Ohai that's a random that means nothing eh
[Muzukashii]
00:18:895 (1) - This note is wrongly snapped; 00:18:867 - is where your new timing is. I suspect there was a timing change though. Knowing you; you wouldn't even let that.
00:25:967 (38) - I kinda not expected that kat to be here, as all your stanzas start by a don. Why don't you make that one consistent with the others?
00:36:263 (31,32) - Same unexpectation, you worked on a 0 1 2 3 base throughout the whole section; 31 ends up on the 1 note which makes the pattern a bit wobbly.
I would have said the same for 00:41:056 (55,56,57,58) - but since you used a 1/4, there's nothing to say. However, I think there's something weird; the drums doesn't really go that way. Could be me, I'm hearing something similar between 00:41:056 (55,56,57) - and 00:41:411 (58,1) - , maybe the k makes me feel this way.
01:17:801 (75) - to 01:24:192 (114) - A little bit long I must say. I can't really find ideas to shorten it since it seems like every note is important here. (still, 40 notes orz)
I'll just ask a question; since I happen to see many of these in this map. I won't ask you to change or anything. All I want is an answer, after all.
00:25:168 (34,35) - (and all other kd/dk) What's the desired effect behind this even though a simple note would suffice in itself ? I still have not understood what these guys are to your eyes: A way to get less emptiness ? A “signature” ? I noticed in the Oni there were almost none, though.
[Oni Collab]
00:36:263 (39,40,41,42,43,44) - Same structure thing as Muzukashii, the whole sections seems to use 0 1 2 3 as a base. I will not take account of the K being on 0 as it's something justifiable but this part sounds a bit off. (The fact it's the same as Muzukashii makes me question if it isn't related to the desire of variation.)
00:38:748 (54) - Perhaps add a finisher as it's a crash as well (Since 00:38:393 (53) - is a crash).
00:50:109 (50) - ^ The same here.
00:52:417 (66,67,68) - Add, for a smoother slowdown:
Looks like a solid set. I've told Climbb about some BG issues when the maps are played on non-4:3 resolutions, he's working on it. (Example on 16:9 resolution: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1615276).
[Muzukashii]
00:18:895 (1) - This note is wrongly snapped; 00:18:867 - is where your new timing is. I suspect there was a timing change though. Knowing you; you wouldn't even let that.
00:25:967 (38) - I kinda not expected that kat to be here, as all your stanzas start by a don. Why don't you make that one consistent with the others?
00:36:263 (31,32) - Same unexpectation, you worked on a 0 1 2 3 base throughout the whole section; 31 ends up on the 1 note which makes the pattern a bit wobbly.
I would have said the same for 00:41:056 (55,56,57,58) - but since you used a 1/4, there's nothing to say. However, I think there's something weird; the drums doesn't really go that way. Could be me, I'm hearing something similar between 00:41:056 (55,56,57) - and 00:41:411 (58,1) - , maybe the k makes me feel this way.
01:17:801 (75) - to 01:24:192 (114) - A little bit long I must say. I can't really find ideas to shorten it since it seems like every note is important here. (still, 40 notes orz)
I'll just ask a question; since I happen to see many of these in this map. I won't ask you to change or anything. All I want is an answer, after all.
00:25:168 (34,35) - (and all other kd/dk) What's the desired effect behind this even though a simple note would suffice in itself ? I still have not understood what these guys are to your eyes: A way to get less emptiness ? A “signature” ? I noticed in the Oni there were almost none, though.
[Oni Collab]
00:36:263 (39,40,41,42,43,44) - Same structure thing as Muzukashii, the whole sections seems to use 0 1 2 3 as a base. I will not take account of the K being on 0 as it's something justifiable but this part sounds a bit off. (The fact it's the same as Muzukashii makes me question if it isn't related to the desire of variation.)
00:38:748 (54) - Perhaps add a finisher as it's a crash as well (Since 00:38:393 (53) - is a crash).
00:50:109 (50) - ^ The same here.
00:52:417 (66,67,68) - Add, for a smoother slowdown:
- 0.975x on 66
- 0.950x on 67
- 0.925x on 68.
Looks like a solid set. I've told Climbb about some BG issues when the maps are played on non-4:3 resolutions, he's working on it. (Example on 16:9 resolution: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1615276).
