No Dap wrote:

Rush_FTK 이분 쿠도스 주셔야죠

Joon님은 주지마시고

xLoupGarou wrote:

Sorry for the Late Reply From . . xLoupGarou's Modding Queue



*Mp3 --> Nyan~LINK
-audio bitrate from 152 kbps to 192 kbps
-sampling frequency to 48 kHz
-audio boost by 150% did you touch normalizer? it has little big sonud.
if i change with this i have to reset all TimingPoint's volume.. this's terrible situationT^T


*BG --> OK

Nyan~MOD

Important : First of All .

*Change your Offset to 691 --> it's much better
After Go to Timing Menu then Re-Snap All Notes it's too fast. in this point, resultingly don't fit with kiai time. i tested it. sry

*Go to you BM's notepad then change the AudioLeadIn to 1000 fixed!

[Normal]
00:13:066 Move ( x:448 y:160 ) moved but not concurrence
00:14:191 Move ( x:176 y:312 ) ^
00:20:941 Improve fixed!


00:22:066 Fix fixed!


00:43:441 Fix fixed!


00:53:003 Fix fixed!


00:56:191 Fix fixed!


01:02:599 Move ( x:216 y:80 ) and Fix fixed!


01:03:691 Fix fixed!


01:28:816 (4,5) Fix fixed!


[Hard]
00:16:075 Fix/Revert fixed!


01:02:950 Fix this's a kind of triangle. so skip it.


01:13:075 Move ( x:296 y:204 ) no reason i could find.
01:28:450 Fix ^


01:29:950 Improve ^

That's All, Nice Song
Good Luck~

[-MrSergio-] wrote:

Mod request from my Modding queue

[General]

My AIMod pointed out a lead-in conflict with you Normal diff and when I checked I understood why. Trying to fix it I found out it was worse trying to modify it in any way, so for now keep it like that
Are you planning on doing a SB? If not, remember to un-tick: Song Setup > Design > Widescreen Support. You don't need it without SB

[Thine]

I think it's useless to say the first slider is really confusing at first. Since I can't come up with anything else, leave it as it is, but I think it should be changed in some way :/ but.. that confusing did not stay after. it'll occur in just first play i think.
00:07:075 (9,10,1) - Since (9) is really slow, adding a triplet right after it it's misleading. try stacking them all at (1)'s position (the slider's end will be, obviously, stacked here) Ok!
00:17:950 - From here on we have a drastic decreasing with volume. To tell you the truth, while playing, I couldn't understand the pattern due to the volume's drop. I think increasing by a bit should be perfect. Where you have 30% --> 40%. Where you have 5% --> 15%. See yourself what's better Ok!
00:20:950 (1) - This is A LOT confusing imo. Why not:

368,80,20950,6,0,B|392:48|392:24|392:24|392:162,1,200,12|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

I like these cumbersomes. this add to the amusement at next rhythm i feel.
00:25:450 (6) - Same ^ (sorry, but they're really confusing for me. Maybe it's just me :/ )
00:52:825 (3,6) - Not stacked properly amazing. you found it xD
01:30:700 (1) - Same as 00:20:950 (1)
01:38:575 (1) - Good job here But it's a bit fast xD (I know the reason, don't worry. That's why I won't say anything) yeah
01:45:325 (1) - Same as 00:20:950 (1)
01:47:387 (4) - Maybe convert this to a stream just after (3), without any jumps...? If then, it will spoil unity..maybe
The last stream is at the level of Big Black xD (obviously only joking around)

[Insane]

00:20:575 (7,8) - Select them both and move them to 412;288 ( 7's starting point) it's symmetry with slider(6). so i moved just (8) properly.
00:45:325 (5) - Stack this note properly
00:48:512 (2,3) - Select them both and move them to 168;144 ( 2's starting point) slider(2) is stacked with 00:46:825 (3) - . so i moved just (3) like ^
00:58:450 (3,1) - Aren't stacked properly
01:14:387 (2,1) - Same ^
01:18:325 (1,2) - Same ^ (their ends)
01:21:512 (4,5,1) - Same ^
01:23:762 (4,5,1) - Same ^ fixed the rest

[Hard]

01:17:200 (4,6) - Stack them properly
01:24:700 (3,3) - Same ^ (Maybe it isn't even notable during play xD)
01:44:200 (4,1) - Same ^ fixed all.

