Ryu Sei wrote:

oh dang I can't find it anymore sry

puxtu wrote:

yosh, fixed all minor problems..
ready for

mike91lau wrote:

Just suggest ~

bilqis MX

00:04:779 (4779|2) - remove
00:10:617 (10617|3,10942|0,11104|2) - remove
00:10:942 (10942|0,11104|2,14996|2,15158|3,15320|0,15482|0) - remove
00:17:104 (17104|0) - remove
00:23:590 (23590|0,23590|3) - LN end 00:23:752
00:25:050 - http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2026174
00:27:158 - 00:27:482 - add a note and 00:28:293 - remove 1
01:09:969 - add
01:14:833 (74833|0) - remove
01:19:374 - http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2026445
01:22:942 - add
01:27:806 - http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2026462 ? Harder
01:38:833 (98833|0,98833|3) - LN end 01:38:996 ?
01:42:239 (102239|0) - remove
01:44:833 (104833|1) - ^
01:45:482 (105482|0) - remove
01:48:888 (108888|0) - ^
01:49:861 (109861|2,109861|3) - why double
01:51:806 (111806|0,112617|1) - remove
01:53:104 - http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2026504
01:56:996 (116996|0) - remove
01:58:131 - add 1 note
03:05:671 (185671|2) - remove
03:45:969 (225969|2) - change to long LN that end LN at 03:48:563 for ending

- [ S o r a ] - wrote:

xD
hi~ puxtu

fast mod xD
[HD]
00:02:834 (2834|2,3806|1,4131|1,4455|1,5104|2,5428|2,6401|1,6725|0,7050|2,7698|1,8023|2,8996|2,9320|0,9644|3,10293|1,10617|3,11590|2,11915|1) - remove all these yes sir
00:15:806 (15806|1) - this LN unnecesary remove no sir, piano sound, sir
00:26:185 (26185|3) - this too xD ^
00:33:158 ~ 00:33:969 - lol too fast SV
change this
00:33:320 - add SV 0.50x
00:33:482 - add SV 0.60x
00:33:644 - change 1.30x to 0.80x
00:33:806 - add SV 1.10x ok sv effect looks cool now, sir
00:33:969 (33969|3) - remove this and 00:33:158 (33158|3) - change to LN instead and end at 00:33:969 - (seem cool now xD) yes sir
00:39:077 (39077|1) - unnecesary , remove it , i guess that's a no from me, sir

[bilqis's MX]
remove these SV 01:28:779 ~ 01:32:833 - make player confuse (try to change it faster >> 0.85x / 0.90x seem better)
a little check lol ok thank you
01:41:752 (101752|2) - remove no
01:50:833 (110833|2) - here too

xD

bilqiscutee wrote:

i hate you puxtu

REDYUMiKA wrote:

[4K EZ]
Good♥
01:28:455 (88455|0) - not good taste? extend this end point to 01:28:942 - OK
02:54:077 - remove SV x0.75 changing, that's not appropriate setting for novice player. OK

[4K NM]
Almost perfect♥
01:33:644 (93644|1) - The pattern combined some notes between both the LNs are a little tricky.
I suggest you remove this one. yes just indicated, it's normal difficulty. OK

[4K HD]
Perfect mapping♥
00:23:590 - If you set kinda SV or something else on this point,
...why didn't you insert these SV to 00:28:779 - & 01:44:023 - ? I wondered because, in this part 00:23:590 - the music is totally "stop" and I think it's different from this part 00:28:779 - & 01:44:023 - where the music is still go on
00:48:401 - ~ 00:49:536 - really good <3

[4K MX]
let me fix this for bilqis
00:12:766 (12766|2,12847|0) - remove these notes because a little overmapped compare with backsounds
and move 00:12:725 (12725|3) - to column 3 is comfortable to play.ok

KawaEE wrote:

HI~

i think mod

HD
00:33:649 - F_key longnote 1add (~00:33:969)
03:03:806 - 1add
03:04:131 - 1add
03:12:725 - 1add
03:12:888 - 1add
03:45:320 - 2add

u r song note beat good..

