1. Memories (4,54 stars, 633 notes)

1. Add Collab and Collaboration to the tags. Those who like playing maps with mixed styles would thank you for yousing these tags.
2. Try to remove the green combo colour. There're no green lines on the BG, so this green colour looks a bit out of place, I think.

• 
  
  Andrea
  

1. 00:17:526 (1,2,3,1) - minor - that'd be awesome to use some blankets here. It will fit with your style + it will also look pretty neat.Looks cute, huh?
2. 00:58:291 (6) - what a cute piano sound, try to replace 00:58:291 (6) - with a circle, so it will follow the sound of the piano closer.
3. 05:18:585 - start the spinner here, and hremove the circle from this beat. Why? Because this diff is meant to be playable in all game modes, including o!m and taiko, while the beginning of this 1/4 spinner is totally offbeat

1. 00:34:644 - starting such sliders on the blue ticks feels weird to me. I'd go with something like this, somehow this sounds better to me. Anyway, get more opinions before appliying/rejecting the suggestion!
   Note: it's quite clear, that the same applies for all similar sliders in your part. So, it may take some time to change it.
2. 03:17:173 (1,2,3,4) - nazi - try changing the shape, so the pattern woulld look a bit neater? Example
   Note: the stack is invisible in game, so hurting your VISIBLE attern to keep something invisible seems pointless to me.

1. 01:18:232 (2) - replacing this one with a slider would work better with the vocals. It wn't change your rhythm that much, but the slider will represent vocals better, while circle here gives an unpleasant feeling of incompliteness.
2. 04:31:291 (1,2,3) - it looks like your style has changed in some aspects, so I'm not sure if you want to apply this or not.. well, anyway. This might give you some smoother flow, which is awesome for a relaxing song, please try it!

1. 02:03:761 (1,2) - I do like your style, but this pattern appears to be a bit unusual and unexpected here. It feels totally out of place there because nobody else i the collab uses similar patterns. Oh well, talk to Andrea about this pattern.
2. 03:32:349 (4,5) - the transition here feels a bit unnatural and forced. Try making it a bit smoother, so, the flow will be more enjoyable. example!

1. 02:39:761 (6) - the DS difference make this pattern confusing and the second repeat is way too hard to notice. It makes this relaxing diff confusing and unreadabl, so I strongly recommend you to get rid of this 2x-repeated slider asap!

• Color guide

1. Normal suggestions.
2. Very suggestive stuff. Apply changes only if you like. Also applied for suggestions that don't affect your map at all.
3. Unrankable or highly recommended to change.

• [Memories]

1. 00:22:467 (3) - You could try this rhythm instead of your current to follow the vocals, but that's just up to you. It's just an idea I had when looking at this little pause. What I did in this picture is adding a repeat to (3) and replacing slider (4) with a circle at its end which is at 00:24:232.
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 01:13:644 (3) - Tbh, this slider looks ugly and out of place with that V shape. How about making it simple and straight like 01:13:997 (4)? Like this:
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 01:18:408 (3) - Lol I don't know how did I notice this but.. this note is misplaced by 1 small grid. Try fixing it with DS.
4. 01:29:879 (1) - The combos here don't fit the music imo. I think it'd fit more if you remove the NC of this slider, and then add it to 01:30:938 (2).
5. 01:33:761 (1) - Same here. The combos feel wrong according to the music. I think it fits more the music if you remove this NC, then add it to 01:35:173 (7).
6. 01:43:291 (2,3,4) - I suggest you to place these 3 notes more curvy like this for a better flow.
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 01:55:291 (1,2,3) - This pattern looks scrambled. I think you should rearrange a little bit (2) and (3)'s placement for a better flow. Like this. Looks more clean and flows nicely:
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 01:58:114 (1,2,3) - Same problem again ^. Here the main problem is 01:59:173 (3)'s curve, because it doesn't follow up with (1) and (2). To improve the flow here, I'd change (3)'s curve like this. Looks and flows better imo.
   