[Normal]

Looks fine for me

Alright. What I could do, I did it
I really liked hitsounds, they were great

Good Luck with your map

-Chata- wrote:

Hi. From -Chata- & K.P's Modding Queue

Red : Unrankable issue / must fix.
Blue : Should be fixed / highly suggested.
Black : Just suggestion.

[General]

1. 노말 난이도만 AudioLeadIn이 0입니다. 1000으로 통일해주세요. 넴
2. 비디오 해상도가 800x600을 넘으면 안됩니다. 용량도 너무 크니 재인코딩해주세요 넴
3. offset=700 넴

[Normal]

1. HP-1
2. 00:08:575 (2,2) - 이 두 노트가 안겹치게 해주세요.매우 이상합니다. 넴
   
   초반의 저 슬라이더가 겹치는거 외엔 모양도 괜찮고 박자도 괜찮네요. 양호합니다.

[Hard]

1. 00:07:450 (1) - HP 바에 닿습니다. 특히 리버스 애로우가 가려지면 치명적입니다. 넴
2. 00:58:450 (6,7,1) - Insane에서도 Thine 에서도 남용되고 있는데 이런 역방향 리버스는 흐름도 좋지않고 플레이도 불편할뿐입니다. 특이 이 난이도가 하드인이상 이부분의 (1)만큼은 ctrl + g를 해주세요
3. 01:04:262 (3) - 언랭커블. HP바에 리버스애로우가 가려집니다. 넴
4. 01:26:200 (4,3,4) - 뉴콤보. 01:13:825 (1) - 이부분과 같이 끊어지는 부분에서 뉴콤보를 사용하시기 바랍니다.
5. 01:14:012 (2,2,2) - 분명 01:13:825 - 이부분에서 박자가 시작되 이어지는데 이부분에 놓으니 위화감만 느껴집니다. 01:16:075 (1) - 이거와 같이 바꿔주세요

[Insane]

1. AR+0.5. SV의 속도로 볼때 8은 느린거같습니다.
2. 01:36:325 (1,2) - 이 두 노트는 거리를 더 두시기 바랍니다.

[Thine]

1. 조금 난해한 오버맵이네요.. 박자를 너무 만들어내고 SV를 너무 남용했습니다.
   패스하겠습니다.

-Neipezi wrote:

hi ushiro t. from my mod qeueus

[General]
- 소스에 穢翼のユースティア 추가하시고 Kegare tsubasa no yusutia opening을 태그에 추가하세요. 넴
- bpm offset은 700ms가 맞습니다. 넴
- 동영상 화질이 좀 그래서 인코딩했습니다. HD Video Download (Dropbox) 오 짱짱좋네여! 근데 노래랑 싱크가 안맞아여.. 제가 알아서 편집해보려 했지만 기술부족으로 용량은 늘어나고 화질은 떨어지네여ㅜㅜ 딱 1.2초만 줄이면 되는데 이거 어케 안될까여

[Normal]
- 슬라이드 틱스 1 줄여주세요 넴

00:34:450 (1,2) - 슬라이드 겹칩니다.
01:25:075 (5,1) - 뉴콤 교체 넴

[Hard]
01:11:950 (1,1) - 뉴콤 삭제 넴
01:31:918 (1) - 여기에 스핀있는게 좀 이상하네요.

[Insane]
00:19:075 (3) - ctrl + g? 넴
00:43:075 (4,1) - 플레이할때 이상한 걸 느꼈네요. 여기에 보컬로 잡으시면 좋습니다. 애로우 삭제 하신다음에 (1)슬라이드를 00:43:450 - 으로 이동시킨다음
00:44:012 - 에 1/1슬라이드 추가하시면 되겠습니다. 이미 비슷한 박자가 전이 난이도에도 많이 등장한탓에. 그냥 성격탓이려니 해주세여
00:53:762 (4,6) - ctrl + g?
01:55:825 (3,5) - 뉴콤 추가. 점프이기때문에 뉴콤을 추가합니다. 01:55:825 (3,4) - 01:56:200 (5,6) - 각각 ctrl + g 한번씩 눌러주시면 재미있는 패턴이 될거 같네요. 넴

행운을 빕니다

[Events]
//Background and Video events
Video,0,"Video.avi"

-Neipezi wrote:

비디오 싱크 안맞으시면 .
Video,0,"Video.avi" 에서 숫자만 맞춰주시면 싱크가 맞을겁니다. 1.2초라고 하셨으면 -1200으로 수정하시면 되겠습니다.

