OD 4? cuz Very very long... - I already considered about it and I thought OD5 fits.
00:21:917 (117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126) - very unfriendly(hard) and
limited the player range. So I suggest you cancel that 1/6 since it is just the beginning. -
I more likely followed the song. That's why. Also don't you think the map itself is already for limited player range.. :/00:52:385 (394,395) - kk -
oh sure01:12:463 (547) - delete -
whhhyyy :<01:12:542 (548) - finish
01:12:698 (549) - k -
These two lines are rejected since I mapped it rhythm-based.01:14:963 (565) - delete
01:15:042 (566) - finish -
Here too. You shoulda know that there's audible RHYTTMHfdsafghb01:15:198 (566) - k - Probably the same goes with 01:12:698 (549)
01:54:963 (874) - delete
01:55:042 (875) - finish -
I guess I don't have to tell you 3 three times.02:10:901 (1011) - d (kddkkdk is very weird) -
But it fits the song02:46:370 (1340) - delete
02:47:229 (1347) - delete -
4 times already03:11:682 (1581) - delete -
5 times and still counting03:55:042 (228) - i really dislike finish at the end of stream. -
Okay you dislike it but why?04:32:463 (488) - k -
Accepted04:32:620 (490,491) - delete and 04:34:885 (510,511) - delete to make it clear -
604:33:557 (497) - delete this note and 04:35:745 (516) - this note -
704:46:604 (614,615,616,617,618,619) - all k is good imo. -
bad imo05:04:729 (789,792,795) - finish -
It doesn't even fit the song u w0t05:06:604 (799,800,801,802,803,804,805,806,807) - kkddkdkkd feels better here -
Current one is fine tho06:19:729 (1433) - d -
I found that there is no clearly audible bass and the pitch is high so I thought k would be fine here.06:59:650 (1743) - k -
B..But d was to follow the song going down07:34:104 (1) - fuusen is not a good idea here. advice:07:34:104 to 07:34:572 'kdd d k' -
Extended the spinner instead. Not to break 6444 combo and it is to follow the melody which is going high. That is actually a nice idea, sry :<08:09:650 (248) - delete -
I don't see any certain reason.09:45:354 (684) - delete -
^09:50:041 and 09:50:354 add d -
you surely hoped if it would be kinda melody-based09:50:666 - add k , make09:50:822 (714) - D and 09:50:900 (715,716) - delete -
^09:53:713 (733,734,735,736,737,738,739,740,741,742,743) - not very good imo. -
Following piano. Oh and it is mapped a bit off, changed the pattern.My recommendation: 09:53:869 to 09:54:494: 'kkdk d kd' -
Look a bit above09:55:275 (745) - delete 09:55:354 (745) -
09:55:744 (748) - delete -
The reason is already told I guess10:49:416 (1195,1196,1197,1198) - i prefer single note after dddkd. So my advice: 'd dkd' instead of 'kkd d' -
No...12:38:479 (695,696,697,698,699) - according to music here, kkkkk can be a choice. -
Yup, kinda kddkk would also be good but no12:53:374 (803,804,805,806,807,808,809,810,811,812,813,814,815) - i love the style here
though it's difficult to play(speedchanges...) -
Thanks!13:27:072 (1038) - idk why but i prefer this final note D.... -
idk why but K fits xD