u r song good luck XD

1164530434 wrote:

hi~ puxtu
I think it's better adding drumsounds.
so here are my drumsounds mod.
And drumtrack for review

http://puu.sh/cesCA/a496aacb84.rar

Nice map!~
No good luck. Just go for rank/

Zan - wrote:

it should be [bilqis' MX] i think
w/o 's' after 'koma atas'
lololololol RIP english
im done

R☆Yumi's Specific 4K Chart Recheck (Column:1,2,3,4)
---> Type:GM, Language:

• just balanced as MX. (e.g.1) would be a reasonable placement, also playable for high-player.

• 00:18:401 (18401|2) - the start of LN should be regarded as the stuff equal to normal note.
  the existing 2-objects are already assigned to the sounds each other. just this one might be good to remove.

• 00:22:779 (22779|2) - why did you maintain this? It looks like something is wrong imo.
  In most cases what you go against the main rhythm will make it more worse. (e.g.2)

• 00:24:725 (24725|3) -, 00:30:725 (30725|3) - remove them to take a consistency each other.

• several LNs are used by unique usage, but that's comfortable to pass.
  
  00:48:806 (48806|1,48888|3,48888|2) - I'm not 100% sure that.. I suggest you take a relevance. (e.g.3)
  00:57:969 (57969|3) - move to 2, add a pitch against the notes of 00:57:320 - ~ 00:57:644 -
  01:02:428 (62428|1,62509|0) - Ctrl+J would be good to change the existing hand balance for the internal column.
  01:05:671 - add a note to 3

• Looks good.

• 01:28:131 (88131|0) - it's too obscure to hear the drums as double-notes. I suggest you remove.

• almost good what you got, just I don't know whether 01:32:996 (92996|0) - is appropriate or not.

• Looks good.

• well, that's a little aggressive part than No.4

• 02:04:050 - ~ 02:04:779 - take a relevance for the drums. (e.g.4)

• Looks good, also SV is acceptable.

• 02:33:320 - ~ 02:42:239 - / 02:43:698 - ~ 02:52:617 - what an obvious changes.. it's not like you.

• placement is no problem, but the existing volume is too loud.

• 03:06:401 - ~ 03:07:050 - these 1/8 stairs are the most advanced pattern in your chart. actually I have thought whether they would be appropriate as for the rank since I checked it. we might be able to approve them in the case that you remove some notes which have no sense. (e.g.5) make them more simple but 03:06:320 - is regarded as the stuff equal to beat.
  
  03:11:388 (191388|2) - so obscure sounds, and I feel a little uncomfortable to pass it. move to 03:11:347 -
  
  03:16:293 - ~ 03:17:428 - it seems like your placement apparently make them a bit uncomfortable. (e.g.6)

• 03:40:779 - ~ 03:45:969 - remove this kiai time, too short.
  03:43:861 (223861|1) - remove it, and 03:43:942 (223942|2) - move to 2

I hope it will be helpful, Good Luck

REDYUMiKA wrote:

R☆Yumi's Specific 4K Chart Recheck (Column:1,2,3,4)
---> Type:GM, Language:

[bilqis's MX]
1. 00:02:834 - ~ 00:13:212 -

• just balanced as MX. (e.g.1) would be a reasonable placement, also playable for high-player.

2. 00:13:212 - ~ 00:18:401 -

• 00:18:401 (18401|2) - the start of LN should be regarded as the stuff equal to normal note.
  the existing 2-objects are already assigned to the sounds each other. just this one might be good to remove.

3. 00:18:401 - ~ 00:23:590 -

• 00:22:779 (22779|2) - why did you maintain this? It looks like something is wrong imo.
  In most cases what you go against the main rhythm will make it more worse. (e.g.2)

4. 00:23:590 - ~ 00:33:158 -

• 00:24:725 (24725|3) -, 00:30:725 (30725|3) - remove them to take a consistency each other. no, there have bass sound

5. 00:33:158 - ~ 01:07:698 - (kiai time)

• several LNs are used by unique usage, but that's comfortable to pass.
  