280,140,10075,2,0,B|252:88|208:72|208:72,1,100,2|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

1. Please add "Aiyoku no Eustia" to tags since that's the romanized title of the VN.
2. Change the metronome on the offset to 6/4 in all the difficulties. The music switches to a new stanza every 6 beats. If you don't know how to do it, enter the Timing Setup Panel, click the uninherited timing points, and do this on the left side of the window. Also add another uninherited timing point at 01:13:825 to reset the metronome. Keep the kiai time of course.
3. 10% volume is waaaaay too inaudible for the beginning of the difficulties. It'll make players feel awkward while playing. Use at least 30% or so.

1. 00:20:575 (3) - Move to 00:20:387 since the instrument is far stronger there, and add a circle at 00:20:762 to follow the vocal? Alternatively, remove this circle and add a stream at 00:20:387 - 00:20:762?
2. 01:01:450 (1,2,1) - Why is the spacing inconsistent here?
3. 01:34:075 (1) - Move to (140,152) for a better flow? You'll have to readjust the position of your next objects, of course.

1. 00:17:200 (3) - Remove the clap? I think it's too loud, and the hitsound here should be enough to support the percussion.
2. 00:52:075 - Add a whistle to emphasize the piano here? It also sounds way too empty because of the volume, so adding a whistle is necessary, IMO.
3. 01:04:825 (4) - I personally feel that this slider shape is kind of random. Try a simpler shape?

1. 00:17:200 (5,6) - Add a node at (352,152) on (5) and move (6) to (375,90) for a better flow and so they'll look neater?
2. 00:23:387 (2,3) - Is it possible not to make these objects touch each other so they'll look nicer to see.
3. 00:27:700 (7) - Place this in the center of 00:26:575 (4,5,6), like this? Looks better and fits better with the song.
4. 00:35:575 (1,2,3) - IMO, the slider velocity change doesn't really emphasize anything, and thus can be confusing for players. Just make them all have the same speed and length (you know, removing the velocity changes).
5. 00:40:075 (5,1) - Swap NC? The current combo pattern makes the stack weird to play IMO.
6. 00:40:637 (1,2) - ^
7. 01:19:450 (4,5,6) - Same as 00:35:575 (1,2,3); even more so here.
8. 01:26:575 (2) - NC to indicate the change of the spacing (and the 1/4 jump) like what you did at 01:17:575 (1)?
9. 01:46:450 (3,4,5) - Same as 00:35:575 (1,2,3) too.

1. Any reason for using Thine as the diff's name?
2. 00:14:012 (6,1,2,1,2,3) - I really don't recommend you to add 1/4 jumps here since the music isn't that strong yet. They're awkward to play.
3. 00:24:325 (4) - Any reason to slow down the slider? I feel that it's far more fitting to the song if the slider uses the normal speed.
4. 00:47:575 (7,8,9,1) - Don't you think they're too close to each other? Consider moving 00:47:762 (8,9,1) to (132,56)?
5. 00:55:262 (4,5) - Try to make them not touch each other? That'd be neater.
6. 00:59:012 (1,2) - Swap NC since the music's rhythm goes to a new stanza at 00:59:200?
7. 01:03:606 (5) - Remove this please. It's overmapped and doesn't fit with the map's rhythm. Also, why are you even silencing it...?

• 1. i think there's a rule which doesn't allow adding '(Short Ver.)' or '(Cut Ver.) unless the official blog say so. exception for this map https://osu.ppy.sh/s/30127 since it's mapped before the new rule executed. but i can't find the rule thread so yeah idk
  
  2. nooooo

• 00:36:700 (1,2) - only suggestions
  
  SPOILER

  
  copypaste (1) -> ctrl+H -> rotate by 45 degree clockwise
  00:45:325 (4,1) - since you're following the vocal, the beat kinda makes more sense if you switch nc

• 00:00:700 - 00:02:950 - 00:05:200 - 00:07:450 - add finish on those slider's head? you added one in normal diff
  00:09:700 - 00:11:950 - 00:14:200 - 00:16:450 - ^
  00:35:575 (5) - only suggestion
  
  SPOILER

  
  00:45:137 - add clap
  00:56:387 - ^
  01:36:512 (1) - only opinion though, it would be better if you mapped this part. but it's all up to you

• OD and HP settings is kinda low for me idk so how about HP+1?
  
