal. Current conception is not good. Use similar: http://puu.sh/exm1l/85222b2229.jpg
  28. 03:56:232 (1,2,3) - Same as: 03:02:898 (1,2) - Vocal killer. Please, follow the vocal.
  29. 03:59:843 (5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - Vocal... Timeline example: 03:56:232 - to 04:00:676 - : http://puu.sh/exmvV/ba2b45f066.jpg 04:01:232 - to 04:04:843 - : http://puu.sh/exmAl/de4f0256f3.jpg
Ok. Why ignore the vocals? I think enjoyable, if you not only focuses on the drums. This is hard difficulty, not "hard normal", and BPM is slow.

[Easy]

OK sufficiently easy. Good, no idea.

Good luck.
Oh well, thanks for modding but seriously the next time check mapper style before to do a mod. It looks like you wanted to force your mapping style into my map, most of the things you suggested me doesn't fit with my style or plays really poor (like the 1/3 you suggested me).
So this is my recomendation for you, try to improve others maps by following their mapping style and not by forcing your style into others maps.
Once again, thanks anyway! :)

Xinchii

Xinchii wrote:

Hello ~ from queue :) Hey!

[Dificil]
  1. 00:38:176(6) - suggest to set this slider straight , will better look with (5) in my veiw. Hmm.. looks good for me, I'll keep it for now.
  2. 01:30:676(2,3,4,5) - try to set this a pentagon with (1)'s slider end ? like: Nice one, fixed.
    I think it's more beautiful in veiw , also it's easy to keep your (5) on center line and (6)'s place symmetry with (4)
  3. 01:32:620(6) - 01:32:620(6) - you let 01:33:176 -'s beat to be empty , so may be set this slider to 2 note will have better play effect , like same you do at 02:43:732(7,8) - I think. Vocals stop considerably, so having no objects is the best thing in my personal point of view.
  4. 02:34:843(7) - Bend this slider down will be good look with (8) in my view. Sure, I did something here.
  5. 02:40:676(5,1) - spacing uncentralized here ? check if is mistake. This was intentional, I wanted to emphasized the start of the chorus with a little spacing change.
  6. 03:01:509(7) - ^ Fixed this one.
  7. 03:14:287 - 03:16:509 - why leave this part empty ? don't consider to map it like previously similar part ? ---> 01:45:398 - Not really because drums sound lower than the previous part and I think this rhythmical break gives a better effect.
  8. 03:40:676(5) - little nazi , try to move this right to x:252|y:340 to be better blanket okie.
  9. 03:51:509(10,1) - little nazi , try to set (1)'s slider's end at x:236|y:76 , more parallel with (10) hmm.. k

what language this song use? I just feel some interest about this :3
I'm few to listen song genre like this , but it's great relaxed song Is a spanish song, and yeah is really relaxing c:

Good luck ~!
Thanks!

Lally

Lally wrote:

#queue

[General]
  1. kiai is not consistent in the diffs At least they are consistent in my difficultie, and this is the important imo. Anyway, let see what Xanandra says about this.
[Dificil o3o]
  1. 01:15:954 (8) - what about to change the flow like this? Sure, I did something similar
  2. 02:44:287 - :/ missing circle hre add one >3< Not really, as I said in other mod response the vocals stop considerably, so this empty place is the best if you ask me.
  3. 03:06:787 (8) - ctrl+g Hmm.. I think I've changed that before but oh well, done.
perfect map <3 good luck
Thanks a lot nyally!

Once again, Thanks a lot for modding guys!
Updated!
Luvdic

Lally wrote:

#queue

[General]
  1. kiai is not consistent in the diffs
I just moved it 1/2 earlier so it wouldnt start in the middle of a slider.

[Medio]

  1. 00:18:454 (1) - why are you starting 1/2 before the others diff?
    Why not? ;)
    On a more serious note though, considering how Ive been following the rhythm, starting it 1/2 earlier just seems more consistent with the rest of my diff.

  2. 00:19:565 (2,1) - personally i don't like this flow why don't you try to give another shape to 00:19:565 (2) - to have a better flow for the next object?
    Unfortunately, this is something that I seem to disagree with the majority of other mappers as in they say this flow is pretty unnatural, while I say that it is perfectly good
  3. 00:44:842 (4,1,2) - i explain everything with the immage:
    Sorry, not exactly sure what you mean even with the image...

    the flow is not good here
perfect map <3 good luck
Thanks for looking at it!
Pereira006
hi

[Facil]

Hitsound:

  1. 02:46:509 (3) - Missing Whistle in begin, I can see you have done pattern before and other diff, what i did explain in gameplay 00:49:843 (3)
  2. 03:04:287 (2) - ^ same also all diff's too
only this missing

Gameplay:

  1. 00:23:176 (3) - this really need NC you should know this level is "Facil" I mean level easy
  2. 00:23:176 (3) - ^ same
  3. 00:49:843 (3) - be honest, I'm confuse you style this diff, this is not NC, but if you listen this rhythm (vocal and beat) in 02:18:732 (1), that rhythm is same because the rhythm is repeat but in 02:18:732 (1) - is NC and in 00:49:843 (3) - is not nc why? missing? I just wanna make sure you style is "consistency"
only NC is missing.

