Default wrote:

Can you use a colour that isn't red for your answers? it really looked like you rejected everything until I started reading what you said lol

bbj0920 wrote:

oh wow, you came back! that is a surprise
good luck!

1. reduce OD to 4, 6 is way too much for a Normal
   
2. 00:20:971 (4,1) - fix this blanket
   
3. 00:32:371 (4,5,6) - this seeems really messy I would clean this up more, since this is a normal I seems harder
   to read for lower ranked players
   
4. 00:32:971 (5) - too far from previous note xd
   
5. 00:46:171 (2,3,4) - make these a 1/2 repeat. it feels better than 3 circles

1. 00:08:971 (2) - ctl+g better flow and consistent with 00:09:371 (1,2) -
   
2. 00:59:771 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - seems really unecessary to have this stream here
   you're not really following anything so considered removing this.
   
3. 01:49:371 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - again nothing to follow here
   
4. 02:26:171 (1,2,3) - why stack this? feels awkward to play imo

1. 00:39:371 (3) - NC
   
2. 00:39:771 (4) - NC
   
3. 00:40:171 (5) - NC
   
4. 00:48:171 (1,2) - swap NC
   
5. 00:56:171 (1,2,3) - 1.8ds seems too much, dont really hear any reason for this huge spacing, Try 1.5 instead?

1. 00:13:371 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1) - this is like a seizure waiting to happen lmao
   
2. 00:46:971 (1) - NC
   
3. 01:26:171 (1) - ctl+g flow is weird
   
4. 01:07:271 (2,3,4,5,6) - stream shape feels really bad to play
   
5. 02:25:421 (1) - remove dis spinner pls, auto cant spin 1k bonus

Depths wrote:

I can't believe Im doing this lmao, but as requested

[Haqi's Insane]

1. 00:08:971 (2) - ctl+g better flow and consistent with 00:09:371 (1,2) - wanted to stress the pitch, but yea i think this might be better
   
2. 00:59:771 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - seems really unecessary to have this stream here
   you're not really following anything so considered removing this. listen to the harp
   
3. 01:49:371 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - again nothing to follow here ^
   
4. 02:26:171 (1,2,3) - why stack this? feels awkward to play imo if others think this is awkward i'll consider changing it, but i like how it is right now

call me back when the other diffs are done and I'll recheck

Depths wrote:

I can't believe Im doing this lmao, but as requested

comments

[Normal]

1. reduce OD to 4, 6 is way too much for a Normal - oh i guess i can reduce it to 5
   
2. 00:20:971 (4,1) - fix this blanket - ok
   
3. 00:32:371 (4,5,6) - this seeems really messy I would clean this up more, since this is a normal I seems harder
   to read for lower ranked players - then they miss. then they figure it out. and this is how they learn.
   
4. 00:32:971 (5) - too far from previous note xd - i think in a case like this it's fine tho, because it's only too "far" because of how osu! tracks the slider end, but in terms of actual cursor movement it's different.
   
5. 00:46:171 (2,3,4) - make these a 1/2 repeat. it feels better than 3 circles - ok

[Expert]

1. 00:39:371 (3) - NC - i understand why but no lol
   
2. 00:39:771 (4) - NC - ^
   
3. 00:40:171 (5) - NC - ^
   
4. 00:48:171 (1,2) - swap NC - yea, that's prolly technically correct but doing that means i have to remap the pattern.. well w/e guess i will
   
5. 00:56:171 (1,2,3) - 1.8ds seems too much, dont really hear any reason for this huge spacing, Try 1.5 instead? - no i think it's fine. anything lower isn't drastic enough.

[Kneesocks]

1. 00:13:371 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1) - this is like a seizure waiting to happen lmao - good
   
2. 00:46:971 (1) - NC - no, because it's still mapped to the same violin phrase in the music
   
3. 01:26:171 (1) - ctl+g flow is weird - the stream flows directly into the slider start, and then the flow changes directions w/ the slider body. it looks kind of weird but it plays well.
   
4. 01:07:271 (2,3,4,5,6) - stream shape feels really bad to play - tracing weird patterns is fun.
   