  00:23:387 (2,3) - idk not a really neat overlap. but it's not a big problem anyway
  00:26:950 (5) - clap at slider's tail?
  00:35:575 (1,2,3) - 01:19:450 (4,5,6) - am i the only one who have a little problem with this idk it's kinda weird when the sv changes especially when there's no significant changes in the music and there's no repetitive rhythm either (exception for 01:46:450 (3,4,5) - 01:28:450 (4,5,6) - ) well yeah but i suppose it's not a problem for most people
  01:17:950 (1) - i don't think nc is necessary here since the sv change is kinda unnoticed
  01:26:950 (1) - ^
  01:36:325 (1,2) - kinda nazi, but i prefer if they don't touch each other. since you stack (2) with 01:35:575 (4) - , how about lowering them a bit? you might have to change 01:37:075 (3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6) - 's position though
  01:38:481 - add a note? kinda fits between 01:38:200 (6,1) -

• hella can't even play this
  
  00:00:700 - add finish?
  00:23:200 (1) - why's the hitsound so quiet? kinda weird though
  00:25:450 (6) - nc?
  00:56:950 (1) - add finish? there's a loud cymbal sound
  00:58:075 (8) - ^

The Girls wrote:

Hi, from Mod Queue

Cheat Sheet:
Fix (Unrankable)
Suggestions (Improvable)
Opinion (Optional)

[General]
Your song folder is so clean. .___. I need to fix mine...

[Normal]

AI Mod categorizes this as a Hard difficulty. You will need a Easy/Norm for ranked. If might want to tone down your map's settings a little bit... Perhaps, AR 4, OD 3 ok..i will..

00:43:825 (3) - Balance out slider for better flow and aesthetics. ok!


01:02:575 (2) - Needs to be lowered a bit. Its a tad farther DS-wise from everything else. ok!

01:03:700 (1, 2) - Blanket around Slider 2 of previous combo. Modify Slider 2 in the combo to follow the new blanketed Slider 1. ok!


01:09:325 (3, 4, 5, 6) - Make this into a diamond? As opposed to a parallelogram? I think it's parallelogram lol

01:38:575 - The slider is too long to be enjoyable. Shorten somehow. I suggest making a Slider like the following somes strange for getting next rhythm.

[Hard]

You have really nice flow >< Man. Gimme more of your beatmaps for me to mod so I can learn a thing or two.

00:27:700 - Ahhh double spinners. Double spinners are sort of dull. Especially when they are this long.You should shorten the spinners and do something with the section Consider the pattern I have made, I think it makes this part of the map just as spicy as the rest of your map! there's no way for rhythms imo DX



00:40:450 (5) - Tad overlay, just pull it out a little bit so its only touching. ok!

01:11:575 - This stream is a bit confusing and lackluster compared to the rest of your map. You could map it similar to 00:40:450 (5, 6, 7) and use a predictably larger DS. so I put NC but guys relieved it T T

01:27:887 (2) - This one slider has a really jarring affect on the smoothness of your flow. Your flow is primarily oval and cyclical. This this ok!


01:47:575 (4) - As I'm going thru your map more and more, I realize why I find your use of long spinners a little distasteful. It just feels very out of place BECAUSE the entire map to a constant 1/2 beat rhythm. These spinner sections are out of place because the rhythm you have constructed and built up during this entire down gets deflated by a spinner that doesn't push the song forward it the 1/2 beats you have been mapping. I think you can use them like longer sliders and add some notes to the ends of the spinners to really enhance the climax of your song. Otherwise, it feels very anti-climactic...the spinners i mean. See this. Tell me you don't like the rhythm this combo sets up ok~ but i'll try at insane diff!


Take out Circle 4, star the Spinner on the White tick (downbeat) and end your original spinner section with two circles. Repeat for the second Spinner.

