Charles445 wrote:
Take a drink every time the map gets unqualified
02:52:306 (1,2,3,4) - Emphasis is put on wrong points with wrong objects. I would have just left six circles here, 2x3 circles (as in, 2 combos à 3 circles). Maybe like this. It really doesn't matter what way you arrange (triangles or unfinished squares) or space them (3 circles even, jump, 3 circles even, another jump to next combo).
And such is the dilemma of emphasis patterns.
Of these 6 notes, the only one with true impact is 02:52:306 - , therefore there must be a start here (which there is).
The rest of it is ambiguous and can be done however, so I chose to do it like 00:50:592 - .
I've considered that statement, deeply... and I've come to one conclusion.
It can't be done just 'however'. You see, the patterns I'm referring to will be 01:16:311 (1,2,3,4) - and 02:52:311 (1,2,3,4) - .
According to my suggestion, you would put click emphasis on all 6 beats but emphasise that their time signature is defined as 1/3, which is presented by the jump after three of those circles (with following three circles).
You say that part can be done however. If that were so, you would put optimal emphasis on that part through the use of your pattern.
However, using your (and in the end also inverness') pattern at that part, you reduce emphasis on the second of each of the three-circle bits by using a slider instead of a circle, even though there are three evenly emphasised sounds in the song, rendering the current emphasis invalid.
That, in turn, would only fit with 01:30:025 (1,2,3,4) - this part (which, btw, you have done amazingly here, inverness! nice job)
Using circles instead keeps up good average movement of the cursor anyway, which I'd consider fun in that sort of patterns.