  00:48:806 (48806|1,48888|3,48888|2) - I'm not 100% sure that.. I suggest you take a relevance. (e.g.3)
  00:57:969 (57969|3) - move to 2, add a pitch against the notes of 00:57:320 - ~ 00:57:644 -
  01:02:428 (62428|1,62509|0) - Ctrl+J would be good to change the existing hand balance for the internal column.
  01:05:671 - add a note to 3

6. 01:07:698 - ~ 01:18:077 -

• Looks good.

7. 01:18:077 - ~ 01:28:455 -

• 01:28:131 (88131|0) - it's too obscure to hear the drums as double-notes. I suggest you remove.

8. 01:28:455 - ~ 01:33:644 -

• almost good what you got, just I don't know whether 01:32:996 (92996|0) - is appropriate or not.

9. 01:33:644 - ~ 01:38:833 -

• Looks good.

10. 01:38:833 - ~ 01:49:212 -

• well, that's a little aggressive part than No.4

11. 01:49:212 - ~ 02:22:942 - (kiai time)

• 02:04:050 - ~ 02:04:779 - take a relevance for the drums. (e.g.4)

12. 02:22:942 - ~ 02:33:320 -

• Looks good, also SV is acceptable.

13. 02:33:320 - ~ 02:54:077 -

• 02:33:320 - ~ 02:42:239 - / 02:43:698 - ~ 02:52:617 - what an obvious changes.. it's not like you.

14. 02:54:077 - ~ 03:04:455 -

• placement is no problem, but the existing volume is too loud.

15. 03:04:455 - ~ 03:35:590 - (kiai time)

• 03:06:401 - ~ 03:07:050 - these 1/8 stairs are the most advanced pattern in your chart. actually I have thought whether they would be appropriate as for the rank since I checked it. we might be able to approve them in the case that you remove some notes which have no sense. (e.g.5) make them more simple but 03:06:320 - is regarded as the stuff equal to beat.
  
  03:11:388 (191388|2) - so obscure sounds, and I feel a little uncomfortable to pass it. move to 03:11:347 -
  
  03:16:293 - ~ 03:17:428 - it seems like your placement apparently make them a bit uncomfortable. (e.g.6)

16. 03:04:455 - ~ 03:45:969 -

• 03:40:779 - ~ 03:45:969 - remove this kiai time, too short.
  03:43:861 (223861|1) - remove it, and 03:43:942 (223942|2) - move to 2

I hope it will be helpful, Good Luck

*Mods Quality Feedback*
・Overview
Since the start of the activity I have mostly received a comment to own mod though, I feel sometimes feedback is a little insufficient between the mapper and modder when I think one's comment over again. mod should be the stuff that is always recognized as a simple reference, or a just suggestion toward the mapper, no matter what it hurt you with kinda aggressive phrase. however we have to know one's honest thoughts about the processed mods for example what did you get, or how did you receive.Don't hold me back. I'm not gonna get a false evaluation. Strict opinion will make me more strong.
Note : ★☆☆☆☆ < (Low) < (High) < ★★★★★

1. how many useful tips did you get from my mod?
[list:1337]★★★★☆2. were you able to understand the mod's meaning or intention easily?
★★★☆☆3. was I able to satisfy you with the existing contents?
★★★★☆4. what do you have a concern about your chart now?
*im just concern its a lil bit overmap :v*5. do you have a point which need the check further?
*about chart placement,*・Information
I will change these questions depending on the situation, and surely feedback them for you guys.~ Since 2014,12,14 ~

puxtu wrote:

itu lo pake semua modnya?

Spy wrote:

I just come here for warning someone,don't satirize someone's mod in your stubborn opinions.

puxtu wrote:

Sebutin mana yg ga lo pake pea
Kasi alasannya jg knp ngga lo pake

Anyway yumi, thanks for re-check
*gives 5 stats

bilqiscutee wrote:

puxtu wrote:

Sebutin mana yg ga lo pake pea
Kasi alasannya jg knp ngga lo pake

Anyway yumi, thanks for re-check
*gives 5 stats

done~