Axarious wrote:

[General]
amzin
[easy_]

1. 00:44:592 (1) - Might look better with a red point angle bend rather than a curve. :> I prefer to keep the curve here, due I've been using two straight sliders already, smh
2. 00:49:735 (2,3) - Blanket fix, rotate (2) 1 degree around selection center so (3) has 0.99x/1.00x distance snap OR move (3) to x:97 y:238 for 0.98x/1.02x distance snap. sure fam why not
3. 01:18:878 (1,2) - Blanket fix, rotate (2) -2 degrees around selection center and move to x:224 y:228. Maintains 1.00x/1.00x distance snap. cool yo
4. 01:30:878 (3,1,2) - Blanket fix, rotate (1) -3 degrees around selection center and move to x:265 y:188. Maintains 1.00x/1.00x distance snap. sure thing fam
5. 02:00:878 (3,4) - Blanket fix, rotate (4) 2 degrees around selection center and move to x:260 y:188. Slider (4) will have 0.98x/1.00x distance snap, may require additional changing. cool enough so ye
6. 02:30:878 (1,2) - Highly recommend having two white points after the red's ending to get a better blanket. worth a try
7. 02:37:735 (1,2) - Not parallel, maybe use (1) and reverse and scale the slider up with ctrl shift s. huh? it's good o.0
8. 02:51:449 (1,2) - Highly recommend having two white points after the red's ending to get a better blanket. tuned the blanket the other way around tho

[hard_]

1. 00:32:592 (3,4) - Blanket fix, rotate (4) 2 degrees around selection center. the good
2. 01:36:449 (2,3) - Blanket fix, rotate (2) -1 degree around selection center. yeah sure
3. 02:02:592 (4,5,1) - Fix blankets, I suggest moving (5) to x:91 y:276 and (1) to x:188 y:334. I find this better
4. 02:09:878 (4,1) - Blanket fix, rotate (1) 1 degree around selection center. sure
5. 02:17:163 (1,2,3) - Link Make (3) bend around the head of (1) more? done
6. 02:20:592 (1,2) - Blanket fix, move (2) to x:190 y:180. I don't really see that but eh
7. 03:00:878 (7,1) - Move (1) to x:276 y:294, maybe. k
8. 03:15:878 (2,3) - Blanket fix, rotate (3) -4 degrees around selection center. that's nice
9. 03:18:020 (4,5,6,7,8,9) - (4,5) are 0.19x apart while (6,7) and (8,9) are 0.13x apart. Maybe move (5) to x:279 y:20 or something. idk but I'd keep this for now

[kyversible-insane_]

1. 01:24:878 (1,1) - Move 01:25:735 (1) - to x:482 y:36 to blanket with the tail of 01:24:878 (1) - . fixed, shouldn't be a pretty big deal

[apoplexy_]

1. 00:53:735 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - Stream looks a little crooked, probably intentional, though. yeah it is
2. 01:34:878 (3,4,1) - Definitely comboable but it's hard to hit. it was jesse's suggestion back then so I'd stick to that

Kaguya Hourain wrote:

Hellol

General

1. *thumbs up*

easy_

1. You sure you need AR4? o.o now it's ar4.5 elellelele
2. Maybe add sb for your name like you did with every other diff? nah I'll leave it the way it is now
3. 00:49:735 (2,3) - I WILL BLANKET MOD THE SHIT OUT OF THIS DIFF CUZ YOU KNOW WHY sure
4. 01:08:592 (1,2) - Not sure if this is even rankable lol it is, it's easy enough to distinguish the sliders
5. 02:00:878 (3,4) - BLANKET I can't even check that it's way too far lol but k
6. 02:17:163 (1,1) - I don't like those they feel too boring, probably circles or double sliderpairs or something yada yada
7. 02:27:020 - Too much going on in the music to skip this beat here
8. 02:33:878 - Same
9. 02:40:735 - Yes I like the idea of pattern delays because it could help players feel the pattern and the beats more
10. 02:44:592 (1,2) - Daaaaaaaayum it's K jajajja
11. 03:03:449 (4,5) - Blanket yo ye
12. Why the spacing inconsistencies? DS is so 1997ly dull

Hard

1. AR7 might work, otherwise OD to 7. Actually OD to 7 period. OD7
2. Same sb thing nah
3. 00:32:592 (3,4) - Wao the blanket wao!!!!!
4. 01:05:592 (2,3,4,5) - Might get hard to read idk players know there won't be any 1/6 streams already here so it's k
5. 01:27:020 (3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - Am I the only one that finds this overlap ugly and the next three circles hard to read? I love it
6. 01:33:449 (3,4,5) - Two reverse sliders would fit more
7. 01:34:306 (1,2,3) - Same
8. 01:41:163 (3,4,5) - Same pattern variations doe
9. 01:59:806 (7) - High impact sliderend = no I'll see what I can do
10. 02:24:878 (3,4,5) - Two reverses here as well nah :3
11. 02:32:021 (2,3,4,5,1) - Hard to read maybe? tuned it up a bit
12. 02:42:020 (3,4,5) - This should DEFINITELY change because there is actually a sixtuple in the music there which would really confuse people after all these 1/3s and then suddenly 1/6? it will be more confusing imo
13. 03:09:449 (3,4,5) - Two reverses fit more here too i THINK
14. 03:18:020 (4,5,6,7,8,9) - Scale triangle down maybe, feels a little too distanced. sure

