剛剛沒有看到不好意思Hollow Wings wrote:
5. do the post AFTER you mod my map. link your mod and your map together in your slot. anyone who don't do this from now on will be directly ignored.
I questioned it because it's a strange rule. You're basically telling modders they may or may not receive a mod back.Nostalgic wrote:
[strike]剛剛沒有看到不好意思Hollow Wings wrote:
5. do the post AFTER you mod my map. link your mod and your map together in your slot. anyone who don't do this from now on will be directly ignored.
no, you just simply don't understand what m4m means.Bubblun wrote:
I questioned it because it's a strange rule. You're basically telling modders they may or may not receive a mod back.Nostalgic wrote:
剛剛沒有看到不好意思
i will always doult there'll be more than 3 can do it at the same time.Bubblun wrote:
No, that's not my point. What I don't understand is why they have to mod your map before you even agree to an m4m. For all you know 5 people could be in the process of modding your map, do the last 2 to finish simply not receive mods in return?
Hollow Wings wrote:
i will always doult there'll be more than 3 can do it at the same time.
Why take that chance? 1 map could take 2 days to mod for some modders. Once they see 3 posts have been made across that time period do you expect them to finish their mod despite not receiving anything in return, or to trash it? Either or wastes their time
be that previous 3 please, or just keep doing not understand. I understand it, just the rule seems very scummy. It really looks like you're trying to steal mods.
Bubblun wrote:
Hollow Wings wrote:
i will always doult there'll be more than 3 can do it at the same time.
Why take that chance? 1 map could take 2 days to mod for some modders. Once they see 3 posts have been made across that time period do you expect them to finish their mod despite not receiving anything in return, or to trash it? Either or wastes their time you cant risk it then don't ever do it.
be that previous 3 please, or just keep doing not understand. I understand it, just the rule seems very scummy. It really looks like you're trying to steal mods. no you don't understand, and just your posts seems scummy or even nonsence. find evidence that i've ever stolen mods, or just leave.
trying to? wtf are you talking about? always nonsense your posts are till now.Bubblun wrote:
Don't forget, we're speaking internationally, so there may have been an error in translation. There IS a high chance I misunderstood it. If that's the case, could you please explain to me what I'm not understanding?
Also I'm not saying you steal mods. I'm saying the rule makes it seem like you're trying to. I believe you when you say you've never stolen mods. I simply want to clarify you have the rule in place for fair reasons, there's no need to be so defensive.