405,344,65831,1,2,0:0:0:0:
469,189,66016,6,0,P|399:170|323:203,1,139.999995231629,0|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

tm1209 wrote:

From M4M , awesome beatmap !
[Insane]
00:17:616 (1,2,3,4) - 01:11:998 (1,2,3,4) - What about add a reverse there ? Beacuse I think there have 4 tone in every part .
yep, but in order to keep this more easy to play I prefer 1 repeat
00:43:527 (4) - This slider I think change it to a stream may more suitable . http://puu.sh/gm2CY/37107cf255.jpg
not the time
00:54:934 (4) - What about overlap with 00:53:400 (8) - ?
yep
00:57:227 (2) - What about overlap with 00:55:699 (2) - ? And 00:56:845 (1) - still symmetry with 00:57:227 (2) - .
like this one as it is
01:06:016 (1) - What about this slider's end overlap with 01:04:336 (6) - ? And blanket with 01:05:831 (6) - ?

405,344,65831,1,2,0:0:0:0:
469,189,66016,6,0,P|399:170|323:203,1,139.999995231629,0|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

may work
01:17:248 (1) - What about move to (222,313) ? Because its end will overlap with 01:16:123 (5) - , may looking more beautiful after do this , and 01:16:873 (8) - move to (368,245) to keep DS the same .
alright
01:35:340 (7,8) - This blanket may not perfect . Move to (317,228) may looking good .
not supposed to

[Hard]
00:31:134 - What about add a circle there ? Because there have a obvious tone . http://puu.sh/gm5bo/d316a13de2.jpg
seems legit
01:27:373 (2) - Move to (151,130) to gain a good blanket .
sure
[Advenced]
00:49:738 (3) - What about move to (185,39) and 00:50:115 (4) - move to (64,138) ? 00:50:115 (4) - will overlap with 00:48:763 (3) - and looking better after do this , I think .
yep
[Normal]
I think it's good .
That's all , sorry I'm so noob and poor English , forgive me plz XDDD

1. i assume the kiai always ending the 1/16 tick after it would usually end is intentional... but i'd still want to know why lol (excluding the flashes)
2. widescreen support

1. 00:34:661 (3,1) - spacing these more may make it easier to interpret the pause in the music. you did so on advanced pretty well by using 1.6x spacing, but this diff's only got 1.1x and it looks like there's less of a gap than there really should be
2. 00:42:056 (2) - this is in the box below, but even if you don't apply that stuff, should really lower the sv on this since 160bpm is so confusingly fast when coming from 120bpm
3. 00:38:327 (4,1) - 00:42:671 (1,2) - 00:45:901 (1,2) - shouldn't the first one have the same comboing as the second and third? exact same rhythms
4. 00:55:125 (3) - don't think that whistle on the tail is necessary. consistency with 00:52:048 (3) - . looks like this is on every other diff too so i won't mention it in those
5. 01:10:310 (1) - a rhythm like 00:29:307 (3,1) - with a click on 01:10:498 - would be a lot more satisfying htan skipping right over it
6. 01:13:123 (4,5,6) - that finish on tail :/ using a rhythm like this works well but what do i know
   
   pain

   even with this stuff, i'd still go with making an easy
   --
   i'm not gonna say you really need to change this, but it's something worth thinking about. to make this diff more acceptable as the easiest on the set, it would be really nice to adjust for the timing with slider velocity to at least some degree. right now everything is 1x sv, but with bpm ranging so much, there's a huge difference between asdfsdf i dont need to explain this you already know. changing sv to something along the lines of what's labeled here would make things great, but your 1/2 spacing being as large as it is makes the last section require like 1.5x spacing between objects which is possibly not too great.

   1. 00:02:115 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - about 1.2x
   2. 00:08:621 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - 1.1
   3. 00:21:380 (1) - first kiai - 0.95
   4. 00:35:634 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - 1.2
   5. 00:42:056 (2) - 0.85
   6. 00:42:671 (1,2,3,4,1) - 0.95
   7. 00:45:342 (2) - to the end - 0.9

   i could easily undersatnd why you wouldnt want to do this (it would be a pain), but i thought it would be worth mentioning since personally i wouldn't really be comfortable ranking the current normal as the easiest diff on the set

1. 00:15:369 (4,1) - probably want to reconsider spacing on these. 1.1x exactly just makes things more confusing cuz of the larger gap it has compared to everything around it
2. 00:38:327 (5,1) - comboing is inconsistent wiht 00:42:671 (1,2) - 00:45:901 (1,2) - .
3. 00:42:056 (3) - definitely want to lower sv on this. it's pretty unnatural how slider suddenly speeds up while you've got it set up to be exactly like 00:41:570 (2) -
4. 01:05:086 (3) - 01:11:060 (3) - missing a whistle on these tails i think. hard/insane both have whistles there

1. 00:33:798 (2) - may be missing a whistle on tail here. advanced/insane have one.
2. 00:42:056 (3) - same as other diffs yea
3. 00:45:528 (1) - is the new combo here necessary when you've got 00:35:206 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 00:41:058 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - as their own combos, while 00:44:553 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - is pretty much the same thing
4. 00:57:801 (4) - tail wh istle pourquoi. other diffs don't have the whistle on tail here sooooo
5. 01:09:279 (2) - while playing i always assume this has only one repeat, probably cuz i see 3 onscreen when clicking it already or something. using like any other rhythm would be better i'd think
6. 01:33:051 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - super subjective, but gonna say it anyway. having sv increase steadily starting from something lower than the current to follow the accordian build up would be so cool. would also do it on insane asfdfsd

