Hi, here for M4M from your Modding Queue. Hope this helps!
[General]
offset sounds a little too early. Get another opinion before you make changes, but it sounds like offset: -12 is a little better.
[Refraction]
Nice job with the ¼ sliders. You executed them in a way that felt like a strength instead of a hurdle to overcome.
00:38:487 (3) – Rotate by 1 degree anti-clockwise selection center since the latter part of this slider is a little closer to (1).
00:40:377 (3) - I'm not on board with the SV changes since I think if there is something to emphasize with these sliders, then I would change the spacing and not the SV. For 00:32:818 (3) – and 00:34:708 (3) - , the slider leniency kind of canceled it out, but for 00:40:377 (3) - , the straight motion had the full impact of the SV, and I don't see why it needs an SV change when 00:36:598 (3) - and 00:38:487 (3) – don't have one.
00:47:936 (3,5) – This blanket could be cleaner (execution: make a normal slider representing the first part up until the red anchor, make a blanket with (5), then make (3) overlap this helper slider exactly)
00:57:858 (6,1) – Find a way to stack this? (comment below related)
00:58:448 (8,1) – try making the spacing here either 1.4x or 1.8x. Right now it's on the border of being a jump or being normal spacing, and I think it's more preferable to have a binary choice between jump and normal as opposed to having middle ground in this context
01:03:172 (4,5,7,8) – This rhythm feels a little odd to me. Try this: http://puu.sh/nEE04/98dba045dc.jpg
01:17:464 (1,2,3,4,5,6) – Without the song, this pattern implies repetition to me since this curved flow with straight sliders is repeating. I can't find anything in the song that fits this, so I'm not that pleased with the flow. Is there a different pattern that you like that might go with perhaps a different instrument in a little stricter way?
01:18:881 (7,8,9,10,1) – The spacing and rhythm makes this pattern very intense, and I think it's a bit more intense than it should be in relation to what comes before and after it. Consider making 01:18:881 (7) – a ¼ slider to go with the finish. The spacing at 01:19:235 (10,1,2) – can also be rhythmically confusing, so maybe make the DS between (1,2) a little bigger.
01:22:424 (4,5) – It'd be nice if you could work in a blanket between these. I respect that you want a certain curvature here, so maybe rotating 01:21:243 (1) – clockwise will set up (2) in a way that still supports it, but idk.
01:23:842 (3) – Consider rotating this 15 degree anti-clockwise selection center to give a stronger visual cue about the rhythm into (4)
[taku's Insane]
00:22:661 (1) – With the singer going really quiet, is now a good time to increase the spacing/intensity this much? It feels a little too much.
00:31:165 (4,5) – I'd prefer these not stacked and instead have normal spacing.
00:35:889 (1,1) – Just my preference, but spacing these out a little more looks better for me. Try moving the second (1) to 481, 238 or further
00:42:267 (1) - ^
01:25:968 (3,4,5) – Due to slider leniency, you don't really get that circular flow into (4) at all, instead it plays a little funky. So move (4,5) up or to the right by a lot to account for slider leniency.
[Hard]
00:03:763 (1,2) – Blanket of (2)'s end could be vastly improved
00:29:039 (2,1) – This overlap looks odd imo. Rotate (1) counterclockwise and move what comes before it to work.
01:23:842 (4) – Consider moving this to ~116, 152 for a smoother angle into (4).
[Normal]
00:31:873 (3) – Delete one of these timing points.
00:37:779 (1,1) – Why not make the DS between these 1.20x for a nicer triangle and a less cluttered blanket?
01:04:235 (1,2,3) – I'd prefer these to be symmetrical like: http://puu.sh/nEGdC/37511ac062.jpg (I would love to explain how I got this symmetry if you want me to show you)
[Estel's Easy]
00:18:881 (3,1) – These are so close it looks a bit cluttered. Try giving these some room.
00:56:676 (1,3) – (1)'s head could be blanketed by (3) a little nicer
01:04:472 (1) – Consider deleting this and making a circle at 01:04:708 – for an easier rhythm
01:15:574 (1,2,3,4) - The fact that this is a different rhythm from 01:00:456 (1,2,3,4,5) – bothers me. You need to hit the downbeat at 01:19:354 (1) - , so I see why, but that just kind of makes me wish you didn't go with the singer at 01:00:456 (1,2,3,4,5) – to set up my expectations here . idk though, easy's are weird.