01:56:387 (1) - The roll at the end of the melody ends 1/4 beat (blue tick) right after. Since you made this a new combo, and a slider, it deceives the player to follow the music and would hit the slider ON The 1/4 note roll instead. Sorry if I'm not making any sense...what I'm trying to say is that the way you mapped this and how the song ends are different. An intuitive player would follow the music and mess up here. If I'm not making any sense, try the hit pattern I have done here and see how much cleaner the finish of the song seems? There are two benefits, 1) The 6-beat streams matches the trope you used in the previous pattern. this thing has already when it click 01:55:450 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - . 2) Has a cleaner finish than what you have now. I guess message me if I'm not making any sense :/ hm.. cleaner finish. isn't it more clean with when slider's end is song's end? that's my opinion. anyway, both way is enough to good to end.

[Insane]

00:42:137 (5, 6, 1) - I don't see any reason why it shouldn't be symmetrical. Let 5, 6, 1 form a equilateral triangle. You have very strong pattern tropes in your beatmap, i guess I'm just holding you to a higher standard xD sooo sloppy. Jk oops lol it's okay. when player see the 6,1 there's no 5 !

00:56:200 (7) - Move a little right-upward to match your current blanketing ;P

01:00:887 (2, 3, 4) - You can smooth out the flow and naturalness of your beatmap if you made the 2, 3, 4, crown the next Slider in more of an arch. It better matches the spacious and grand feels of this difficulty of the song. Bascially, you get to access a warmer oval flow AND set up the next wind-mill formation. Don't forget to change these as well for symmetry. 00:59:762 (2, 3, 4) hm. i think it's okay to leave.


01:02:575 (1, 2, 3) - It forms such a lopsided triangle. I don't know...like at first I thought you didn't rotate by 120 degrees. But you did, but it stills looks a little funky. I guess the arch of the slider isn't curved enough to look more balanced. I know you're trying to bracket with the previous combo. Maybe try this? Stack and mirror diagonally. And then rotate. same as ^



01:37:450 (1, 2, 3, 4) - DS is too inconsistent here. The jump doesn't work at the moment. that's my intention fot highlight !

01:47:575 - I be hating on your double-spinners xD actually I think this is in comparison to your Hard difficulty a lot less jarring since this difficult has bigger spatial freedom, DS, and grandeur. Plus, you aren't mapping ever single red tick in the rhythm.

[Thine]

I can't say much about this difficulty, since its so out of my scope that I can only watch it being played, not being able to play test it. WHAT happened to submitting BEGINNER MAPS FOR ME TO MOD? I'll try...

00:09:137 (5, 6, 7) - They don't follow your pattern...? Maybe try...? this's uninterrupted zigzag xD


00:45:700 - Is that shape rankable? :O i don know becuz i have no ranked..(snivel)

Yeah... i can't help with this one :/ soz.

Thanks for give me a chance to mod your map
Called from ♪ ichia7x's [4Mode] Modding Queue ♪

• 
  Ceui :3

1. Why it has different tags? please check it soon
   
   SPOILER

   
   
2. At least check all AiMod suggestion/warning
3. Just suggestion, please remove all kiai except 01:13:825 - 01:31:825 -

1. Change HP to 4 atm ?
2. Just suggestion, please put spinner at the last part 01:56:575 - 02:03:325 -, if accepted, do same to all diff too
   Nothing wrong~

1. 00:27:512 (5) - remove this
2. from 00:40:075 - 00:40:637 - please fix this pattern

1. 00:58:731 (4,5) - don't stack this

TheOmyNomy wrote:

I'm not the person to normally judge a map and comment on it. But this map OMG.

Hard
Perfect for people who enjoy DT. (Song sounds amazing on NC)
Nothing wrong with it, works out fine.

Insane
I sat here for a while trying to finish it with an A.
Once again it's perfect and don't need to change it.

Thine
Used NF seeing I suck and omg looks hard but so amazing.


I didn't try other difficulties yet, but who needs to?
Overall beatmap is going amazing. Keep up good work

<3.

Kazamastar11 wrote:

Mod Request From Kazamastar’s Modding Queue
Hello, Ushiro T !
Thank’s for calling me to mod your beatmap 
Let’s get started..