[Intermedio]

Hitsound:

  1. 00:39:843 (2) - missing whistle, you have done pattern like in 02:08:732 (2), if you listen rhythm, they are repeat.
  2. 00:44:564 (3) - ^ same
Gameplay:

  1. 03:51:787 (T) - you don't wanna change time to in 03:52:065 ? to consistency other diff's ? and your pattern time kiai in 02:40:954
  2. 04:07:343 (1) - dunno why you put NC, because other pattern like in 03:51:787 (1,2,3,4,5), 03:56:232 (1,2,3) and more, you do put every NC is 3/1 but this in 04:07:343 (1) - is 2/1, remove NC
[Dificil]

Gameplay:

  1. 00:47:343 (1) - This no need NC, like you did pattern in 02:14:287 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) and more
  2. 00:52:065 (1) - ^ same
  3. 03:50:954 (7) - this isn't should be NC ? you have done pattern before
[]
The mapset look good, only some missing
Any question if you don't get it my english, pm me
Call me when you done, gonna put star
Luvdic

Pereira006 wrote:

hi

[Intermedio]

Hitsound:

  1. 00:39:843 (2) - missing whistle, you have done pattern like in 02:08:732 (2), if you listen rhythm, they are repeat.
  2. 00:44:564 (3) - ^ same
Changed some whistles here and there, should be more consistent now

Gameplay:

  1. 03:51:787 (T) - you don't wanna change time to in 03:52:065 ? to consistency other diff's ? and your pattern time kiai in 02:40:954
    Oops, actually, I changed kiai start of 02:40:954 because I dont believe in starting kiai in the middle of a slider
  2. 04:07:343 (1) - dunno why you put NC, because other pattern like in 03:51:787 (1,2,3,4,5), 03:56:232 (1,2,3) and more, you do put every NC is 3/1 but this in 04:07:343 (1) - is 2/1, remove NC
    Removed
http://puu.sh/foN2J/f88e8e9719.osu

And thanks for the mod!
Topic Starter
mancuso_JM_

Pereira006 wrote:

hi

[Facil]

Hitsound:

  1. 02:46:509 (3) - Missing Whistle in begin, I can see you have done pattern before and other diff, what i did explain in gameplay 00:49:843 (3) Fixed
  2. 03:04:287 (2) - ^ same also all diff's too Fixed and fixed the hitsounding in Dificil for consistency.
only this missing

Gameplay:

  1. 00:23:176 (3) - this really need NC you should know this level is "Facil" I mean level easy
  2. 00:23:176 (3) - ^ same well, added more NCs at the beginning, and I think you mean 00:32:065 - (?).. You've repeated 00:23:176 - twice xDD
  3. 00:49:843 (3) - be honest, I'm confuse you style this diff, this is not NC, but if you listen this rhythm (vocal and beat) in 02:18:732 (1), that rhythm is same because the rhythm is repeat but in 02:18:732 (1) - is NC and in 00:49:843 (3) - is not nc why? missing? I just wanna make sure you style is "consistency" Oops, that was my fault. Fixed, and rechecked everything in case I've missed something like that in the whole difficulty, I think the comboing is correct now.
only NC is missing.

[Dificil]

Gameplay:

  1. 00:47:343 (1) - This no need NC, like you did pattern in 02:14:287 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) and more
  2. 00:52:065 (1) - ^ same Hmm.. k
  3. 03:50:954 (7) - this isn't should be NC ? you have done pattern before Hmm.. yeah, generally I emphasized drums with new combos, so this makes sense. Added.
[]
The mapset look good, only some missing
Any question if you don't get it my english, pm me
Call me when you done, gonna put star
Thanks a lot Pereira!
Updated everything!
Pereira006
Alright, everthing look good now

bubble

good luck!
Aurele
It's been a while since I've done this.


Qualified!
Topic Starter
mancuso_JM_
Thanks a lot Gabe! :D

Give him kudos because we fixed some spacing in Easy (but I lost the log, because I close the game in a moment and I forgot to save the log :c).
Aurele
@Log. I have it if needed.
Myxo
Congratz :3
Pereira006

mancuso_JM_ wrote:

Pereira006 wrote:

hi


[*]00:23:176 (3) - ^ same well, added more NCs at the beginning, and I think you mean 00:32:065 - (?).. You've repeated 00:23:176 - twice xDD[/list]

only NC is missing.

[Dificil]
... I... didn't notice LOL, kill me pleasse

anyway congratz !!
Please sign in to reply.

New reply