forum

AKIHIDE - RAIN MAN (TV Size)

posted
Total Posts
10
Topic Starter
S h i o n
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on 2014年10月6日 at 15:44:44

Artist: AKIHIDE
Title: RAIN MAN (TV Size)
Source: Detective Conan
Tags: Rain Story Sato Akihide
BPM: 170
Filesize: 3117kb
Play Time: 01:17
Difficulties Available:
  1. Hard (2.93 stars, 187 notes)
  2. Normal (1.23 stars, 81 notes)
Download: AKIHIDE - RAIN MAN (TV Size)
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
2014/9/14 BG/audio changed. PLEASE REDOWNLOAD

名探偵コナン 47th ending

Thanks Ringating for BG/audio help.
Ringating
from my queue:

As per your request, I removed the bit of noise in the beginning of the song. I also added a slight fade out at the end of the song, because it ended pretty abruptly. All these edits were done losslessly, so there was no re-encode. Here is the new mp3. The timing offset value should be ever-so-slightly smaller, because I had to cut out a tiny portion of the beginning silence.

As for your bg, I used this image and basically just extended the whiteness to 16:9 then added blue-ish gradients to the right and left edges. Here is that:
no kudosu
Topic Starter
S h i o n

Ringating wrote:

from my queue:

As per your request, I removed the bit of noise in the beginning of the song. I also added a slight fade out at the end of the song, because it ended pretty abruptly. All these edits were done losslessly, so there was no re-encode. Here is the new mp3. The timing offset value should be ever-so-slightly smaller, because I had to cut out a tiny portion of the beginning silence.

As for your bg, I used this image and basically just extended the whiteness to 16:9 then added blue-ish gradients to the right and left edges. Here is that:
no kudosu
You're GOD!
As you said no kudosu but my heart.
EndlessShadow
[Nomral]
00:18:909 Put the slider to 00:18:556
00:19:614 Add a note here.
00:19:967 Add a slider to 00:20:673.
00:21:026 Add a note here.
00:21:379 Add a slider to 00:22:085
00:25:262 Change to a reverse slider to 00:25:967
00:27:732 Change to a reverse slider to 00:28:438
00:28:791 Add note here.
00:34:423 Add note here.
01:18:556 Add Spiner to 01:19:262.

I think picture is good. but somethings bad in the timing section.

Thanks for giving chance to me for mod.
Also, I think that you can do better. Do more Modding / Guest Diff. from other.
Learning more Experience for them :)
Topic Starter
S h i o n

EndlessShadow wrote:

[Nomral]
00:18:909 Put the slider to 00:18:556
00:19:614 Add a note here.
00:19:967 Add a slider to 00:20:673.
00:21:026 Add a note here.
00:21:379 Add a slider to 00:22:085
00:25:262 Change to a reverse slider to 00:25:967
00:27:732 Change to a reverse slider to 00:28:438
00:28:791 Add note here.
00:34:423 Add note here.
01:18:556 Add Spiner to 01:19:262.

I think picture is good. but somethings bad in the timing section.

Thanks for giving chance to me for mod.
Also, I think that you can do better. Do more Modding / Guest Diff. from other.
Learning more Experience for them :)
Hard diff fine? I said 'normal mod', but not just a mod for normal. Apologies for causing misundstand.

As to Normal diff, what you have suggested are all about rhythm issues,acceptable but I think mine are better.
So I won't change them because it will break the consistency of my idea.
And next time please check the newest version of the map before you check, because I've already changed the offset.

Sorry no kudosu, but still thanks for checking. As you wish, I will do more mod/GD to improve myself.
fm4a93au04
哈囉來摸圖 ^^ ~

fm4a93au04's standard modding and GD ( ? ) queue

Modding
[General]

你的圖裡沒有休息時間 , 建議把 Letterbox 拿掉 .

[Normal]

沒有發現什麼 .

[Hard]

00:04:796 (1,2,3,4) – 漸減間距的話 , 要不要考慮把音量一同漸減去強調它 ?

00:06:915 (1,2,3,4) - 為何 1,2 與 3,4 使用不同的間距 ? 明明時間差是一樣的阿 = = …… 都是 4 格 1/6 beat , 請使用相同的時間差 . 容易混淆 ( 都會打成 100 ) .

00:16:444 (1,2,3) – 間距驟減太大容易按錯 ( 或是按成 100 ) . 考慮 2,3 大跳 ?

00:21:031 (1,2) – 這也是 . 容易誤判成隔 1 拍的物件 .

00:22:443 (1,1,1,1) – 不建議這樣排 . 有 NC 是沒錯 , 但打起來不順 . 也可能是我的問題吧 …… 我只是說出我的感覺給你參考 .

或是你也可以配合一同減或加音量在聽覺上強調出來 , 可能也是一種方法 .

00:23:855 (1,2) – 易誤判理由同上 . 把類似這種時間差的間距統一一下 =..= . 後面不再提了 ~

00:24:443 (2,3) – 不如 Overlap 在 2 的尾巴 ?

01:03:737 (2,3,4) – 個人覺得此節奏不合這一段 .

整體下來 , 間距的問題居多 . 建議先把間距統一之後再看哪裡要跳或怎樣 . 畢竟 1/6 beat 的圖比較少見 , 這樣的節奏玩家比較不熟悉 .

至少 , 短時間內不要在同時間差的情況下出現兩種不同的間距 00:06:915 (1,2,3,4) .