Normal

00:54:137 - add circle with clap,
01:17:950 (4) – add clap,
98950,-100,6,2,1,65,0,1
99700,-100,6,2,1,65,0,0 – remove this timing points,
Add timing here 111700,-100,6,2,3,65,0,0 and stop the Kiai,
112075,-100,6,2,2,40,0,1
112450,-100,6,2,2,20,0,0
113200,-100,6,2,2,40,0,1
113575,-100,6,2,2,20,0,0
114325,-100,6,2,2,40,0,1
114700,-100,6,2,2,20,0,0
115450,-100,6,2,2,40,0,1
115825,-100,6,2,2,20,0,0 – remove all of this Kiai (i mean, timing points)

Hard

32575,-100,6,2,1,30,0,0 – remove this timing points, it would be better to hear the sound from soft-hitwhistle3,
98950,-100,6,2,1,65,0,1
99700,-100,6,2,1,65,0,0 – remove this timing points,
Add timing here 111700,-100,6,2,3,65,0,0 and stop the Kiai,
112075,-100,6,2,2,40,0,1
112450,-100,6,2,2,20,0,0
113200,-100,6,2,2,40,0,1
113575,-100,6,2,2,20,0,0
114325,-100,6,2,2,40,0,1
114700,-100,6,2,2,20,0,0
115450,-100,6,2,2,40,0,1
115825,-100,6,2,2,20,0,0 – remove all of this Kiai (i mean, timing points)

Thine

Same as Normal & Hard, remove the timing and Kiai (you must be know which part i mean.

Insane

Same as Thine, your Kiai time is looking ‘freak’, please remove it 

That’s All Ushiro T ! Good luck !

Special Notes : i mod before you update your beatmap

Okoratu wrote:

General

• 
  

1. I like this song, let's see what i can find in your maps.
2. Your soft-hitfinish2.wav is currently at a filesize of 1,34 mb (for comparison the whole song is at a 2.53 mb) so you might want to compress that one down to a reasonable quality for lower filesizes because it's a tiny bit unnecessary Sure!
3. Also you seem to be using 3 soft samplesets, while the first 2 have their sliderslide.wav muted and the third has not. This might have been an accident or your intention, idk. Sure!
4. Dunno, but I think you could find something more reasonable than BANG!! for the custom diffname, but that's entirely up to you as well (the previous one wasn't bad imo) xD
5. None of your diffs do have any breaks, yet you still have "Letterbox during breaks" enabled and should probably uncheck Sure!
6. The overall Diffspread would probably be better off with an additional Easy difficulty since the lowest difficulty is at 1.99 stars which >barely< fits the ranking criteria, but i'd still leave this here as an option because Easy difficulties are supposedly easy to map. ya. i'm so lazy person as you see the Hard,Normal (there's only rhythm :p). so maybe (if there's no request Easydiff for bubble)it's not possible.
7. Compared to the other 3 combo colours your combocolor 2 is really really Dark, if you play this set and black out the BG in the settings you will most likely have difficulties reading things done with that combo. i'm not player so i would not be kind as well. lol
8. Would set the AudioLeadIn to 1600 so that the player has at least 2 seconds to adjust their hand and stuff before the thing begins (Current AudioLeadIn is 1000).

Sure!

BANG!!

• 
  

1. I don't really understand this diffname, but you could explain this to me this.. hm. it's shame to say, that's my extra name
2. CS 4.5 is neat, but i think AR 9.5 is too fast for a 160 bpm song even with those 1/4 jumps and all that stuff you have. After some testing i found AR 9.3 or 9.2 to be more suitable candidates for this kind of difficulty than AR 9.5 this has no problem i think.
3. 00:00:325 - somehow I don't really understand why 00:00:419 (1) - doesn't start either on that tick or on 00:00:512 - (the sound on there is actually pretty loud) also i think changing that will make the downbeat change in 00:00:419 - obsolete.^
4. 00:17:950 (2,3,1,2) - I really do like this idea but the way 00:17:950 (2,3) - are basically in the same place while 00:18:137 (3,1,2) - are jumps doesn't play all that well, how about having all 4 being left right jumps? i like current position~
   
   something like this could be WAY more straightforward to do here

   
5. 00:19:825 (3,4) - using the same kind of slider would be really obvious and would boost the overall looks of that pattern imo: Sure!
   
