[General]
Disable "Letterbox during breaks" ?
[Ambicatus]
Consider OD7 instead OD6 ?
00:27:522 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - 00:30:950 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - I think a little boring here...these sliders like a train...If I were you I will use this pattren more 1 2 3 Because I think these sliders needn't end to end ,they can separate.
01:04:379 (4,5) - Not a perfect blanket ,move 01:04:808 (5) - to (246,96) can be better.
01:10:808 (7) - 02:34:379 (9) - 03:32:665 (8) - NC here ?
01:32:129 (12,1) - This DS keep the same with 01:32:022 (11,12) - is better. Because 4 small DS and 4 big DS looking good and can suit these drum better but 3 small DS and 5 big DS can't.
02:20:129 (12,1) - Ditto.
01:56:129 (5) - You can add a circle in 01:56:236 - ,2 circles can reflect this place's drum and vocal better.
00:54:415 (5) - 01:01:272 (6) - 02:02:986 (6) - Ditto.
02:28:808 (4,5,6) - A little hard to move...what about overlap with 02:29:879 (7) - ?
02:40:379 - I think you need to increase sliders' speed because this solo is so awesome and you can use more sliders combination to reflect this awesome solo but you make that a train again until 02:59:022 (4) - . This train is much longer than before. I think you can use more this combination to instead this kind of slider. For example you can use this pattern like this in 02:48:522 - to reflcet the rhythm better. And I also think you should use 1/4 in 02:58:700 (3) - ,not 1/2.
I like this solo so I said a lot ,if I say anything wrong just ignore that.
03:19:808 (1) - A long train again ∑(っ °Д °;)っ
03:32:665 (8) - Add a spinner until 03:32:665 (8) - may better.
Other diffs are looking good ,at least I can find nothing.
Poor English, forgive me plz. But I still think you can understand what I said.
Disable "Letterbox during breaks" ?
[Ambicatus]
Consider OD7 instead OD6 ?
00:27:522 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - 00:30:950 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - I think a little boring here...these sliders like a train...If I were you I will use this pattren more 1 2 3 Because I think these sliders needn't end to end ,they can separate.
01:04:379 (4,5) - Not a perfect blanket ,move 01:04:808 (5) - to (246,96) can be better.
01:10:808 (7) - 02:34:379 (9) - 03:32:665 (8) - NC here ?
01:32:129 (12,1) - This DS keep the same with 01:32:022 (11,12) - is better. Because 4 small DS and 4 big DS looking good and can suit these drum better but 3 small DS and 5 big DS can't.
02:20:129 (12,1) - Ditto.
01:56:129 (5) - You can add a circle in 01:56:236 - ,2 circles can reflect this place's drum and vocal better.
00:54:415 (5) - 01:01:272 (6) - 02:02:986 (6) - Ditto.
02:28:808 (4,5,6) - A little hard to move...what about overlap with 02:29:879 (7) - ?
02:40:379 - I think you need to increase sliders' speed because this solo is so awesome and you can use more sliders combination to reflect this awesome solo but you make that a train again until 02:59:022 (4) - . This train is much longer than before. I think you can use more this combination to instead this kind of slider. For example you can use this pattern like this in 02:48:522 - to reflcet the rhythm better. And I also think you should use 1/4 in 02:58:700 (3) - ,not 1/2.
I like this solo so I said a lot ,if I say anything wrong just ignore that.
03:19:808 (1) - A long train again ∑(っ °Д °;)っ
03:32:665 (8) - Add a spinner until 03:32:665 (8) - may better.
Other diffs are looking good ,at least I can find nothing.
Poor English, forgive me plz. But I still think you can understand what I said.