就降囉 ~

Good luck to your map ~
Topic Starter
S h i o n

fm4a93au04 wrote:

[General]

你的圖裡沒有休息時間 , 建議把 Letterbox 拿掉 . ok

[Normal]

沒有發現什麼 .

[Hard]

00:04:796 (1,2,3,4) – 漸減間距的話 , 要不要考慮把音量一同漸減去強調它 ? 背景声并没有渐弱,所以暂时先不做这样的调整了
00:06:915 (1,2,3,4) - 為何 1,2 與 3,4 使用不同的間距 ? 明明時間差是一樣的阿 = = …… 都是 4 格 1/6 beat , 請使用相同的時間差 . 容易混淆 ( 都會打成 100 ) . 的确,改好了

00:16:444 (1,2,3) – 間距驟減太大容易按錯 ( 或是按成 100 ) . 考慮 2,3 大跳 ? 因为渐小的间距之前有出现过,所以应该不会

00:21:031 (1,2) – 這也是 . 容易誤判成隔 1 拍的物件 . 还好吧

00:22:443 (1,1,1,1) – 不建議這樣排 . 有 NC 是沒錯 , 但打起來不順 . 也可能是我的問題吧 …… 我只是說出我的感覺給你參考 .

或是你也可以配合一同減或加音量在聽覺上強調出來 , 可能也是一種方法 .

00:23:855 (1,2) – 易誤判理由同上 . 把類似這種時間差的間距統一一下 =..= . 後面不再提了 ~ 不改的理由是第一我觉得间距是有连贯性的,第二节奏符合音乐/人声。

00:24:443 (2,3) – 不如 Overlap 在 2 的尾巴 ? 不太好

01:03:737 (2,3,4) – 個人覺得此節奏不合這一段 .

整體下來 , 間距的問題居多 . 建議先把間距統一之後再看哪裡要跳或怎樣 . 畢竟 1/6 beat 的圖比較少見 , 這樣的節奏玩家比較不熟悉 .

至少 , 短時間內不要在同時間差的情況下出現兩種不同的間距 00:06:915 (1,2,3,4) .

就降囉 ~[/box]

Good luck to your map ~
谢谢你的mod :)
streeteelf
SEE's Modding Queue

Finally git time to mod map. :)

[General]

*Move beginning of Kiai from 00:58:443 to 00:58:090 and end from 01:18:208 to 01:17:855. Kiai must be between bigger white ticks.

[Normal]

*Use constant DS in whole diff, try using 1.2 +/- 0.02.
*00:21:737 (3) - You can replace this circle with 1-beat long slider, better fits Normal.
*01:04:796 (2) - Try to move this 1 beat earlier and add reverse, IMO is better.

[Hard]

*00:01:972 (1) - Use 1/3 slider, not 1/6 w/ reverse.
*00:57:737 (2,3,4,1,2,3) , 01:09:031 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - Avoid using something like this, it's too hard for hard diff.

Thats all I think, not bad map, but still need more work. :) Good luck~ :D
Leorda
Hello there

[Normal]
* AR -2 or -1? Your current AR seems too fast for Normal diff

00:03:031 (2) - Move up a bit so beginners would easily to read this slider?
01:14:325 (1) - Remove new combo?
01:16:090 (3) - New combo for new part of song?
01:17:502 (1) - Remove new combo? (if you apply above)

[Hard]
00:02:325 (2,3,4) - I think spacing for this part isn't equal between them, so make it consistent spacing between them or it was intentional?
00:10:091 (3) - Spacing was from previous one

That's a simple mod btw
good luck then
Topic Starter
S h i o n
streeteelf's mod
SPOILER

streeteelf wrote:

[General]

*Move beginning of Kiai from 00:58:443 to 00:58:090 and end from 01:18:208 to 01:17:855. Kiai must be between bigger white ticks. I don't know, but let me check.
[Normal]

*Use constant DS in whole diff, try using 1.2 +/- 0.02. I think 1.00 is ok.
*00:21:737 (3) - You can replace this circle with 1-beat long slider, better fits Normal.
*01:04:796 (2) - Try to move this 1 beat earlier and add reverse, IMO is better. both no,thanks

[Hard]

*00:01:972 (1) - Use 1/3 slider, not 1/6 w/ reverse. no, 1/6 fits the music.
*00:57:737 (2,3,4,1,2,3) , 01:09:031 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - Avoid using something like this, it's too hard for hard diff.Yes, a bit hard. but it's the only hard part in this diff so I want to keep it.
Leorda's mod
SPOILER

Leorda wrote:

Hello there

[Normal]
* AR -2 or -1? Your current AR seems too fast for Normal diff Yes, AR-1

00:03:031 (2) - Move up a bit so beginners would easily to read this slider? it doesn't make sense imo
01:14:325 (1) - Remove new combo?
01:16:090 (3) - New combo for new part of song?
01:17:502 (1) - Remove new combo? (if you apply above) I just removed this one.

[Hard]
00:02:325 (2,3,4) - I think spacing for this part isn't equal between them, so make it consistent spacing between them or it was intentional? Yes. they're made intentionally.
00:10:091 (3) - Spacing was from previous one just a slght jump

That's a simple mod btw
good luck then

:) Thanks for mod

I failed to upload due to bad network and I will try later.
BanchoBot
This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply