Sounds like you a trying to blame a poorly configured and/or broken PC on a game. osu! performs better than it did in any previous year, performance wise.
true fact, it runs on my old laptop that only have 800mzh, 16mb video and 512mb ram ... and it runs just a bit laggy.peppy wrote:
Sounds like you a trying to blame a poorly configured and/or broken PC on a game. osu! performs better than it did in any previous year, performance wise.
weird, my mouse gets stuck to the right on spinners... why yes of course it does, i just updated my harddrive on my pc and everything. but whatever, used to be fun sorry about it guys :-)peppy wrote:
Sounds like you a trying to blame a poorly configured and/or broken PC on a game. osu! performs better than it did in any previous year, performance wise.
"just a bit laggy" 30fps? osu is barely and barely playable on 60 fps, even 100. Unless of course you are a massive casual playing 10 bpm songs and 1 note per minuteseicHmsc wrote:
true fact, it runs on my old laptop that only have 800mzh, 16mb video and 512mb ram ... and it runs just a bit laggy.peppy wrote:
Sounds like you a trying to blame a poorly configured and/or broken PC on a game. osu! performs better than it did in any previous year, performance wise.
did you know that 100fps is more than enough? and with the old laptop I got like 30 - 35fps which is still pretty good. Obviously I have something a lot better now, with unlimited fps I get almost 3000, but there is absolute no difference between 3000 and 100.Soarezi wrote:
"just a bit laggy" 30fps? osu is barely and barely playable on 60 fps, even 100. Unless of course you are a massive casual playing 10 bpm songs and 1 note per minuteseicHmsc wrote:
true fact, it runs on my old laptop that only have 800mzh, 16mb video and 512mb ram ... and it runs just a bit laggy.
More than 60 is not needed. Many displays can't even show more than that, so getting it is pointless. Also, the human eye is not able to tell that small of a difference above that. How smooth something looks is almost fully dependant on the display and the refresh rate. Movies are usually shot with 24 fps.Soarezi wrote:
"just a bit laggy" 30fps? osu is barely and barely playable on 60 fps, even 100. Unless of course you are a massive casual playing 10 bpm songs and 1 note per minuteseicHmsc wrote:
true fact, it runs on my old laptop that only have 800mzh, 16mb video and 512mb ram ... and it runs just a bit laggy.
Causes a higher input latency. And yes, it is noticeable.Legxis wrote:
More than 60 is not needed. Many displays can't even show more than that, so getting it is pointless. Also, the human eye is not able to tell that small of a difference above that. How smooth something looks is almost fully dependant on the display and the refresh rate. Movies are usually shot with 24 fps.
If 60 fps is unplayable for you, the problem lies elsewhere.
More than 60fps is not needed only to have more accurate graphics. Framerate also affects input latency/stability and audio latency/stability in this game.Legxis wrote:
More than 60 is not needed. Many displays can't even show more than that, so getting it is pointless. Also, the human eye is not able to tell that small of a difference above that. How smooth something looks is almost fully dependant on the display and the refresh rate. Movies are usually shot with 24 fps.
If 60 fps is unplayable for you, the problem lies elsewhere.
https://boallen.com/fps-compare.htmlPhilantropist wrote:
Please don't descend into a thread about how the human eye can't see more than 30 frames..
also my computer sucks and I can still run osu! fine, this is no-ones fault but your own.
Someone has to make a ABX test for this.Bauxe wrote:
https://boallen.com/fps-compare.htmlPhilantropist wrote:
Please don't descend into a thread about how the human eye can't see more than 30 frames..
also my computer sucks and I can still run osu! fine, this is no-ones fault but your own.
:^)
Nope, you'd get a piece of junk for $300-400. If it wasn't using outdated or super low end parts, you'd have to get a free OS somehow, and need to know how to build it yourself.Dexus wrote:
$300-400 is plenty to get an up to date computer
a build like that could probably run osu! at 100fps+ easily, assuming you have those flashy graphic settings turned off missing a psu doe but a 450w lying around should be fineDexus wrote:
I really wouldn't think something like this would be junk http://pcpartpicker.com/p/3min2 granted with this list you could use a cheaper gpu/cpu instead. This is just to show a higher end of a budget build.
I thought I edited that post to say within the $400 range, oh well.
That PC is $535. You forgot an OS, which is at least another $100. So even if you can put one together yourself, that's a $600-700 (incl. shipping). You said $300-400.Dexus wrote:
I really wouldn't think something like this would be junk http://pcpartpicker.com/p/3min2 granted with this list you could use a cheaper gpu/cpu instead. This is just to show a higher end of a budget build.
I thought I edited that post to say within the $400 range, oh well.
Building a PC is like putting lego parts together. psu aren't really expensive (you don't need 1000w to run shit, it takes two 250w PSU to send a signal into space to a satellite and it in the long run wastes energy) Just look for 80+ bronze standard from a reliable company at a reasonable wattage/price. Also 8GB (2x4 for dual channel) is plenty anything more is a waste for a common user and less would be harmful in the long run (The RAM clock speed depends on what cpu you get because the memory controller can have a limit, AMD:1866, Intel: 1333/1600, CAS is pointless to debate about). As for a GPU a GTX 750 ti runs well at a low TDP. Best price per dollar performance gpu I've ever seen. AMD gpu are cheaper, I remember using a 7770 ghz edition and it was running the game just fine. Processors? Nothing really takes advantage of multi core threads. I believe osu! itself just runs on one thread, so a dual core cpu would be plenty unless you want to stream or something. Although a quad core cpu would be better in the long run since games on the consoles are using multi cores now (which is where pc games will most likely be heading). You can forget about overclocking too, it's pretty much pointless unless you're benchmarking, windows itself has a timer that doesn't really go that fast. HPET gets pretty unstable too. With timers and speed, the lower the more stable it is so you have to find a right balance in speed with everything.
This. My $500 laptop with some ghetto i3 using integrated graphics doesn't ever fall below 60fps, and it's obviously not made for gaming. Building your own PC would cost less than this and get even better performance because you can optimise it for what you're going to use it for.Marcin wrote:
If you want to buy PC ONLY for osu!, you can as well use integrated into newest Intel I7/5/3 Core generation. External GPU is unnecessary.
Ha.B1rd wrote:
You forgot an OS, which is at least another $100.
granted with this list you could use a cheaper gpu/cpu instead. This is just to show a higher end of a budget build.Why buy an OS? *runs*
osu! is definitely playable at 60-100fps even at a high levelSoarezi wrote:
"just a bit laggy" 30fps? osu is barely and barely playable on 60 fps, even 100. Unless of course you are a massive casual playing 10 bpm songs and 1 note per minute
defintely notSync wrote:
osu! is definitely playable at 60-100fps even at a high level
Try borrowing a gaming mouse to see if your mouse is the cause, or look to see if anything got stuck in the optical sensor.Polymelia wrote:
weird, my mouse gets stuck to the right on spinners... why yes of course it does, i just updated my harddrive on my pc and everything. but whatever, used to be fun sorry about it guys :-)peppy wrote:
Sounds like you a trying to blame a poorly configured and/or broken PC on a game. osu! performs better than it did in any previous year, performance wise.