1. 00:25:223 (2,3,4,5) - super linear flow here feels pretty weird. something like this is way more comfortable
2. 00:28:538 (3,4) - offbeat 1/4 sliders here are idk also weird. nothing in the song really emphasizes blue ticks more than white/red, so using a rhythm that's more reflective of the song would make sense. the other time this appears in the song is at 01:08:998 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - which worked k cuz circles
3. 00:38:327 (6,1) - 00:42:671 (1,2) - 00:45:901 (1,2) - okay why does every diff have combos inconsistent right here there must be a reason at htis point but i'm still not getting it
4. 00:42:056 (3) - same as other diffs yea
5. 01:35:724 (8,9) - would expect these to have larger spacing as the last thing in the build up. same could be said about this on hard, but it's more noticeable here

pishifat wrote:

song is so hot

[general]

1. i assume the kiai always ending the 1/16 tick after it would usually end is intentional... but i'd still want to know why lol (excluding the flashes)
   it's like whatever 1/16 or 1/4, last note lands on kiai and then kiai ends
2. widescreen support
   yep

[normal]

1. 00:34:661 (3,1) - spacing these more may make it easier to interpret the pause in the music. you did so on advanced pretty well by using 1.6x spacing, but this diff's only got 1.1x and it looks like there's less of a gap than there really should be
   legit
2. 00:42:056 (2) - this is in the box below, but even if you don't apply that stuff, should really lower the sv on this since 160bpm is so confusingly fast when coming from 120bpm
   changed this slider to a circle on this diff
3. 00:38:327 (4,1) - 00:42:671 (1,2) - 00:45:901 (1,2) - shouldn't the first one have the same comboing as the second and third? exact same rhythms
   fxd
4. 00:55:125 (3) - don't think that whistle on the tail is necessary. consistency with 00:52:048 (3) - . looks like this is on every other diff too so i won't mention it in those
   alright
5. 01:10:310 (1) - a rhythm like 00:29:307 (3,1) - with a click on 01:10:498 - would be a lot more satisfying htan skipping right over it
   yep
6. 01:13:123 (4,5,6) - that finish on tail :/ using a rhythm like this works well but what do i know
   yep
   
   pain

   even with this stuff, i'd still go with making an easy
   --
   i'm not gonna say you really need to change this, but it's something worth thinking about. to make this diff more acceptable as the easiest on the set, it would be really nice to adjust for the timing with slider velocity to at least some degree. right now everything is 1x sv, but with bpm ranging so much, there's a huge difference between asdfsdf i dont need to explain this you already know. changing sv to something along the lines of what's labeled here would make things great, but your 1/2 spacing being as large as it is makes the last section require like 1.5x spacing between objects which is possibly not too great.

   1. 00:02:115 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - about 1.2x
   2. 00:08:621 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - 1.1
   3. 00:21:380 (1) - first kiai - 0.95
   4. 00:35:634 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - 1.2
   5. 00:42:056 (2) - 0.85
   6. 00:42:671 (1,2,3,4,1) - 0.95
   7. 00:45:342 (2) - to the end - 0.9

   i could easily undersatnd why you wouldnt want to do this (it would be a pain), but i thought it would be worth mentioning since personally i wouldn't really be comfortable ranking the current normal as the easiest diff on the set
   there is more, actually I'm quite happy with the outcome

[advanced]

1. 00:15:369 (4,1) - probably want to reconsider spacing on these. 1.1x exactly just makes things more confusing cuz of the larger gap it has compared to everything around it
   sure
2. 00:38:327 (5,1) - comboing is inconsistent wiht 00:42:671 (1,2) - 00:45:901 (1,2) - .
   comboing fixed
3. 00:42:056 (3) - definitely want to lower sv on this. it's pretty unnatural how slider suddenly speeds up while you've got it set up to be exactly like 00:41:570 (2) -
   yea
4. 01:05:086 (3) - 01:11:060 (3) - missing a whistle on these tails i think. hard/insane both have whistles there
   fxd

[hard]

1. 00:33:798 (2) - may be missing a whistle on tail here. advanced/insane have one.
   yep
2. 00:42:056 (3) - same as other diffs yea
   ok
3. 00:45:528 (1) - is the new combo here necessary when you've got 00:35:206 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 00:41:058 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - as their own combos, while 00:44:553 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - is pretty much the same thing
   fixed combos
4. 00:57:801 (4) - tail wh istle pourquoi. other diffs don't have the whistle on tail here sooooo
   yea
5. 01:09:279 (2) - while playing i always assume this has only one repeat, probably cuz i see 3 onscreen when clicking it already or something. using like any other rhythm would be better i'd think
   I'll tried something
6. 01:33:051 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - super subjective, but gonna say it anyway. having sv increase steadily starting from something lower than the current to follow the accordian build up would be so cool. would also do it on insane asfdfsd
   well imo, it would be strange to make such techniques only in 1 spot on map instead of using natural SV change, huh, imo

[insane]

1. 00:25:223 (2,3,4,5) - super linear flow here feels pretty weird. something like this is way more comfortable
   alrght
2. 00:28:538 (3,4) - offbeat 1/4 sliders here are idk also weird. nothing in the song really emphasizes blue ticks more than white/red, so using a rhythm that's more reflective of the song would make sense. the other time this appears in the song is at 01:08:998 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - which worked k cuz circles
   makes sense, always was worried about that spot, lol, so obvious
3. 00:38:327 (6,1) - 00:42:671 (1,2) - 00:45:901 (1,2) - okay why does every diff have combos inconsistent right here there must be a reason at htis point but i'm still not getting it
   put your bookmarks properly Sieg, guess this is fixed now
4. 00:42:056 (3) - same as other diffs yea
   yea
5. 01:35:724 (8,9) - would expect these to have larger spacing as the last thing in the build up. same could be said about this on hard, but it's more noticeable here
   alright