   before

   
   after

   
6. 00:24:325 (4,1) - same thing but not as obvious so i wouldn't mind it that much if it stays ok.
7. 00:27:700 - this beat here is kinda strong, you could map it as a circle and have the spinner begin on the tick afterwards , just saying ya. but same thing, it's good enough i think.
8. 00:40:825 (5,6,7,8,1,2,3) - this stream might be easier to get correctly if it was moved a bit closer to 00:40:637 (4) - current is my like.
   
   the distances between each entity might look more even as well like this

   
9. 00:43:450 (7) - not that i don't like these sliders but the Standard Ranking Criteria says that Slider anchors/nodes must not be used to manipulate slider speeds (here) and that's clearly what is happening here, a bit wiggling is ok, as long as the ball is not moving that much from left to right. ok.
10. 00:45:700 (1) - ^ the very same thing applies to its end i think both of them should be straightened out a bit in order to fit into the criteria. ok.
11. 00:59:200 (2) - sad (compared to the other 4 sliders or something like this this one is quite noticably more manipulative than the others) no problem ;D
    
    things like this should be borderline ok since they don't really manipulate the overall speed

    
12. also while you're at making these things fit into the criteria you could think about improving the blanket of 00:45:700 (1) - with 00:45:512 (7) - ? there's no place to locate :p
13. 00:59:012 (1) - are you missing a whistle here? no, it's my mistake lol
14. 01:10:262 (9,10,1) - I would consider rotating this whole thing by -40 degrees and moving it a bit to make the pattern that 01:10:075 (8,9,10,1,2) - follow a bit more straight forward:
    
    Example

    
15. 01:17:950 (1,2) - if you want to use different SVs for basically the same thing you should at least move them in a less-cruel-to-hit position so that you don't miss 01:18:137 (2) - if you misread it as an 1/2 slider (165|214 or something similar should be better / less frustrating than what you currently have)ok.
16. 01:23:762 (4,5) - you should probably consider unstacking these because you don't really stack things like that in the rest of this so that might be confusing (examples? here: 01:20:481 (10,1) - , 01:22:731 (9,1) - , 01:24:981 (2,3) - , 01:26:856 (6,1) - , 01:29:856 (4,5) - , 01:37:356 (4,1) - ... i think you get the thing) 1/8 beat here and i'm not forgive them!
17. 01:44:200 (3) - would be a bit more hesitant to reduce the slider speed that drastically here as it makes this one look like an 1/4 slider (01:42:887 (5) - , etc.) so maybe i think 0.75x would be a bit more clear for the player ok.
18. 01:45:137 (4,5,1) - you could think about increasing the spacing to 01:44:950 (3) - since the 1,2x spacing is pretty unusual for this kind of map (at least for doubles like this considering the way 01:44:575 (1,2) - are spaced) no problem!
19. 01:47:575 - i think i already suggested adding a circle on 00:27:700 - so i will do that again here same as before~
20. 01:52:075 - why is this part not that loud? 20% volume kinda kills the whistle on every 1/2 beat thing for me D: ya. increased
21. 01:56:012 (1) - would consider not having it exactly symmetrical since 01:55:825 (3) - suggests an upwards movement and thus 01:56:012 (1) - could catch that better if it was placed around (316|195)ish...? something strange
    
    Example?

    

Some of the 1/8 sliders in this diff felt like they were a bit overdone, be a bit careful with those.

Insane

• 
  

1. The gap from this to the BANG!! diff is kinda big, just saying also i think AR 8.5 fits this map a lot better than 8.0 this's not good idea. sry
2. 00:19:075 (3) - would rotate it by 20 degrees so that it still blankets 00:18:887 (2) - and creates a nicer oval flow with 00:19:450 (4) - i like current position~
   
   Example

   
   for other neat examples of oval flow see 00:20:200 (6,7) -
3. 00:23:387 (2,3) - this overlap doesn't really look planned at all, so you could try avoiding it by increasing the overall DS 00:23:200 (1,2,3) - have...? fixed~
4. 00:31:168 (1) - on your highest diff, this spinner ends in 00:32:200 - eating up that vocal as well, you should do these things consistently throughout your diffs i cant understand about that thing.
5. 00:34:450 (7) - this vocal -could- use a NC sure~
6. 01:03:325 (3,1) - this overlap can be avoided pretty easily and doesn't look that nice (e.g. by moving 01:03:700 (1) - about a bit)
7. 01:08:012 (6,1) - I expected this jump to be bigger since things like 01:07:262 (2,3,4,5,6) - are relatively big jumps so this feels like it's a bit too short
8. 01:17:575 (1,2,1) - this pattern is pretty hard to get correctly and i think overall 01:17:950 (1) - should be longer in order to be more intuitive and more straight forward
9. 01:18:887 (2,3) - I don't really like that rhythm here since the strong vocal is on 01:19:075 - it should probably be better off like this:
   
