Is the 2nd picture pattern impossible? Did you try?Badis wrote:
The new hypers created issues on mapping now , I hope its gonna be fixed it , take a look at this :
Same distance between 1-2 and between 2-3 , it means 1 and 2 would be a hyper , but only 2 is a hyper...
I changed position of 1 it means distance between 2 and 3 is the same compare to the 1st picture , what happend ? only 1 is a hyper
Something wrong right here I guess its not the same physics as before but it would be nice if someone told me how new hypers works , I need this information to do accurate mapping
Sad to hear this since i'm really happy with this change