kyversible-insane_

1. OD to 8
2. Shouldn't you add everyone's name on the SB on all parts they mapped? nope it's somewhat O.K.

Extra

1. OD9? DEAD INSIDE
2. I know inv mapped the parts without the sb but it would be nice to apply it there as well fine fine I'll consider this if there are more pointout on this
3. 01:10:592 (2,3,4,5,6) - This might be a little too fast, breaks will ensue here. ctrl+g on 5,6 would be nice nudged 5 a bit so it's not that hard to hit
4. 01:19:735 (1,2,3) - Nice pattern and all but polarity :v Should be slider circle slider circle :v
5. 01:33:449 (1,2,3) - Same for here K
   -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. 02:45:449 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - Hue hue hue. How about ctrl + g the second combo?
7. 02:46:878 (2,3) - ctrl +g?
8. 03:10:163 (1,2) - You sure you don't wanna just add a circle there and make it like 03:10:592 (4,5,1) - this?
9. I must have missed a lot of moddable things since eh I'm not really great at modding good harder diffs but cool I like it!

Rank this asap croissant ok

Static Noise Bird wrote:

[general_]
The last spinner appears way too soon after the last hitobject, I don't think that's allowed. Rather have it start at the next red tick (applied in normal_ already). it is allowed and I prefer it to be closer as possible to the note somehow
How to mod a perfection?!?! BY HONDA

[ez tbh_]

(CS3 please, nobody likes the big unreal) how about CS2.5?!?!? Not CS3 because it'll mess up spread smh
00:53:163 (2,1) - I don't feel too good about this direction change. put both closer a bit
01:06:878 (2,1) - Fix ur distance. done?!?!
01:15:449 (1,2) - same tbh K
01:37:735 (3,4) - Not sure if this misstack is on purpose, but you should probably stack these. That would also fix the minor distance error between stack is intentional because it will not get autostacked due to 1/1 gap 01:37:735 (4,1)
03:02:592 (3,4) - The big distance?!?! (fix the snap) I like this one TBH
03:13:735 (2) - Feel like the turn should be at the blue tick to match the kick. The kick is not on the downbeat and it would be pretty awkward to repeat the slider here
03:17:163 (3,4) - A simple design suggestion. cool?!?!

[hard_]
03:05:163 (1) - x504 y124 for a nicer overlap ~tbh~ suer

[kyversible-insane_]
00:24:449 (4,5) - Could be combined to a slider. I see no reason for the second circle. I believe Irre is trying to do some pattern variations here by utilizing circles
00:32:592 (1,2,3) - Don't stack 1/1 and 1/2 to a same stack. changed
Kshro will be nowhere so I applied his mods too (fuck u kshro :0) )
02:00:020 (1) - The curve should be opened up just a little bit to give the (2) inside some room. synthetic ecstASY WHEN HER LEGS ARE OEPN
02:54:020 (1,1) - Stack sliderends. Sur

[apoplexy_]
00:53:949 (5,6,7,8,9) - The shape could be prettier. intended (suggested by NOLD (TM)
01:40:163 (1,1) - The jump could be tuned down. I'd say it's quite brutal. fast streams, fast movement, lower spacing will be awkward to hit

Now pls rank.

chomelisgod wrote:

You promised me that I'll be happy and grateful after this. Dont lie to me ._.
Hard:
02:01:520 - That circle overlaps too much with the two sliders front and behind. I would move slider 1 to the right and slider 3 to the left, positioning the circle towards the centre. Fixed that

Kyversible insane:
01:39:128 - Objects end isnt snapped, but i guess its not noticeable. It's intentional

apoplexy:
03:10:592 - It looks so confusing, so i would straighten out or organise this triplet of circles to look neater. it's just the way hanzer maps lol
03:15:878 - I would prefer a straight or organised line of circles.
03:16:735 - ^

Overall, awesome song, awesome mapping, can really see the effort put into it. The osu system isnt too happy with the amount of kiai time your using so careful with that. GL with ranked.

Musty wrote:

This is concerning the hardest difficulty. It's mostly suggestions:
00:53:735 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - it doesn't feel obvious while playing for me but i think it's alright? Yeah, suggested by nold and I quite liked it.
01:20:306 (3,4,1) - 01:21:163 (3,4,1) - 01:27:163 (3,4,1) - this is not fun to play because the music actually seems to be have a fast paced rhythm which is stable here, so it feels like you have to go faster because the map is like that and it's not really fun to play to be honest but everyone else liked it ;__; i prefer to keep it for now
02:28:163 (4) - put the note a bit slightly lower because it feels like its as close as the previous one fixed for Ends since i don't think it's a big deal
03:15:449 (1,1,1,1,2,1,2,1,1,1,1,1,2,1,2,1) - This is uber creative but i don't like that kind of stuff which is pretty surprising while playing sightread. just hanzer being hanzer B) jokes aside he liked it so no change,,,


everything else on the difficulty is absolutely perfect i love this one so much