Good luck!
[General]
offset sounds a little too early. Get another opinion before you make changes, but it sounds like offset: -12 is a little better.
[Refraction]
Nice job with the ¼ sliders. You executed them in a way that felt like a strength instead of a hurdle to overcome.
00:38:487 (3) – Rotate by 1 degree anti-clockwise selection center since the latter part of this slider is a little closer to (1).
00:40:377 (3) - I'm not on board with the SV changes since I think if there is something to emphasize with these sliders, then I would change the spacing and not the SV. For 00:32:818 (3) – and 00:34:708 (3) - , the slider leniency kind of canceled it out, but for 00:40:377 (3) - , the straight motion had the full impact of the SV, and I don't see why it needs an SV change when 00:36:598 (3) - and 00:38:487 (3) – don't have one.
00:47:936 (3,5) – This blanket could be cleaner (execution: make a normal slider representing the first part up until the red anchor, make a blanket with (5), then make (3) overlap this helper slider exactly)
00:57:858 (6,1) – Find a way to stack this? (comment below related)
00:58:448 (8,1) – try making the spacing here either 1.4x or 1.8x. Right now it's on the border of being a jump or being normal spacing, and I think it's more preferable to have a binary choice between jump and normal as opposed to having middle ground in this context
01:03:172 (4,5,7,8) – This rhythm feels a little odd to me. Try this: http://puu.sh/nEE04/98dba045dc.jpg
01:17:464 (1,2,3,4,5,6) – Without the song, this pattern implies repetition to me since this curved flow with straight sliders is repeating. I can't find anything in the song that fits this, so I'm not that pleased with the flow. Is there a different pattern that you like that might go with perhaps a different instrument in a little stricter way?
01:18:881 (7,8,9,10,1) – The spacing and rhythm makes this pattern very intense, and I think it's a bit more intense than it should be in relation to what comes before and after it. Consider making 01:18:881 (7) – a ¼ slider to go with the finish. The spacing at 01:19:235 (10,1,2) – can also be rhythmically confusing, so maybe make the DS between (1,2) a little bigger.
01:22:424 (4,5) – It'd be nice if you could work in a blanket between these. I respect that you want a certain curvature here, so maybe rotating 01:21:243 (1) – clockwise will set up (2) in a way that still supports it, but idk.
01:23:842 (3) – Consider rotating this 15 degree anti-clockwise selection center to give a stronger visual cue about the rhythm into (4)
[taku's Insane]
00:22:661 (1) – With the singer going really quiet, is now a good time to increase the spacing/intensity this much? It feels a little too much.
00:31:165 (4,5) – I'd prefer these not stacked and instead have normal spacing.
00:35:889 (1,1) – Just my preference, but spacing these out a little more looks better for me. Try moving the second (1) to 481, 238 or further
00:42:267 (1) - ^
01:25:968 (3,4,5) – Due to slider leniency, you don't really get that circular flow into (4) at all, instead it plays a little funky. So move (4,5) up or to the right by a lot to account for slider leniency.
[Hard]
00:03:763 (1,2) – Blanket of (2)'s end could be vastly improved
00:29:039 (2,1) – This overlap looks odd imo. Rotate (1) counterclockwise and move what comes before it to work.
01:23:842 (4) – Consider moving this to ~116, 152 for a smoother angle into (4).
[Normal]
00:31:873 (3) – Delete one of these timing points.
00:37:779 (1,1) – Why not make the DS between these 1.20x for a nicer triangle and a less cluttered blanket?
01:04:235 (1,2,3) – I'd prefer these to be symmetrical like: http://puu.sh/nEGdC/37511ac062.jpg (I would love to explain how I got this symmetry if you want me to show you)
[Estel's Easy]
00:18:881 (3,1) – These are so close it looks a bit cluttered. Try giving these some room.
00:56:676 (1,3) – (1)'s head could be blanketed by (3) a little nicer
01:04:472 (1) – Consider deleting this and making a circle at 01:04:708 – for an easier rhythm
01:15:574 (1,2,3,4) - The fact that this is a different rhythm from 01:00:456 (1,2,3,4,5) – bothers me. You need to hit the downbeat at 01:19:354 (1) - , so I see why, but that just kind of makes me wish you didn't go with the singer at 01:00:456 (1,2,3,4,5) – to set up my expectations here . idk though, easy's are weird.
Good luck!