1. Beginner (1.49 stars, 87 notes)
2. Easy (1.89 stars, 111 notes)
3. Hard (3.3 stars, 234 notes)
4. Insane (4.1 stars, 301 notes)
5. Kinomi's Muzukashii (2.62 stars, 333 notes)
6. Kinomi's Oni (4.11 stars, 454 notes)
7. Normal (2.2 stars, 159 notes)
8. Taco (3.78 stars, 242 notes)

Yopkyu wrote:

Easy:
CS +0.5 - Added a beginner, which is easier than this, so keeping the CS.

Hard:
00:47:913 (5,6,7) -
It plays/looks really crammed. Could try rotating the slider CW, re-blanket, and the re-positioning of the hit circles may give it more distance from 00:47:386 (4). - Just changed (5) a bit.

Insane:
00:48:878 (1) -
Maybe you could add a triple after 00:50:369 (2) instead, and remove this. - Removed the note (I've been meaning to remove it.) Not adding that triple though.
01:00:720 (2) - - Keeping these stacks for now.
Try unstacking.
01:19:842 (1,2) -
You've used vertical symmetry throughout the song, why not keep the theme and Ctrl+Shift+R 90CCW. - Not quite sure what you mean, but the pattern looks fine anyway?

Another great mapset, impossible to find improvements, good job! Probably ready for ranking already with the completion of hit sounds.

DakeDekaane wrote:

lemme do GD pls

rEdo wrote:

[Beginner]
Rename to Easy and map an another Beginner, thank you. No, really. This is quite too hard to be the easiest difficulty, especially when labeled 'Beginner', which it shouldn't be. - Yes, it's basically the Easy diff. I'd rather not use + in diffnames. If you have a better idea how to name them, then sure.

[Easy]
I shouldn't be modding this since you should delete this, but oh well =W= - No. The spread works fine as it is, it's just 1 more difficulty at the low-end.
Quite fast SV for an Easy, but I guess that's why there's a Beginner in this mapset =w=b - Yes.
­
00:10:895 (1) - You should generally avoid covering sliders' ends with other circles on easier difficulties. - The sliderpath before the end is pretty clear. I don't really think it's that easy to misread. I'll change it if people complain.
00:27:211 (1) - Ended with a clap sounds better in my opinion. - Nah, I'd rather not have drumsounds there.
00:59:141 (2) - Delete this and add an another repeat to 00:57:386 (1). - Oh sure.
01:15:457 (4) - Again, a hidden slider's end =w=p - Same as before. Probably even more here, since longer slider.

[Normal]
00:06:860 (1) - Curve this a little bit, perhaps like this? - Uh sure.
00:27:386 (1) - Ended with a clap sounds better in my opinion. - See above.
00:46:158 (2) - New combo here. - k.
01:26:509 (3) - And add it here. - I don't really think that one needs an NC tbh.

[Hard]
00:06:685 (5) - So what does this note follow? I don't hear shit, it seems completely artificial to me. - There is this constant 1/2 in the background. But eh, might as well delete it.
00:17:211 (5) - Move it a little bit to the right for spacing consistency. - Ops.
00:27:737 (1) - Ended with a clap sounds better in my opinion. - See above.
01:27:913 (5) - Ctrl+G cause why not. - Sure.

[Insane]
00:06:685 (1) - So what does this note follow? I don't hear shit, it seems completely artificial to me. - See above.
00:09:667 (1,2,3,4) - Move this whole complex a little bit lower so (1,2) aren't that close to 00:08:965 (5). - Just moved (1,2).
00:15:807 (2,3,4) - Protip: Ctrl+J.
00:20:018 (5) - Use a 180° rorated copy of 00:19:492 (4) instead of Ctrl+H'd copy of 00:19:492 (4)? - I just wanted to do this for some reason. Doesn't really do anything to playability, so keeping.
00:27:737 (1) - Ended with a clap sounds better in my opinion. - See above.
00:29:930 (5) - I realize that this does follow the music, but I guess it would be much better to leave this place blank. It kinda breaks the momentum that's slowly building up. - Mm, I'll think about this. Keeping it for now.
00:31:772 (3) - Use auto additions at its beginning. - Intentional.
00:39:842 (1,2,3) - I really dislike this, but I guess it's on purpose, so whatever. - Idk what you dislike about it.
00:54:228 (3) - 1/6 sounds better =w=b - k.
01:06:685 (2) - Try x:292 y:128 or something like this, I completely dislike the flow of that jump you've got there. -
01:13:878 (5,6,7,8,1) - Please, no. - Do elaborate.
01:17:035 (1,2) - This is cool. - =w=b
01:26:509 (4) - This needs to be placed quite further to the right. -
01:27:913 (4) - Ctrl+G cause why not. - Sure.