5. 02:25:421 (1) - remove dis spinner pls, auto cant spin 1k bonus - AI Mod is wrong.

call me back when the other diffs are done and I'll recheck

samotoda wrote:

The MP3 is missing, I even re-downloaded it. Hopefully you didn't mention that somewhere always ill feel stupid.. Also, some of the spinners are missing where they're supposed to be.

samotoda wrote:

The MP3 is missing, I even re-downloaded it. Hopefully you didn't mention that somewhere always ill feel stupid.. Also, some of the spinners are missing where they're supposed to be.

1. General - Maybe AR8.7 or AR8.5? I think it plays better, but I understand if you want to leave it at AR9
2. General - I think OD8 or higher would be better, the song and map are very straightforward rhythmically. Plus the sliders at the start of the bpm change make it very easy to get a feel for the new tempo.
   
3. 02:34:971 (1,2) - Make these 1/4 sliders, so you can still bring attention to the crash symbols while mapping to the violin. It would also match how the ending is, then.

1. 02:32:571 (1) - Remove the last tick of this slider. The violin doesn't play on it, and since that's what you were mapping to the measure before, it sounds weird having it there.
2. 03:13:173 (1,2) - I actually think this plays fine as is even though it doesn't match 02:34:971 (1,2), because it emphasizes the symbols and you bring attention to the percussion before that with 03:11:056 (3,4,5) and continue to map to it. However, I think making 03:13:173 (1,2) 1/4 sliders may play just a little better, since 03:11:762 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) could also be going to the violin. If you do end up changing it, I would also lower the spacing just a hair.

1. 01:56:571 (3) - I wouldn't make this a 1/4 slider. It goes into the silence there and it plays really awkwardly.
2. 02:54:997 (5,1) - This played weirdly to me, but changing it is difficult because if you increased the spacing it could get mistaken for a 1/2. Maybe make 2:54:997 (5) a 1/2 slider that goes up and move 02:55:350 (1) down more?
3. 03:05:232 (1) - I would move this much farther away from 03:05:056 (3). Maybe somewhere on the right of the screen. You're making people run all over the screen before and after that part, so having a stop in the middle of it is weird.
4. 03:12:821 (3,4,5,6,1) - Holy shit
5. 03:13:173 (1,2) - I'd make these 1/4 sliders so you continue to go with the violin. You could even make these stacked 1/4s and lower the distance a little on 3 if you wanted, because of how insane 03:12:821 (3,4,5,6,1) is.

fappy30 wrote:

hi bbs

[Haqi's Insane]
I can look at this closer when I have more free time. I only played through it once and there was some spacing I didn't like, but I'll have to play through it a few more times before I get a final opinion and suggestions. I liked it in general though. thx bbycakes

1. 02:32:571 (1) - Remove the last tick of this slider. The violin doesn't play on it, and since that's what you were mapping to the measure before, it sounds weird having it there. i can see where you're going at, but there is a somewhat faint violin. since its not so obvious, decide to just remove the last tick, and went ahead and removed last tick of the next slider as well for consistency.
2. 03:13:173 (1,2) - I actually think this plays fine as is even though it doesn't match 02:34:971 (1,2), because it emphasizes the symbols and you bring attention to the percussion before that with 03:11:056 (3,4,5) and continue to map to it. However, I think making 03:13:173 (1,2) 1/4 sliders may play just a little better, since 03:11:762 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) could also be going to the violin. If you do end up changing it, I would also lower the spacing just a hair. done, agreed

Thunderstyle wrote:

FINALLY. If nothing else, then Kneesocks difficulty deserves to be ranked. It's one of the most fun beatmap&song combos I've played.

xxdeathx wrote:

http://puu.sh/nz2A1/1f207d64e8.zip

samotoda wrote:

I feel like the ending is kind of meh, there is not really any special characteristics like the old one: noticeably the spaced heart stream which makes people go: dang. That's the only thing I don't like about it.

YayaBunWa wrote:

Aye, why ain't this being ranked? Such a sick map, I fricking love it D:

Rank bancho plz