   Example

   
10. 01:26:950 (1) - already said something about that <.<
11. 01:29:950 (5,1) - if possible you could try to avoid the overlap here as it doesn't look that planned
12. 01:49:637 - idk this feels kinda empty and maybe a circle in the middle of the screen is nice here?

from 01:03:325 (3,1) these are unnecessary things all :p Thanks.

Hard

• 
  

1. CS could be bigger for a better spread, also i would prefer it if the part until 01:14:012 - made use of more spacing, at least as high so that not everything is overlapping? >.<
2. Overall i think you do stick too strictly to your distance snap, for ex.: 00:37:825 (3,4,5) - and 00:42:324 (5,6,7) - are completely different while being exactly the same vocal mapping thing. The same applies for many other things in this difficulty, but overall i just think it would look nicer if you'd sticked to a distance snap of 1.2x throughout most of this diff >.<
3. like the whole beginning until 00:41:200 - is mapped more or less in the same way and continues to get more and more interesting afterwards, i really like that part from there on but up until there it looks like you were just lazy with patterns and stuff and i don't think it has to look that way! >.<
4. 00:26:575 (3,4,5) - why not: >.<
   
   ? the vocals are asking for something like that!

   
5. 00:40:450 (5,6,7) - due to the low spacing before this one might be easily misread as an 1/1 pattern, so i'd advise you again to increase the overall spacing to make things like this less awkward just NC! lol
6. 01:33:325 (1,2,3) - this thing, especially 01:33:325 (1,2) - might be pretty hard to read as an 1/1 pattern after the kiai ended there, you could easily get the idea to hit these early and thus you should probably even out the spacing here or increase at least the space between 01:33:325 (1,2) - >.<

Overall i think you should probably use 1.2x spacing for this diff instead of strict 1.0, the beginning of it uses too many repetitive overlapping things for my tastes
^ this thing is a bit shorter, if you want me to recheck that one after you applied some spacing stuff there, sure

Normal

• 
  

1. I don't know >that< many things about normals, also bigger circles maybe because most normals use CS 3? so am i xD
2. laziest beginning ever, it doesn't even look like you're trying to make something creative xDxD
3. 00:20:387 (3,4) - these could probably be better off as one 1/1 slider because circles directly following a slider tend to be confusing for beginners while they manage to hold notes quite well (see 00:24:700 (4) - for an example)
4. 00:42:325 (3) - compared to the sliders you used in other diffs this one doesn't really fit your style... like at all, why is it there? i dont know lol
5. 00:46:825 (3) - ^
6. 01:10:450 (6) - judging by your ncing pattern you forgot one here
7. 01:17:950 (4,1) - could consider swapping these NCs because of 01:15:700 (4,1) - ? it's not be problem i think
8. 01:20:575 (1) - this curve could probably look a bit better if you moved its 2nd anchor a bit: i couldn't understand
   
   Example

   
9. 01:36:325 (1) - why not something like this: >.<
   
   would fit the vocal a lot better also it's somehow similar to 01:34:075 (1,2) -

   
10. 01:56:200 (3,1) - for a stronger finish i'd suggest something like this ok~
    
    Example

    

Overall, I think the Hard should see some serious work, I really like that BANG!! diff and the Insane isn't bad either. It's just the hard imo that's not that creative in slidershapes and spacings (you may actually use some smaller jumps in there, that's totally fine and you already did, i just loved to see more of these since everything until 3.75 stars is considered a Hard diff)
Also some suggestions for CS:
Normal: 3, Hard: 3.5, Insane: 4, BANG!!: 4.5 would make for a pretty nice spread CS wise

Sorry for such a short mod. I would like to have an answer to it though because I learn from these, so tell me what you fixed and what you didn't do and why you didn't do that so I can actually improve the quality of my mods by modding

Gl with your map!