Speedmapping is bad =w=p - Nah =w=b

hamza129pro wrote:

thanks.. but how can i import it in osu!droid?

CXu wrote:

01:13:878 (5,6,7,8,1) - Please, no. - Do elaborate.

CXu wrote:

39485 sets

[ Joey ] wrote:

Hello CXu, just a NM here

Insane
00:06:158 (4,1) - From slider 4 to 1 doesn't have a pleasing feeling to me. I feel like it should have less curve like this: http://puu.sh/ak76H/e71fd1a488.jpg Because now it gives a nice design of each set of sliders slightly decreasing curviness: http://puu.sh/ak9Lx/cb434a4a60.jpg If you decide to change it, you would have to adjust these: 00:07:562 (2,3,4) - - Sure.
00:11:948 - Add another green timing section here to increase the volume of this note too - (1,2) sounds more or less the same to me, so keeping.
00:16:860 - 00:17:035 - 00:17:211 - You can add some drum claps on these notes - I don't know, just sounds better to me with the whistles instead.
00:20:895 (1,3) - These can be made more parallel (idk if you want that) - Sure.
00:34:053 (2,3) - These can be stacked (not very important) - Well why not
00:59:842 - NC? - Nah, having the new combo on the downbeat.
01:05:720 (11) - This combo runs a little high - Well, it's a stream
00:30:369 - NC? - Same as before (which technically is later in the timeline.)
00:45:632 - 00:45:807 - 00:45:983 - Could these be drum claps? I cant tell - Sounds better as whistles to me.
I would reverse the placement of 01:04:404 (8) - and 01:04:755 (2,3,4) - - I don't really understand what you mean here
01:08:264 (6,1) - Idk why but I would like it if these weren't so close together - Can't really do much about that because of the pattern really.

Hard
00:30:544 (6,1) - These can be blanketed better - Fixed.
01:07:211 (1) - Kind of an ugly slider, no offense - Naah, it's cool.
01:19:492 (7) - Should the NC be here? - Having the NC on the downbeat.

Normal
00:06:860 (1,3) - Would look better if this combo was symmetrical - Well, it's kinda hard to mke it symmetrical. Made (1) a straight slider parallell with 00:05:457 (3) - instead.
00:36:334 (1,2) - Make parallel? - Sure.
00:58:790 (2,3) - These aren't parallel either. Not a big deal though. - Done.
01:15:457 - Add NC. 01:15:983 - Remove NC. 01:17:035 - Add NC. 01:17:562 - Remove NC - I probably did this to make the symmetrical patterns stay in the same combo. Keeping it like this for now, but might change it sometime down the road.
01:24:053 - Remove NC - Sure.
01:27:913 (7) - The combo runs long compared to the other combos in this diff. Might want to break it up a little - Sure.

Easy
00:10:193 (4,1) - Think you can move these a little bit so they don't overlap? - Sure. Hopefully no one will kill me for spacing.
00:10:895 (1,1) - Can blanket better - Done.
00:17:386 (1) - hmm I don't think a NC should be here - Probably not.
00:29:316 (1) - REALLY cool slider. But I wish the downbeats were on the other bumps in the slider - Well, that's kinda hard with the shape of the slider
00:54:579 (1) - Amazing slider. Teach me senpai - Make long slider, make random anchor points, make symmetrical.
00:57:386 (1) - I'm not a big fan of sliders that reverse this many times - I think it works well for easier diffs tho, and it fits with the song anyway.
01:22:650 (1) - O.O Beautiful

Beginner
00:28:088 - Do you need all these extra green timing sections? I see them throughout the whole diff. - Laziness. Removed.
00:25:807 (5,6) - Check distance - Ops.
Can't find anything else on this diff

Great mapset, your sliders are godlike.
I hope you found at least a little bit of this helpful.
Good luck!