   SPOILER

   
9. 02:01:997 (3) - Same here, (3) doesn't follow up with 02:00:938 (1,2) and looks ugly placed like that imo, plus, its curve doesn't even follow up to 02:03:055 (4). To put it more simple: (3)'s curve is going to the right, while (4) is placed to the left which is the opposite way of (3)'s curve and that's what derails more the flow here. Please try out this pattern, it's similar to what I suggested you up there ^
   
   SPOILER

   
10. 02:03:761 (1,2) - This overlap looks messy as well, imo. I'd suggest you to make a cleaner pattern with better flow. I'd go for something like this:
    
    SPOILER

    
11. 02:18:938 (4) - Place this at 02:17:879 (1)'s place?
12. 02:37:644 (1) - The flow here would be better if you make this slider curved like this imo, cuz it follows up (2) and (3)'s placement better.
    
    SPOILER

    
13. 02:51:761 (1,2,3,4,5) - To make the flow more natural I'd suggest you to change the curves of (1) and (3) like this:
    
    SPOILER

    
14. 03:07:644 (4,5) - This pattern is too overlapped imo and may result difficult for players to see that (5) is actually a slider, due to (3) and (4)'s hibursts. I'd recommend you to "stick out" (5)'s end a little more, like this:
    
    SPOILER

    
15. 04:57:055 (5) - Make this curved down instead of up for a slightly better flow?
    
    SPOILER

    
    _______________________

1. Add "livetune" to tags please. It is known in kz(livetune),

• 
  
  Andrea

1. 01:00:232 (3) - hm, It looks random placement a little. Try to make a straight line. (2's end, 3 and 4's head)
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 01:01:291 (5,6) - if you changed above suggestion, maintain a symmetry please.
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 04:09:761 (1) - (nazi) move to x308 y168 please. make a triangle.
   
   
   Samah
   
   
4. 01:58:114 (1,2,3) - not straight triplet only here in this part. try to move 01:58:997 (2) - this note x198 y108.
5. 02:05:173 (3) - not fit the song this 1/2 repeat slider i thought. There should be better rhythm. please try this.
   
   
6. 02:16:291 - Try to add a note here.
   
   
   Momochikun
   
   
7. 00:32:702 (6) - Consider changing flow this slider. The flow will be improved over the current one.
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 00:44:526 - hmm why did you not add a note here? I suggest that add note in the same way as other places. (00:42:408 - , 00:38:879 - and so on)
9. 03:14:349 (1,2) - design suggestion. like this slider curve and note placement? it looks better than current one imo.
   
   SPOILER

   
10. 03:16:467 (4) - Try blanket for the slider body.
    
    SPOILER

    
11. 03:19:291 (6,7,1) - hmm, note hides by 03:19:291 (6) - this slider body. Please try my suggesiton.
    
    SPOILER

    
    
    
    Gero
    
    
12. 04:17:526 (2) - Consider removing whistle out of slider end. not sound, not vocal here. so whistle sound is weird for me.

Guy wrote:

Hi.

Red : Unrankable issue / must fix.
Blue : Should be fixed / highly suggested.
Black : Just suggestion.


[General]

1. Add "livetune" to tags please. It is known in kz(livetune),

[Memories]

• 
  
  
  
  Momochikun

1. 00:32:702 (6) - Consider changing flow this slider. The flow will be improved over the current one. nope, the current pattern was did on purpose
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:44:526 - hmm why did you not add a note here? I suggest that add note in the same way as other places. (00:42:408 - , 00:38:879 - and so on) i want to create diagonal placement actually, also it would be very difficult to fix this.
3. 03:14:349 (1,2) - design suggestion. like this slider curve and note placement? it looks better than current one imo. i like my current ><
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 03:16:467 (4) - Try blanket for the slider body. uhm.. okay
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 03:19:291 (6,7,1) - hmm, note hides by 03:19:291 (6) - this slider body. Please try my suggesiton. ok fixed
   
   SPOILER

   

Call me back!

1. 03:07:644 (4,5) - heard weird a little around here, the beat i recommend is :
   
2. 04:17:526 (2) - also an uncomfortable beat, maybe try this?
   

ErunamoJAZZ wrote:

oh, congrats, but... i dont understad why a map of 5:22 is approval with only 1 diff; and the ranking criteria what?...
ok... the song is slow, but, this was very lazy... no ctb, no mania... u.u

EDIT> https://osu.ppy.sh/wiki/Ranking_Criteria 5min? plz